Roger Ebert: Elegance And Empathy : NPR

9

Roger Ebert was a critic, not a blowtorch. He could be sharp if he thought a movie insulted the audience, but had a champ's disdain for a cheap shot.


Many critics ridiculed the film Deep Throat when it came out in 1973. Who couldn't mock its absurdities? Roger just wrote, "If you have to work this hard at sexual freedom, maybe it isn't worth the effort."

Roger Ebert was a Chicago newspaperman who typed with two fingers — it sounded like a machine gun, columnist Bob Greene remembered on Friday — who was from the age when reporters were fueled by ink and booze.

But Roger gave up drinking when he saw it ruin too many people he loved, and spent 30 years helping others give it up, too. And he elegantly adapted to the age of blogs and tweets, so when he died this week at the age of 70, his website was so overloaded it shut down.

Maybe that's today's version of a standing ovation.

Roger Ebert wrote simply, abundantly, gorgeously, and on deadline for 46 years at theChicago Sun-Times. "Jargon," he said, "is the last refuge of the scoundrel," and over the years his work reminded us that empathy is the grace note of a good life, not just great art.

A few years ago, I finally got the nerve to tell Roger that one of the first things I did on turning 21 was go to a North Side bar where I'd heard that he held court with other lions of Chicago letters.

"I heard that on a great night Studs, Royko and Algen would come in together," I told Roger, who smiled and said, "Yes. But those nights were rarely great."

Roger began a struggle with cancer a decade ago, and eventually lost his lower jaw. Monica Eng of the Chicago Tribune, who knew Roger since she was six, says he told her, "I can't talk, but I have a voice as long as I can write." In his blog, columns, tweets and a superb memoir called Life Itself, he detonated ideas each day. He used movies, as great filmmakers do, to move into our imaginations.

Roger Ebert became fascinated by Richard Dawkins' theory that people give off mental units — memes — that can move between us and spread like fire:

"After a lifetime of writing, teaching, broadcasting and telling too many jokes, I will leave behind more memes than many. They will all also eventually die, but so it goes."

"We must try to contribute joy to the world," said Roger Ebert. "That is true no matter what our problems, our health, our circumstances. We must try. I didn't always know this and am happy I lived long enough to find it out."

Written By: by Scott Simon
continue to source article at npr.org

9 COMMENTS

  1. I always liked Ebert, and admired his ability to use his language efficiently. He’ll be missed.

    And, on an unrelated note, I would love to have Scott Simon do my obit when the time comes. ;-)

    Steve

  2. Two thumbs up for a great film critic! I relied heavily on Roger Ebert’s film reviews in order to most efficiently spend my limited funds on the best movie going experiences. He will be missed!

  3. I was a kid when Siskel and Ebert’s first show was syndicated nationally on PBS, and I started watching them, with pleasure. I would have been 11 years old I think.

    The USA Today story on Ebert made reference to one of their most amusing disagreements, which I remember clearly. A very bad Burt Reynolds kid-flick called “Cop and a Half” was given a positive review and a thumbs up by Ebert, which Siskel found vastly amusing and wrong-headed. I can remember Gene needling Roger about that particular movie on subsequent shows.

    The beauty of Siskel and Ebert was in showing how reasonable adults can disagree, sometimes very strongly, without becoming unreasonable. As an example for how public discourse can include squabbling and disagreement, while retaining mutual respect, they served a valuable public service.

    RIP Roger Ebert–I was always more of a Siskel guy (including regarding Cop and a Half), but I always enjoyed Ebert too!

  4. I read that when Ebert first met his wife, he began corresponding via email. He was impressed with her perfect grammar. I immediately thought of Richard and wondered if Ebert was an atheist. ha ha, lol!

    I know it is coming, and I do not fear it, because I believe there is nothing on the other side of death to fear. I hope to be spared as much pain as possible on the approach path. I was perfectly content before I was born, and I think of death as the same state. What I am grateful for is the gift of intelligence, and for life, love, wonder, and laughter. You can’t say it wasn’t interesting.

    A nice tribute can be found on Hemant Mehta.

Leave a Reply