Gay row US Anglicans miss summit

2. Comment #43919 by mjwemdee on May 23, 2007 at 4:06 am
3. Comment #43942 by CJ22 on May 23, 2007 at 4:35 am
4. Comment #43974 by Titchfield on May 23, 2007 at 5:38 am
I don't see the problem really. I wouldn't invite them to my house, filthy god squaddies that they are. They're welcome to pop around for a chat if they denounce religion though :)5. Comment #43978 by Russell Blackford on May 23, 2007 at 5:43 am
Rowan Williams is a coward. This was a cowardly act.6. Comment #43979 by Russell Blackford on May 23, 2007 at 5:49 am
It annoys me, in part, because rightly or wrongly I still have some residual fondness for the good old Church of England. I suppose I'm still welcome there, like lots of other atheists (many of them in the clergy). But they will go on equivocating about whether gays are welcome.7. Comment #44128 by John Phillips on May 23, 2007 at 11:05 am
A large factor in this is the strength nowadays of the African wing of the church which still condemns homosexuality unreservedly and has threatened to split from the main Anglican church over it before. But hey, when you base your belief on the irrational you will always be a hostage to fortune, i.e. others of an even more irrational stance gaining power.8. Comment #44131 by Bonzai on May 23, 2007 at 11:15 am
The Church is like a corporation. It caters to the market. These days the market is in the developing world where homosexuality is still a taboo. But at least it shows that the organized churches are in rapid decline in the industrialized countries. Church opposition to gay right is a non issue in these countries because no one cares what it has to say anyway. There is a siver lining to everything.9. Comment #44195 by Shuggy on May 23, 2007 at 3:22 pm
within 20 years religious groups will have caught up with the rest of society and will have no problem with homosexuality; those passages in the bible will be conveniently ignored along with the stuff about beating your wife and owning slaves. And Rowan Williams will be vilified by history as a filthy homophobe and sycophant.
But at least it shows that the organized churches are in rapid decline in the industrialized countries. Church opposition to gay right is a non issue in these countries because no one cares what it has to say anyway. There is a siver lining to everything.
10. Comment #44196 by BaronOchs on May 23, 2007 at 3:25 pm
11. Comment #44300 by yogibear on May 24, 2007 at 6:52 am
12. Comment #44306 by Daniel Stoker on May 24, 2007 at 8:08 am
Does anyone know how to go about getting ex-communicated from the Curch of England? I was baptized when I was a baby but never conifrmed. In the past I was content to do nothing about my minimal association with the Church but as a gay atheist, I'm now so sickened by the CofE that I want to sever completely my ties to them.13. Comment #44308 by Philip1978 on May 24, 2007 at 8:28 am
14. Comment #44309 by BaronOchs on May 24, 2007 at 8:53 am
15. Comment #44319 by Stuart Paul Wood on May 24, 2007 at 10:42 am
"Canon Kearon said the subject of whether to invite Bishop Robinson had "exercised" Dr Williams' mind for "quite some time"."16. Comment #44393 by Ivan The Not So Bad on May 24, 2007 at 1:40 pm
17. Comment #44582 by Awl on May 25, 2007 at 5:04 am
DanielStoker and Philip197818. Comment #44774 by Daniel Stoker on May 25, 2007 at 9:17 am
Philip1978, even though I don't believe that the baptismal ceremony had any meaning whatsoever (the vicar could have trickled coke on me and spoken the first line of Moby Dick and it would have had the exactly the same significance), I still feel the need to register a symbolic protest against the Church. I have two main reasons for this. The homophobia of certain parts of the Church of England as well as the Anglican Communion as a whole are my immediate catalyst. But I also wish to express my disapproval of the religious indoctrination of children that begins with the practise of performing baptisms on unsuspecting infants who are incorporated into the Church without their consent.
1. Comment #43877 by Awl on May 23, 2007 at 3:15 am
Utterly, utterly disgusting. How can these people claim to love and forgive etc etc when they can discriminate against one of their own so flagrantly? The hypocracy within the church is at such an obscene level that surely it can only start to self destrcut now?What amuses me about this 'controversy' is the fact that within 20 years religious groups will have caught up with the rest of society and will have no problem with homosexuality; those passages in the bible will be conveniently ignored along with the stuff about beating your wife and owning slaves. And Rowan Williams will be vilified by history as a filthy homophobe and sycophant.
Serious, when are these divisive, ignorant people going to disappear and stop having a public influence?
Other Comments by Awl