Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Friday, July 13, 2007 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Butterfly shows evolution at work

by BBC

Thanks to Geoff for the link.

Reposted from:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6896753.stm

butterflyScientists say they have seen one of the fastest evolutionary changes ever observed in a species of butterfly.

The tropical blue moon butterfly has developed a way of fighting back against parasitic bacteria.

Six years ago, males accounted for just 1% of the blue moon population on two islands in the South Pacific.

But by last year, the butterflies had evolved a gene to keep the bacteria in check and male numbers were up to about 40% of the population.

Scientists believe the comeback is due to "suppressor" genes that control the Wolbachia bacteria that is passed down from the mother and kills the male embryos before they hatch.

"To my knowledge, this is the fastest evolutionary change that has ever been observed," said Sylvain Charlat, of University College London, UK, whose study appears in the journal Science.

Rapid natural selection

Gregory Hurst, a University College researcher who worked with Mr Charlat, added: "We usually think of natural selection as acting slowly, over hundreds of thousands of years.

"But the example in this study happened in the blink of the eye, in terms of evolutionary time, and is a remarkable thing to get to observe."

The team first documented the massive imbalance in the sex ratio of the blue moon butterfly (Hypolimnas bolina) on the Samoan islands of Savaii and Upolu in 2001.

In 2006, they started a new survey after an increase in reports of male sightings at Upolo.

They found that the numbers of male butterflies had either reached or were approaching those of females.

The researchers are not sure whether the gene that suppressed the parasite emerged from a mutation in the local population or whether it was introduced by migratory Southeast Asian butterflies in which the mutation already existed.

But they said that the repopulation of male butterflies illustrates rapid natural selection, a process in which traits that help a species survive become more prominent in a population.

"We're witnessing an evolutionary arms race between the parasite and the host. This strengthens the view that parasites can be major drivers in evolution," Mr Charlat said.

Comments 1 - 7 of 7 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #56070 by pewkatchoo on July 13, 2007 at 3:22 pm

 avatarAnd a very large and solid nail in the coffin of the creationists.

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

2. Comment #56081 by D'Arcy on July 13, 2007 at 3:53 pm

 avatar
And a very large and solid nail in the coffin of the creationists.


Ah yes, but in their intellectual way they will argue that a butterfly never yet gave birth to a monkey!

If parasites drive an evolutionary arms race between species, then I wonder what Wee Fleas will do for Dawkins!

Other Comments by D'Arcy

3. Comment #56087 by Big T on July 13, 2007 at 4:32 pm

Rather than see a species of butterfly become extinct, Allah hath decided to (miraculously) alter the genetic makeup of the species. Praise Allah!

Other Comments by Big T

4. Comment #56088 by eoinc on July 13, 2007 at 4:39 pm

"And a very large and solid nail in the coffin of the creationists."


But I can already imagine the creationists' response:

"But this is merely an example of micro-evolution. Nobody doubts that micro-evolution happens. The new butterflies are still the same KIND of creature as the older ones, and change between KINDS is what we never see taking place.... etc"

Other Comments by eoinc

5. Comment #56144 by doodinthemood on July 14, 2007 at 3:01 am

"And a very large and solid nail in the coffin of the creationists."

so much optimism! there have been things like this for a long while. Just think "god could have programmed butterflies to be able to do this. Now show me a crocoduck"

Other Comments by doodinthemood

6. Comment #56180 by deBeuk on July 14, 2007 at 10:02 am

"But I can already imagine the creationists' response:"

You forgot this one:
There's no morphological change! That's not evolution!

Other Comments by deBeuk

7. Comment #56501 by DamnDirtyApe on July 16, 2007 at 4:17 am

 avatarCrocoduck... Platypus, perhaps?

Other Comments by DamnDirtyApe
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: