










Call for 'post-9/11' RE teaching
RE teachers must provide children with a more sophisticated understanding of the subject in a post-11 September world, Ofsted says.2. Comment #50340 by BMMcArdle on June 17, 2007 at 1:54 am
This article seems biased towards religion.3. Comment #50341 by PaulJ on June 17, 2007 at 1:59 am
4. Comment #50342 by Father on June 17, 2007 at 2:01 am
In this competitive age many clever children choose to study RE for the following reason;5. Comment #50343 by GodlessHeathen on June 17, 2007 at 2:40 am
6. Comment #50346 by SteveN on June 17, 2007 at 2:58 am
"It says teachers should include ways in which religion is not always a force for good."I think the BBC is confusing 'not always' with 'virtually never'.
7. Comment #50355 by NJS on June 17, 2007 at 5:50 am
I read the "not always a force for good" and laughed .8. Comment #50360 by bamboospitfire on June 17, 2007 at 7:24 am
9. Comment #50361 by debaser71 on June 17, 2007 at 7:28 am
I am American and I went to high school in the 1980's. As part of our Social Studies classes I learned about religions. I distinctly remember reading comic books about Indian gods (vishnu kali etc. I remember learning about Iriqoui(sp)american indian myths (earth is a giant turtle, humans were bron from one mother who had twins, the bad twin came out the mothers arm pit, etc). In English class I learned all about ancient greek myths. But for me, what seemed to help nudge me on a path of not being religious was what I learned about christianity's history. FUll of violence, power seeking, wealth hording, and nonsense.SHit, I even learned about creationism in advanced placement biology class (basically a lesson in debunking it).10. Comment #50367 by js5535 on June 17, 2007 at 8:59 am
The discovery that there are many faiths other than their parents' is probably the most damaging thing that can happen to a child's religion. 11. Comment #50368 by PrimeNumbers on June 17, 2007 at 9:18 am
12. Comment #50374 by icanus on June 17, 2007 at 11:05 am
I did a GCSE in RE almost ten years ago (it was compulsory at my school, because it was considered an easy pass to push up the school's results).13. Comment #50375 by perkyjay on June 17, 2007 at 12:00 pm
I was at a grammar school in Yorkshire during WWII and since all the masters of military age had been called up for service, we were taught mainly by old fogies and very attractive young mistresses, who had never been previously allowed within the confines of a boys' school. RI, as it was then known,(Religious Instruction), was taught by a delightfully humourous 25 year old woman, who had us all eating out of the palm of her hand ,(we wished), and we spent a great deal of our time trying to look up her skirt as she sat14. Comment #50377 by Diplo on June 17, 2007 at 12:27 pm
15. Comment #50421 by Newton30 on June 18, 2007 at 4:02 am
16. Comment #50424 by Newton30 on June 18, 2007 at 4:25 am
17. Comment #50466 by chezzyd on June 18, 2007 at 10:14 am
I think Religious Education should be scrapped and included instead in something like 'Philosophy & Ethics' where *all* religions and philosophies can be examined and discussed.18. Comment #50470 by slummingangel on June 18, 2007 at 10:31 am
19. Comment #50660 by hexhunter on June 19, 2007 at 9:26 am
20. Comment #50661 by RAS on June 19, 2007 at 9:32 am
Please contact www.ofsted.gov.uk with suggestions that atheism be given equal time to each and every other religion taught, in the interests of fairness, balance and impartiality. It should not be that difficult to implement...21. Comment #50765 by mmurray on June 19, 2007 at 10:43 pm
1. Comment #50339 by adamhaar on June 17, 2007 at 1:47 am
Wouldn't it be nice if they taught *about* religion, especially all the different religions of the world, past and current.Other Comments by adamhaar