New Scouts pledge welcomes non-believers

8

Members of Scout Association will no longer have to promise to do their duty to God, following move made by Guides.

From 1 January next year, atheists yearning to slip on a woggle and embrace the self-reliant yet altruistic philosophy of the Scouts will find the organisation well prepared.

After more than a century, members will no longer have to promise – on their honour – to do their duty to God when they make their pledge to the movement. They will, however, still be required to promise to uphold Scout values, observe its law, do their duty to the Queen and help others.

The introduction of the atheist-friendly pledge comes after the Scout Association, which has almost 537,000 members in the UK, spent 10 months pondering how best to welcome non-believers.

"Throughout its 106-year history, the movement has continued to evolve and today marks an important step in that journey," said Wayne Bulpitt, UK chief commissioner for the Scouts. "It also signifies the determination to become truly inclusive and relevant to all sections of society that it serves."

But he added: "We are a values-based movement and exploring faith and beliefs remains a key element of the Scouting programme. That will not change."

The Scout Association stressed that the core promise – "on my honour, I promise that I will do my best, to do my duty to God and to the Queen, to help other people and to keep the Scout law" – remained very much intact.

The atheist promise will be available to those aged eight and over; prospective Beaver Scouts, aged six to eight, have only to promise to do their best "to be kind and helpful and to love our world".

The announcement of the new provision comes four months after the Guides broke with 102 years of tradition by dropping the promise to serve God and country from their pledge. Guides now vow to "be true to myself and develop my beliefs" and "to serve my Queen and community".

The Scout Association's move to reach out to young atheists was praised by secular groups. Andrew Copson, chief executive of the British Humanist Association, said the Scouts had recognised the contribution that "thoughtful and ethical non-religious young people and adults" could make to both the movement and society.

Written By: Sam Jones
continue to source article at theguardian.com

8 COMMENTS

  1. Way to go UK scouting. The Boy Scouts of America have a long way to go. It makes me sad that an organization which meant so much to me as a child is so needlessly attached to homophobic and theistic baggage. They need to take a page from the Girl Scouts handbook At least they get these issues right here in the US.

  2. After being in Scouting in the sixty’s, I was insulted to learn about the policies of the BSA.
    I have burned my uniform which my parents kept for fifty years.
    My dog wears my neckscarf. (he doesn’t know)

  3. The atheist promise will be available to those aged eight and over; prospective Beaver Scouts, aged six to eight, have only to promise to do their best “to be kind and helpful and to love our world”.

    This younger oath is sweet and appropriate age wise. Indeed I think this simpler oath would have been suitable up to age eleven.

    Nevertheless, scouts, a good step forward.

    • In reply to #5 by A3Kr0n:

      Awesome! Do that in the USA, and I might even donate money.

      You truly took the words from my mouth. In any case, it’s a step forward, and we have to take victories whenever we can get them.

  4. I’d be interested to know how many Scout or guide leaders are actually making this change locally.
    My own experience very recently was that the leader of my daughters Rainbow troop (these are the junior Brownies) completely ignored the new guidelines and asked all the girls to plead allegiance to God.
    I can’t say I was surprised really the Rainbows hold their activities in the church hall and when I checked all the troop leaders are part of the churches evangelical group (according to their website which also hosts the brownies site)

Leave a Reply