Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, July 15, 2007 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments

Document LA Church 'agrees abuse pay deal'

by BBC

Thanks to Geoff for the link.

Reposted from:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6899391.stm

communionMore than 500 people allegedly abused by Los Angeles Catholic priests are to receive a record-breaking compensation pay-out, their main lawyer says.

The deal, which a judge must approve, is reported to be worth $660m (£324m).

With the alleged abuse dating back to the 1940s, lawyer Ray Boucher said it was payment of a long overdue debt.

Cardinal Roger Mahony, the leader of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, later apologised to the victims, pledging that the abuse "will not happen again".

"There really is no way to go back and give them that innocence that was taken from them. The one thing I wish I could give the victims... I cannot," Cadrinal Mahony said.

'Transparency critical'

It would be the largest payment by the US Church since the abuse became public in 2002 and just before a series of trials into sex claims were to begin.

The agreement, if approved, will settle all 15 upcoming paedophilia trials against Los Angeles archdiocese and avoids the threat of Cardinal Mahony being forced to testify about how the Church dealt with abuses spanning the 1940s to 1990s.

Los Angeles diocese records released in the past revealed that for decades priests accused of child sex abuse were simply moved to new assignments or provided with therapy, Church leaders believing that they could be rehabilitated.

steven
Plaintiff Steven Sanchez had been preparing for trial

This latest settlement calls for the release of confidential priest personnel files, Mr Boucher said.

"Transparency is a critical part of this and of all resolutions," he said.

Steven Sanchez, a plaintiff in the case, said he was both relieved and disappointed by the outcome.

"I was really emotionally ready to take on the archdiocese in court in less than 48 hours, but I'm glad all victims are going to be compensated," he said.

"I hope all victims will find some type of healing in this process."

Insurance claim

The deal is expected to be officially announced in a joint statement to be released by the plaintiffs and archdiocese later on Sunday, and a news conference will take place on Monday.

The reported figure of $660m dwarfs the $157m settlement paid out by the diocese of Boston following a child sex scandal which became public in 2002.

mahony
Cardinal Mahony has said property will be sold to raise the funds

The Los Angeles payment, which amounts to an average of $1.3m for each plaintiff, takes the total paid out by US dioceses to $2bn since 1950, with Los Angeles paying about one quarter of that.

Los Angeles is the country's most populous Catholic diocese, serving more than three million parishioners, but the scandal has brought the archdiocese close to financial ruin.

According to Church lawyers the diocese is likely to pay $250m in cash, the rest of the sum being covered by insurance and payments by religious orders.

Earlier this year, Cardinal Mahoney told parishioners in an open letter that the Church would sell its 12-storey administrative building and was considering the sale of about 50 other non-essential properties to raise funds.

The abuse has also severely dented confidence in the Church and its leaders, the BBC's Peter Bowes in Los Angeles says.

'Stolen childhood'

David Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, said while it was the largest settlement by the Church, money was not the key objective for victims.

"No settlement, no amount of money, can restore the shattered trust and the stolen childhoods and the betrayed faith of people who were wounded by abusive priests and by complicit bishops," he said.

"But, having said that, certainly this represents a tremendous achievement by these brave survivors, who somehow found the strength to come forward, report the crimes, get legal help, expose the predators and ultimately endure a pretty long, gruelling legal process."

Since 2002 nearly 1,000 people have filed such claims against the Roman Catholic Church in California alone.

In February 2004, a report commissioned by the Church said more than 4,000 Roman Catholic priests in the US had faced sexual abuse allegations in the last 50 years.

Comments 1 - 25 of 25 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #56390 by thebigredmachine on July 15, 2007 at 3:05 pm

The excellent documentary "Deliver Us From Evil" deals with this particular scandal. I'd recommend it to anyone interested. It's horrifying to hear what went on. Here's the IMDB link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814075/

Other Comments by thebigredmachine

2. Comment #56395 by tieInterceptor on July 15, 2007 at 3:21 pm

 avatar'no children behind left' Hitchens must be giggling just about now.

Other Comments by tieInterceptor

3. Comment #56399 by Geoff on July 15, 2007 at 3:36 pm

 avatarI knew it was going on, but I didn't realise the severity of it until I read this, which is why I submitted it.

$2 billion, in the US alone!

Did you spot this bit?:

...the rest of the sum being covered by insurance...


They take out insurance against it? Which firms underwrite that?

Other Comments by Geoff

4. Comment #56405 by the great teapot on July 15, 2007 at 4:14 pm

No one thinks less of religion than me but do we have to expose the human frailities of the church in such a gleefull manner.
We all know religion is man made, we all know priests are men, untouched by god. There is enough wrong with religion without gloating over the fact cruel people hide under its wing.
This is shamefull enough for them without atheists using it as a stick.
Just the fact that religion is make believe twaddle is enough for me to find it derisible.
The way I see it is these men are imposters, if you really believed there was an omnipotent being watching your every move would you do that. These child rapists are bigger atheists than you and me.



Other Comments by the great teapot

5. Comment #56412 by admin on July 15, 2007 at 4:40 pm

 avatarGreat Teapot,

I strongly recommend that you watch the documentary 'Deliver Us From Evil.' It isn't as simple as "cruel people hiding under the wing" of the Catholic church, the church CREATES pedophiles. The requirement of celibacy for priests was introduced so that the church could inherit the priests' estate when they died, as opposed to their family. Young boys are also groomed for the priesthood from a very young age, usually before they reach puberty, and before they develop any sexual maturity. So the system is set up to create sexually stunted grown men, officially committed to celibacy, who are then attracted to the sexual immaturity they see in children. Then add in the power structure and trust placed in the priests, and I'd say this has a lot to do with The Catholic Church, NOT just human frailties.

Josh

Other Comments by admin

6. Comment #56413 by phil rimmer on July 15, 2007 at 4:46 pm

 avatarGt.Teapot.

I sort of agree, but..., on another thread here, someone was arguing that religion might help improve the morals of the religious. This pretty well blows that out of the water. And the point is not the wickedness of the individual abusive priests, its the active and considered complicity of those who covered it up.

I think it is an indictment of the moral absolutism and conservatism in the (Catholic)church that child abuse was not considered important. They just didn't keep up with the rest of us in improving their moral values, as we became aware of the terrible and permanent harm abuse can cause to a developing mind.

This is an argument about the innate potential immorality of dogma based institutions in positions of trust.

Other Comments by phil rimmer

7. Comment #56422 by the great teapot on July 15, 2007 at 5:26 pm

Is deliver us from evil on the net, if so I'll watch it.But with a critical eye.
The notion that the priesthood creates paedophiles by stunting the sexual growth of the priest is a very good point. I wonder if the church is aware of this possibility and if so has it tried to do anything to prevent it, I suspect the denial would be too strong. And even if the priests were aware of the phenomena would that prevent them falling victim to it.
Phil Rimmer - it does deny them the moral higher ground I agree. But I wanted to remind everyone that doesn't give us the moral high ground either.
But you are both right,

Other Comments by the great teapot

8. Comment #56454 by exegesis_saves on July 15, 2007 at 9:00 pm

 avatar
Earlier this year, Cardinal Mahoney told parishioners in an open letter that the Church would sell its 12-storey administrative building and was considering the sale of about 50 other non-essential properties to raise funds.


Poor, sad, tax-exempt churches. Allow me to say:

BOO

FUCKING

HOO

(Sorry).

Other Comments by exegesis_saves

9. Comment #56457 by atheists-r-us on July 15, 2007 at 9:15 pm

Regarding insurance (Geoff #56399); surely they couldn't claim....as its an act of God(?)

Other Comments by atheists-r-us

10. Comment #56462 by Morro on July 15, 2007 at 10:34 pm

 avatarNot to defend the Church that was complicit in child rape, but I do have to wonder what percentage of that 500 were actually abused. There's almost no chance it was all of them. I'll guess 50%. Some are gold diggers, far more probably constructed the memory with the guidance of an alternative therapist.

Beyond that, I agree with Exegesis_saves.

Other Comments by Morro

11. Comment #56464 by pewkatchoo on July 15, 2007 at 11:13 pm

 avatarMorro
That is a very self-opinionated stance you are taking if I may say so. Given the amount of time and the number of priests involved, I am surprised that it is only around 500 people that have come forward. I suspect there are many hundreds more that are keeping quiet due to shame.

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

12. Comment #56469 by Logos on July 16, 2007 at 12:02 am

Interesting that an insurance plan would cover the settlement fee for child molestation. But what's more interesting, is the Church actually subscribes to, and makes use of, such an insurance plan. They knew it's very likely that things like this would happen!?

Other Comments by Logos

13. Comment #56472 by AdrianB on July 16, 2007 at 12:31 am

 avatarTo a certain extent I agree with the great teapot. Religion is man-made, and as such is run by men with all the inbuilt weaknesses. But then again I read two paragraphs from Christopher Hitchens book:


In Ireland alone -- once an unquestioning disciple of Holy Mother Church -- it is now estimated that the unmolested children of religious schools were very probably the minority.

"Child abuse" is really a silly and pathetic euphemism for what has been going on: we are talking about the systematic rape and torture of children, positively aided and abetted by a hierarchy which knowingly moved the grossest offenders to parishes where they would be safer. Given what has come to light in modern cities in recent times, one can only shudder to think what was happening in the centuries where the church was above all criticism.


The most important element is that the hierarchy (one of which has a direct line to God) attempted to cover this up. Moved Priests around, and in doing so created more victims.

Am I alone in thinking that those weak humans with the job title Priest are themselves victims. Rather than being removed from temptation, punished and/or treated, they were given the more hellish prospect of being moved to 'virgin' territory.

It is the Catholic church itself that has been most criminal in this respect. Individuals can act criminally from all walks of life, but when the Catholic Church acts in a criminal manner I think they have handed us the right to claim the higher moral ground.

Other Comments by AdrianB

14. Comment #56473 by Haakon on July 16, 2007 at 12:35 am

I want to say that I'm not gloating. I'm rather feeling sad and angry on behalf of the victims that had their childhood stolen by this and at the sick system that allowed for such systematic abuse.

Other Comments by Haakon

15. Comment #56475 by Corylus on July 16, 2007 at 12:52 am

 avatarIsn't it vile that they waited to just before the trail before announcing the settlement?
Steven Sanchez, a plaintiff in the case, said he was both relieved and disappointed by the outcome.

"I was really emotionally ready to take on the archdiocese in court in less than 48 hours...
Doubtless waiting to see if people would withdraw rather than face the court case and save the Church some money. A game of legal 'chicken' with peoples lives and feelings. Absolutely despicable.

With regard to whether or the figure of 500 is inflated or whether there are more victims out there... Well, for a time I worked as an administrator for the Crown Prosecution Service (British version of the DA's Office). I have to say that the sexual offences cases were the hardest to bring to court and get convictions for and the childhood ones the very worse of those.

The people receiving settlements will be the most articulate, educated and resolute of the victims. They will be those willing to put themselves through court cases, those best able to make good 'witnesses', and those who have managed to live their lives without killing themselves with drink and drugs in order to forget.

There will be others out there.

Other Comments by Corylus

16. Comment #56495 by chezzyd on July 16, 2007 at 3:25 am

As an alternative point: I would be interested to know how many of the survivors of this abuse still believe in God and the Church.

Other Comments by chezzyd

17. Comment #56512 by michaeln36 on July 16, 2007 at 5:05 am

Its sadistically humorous that the only organisation in the world (to my knowledge) that has to take out 'molestation insurance' is the church.

Other Comments by michaeln36

18. Comment #56515 by hungarianelephant on July 16, 2007 at 5:06 am

 avatarIf I may add to thegreatteapot's comment:

One of the disturbing aspects of the Ferns enquiry in Ireland was that a number of paedophiles had joined the priesthood precisely because it was likely to give them unsupervised, trusted access to young children.

The Cathlolic church actively encouraged mindless devotion and trust, but made little attempt to ensure that that trust was deserved. It created the conditions which made child abuse inevitable.

Disgracefully, it then went out of its way to cover the problem up. And then promoted the person who probably knew more than anyone to the rank of Pope.

So my sympathy is limited. I don't think the Church should have to spend the rest of eternity apologising for abusing its position and being complicit in the rape of innocent young boys and girls. 1600 years should be enough.

Other Comments by hungarianelephant

19. Comment #56524 by k1mgy on July 16, 2007 at 5:41 am

 avatarThese priests have needs. "God" should reconsider his prohibition on marriage just as he did a Romney flip-flop on purgatory for the unbaptized. This would solve the problem of child rape happening behind the curtains and leave it to the privacy of the home.

--

It's stunning to me how our systems of "justice" here in 'Murca permit criminal acts to be paid off. This happened most recently where those idiots who erected electronic (Aqua Teen Hunger Force) signs onto bridge decks and public transit facilities were hauled off on criminal charges while Turner Broadcasting, worth billions, paid off Boston and avoided any liability. In the end, holding those two IQ-and-bath-challenged fellows up as an example became embarrassing. There was no way they could possibly be thrashed while Turner walked free by paying off the system. Doing so would surely put a spotlight on just how corrupt it all is.

The travesty conducted and condoned by the catholic church would would be, in any other context, brought down as a wide conspiracy, with elements of obstruction of justice, all around the underlying crime of child rape. Lots of people would be in prison right now, and others on the way. Instead, the "church" is permitted to doll out cash and, pardon the expression, get off.

Now they can divvy out a "sorry... Won't let it happen again" and then pass the plate. Some of these victims ought to rap them over the head with it.

This is not the church's fault exclusively. Our systems, made of people, share the blame. Many prosecutors and juries are sympathetic towards religion and in my region where it all surfaced - Boston - catholicism. Members of the church have infested many of our public institutions. Perhaps some think that only the right-wing drooling bible-bashers are dangerous in public life? Any religious in any public life are dangerous. In this case, they protect their own. The losers are the children (now adults) who continue to suffer and society, who gets yet another example that the "S" in Justice is a dollar symbol.

I agree with Dr. Dawkins who says that there are crimes far greater, particularly the forced indoctrination of children into religion, but I'd point out that the way this has been handled by the civil society is a pointer towards a problem just as dangerous as what the Haggardists present.

So, what to do? The victims should continue to bleed this corrupt church (it's members will pay) for all it's worth until they have nothing but a few shabby brick buildings remaining, and on the way point out soundly how they were almost totally abandoned by the protections of criminal law which did not come to bear except in the most egregious of cases where public scrutiny could no longer be avoided.

Other Comments by k1mgy

20. Comment #56542 by geckoman on July 16, 2007 at 8:15 am

Can you imagine the outrage, furore, calls for punishment etc were another organisation responsible? The church and its adherents would be at the vanguard in such a scenario.

In addition, the Cardinal pledged that the abuse 'would not happen again'. Really? What steps are being taken to ensure that? Are all the criminal priests still alive being placed on a sex offenders' Register? Are all future priests being screened in some way?

On the figures-while there may be a few opportunistic claims-normally the shame, stigma and horror of such abuse stops many victims coming forward; so the figures are likely far higher than reported. Was this your experience with the CPS, Corylus?

Other Comments by geckoman

21. Comment #56549 by bluebird on July 16, 2007 at 10:23 am

 avatar

"Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account Heb4:13

There is nothing covered up that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known Luke12:2,3"

Other Comments by bluebird

22. Comment #56554 by Corylus on July 16, 2007 at 11:42 am

 avatarGeckoman

Well, I can't comment on the numbers that do not come forward at all, because, by definition I would not have heard about them :) I have studied psychology though, so I think I can say the following..

Paedophiles are prolific. Add that to the fact that priests (unlike many others who work with children) do not seem to have a sensible retirement age - they just seem to go on till senility. They can therefore have both a long career as a priest and a long career as a child abuser.

Also, paedophiles are often smart, they will tell children that it is their fault and that they asked for it, adding to the guilt and shame that stops reporting. (I imagine that a Catholic priest would have an extra talent for that sort of thing - i.e."You will go to hell if you tell" and "If you confess your sin, neither or us need mention it again"...)

When these children grow up they often discover that silence has become an impossible habit to break, and a small part of them continues to wonder whether it really was their fault. Completely understandable, and I hope that those who did not come forward are not now blaming themselves not talking. Only one group of people need to feel any guilt at all for this situation.

So, to conclude, I don't think the full extent of this will ever come to light.

However, I think there is cause for optimism here in that; while this is not true justice; this is the light of day being shown where it wasn't previously. More previous victims will be believed now, because some really brave people were willing to fight this. I really hope that your suggestion about priests being screened before being appointed is taken on board.

So, I offer a round of applause to any of the survivors (not victims); who have doubtless spoken for many; should any happen to chance upon this thread.

[Edited for clarity and 'cos I sounded pompous!]

Other Comments by Corylus

23. Comment #56619 by justin willemse on July 16, 2007 at 3:05 pm

OK, I can not find in this article if the priests will be put to jail for their crimes. If an average person did this, they would be put to jail and serve their time. Does this pay out mean that these priests are off the hook???? If so, I am outraged!

Other Comments by justin willemse

24. Comment #56639 by k1mgy on July 16, 2007 at 5:34 pm

 avatar>>Does this pay out mean that these priests are off
>>the hook???? If so, I am outraged!"

Welcome to the outrage club.

Other Comments by k1mgy

25. Comment #56657 by justin willemse on July 16, 2007 at 7:28 pm

So, I have been thinking about this and been wondering why just the settlement. I can't believe that ALL 500 victims agreed to this! Why just the money and not the time in jail in which these priest very well deserve? Is it because the priests are protected by the Vatican which is a state power? It sounds like our own country's laws do not apply against the Catholic Church; therefore justice can never be fulfilled? It would be like a country taking another country to court. Is that possible?

What is protecting these abusers from the rest of the world? Which law(s) is allowing them to run off? What can our own countries do to change this? I wish that this could be challenged. Something must be done to take the Vatican State or any religious power to court. The Pope should be taken to jail for protecting and hiding his criminals for example! One could very well look at all the crimes they have committed. It is incredibility overwhelming and sick but nothing has been or can be done.

Other Comments by justin willemse
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: