Who am I to judge the Pope, says gay man

0

Just something funny for today =)

A GAY man has said that although Pope-ish acts are bad, a Pope-ish orientation is not.


In what his friends claim is a softening of his stance on Popes, 38-year-old gay chef Tom Logan claimed he was fine with them as long as they didn’t do any Pope stuff.

He said: “If a person is a Pope but has good will, who am I to judge them?

“And it would be even more ridiculous if I were to say that then continue by telling Popes how to behave.

“After all I am just a bloke, albeit a bloke with a funny hat – a chef’s hat. Actually that does make me a bit special, so listen up.”


continue to source article at thedailymash.co.uk

NO COMMENTS

  1. A GAY man has said that although Pope-ish acts are bad, a Pope-ish orientation is not.

    I agree. We must remember to love the Pope, but hate the Popering.
    Please remember to pray the Pope away tonight before bedtime, so that he may come to understand that Popering is a sin.

    • In reply to #2 by DHudson:

      A GAY man has said that although Pope-ish acts are bad, a Pope-ish orientation is not.

      I agree. We must remember to love the Pope, but hate the Popering.
      Please remember to pray the Pope away tonight before bedtime, so that he may come to understand that Popering is a sin.

      But… can you be a pope without popering? Satre said that a pope is someone who practices popering. We now know that pople are papal from birth, and think of the psychological damage that is done to pople who are born papal, but forbidden by social pressure to practice their deviant obsession. Some of them are nearly eighty before they come out.

  2. Don’t be silly. The Catholic church has done nothing but judge you all you life. They even encouraged people to beat and kill you.
    What more right do you need? I’d say you have a moral right to nuke the Vatican after what the church has done.

    You may think you have a beef with the church but not Francis. Francis has been supporting this church and helping it rip off the poor most of his adult life. At the very least he much take responsibility for continuing its historical sins.

  3. In reply to #6 by Kevin Murrell:

    We now know that pople are papal from birth

    Ah, but the paradox lies in the sad truth that pople are convinced it is a matter of choice and not fact.

    They are therefore bringing the sin upon themselves and they truly need guidance from the righteous and fabolous.

    Some of them are nearly eighty before they come out.

    A late sin, but a sin nonetheless. This is why we condemn the use of viagra in The Vatican City. Well, that… and a few other reasons.

  4. Does our chef know that the steak known in England as Rump, is, or used to be known as, Pope’s Eye in Scotland ? A bit tougher, but tastier than either Fillet or Sirloin.

    No doubt Delia Smith has explained the best way to cook Pope’s Eye steak, good Anglican Christian that she is ?

    • In reply to #8 by Mr DArcy:

      Does our chef know that the steak known in England as Rump, is, or used to be known as, Pope’s Eye in Scotland ? A bit tougher, but tastier than either Fillet or Sirloin.
      No doubt Delia Smith has explained the best way to cook Pope’s Eye steak, good Anglican Christian that she is ?

      I’m sure Delia can cook anything, but she is a rather devout catholic.

    • Good call. The advantage is that we could then ‘poop the pope away’.

      In reply to #8 by Mr DArcy:

      Does our chef know that the steak known in England as Rump, is, or used to be known as, Pope’s Eye in Scotland ? A bit tougher, but tastier than either Fillet or Sirloin.

      No doubt Delia Smith has explained the best way to cook Pope’s Eye steak, good Anglican Christian that she is ?

    • In reply to #10 by MAJORPAIN:

      DHudson and KevinM: Hahahahaha Awesome!

      I’ve tried praying the pope away, it doesn’t rhyme like pray the gay away….that’s why it’s not working methinks.

      Since atheists dont pray anyway, u can try to “hope the pope away” or “hope the pope dont grope”….. no guarentee it works tho.

  5. The Catholic church has committed the following evils. That grants anyone the right to complain if not take vigilante action against them. The law refuses to prosecute them.

    1. encouraging the murder of gays. Mugabe is a catholic.
    2. mass physical and sexual abuse of children.
    3. forcing non-catholics to suffer at end of life.
    4. interfering with birth control and abortion.
    5. interfering with AIDs eradication.
    6. encouraging superstition and discouraging science.
    7. ripping off the poor in the 3rd world with an ancient religious con
    8. opposing equal rights for women.
    • Yup! My thoughts,exactly.Well put!In reply to #20 by NearlyNakedApe:

      Bravo! A Chef who is as skilled at humor as he is at cooking. A refreshing and deliciously ironic retort to the pope’s purposefully vague and inconsistent stand on gay people.

  6. What is the actual science of homosexuality? I hear it constantly quoted that exactly 10% of the population is gay. But that is scientifically absurd, no other attribute amongst a varied population is constant despite variations in environment and genetic make-up. Both Kinsey and Freud believed that Homosexuality was mutable and effected by society, so why do we not believe now that homosexuality is not itself an unscientific religious belief like polygamy or a mental illness like depression or anorexia?

    I think some people are concerned that if normal biological pairing and the consequent property ownership by families is not protected (in some way) then the state will gain control of too much of our lives, a fear which has been shown to be validated many times throughout history. This would surely be the case if governments become the sole arbiters of who can have children (after all they are the ones that choose which gay couples are fit to be parents).

    There is some evidence for this idea, as marriage is in decline and although the rich are not that adversely affected by frequent divorce, the children of the poor are massively more so, which we do not see in the popular media. If young adults, who are scientifically proven to be chemically confused by their hormones through their age of majority, are bombarded with homosexual ideation through the media then are we that sure that it will not lead first to an anti marriage majority and then to an anti straight / anti monogamy majority?

    I see a potential in the spread of homosexuality misinformation by the liberal elite, for creating an unstoppable momentum behind the flow of children from those whose biological parents have had their resources pulled away from them by impossibly unfair governments, to the those who have been chosen as state approved as parents. It seems to me to be the subversion of the poor by the rich for the rich’s own selfish and often sexually perverted pleasures.

    The fecundity of society has to be a moral issue surely if it is to have consequences on our children?

    Can we ever actually have some unbiased science on the subject?

Leave a Reply