









Cult leader sparks Sikh riots with 'guru' stunt2. Comment #43317 by Luthien on May 21, 2007 at 5:27 am
One person was killed and more than 50 were injured after tens of thousands of angry Sikhs, many armed with their ceremonial kirpan daggers, went on the rampage across Punjab and the neighbouring state of Haryana.
3. Comment #43334 by Azven on May 21, 2007 at 6:13 am
4. Comment #43343 by Luthien on May 21, 2007 at 6:36 am
...all the dagggers I've seen are less than an inch long and less sharp than a ball point pen.
5. Comment #43344 by Vinelectric on May 21, 2007 at 6:37 am
Who benefits from this strory? A government that can point to 'those Sikhs, fighting amongst themselves again' perhaps!
6. Comment #43355 by pewkatchoo on May 21, 2007 at 7:00 am
The prime minister is Sikh.
7. Comment #43356 by the_blur on May 21, 2007 at 7:00 am
Unintentional hilarity I am sure...8. Comment #43369 by waxwings on May 21, 2007 at 7:32 am
9. Comment #43371 by FXR on May 21, 2007 at 7:38 am
10. Comment #43410 by konquererz on May 21, 2007 at 10:04 am
11. Comment #43411 by pewkatchoo on May 21, 2007 at 10:09 am
12. Comment #43432 by BicycleRepairMan on May 21, 2007 at 11:39 am
13. Comment #43439 by slummingangel on May 21, 2007 at 12:12 pm
14. Comment #43473 by jonjermey on May 21, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Presumably the Sikhs already knew that the Dera Sacha Sauda sect didn't believe in their gurus. So why are they reacting? "You can believe something else to us as long as you don't try and express that belief while we're around." So much for tolerance. Sikhism sounds like a very insecure religion to me.15. Comment #43481 by CJ22 on May 21, 2007 at 4:16 pm
16. Comment #43484 by MelM on May 21, 2007 at 5:20 pm
His supporters rejected accusations that he was trying to impersonate the guru. But yesterday police filed a complaint against the sect's leader for hurting religious sentiment, a charge often used in a country where religious differences regularly set off violence.Beware! Don't allow this "complait" to come to the U.S. Remember the resolution (by the U.N. Human Rights Council) about defamation of religion?
17. Comment #43506 by LeeLeeOne on May 21, 2007 at 9:02 pm
18. Comment #43536 by Suki on May 22, 2007 at 12:10 am
I think you are missing the point of the article.19. Comment #43547 by Russell Blackford on May 22, 2007 at 1:24 am
Yeah, right ... "peaceful". Like all those other blood-soaked systems of organised superstition and misery. A bit like how Islam is a "religion of peace", perhaps.20. Comment #43575 by Peacebeuponme on May 22, 2007 at 4:03 am
Suki - yes everyone has the right to free speech and protest. It's usually religion that tries to take this away from us. As the article shows, Baba Gurmeet Singh's rights to freedom of dress were not considered by the sikhs.21. Comment #43577 by leodavinci on May 22, 2007 at 4:05 am
22. Comment #43579 by Peacebeuponme on May 22, 2007 at 4:09 am
Suki - and another thing, I don't care what the knife (that's what it is regardless of what you call it) means to the closed mind of the sikh. They are getting preferential treatment in the UK - I cannot carry a knife, but they can. That is discrimination, plain and simple.23. Comment #43580 by BaronOchs on May 22, 2007 at 4:16 am
They are getting preferential treatment in the UK - I cannot carry a knife, but they can. That is discrimination, plain and simple.
24. Comment #43585 by Philip1978 on May 22, 2007 at 4:28 am
25. Comment #43587 by Logicel on May 22, 2007 at 4:35 am
26. Comment #43591 by Philip1978 on May 22, 2007 at 4:46 am
27. Comment #43596 by Logicel on May 22, 2007 at 5:00 am
28. Comment #43598 by pewkatchoo on May 22, 2007 at 5:03 am
29. Comment #43606 by Logicel on May 22, 2007 at 5:21 am
30. Comment #43619 by pewkatchoo on May 22, 2007 at 6:02 am
31. Comment #43622 by Peacebeuponme on May 22, 2007 at 6:13 am
Comment #43580 by BaronOchs :They can also ride motorcycles without helmets because of their turbans. Essentially here the laws of britain are saying wear a helmet or bow to the teachings of some oriental guru. ridiculous. Either no one or everyone should have to wear a helmet. anything else is unacceptable.
32. Comment #43629 by cybercoma on May 22, 2007 at 6:33 am
33. Comment #43642 by Philip1978 on May 22, 2007 at 7:03 am
34. Comment #43644 by Veronique on May 22, 2007 at 7:14 am
35. Comment #43645 by BaronOchs on May 22, 2007 at 7:18 am
36. Comment #43650 by cybercoma on May 22, 2007 at 7:32 am
37. Comment #44051 by John Phillips on May 23, 2007 at 8:23 am
This peaceful religion carries the knife as a symbol of the great warriors they claim they are/were. Sikhism is a warrior religion and doesn't protest peacefully as we discovered last year when a sikh woman wrote a play about sex abuse and murder in a temple which was shown in a theatre in Birmingham, UK. The theatre was literally besieged by sikhs and and in the end the play was cancelled, partly because the police couldn't guarantee safety to the actors or the theatregoers.38. Comment #63185 by Murakh Di Sangat on August 13, 2007 at 12:43 pm
When will people learn to seperate politics and culture from Religion?
1. Comment #43313 by Logicel on May 21, 2007 at 5:19 am
_____
Yes. I agree! All religions consist of beliefs based on no evidence whatsoever--however different the imaginary raiments may be in clothing the same naked emperor.
Other Comments by Logicel