Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Friday, July 6, 2007 | Reason : Children and Religion | print version Print | Comments

Document Ah, the fervour in returning to my flock

by Lisa Pryor, Sydney Morning Herald

Thanks to Lee for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/ah-the-fervour-in-returning-to-my-flock/2007/07/06/1183351452264.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

Like a holy ghost, parental religion returns to haunt. As age wearies, the solemn vow to resist everything your parents ever stood for crumbles.

The first sign of a return to religion usually appears upon marriage. All of a sudden the spiritually indifferent announce they will marry in a church, synagogue or temple. When the day comes, they promise the priest that they will raise their children according to the laws of God.

Typically, these choices are laughed off at first. It is only a joke. Nothing serious. The religious venue is only chosen because it was cheaper than hiring a marquee and all the stained glass and sandstone would look really classy in photos. As for the priest, well, he came as a package deal.

Don't believe it. Behind the nervous laughter, there may be more to these choices. You know the parties are not pretending when they start making comments along the lines of "well, not everything in the scriptures is perfect but the overall values are positive and life-affirming and should be encouraged". Christening gowns are extracted from mothballs for the first child. The transformation is complete.

Something not so different happened to me. As I have grown older, I have come full circle, returning to the religious beliefs of my family.

Like a prodigal daughter I strayed from the path of righteousness. After years of questioning the belief system of my parents, I have made the predictable return to their way of thinking. I have returned to atheism.

Atheism was the religion of my childhood. I suffered for my beliefs. When my parents finally enrolled me in Sunday School because all the other children were doing it, I was sent to the remedial group and faced the humiliation of colouring in pictures of Jesus with children younger than me because I didn't know enough about the Bible.

Later on as a primary schooler, I suffered persecution when attending Friday night activities at the local church. I was willing to sit through religious instruction if it meant I got to play Ship Wreck with the other children. I hid my atheism well until my best friend's little sister dobbed us in as non-believers.

We were taken aside and counselled. We tried to explain our lack of belief away. Something like "We, um, believe in Jesus as an historical figure but … No, wait a minute. We believe in God but not in Jesus. Or we believe in Jesus but not in the Holy Spirit." Atheists are expected to account for their beliefs in a way that religious people are not.

Atheism is having a moment now. The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins and God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens are bestsellers. In Australia, the number of non-believers is growing. In the latest census, 3.7 million Australians claimed no religion, up from 2.9 million in 1996. Now 19 per cent of Australians are faithless heathens. Curiously, the most heathen state is home to the city of churches. In South Australia, 24 per cent of the population are godless. Make of that what you will.

As the number of heathens grows, there will be more people like me. People who have not chosen atheism as a conscious, rational choice. Second-generation atheists who "choose" atheism in the same way most people "choose" religion - because it is what they were taught by their families and the indoctrination has left them with a gut feeling that is not easy to escape.

Not everything about atheism is perfect but the overall values are positive and life-affirming and should be encouraged. Children raised as atheists know their minds are their own. They do not believe that every private thought is monitored by a higher being ready to punish wrong thinking. They fear not smiting.

When the time comes, I will raise my children as atheists because I want them to have all the advantages and values I enjoyed as a child. At heart I am a conservative who believes in family values and I think it would be nice for my parents to see our tradition of heathenism carried on. Atheism is a wonderful gift to give a child.

Comments 1 - 12 of 12 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #54406 by Janus on July 6, 2007 at 11:39 pm

 avatarNo honey, atheism isn't a religion, it's not a belief system, it doesn't have values, there's no indoctrination involved in being taught there's no evidence for deities, and if your reason for raising your children as atheists is to carry on a tradition, you're pathetic.

What the hell was the point of that article?

Other Comments by Janus

2. Comment #54410 by Serendip on July 7, 2007 at 12:49 am

What the hell was the point of that article?


Humour in the guise of parody I'd say.

No honey...


What the hell was the point of that bit of patronizing sexism?

Other Comments by Serendip

3. Comment #54415 by PaulJ on July 7, 2007 at 1:45 am

 avatar
Atheists are expected to account for their beliefs in a way that religious people are not.
This is so wrong.

The answer to the question "Why are you an atheist?" is "Why shouldn't I be?" The believers in unsupportable, unverifiable nonsense are the ones who should be called to account.

The fact that atheists appear to be a minority should not coerce them into unnecessary justification of their views.

Other Comments by PaulJ

4. Comment #54418 by Logicel on July 7, 2007 at 1:57 am

 avatarThis article did make me chuckle so perhaps it is somewhat a parody. Some theists do regard atheism as a religion and other theists say that atheism was a temporary and rebellious departure from their childhood religion, so there are existing elements to parody.

The author's departure from her atheism seem mostly induced by societal pressure, to be able to do stuff her peers were doing, and not an authentic embracing of monotheistic religion which also ties in with the genre so expressed by McGrath, that he dallied with atheism in university because it was the thing to do, as everybody else were atheists.

Other Comments by Logicel

5. Comment #54423 by BMMcArdle on July 7, 2007 at 2:38 am

More "atheism is a religion/belief" ammo for the God-botherers.

Other Comments by BMMcArdle

6. Comment #54426 by drive1 on July 7, 2007 at 3:03 am

 avatar
Atheism was the religion of my childhood. I suffered for my beliefs. When my parents finally enrolled me in Sunday School because all the other children were doing it, I was sent to the remedial group and faced the humiliation of colouring in pictures of Jesus with children younger than me because I didn't know enough about the Bible. Later on as a primary schooler, I suffered persecution


It appears that colouring-in books have scarred Lisa for life. Here she is, in an article on why religious fundamentalists should not be allowed to marry:
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/opinion/a-fundamental-wrong-in-letting-some-marry/2007/03/30/1174761750887.html

Before you know it, fundamentalist parents will be insisting preschool children read storybooks about the fundamentalist lifestyle in order to better understand it. There will be colouring books directed at four-year-olds showing Jesus turning water into wine and walking on water, as if it were gospel.

What hope does a child indoctrinated with this sort of propaganda have of growing up to be normal? Can you really tell me they will not be more likely to grow up fundamentalist themselves?


Whither journalism? I think I've exceeded my recommended daily intake of bathos already.

Other Comments by drive1

7. Comment #54429 by He-man Daunted World on July 7, 2007 at 3:31 am

That was an horrible article.

Speaking as an Aussie, I was "raised an atheist", but literally did not know what an atheist was until after i finished highschool. The word ATHEIST was never used. Regular church-goers at school were referred to as "bible bashers" and were made fun of. The rest of us were the faithless heathens (far more than 19%!!) who only ever went to church when made to sing carols at christmas, or to attend a wedding, or funeral.

I suppose that people like me are considered "cultural christians", but honestly, our real religion is sport, not christianity.

Other Comments by He-man Daunted World

8. Comment #54436 by Serendip on July 7, 2007 at 4:28 am

@drive1 that second article you link to supports my view of the satirical nature of Lisa Pryor's writing. She is clearly attacking fundamentalist Christian opposition to gay marriage by using their own arguments against them, so that the stupidity and bigotry of their reasoning is made apparent. The article ends with the giveaway:

Before you accuse me of hate speech, I should point out that I bear no grudge against fundamentalists personally. "Love the fundamentalist, hate the fundamentalism" is my policy.

I suppose one chink in this argument is that banning a minority from marrying is utterly unfair, inhumane and intolerant. Kind of like the ban on gay marriage.


Other Comments by Serendip

9. Comment #54440 by pewkatchoo on July 7, 2007 at 5:34 am

 avatarThere was a gay wedding in town this morning, the groom and groom turned up in a white stretch hummer to be married in a church. One of the grooms was dressed in a white suit with a 12 ft train. I would have thought that gays (Elton John excepted) would have more sense than to get sucked into all that shite. I bet that the amount of money wasted on a wedding is directly inverse to the length of time the couple stay together.

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

10. Comment #54451 by Mango on July 7, 2007 at 7:34 am

 avatarIf this article is meant to be satire, it's very subtle. Too subtle in fact, and all theists are going to gain from it is a reinforced idea that atheism is just another religion.

Other Comments by Mango

11. Comment #54562 by Robert Maynard on July 7, 2007 at 7:28 pm

 avatarGood for you, Lisa! :)

..Hey, wait, why was this published in a newspaper?

Other Comments by Robert Maynard

12. Comment #55448 by lindsay.wu on July 11, 2007 at 5:42 am

Fellas, I can guarantee you 100% these articles were in jest, and all the readers understood it as such.

Lisa Pryor writes regularly for the Sydney Morning Herald, her articles are always in good humour.

Aussie humour can be a little hard to understand sometimes ;-)

Other Comments by lindsay.wu
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: