










Gamma-Ray Wipe-Out


2. Comment #47206 by denoir on June 3, 2007 at 1:20 pm
Working with paleontologist Bruce Lieberman from the University of Kansas and others
3. Comment #47208 by Pieter on June 3, 2007 at 1:29 pm
I saw a program on the discovery channel (or maybe PBS) about the discovery of these gamma ray extinctions. it didn't posit that any had happened to the earth yet, but the fact that we detect faint traces of hypernovae daily still scares the shit out of me. from what i remember a hypernovae can be a galactic-killer, sterilizing all life-giving planets for hundreds of thousands of light-years. if one happened in the milky way it probably wasn't as powerful as they say they can be.4. Comment #47209 by _J_ on June 3, 2007 at 1:31 pm
5. Comment #47210 by Don'tForgetToBreathe on June 3, 2007 at 1:39 pm
6. Comment #47212 by Tukka on June 3, 2007 at 2:17 pm
Is it worth worrying about? No. Gamma-ray bursts hit without warning. We can't predict when or where they come from. And we can't do a thing to stop them.Thanks for that. I feel more relaxed already!
7. Comment #47215 by Thanny on June 3, 2007 at 2:34 pm
This is a bit dated. Short GRB's have a good explanatory theory now.8. Comment #47217 by steve99 on June 3, 2007 at 2:50 pm
but the fact that we detect faint traces of hypernovae daily still scares the shit out of me. from what i remember a hypernovae can be a galactic-killer, sterilizing all life-giving planets for hundreds of thousands of light-years. if one happened in the milky way it probably wasn't as powerful as they say they can be.
9. Comment #47223 by jerem7 on June 3, 2007 at 3:31 pm
I'm calling a science foul here. Cute theory, NO evidence. I'm sure everyone here understands the problem with an elegant "theory" completely unsupported by evidence. I mean, are we just making up cool stuff and calling it science now? I expect this "wish it was true, so let's assume it is" crap from theists, but not scientists.10. Comment #47299 by LeeC on June 4, 2007 at 3:07 am
I'm calling a science foul here. Cute theory, NO evidence.
11. Comment #47312 by Pieter on June 4, 2007 at 3:58 am
thanks steve. the program i saw was from a few years ago, but it really didn't do much to try and play down people's fears of a gamma wave killing everything without a moment's notice.12. Comment #47324 by LeeC on June 4, 2007 at 5:03 am
13. Comment #47432 by steve99 on June 4, 2007 at 1:35 pm
15. Comment #47614 by steve99 on June 5, 2007 at 4:26 am
16. Comment #47919 by LeeC on June 6, 2007 at 3:38 am
17. Comment #55708 by Rob Carter on July 12, 2007 at 3:50 am
Hmm, an interesting article, but marred by one elementary error, I quote,18. Comment #55716 by Quetzalcoatl on July 12, 2007 at 4:07 am
19. Comment #58923 by Your_Noodly_Master on July 26, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Hypernovae happen less often now - they require stars of substantial mass, which are pretty rare (they were much more common in the early universe).
Hypernovae also shouldn't be that damaging. They could cause extinctions at thousands of light years, but almost certainly not at hundreds of thousands. The idea of 'galaxy sterilizing' events is fortunately much more science fiction than real science.
1. Comment #47202 by Laurence Winch-Furness on June 3, 2007 at 12:57 pm
Other Comments by Laurence Winch-Furness