Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Tuesday, July 17, 2007 | Reason : Religion as Child Abuse | print version Print | Comments

Document Islamic Creationist and a Book Sent Round the World

by Cornelia Dean

Reposted from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/17/science/17book.html?ref=science

In the United States, opposition to the teaching of evolution in public schools has largely been fueled by the religious right, particularly Protestant fundamentalism.

Now another voice is entering the debate, in dramatic fashion.

It is the voice of Adnan Oktar of Turkey, who, under the name Harun Yahya, has produced numerous books, videos and DVDs on science and faith, in particular what he calls the "deceit" inherent in the theory of evolution. One of his books, "Atlas of Creation," is turning up, unsolicited, in mailboxes of scientists around the country and members of Congress, and at science museums in places like Queens and Bemidji, Minn.

At 11 x 17 inches and 12 pounds, with a bright red cover and almost 800 glossy pages, most of them lavishly illustrated, "Atlas of Creation" is probably the largest and most beautiful creationist challenge yet to Darwin's theory, which Mr. Yahya calls a feeble and perverted ideology contradicted by the Koran.

In bowing to Scripture, Mr. Yahya resembles some fundamentalist creationists in the United States. But he is not among those who assert that Earth is only a few thousand years old. The principal argument of "Atlas of Creation," advanced in page after page of stunning photographs of fossil plants, insects and animals, is that creatures living today are just like creatures that lived in the fossil past. Ergo, Mr. Yahya writes, evolution must be impossible, illusory, a lie, a deception or "a theory in crisis."

In fact, there is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth.

The book caused a stir earlier this year when a French translation materialized at high schools, universities and museums in France. Until then, creationist literature was relatively rare in France, according to Armand de Ricqles, a professor of historical biology and evolutionism at the College de France. Scientists spoke out against the book, he said in an e-mail message, and "thanks to the highly centralized public school system in France, it was possible to organize that the books sent to lycées would not be made available to children."

So far, no similar response is emerging in the United States. "In our country we are used to nonsense like this," said Kevin Padian, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, who, like colleagues there, found a copy in his mailbox.

He said people who had received copies were "just astounded at its size and production values and equally astonished at what a load of crap it is.

"If he sees a picture of an old fossil crab or something, he says, 'See, it looks just like a regular crab, there's no evolution,' " Dr. Padian said. "Extinction does not seem to bother him. He does not really have any sense of what we know about how things change through time."

Kenneth R. Miller, a biologist at Brown University, said he and his colleagues in the life sciences had all received copies. When he called friends at the University of Colorado and the University of Chicago, they had the books too, he said. Scientists at Brigham Young University, the University of Connecticut, the University of Georgia and others have also received them.

"I think he must have sent it to every full professor in the medical school," said Kathryn L. Calame, a microbiologist at the Columbia University medical school who received a copy. "The genetics department, the biochem department, micro — everybody I talked to had it."

While they said they were unimpressed with the book's content, recipients marveled at its apparent cost. "If you went into a bookstore and saw a book like this, it would be at least $100," said Dr. Miller, an author of conventional biology texts. "The production costs alone are astronomical. We are talking millions of dollars."

And then there's postage. Dr. Padian said his copy was shipped by a company called SDS Worldwide, which has an office in Illinois. Calls and e-mail messages to the company were not returned, but Dr. Padian said he spoke to someone there who told him SDS had received a cargo-container-size shipment of books, "with everything prepaid and labeled. It just went all over the country."

Fatih Sen, who heads the United States office of Global Impex, a company that markets Islamic books, gifts and other products, including "Atlas," would not comment on its distribution, except to describe the book as "great" and refer questions to the publisher, Global Publishing of Istanbul. Repeated attempts by telephone and e-mail to reach the concern, or Mr. Yahya, were unsuccessful.

In the book and on his Web site (www.harunyahya.com), Mr. Yahya says he was born in Ankara in 1956, and grew up and was educated in Turkey. He says he seeks to unmask what the book calls "the imposture of evolutionists" and the links between their scientific views and modern evils like fascism, communism and terrorism. He says he hopes to encourage readers "to open their minds and hearts and guide them to become more devoted servants of God."

He adds that he seeks "no material gain" from his publications, most of which are available free or at relatively low cost.

Who finances these efforts is "a big question that no one knows the answer to," said another recipient, Taner Edis, a physicist at Truman State University in Missouri who studies issues of science and religion, particularly Islam. Dr. Edis grew up in a secular household in Turkey and has lived in the United States since enrolling in graduate school at Johns Hopkins, where he earned his doctorate in 1994. He said Mr. Yahya's activities were usually described in the Turkish press as financed by donations. "But what that can mean is anybody's guess," he said.

The effort seems particularly odd given the mailing list. Both Dr. Padian and Dr. Miller testified for the plaintiffs in the Dover, Penn., lawsuit that successfully challenged the teaching of intelligent design, an ideological cousin of creationism, in schools there. Other recipients include Steve Rissing, a biologist at Ohio State University who has been active on behalf of school board candidates who support the teaching of evolution and science museums that accept evolution as the foundation for modern biology.

"I don't know what to make of it, quite honestly," said Laddie Elwell, the director of the Headwaters Science Center in Bemidji, Minn., which she said received a dozen copies. Chuck Deeter, a staff member, said he and his colleagues might use the books' fossil photographs in their programs on Darwin, which he said can be a hard sell in a region where many people are fundamentalist Christians with creationist beliefs.

Support for creationism is also widespread among Muslims, said Dr. Edis, whose book "An Illusion of Harmony: Science and Religion in Islam" was published by Prometheus Books this spring.

"Taken at face value, the Koran is a creationist text," he said, adding that it would be difficult to find a scholar of Islam "who is going to be gung-ho about Darwin."

Perhaps as a result, he said, Mr. Yahya's books and other publications have won him attention in Islamic areas. "This is a guy with some influence," Dr. Edis said, "unfortunately for mainstream science."

Dr. Miller agreed. He said he regularly received e-mail messages from people questioning evolution, with an increasing number coming from Turkey, Lebanon and other areas in the Middle East, most citing Mr. Yahya's work.

That's troubling, he said, because Mr. Yahya's ideas "cast evolution as part of the corrupting influence of the West on Islamic culture, and that promotes a profound anti-science attitude that is certainly not going to help the Islamic world catch up to the West."

As the scientists ponder what to do with the book — for many, it is too beautiful for the trash bin but too erroneous for their shelves — they also speculate about the motives of its distributors.

"My hypothesis is, like all creationists, they believe that they have a startling truth that the public has been shielded from, and that if they present the facts, in quotation marks, that the scales will fall from the eyes and the charade of evolution will be revealed," said Eugenie Scott, director of the National Center for Science Education, which fights the teaching of creationism in public schools. "These people are really serious about this."

That may be, Dr. Miller said, but it's also possible "that Harun Yahya and his people have decided that there are plenty of Muslim people in the United States who need to hear this message."

In his e-mail message, Dr. de Ricqles said some worried that the book was directed at the Muslim population of France as a strategy to "destabilize" poor, predominantly immigrant suburbs "where a large population of youngsters of Moslem faith would be an ideal target for propaganda."

But despite its wide distribution, Dr. Padian predicted that the book would have little impact in the United States. "We are used to books that are totally wrongheaded about science and confuse science and religion," he said. "That's politics."

Comments 1 - 32 of 32 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #56917 by Broshiesq on July 17, 2007 at 8:33 pm

Quick, tell the publisher to keep pumping these out and sending them west. I think I just solved the US-dependence-on-foreign-oil problem. Next.

Other Comments by Broshiesq

2. Comment #56919 by Goldy on July 17, 2007 at 8:36 pm

I never got one :-(

Other Comments by Goldy

3. Comment #56923 by willbonds on July 17, 2007 at 8:47 pm

From looking at his web site, Harun Yahya is a one-man propaganda machine, and someone to be carefully watched.

Other Comments by willbonds

4. Comment #56926 by Planeten Paultje on July 17, 2007 at 9:22 pm

 avatarMe gots one with a blue cover.
http://web.mac.com/planeten.paultje/iWeb/Planeten_Paultje/Images/AoC.gif

Still crap though......

Other Comments by Planeten Paultje

5. Comment #56927 by BAEOZ on July 17, 2007 at 9:24 pm

 avatar
equally astonished at what a load of crap it is.

That made me smile. Gotta love scientific honesty.

Other Comments by BAEOZ

6. Comment #56941 by Beachbum on July 17, 2007 at 11:32 pm

 avatarMy house in Alaska has a wood burning stove and a fireplace... where is that UPS guy?

Other Comments by Beachbum

7. Comment #56946 by Beachbum on July 17, 2007 at 11:59 pm

 avatarNo, no I do not condone burning books. I do however subscribe to the notion that we are witnessing the death throws of a dying beast, religion, but until now I have been concerned about Islams lack of participation in these mindless convulsions. I feel better now.

Other Comments by Beachbum

8. Comment #56949 by Bonzai on July 18, 2007 at 12:09 am

This is creationism on crack. But it is not the only pseudo science in the Islamic world. Another, even more ludicrous and more influential movement is so called "Quranic science". The proponents claim that the Quran contains all of modern science from general relativity to embryology by torturing meanings into vague Quranic verses. For example, the Quran has a verse that says Allah rolled out the sky, they would say see, the Quran talked about the expanding universe way before Hubble, it must be a mirarcle.

"Quranic science" is a big industry funded by Saudi money(surprise surprise). Unlike creationism and ID, which are basically education lobbies with no influence in research institutions, many otherwise respectible universities in the Arab world have departments on "Quranic science". And unlike creationism and ID, this is too crude to be an even mildly interesting hoax. At least it would be a good exercise for students in philosophy and biology to debunk ID and creationism.

Islam would be a joke if it weren't so dangerous.

Other Comments by Bonzai

9. Comment #56951 by Eamonn Shute on July 18, 2007 at 12:18 am

 avatarHarun Yahya stole the photos in his website!

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/06/creationist_amorality.php

Other Comments by Eamonn Shute

10. Comment #56956 by Bonzai on July 18, 2007 at 12:38 am

That's troubling, he said, because Mr. Yahya's ideas "cast evolution as part of the corrupting influence of the West on Islamic culture, and that promotes a profound anti-science attitude that is certainly not going to help the Islamic world catch up to the West."


The Islamic world succumbs to this nonsense,--and "Quranic science",-- because it has a huge chip on its shoulder. It copes by retreating deeper into religion as a kind of therapy. This is a vicious cycle, the more superstitious and anti-science they are, the more backward they will become and the greater will be the need to restore psychological balance by indulging in even more exaggerated fantasies of Islamic greatness.

Unless some catastrophe plunges the Western World a few centuries back into the dark age, the only way for the "Islamic world" to catch up with the West is to ditch Islam. Islam has clearly become too heavy a burden for its followers.

Other Comments by Bonzai

11. Comment #56957 by scottishgeologist on July 18, 2007 at 12:47 am

 avatarYet again, the religious right nut job creationists find themselves with something in common with the islamist nutjobs.

Getting to the stage where its become hard to tell thee two apart...

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

12. Comment #56960 by scottishgeologist on July 18, 2007 at 12:51 am

 avatarHah! That Pharyngula link is great - shows them up for what they really are. And I love PZ's final comment:

"I have such a low opinion of these contemptible vermin that I don't think there's any risk that they will even feel a fleeting sense of shame."

Go on Richard - top that one! Only kidding!

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

13. Comment #56989 by bamboospitfire on July 18, 2007 at 4:12 am

 avatar"Creatures living today are just like creatures that lived in the fossil past. Ergo, Mr. Yahya writes, evolution must be impossible."

That is really quite funny. How about all the creatures alive today that *aren't* found in the fossil record? Yahya is plumbing new depths of idiocy.

Other Comments by bamboospitfire

14. Comment #56991 by leodavinci on July 18, 2007 at 4:19 am

 avatar"just astounded at its size and production values and equally astonished at what a load of crap it is."

What a fabulous sentence, this guy must be getting grinds from Mr Hitchens.

Other Comments by leodavinci

15. Comment #57001 by phasmagigas on July 18, 2007 at 5:31 am

 avatarive not seen the book but if its main argument is that stated then it truly is amazing how ignorant/deluded some minds are. Then again this week (as i mentioned in another post) I had one of my neighbours jovially tell me how selective breeding basically disproves evolution, the person expected agreement but i shot off a simple rubuttal saying that it actually demonstrated it very well at which said person went quiet, I await the next conversation. For those faced with anti evolutionists, before any conversation takes place act dumb and ask them what evo actually is in a nut shell, and you can bet your bottom $$ they wont have a clue (other than saying the words slime, monkey, eye). Interestingly the second to last creationist i ended up talking to felt that evolution could somehow be disproven if I couldnt prove i loved my wife (?!?! I think thats sometimes used as a fallicious god argument). I should have asked him that if i took his thumb and banged it with a hammer and he said ouch/scream/otherwise respond (pain is a state of mind yes?) then i have amazingly proved evolution!! as i proved he can feel pain.

Other Comments by phasmagigas

16. Comment #57002 by phasmagigas on July 18, 2007 at 5:43 am

 avatarthe books argument (as stated) is the most gut wrenching appeal to ignorance argument ive seen. Its one of those topics that Gould could write profusely on (he could talk about just what do we mean by evolutonary change:morphology, DNA sequence, behaviour, cell physiology all which can change of course). ignoring the false conclusion to the argument, the premise is flawed from the start. Aside from the millions (billions?) of species that existed and dont look like modern forms at all (eg a trilobite or eurypterid) there are those which will look superficially morphologically similar (to the lay person. remember all arthropods are just 'bugs/critters' and to some maybe a turkey is no different to a T.rex, hell at least they might see that it is SIMILAR though!) eg a snail from the mesozoic to those today but of course in terms of its genetic content it will be rather different, it will have a host of new innovations battling pathogens and parasites and in detail you can bet that NO organism is the same in every detail (on average) as its own ancestors but a few generations ago. What a pathetic argument, the problem is there are 100's of millions of people who will lap it up, although maybe evangelicals will distance themselves from it due to its islamic origins.

Other Comments by phasmagigas

17. Comment #57009 by Zaphod on July 18, 2007 at 6:31 am

 avatarWith so many great books out there, with so much to learn, if even one person reads this when they could be reading something else. It is sad.

Other Comments by Zaphod

18. Comment #57011 by MrEmpirical on July 18, 2007 at 6:32 am

Mr. Yahya's ideas "cast evolution as part of the corrupting influence of the West on Islamic culture, and that promotes a profound anti-science attitude"


If Yahya and his associates don't like science, let's see them live without all the many fruits of modern science, and of the rationalist approach.

Other Comments by MrEmpirical

19. Comment #57055 by Barbara on July 18, 2007 at 8:10 am

 avatarAs the scientists ponder what to do with the book -- for many, it is too beautiful for the trash bin but too erroneous for their shelves -- they also speculate about the motives of its distributors.

Perhaps it could be filed under 'C' for 'crapola' --- or maybe it could be used as a door stop?

Other Comments by Barbara

20. Comment #57070 by phasmagigas on July 18, 2007 at 8:35 am

 avatarmr empirical says quote:If Yahya and his associates don't like science, let's see them live without all the many fruits of modern science, and of the rationalist approach. unquote.

where I live (USA) I can assume that 9 out of 10 of my neighbours are believers and that most of those will reject evo, its funny then to see that their ( the few that ive seen for one reason or another) medicine cabinets are loaded with all kinds of medicines and health products, orthodox or otherwise. I wonder how many of them question their doctors advice when they give out those desperately needed (or not so needed) pills?? then again the amount of quack medicine you see is indicative of peoples desires just to grab any old crap as long as they and their ailments are in the limelight.

The problem is the masses thrive on the ingenuity of a few so there are no real prizes for rational thinking generally.

Other Comments by phasmagigas

21. Comment #57130 by denoir on July 18, 2007 at 10:44 am

 avatar
Dr. Padian said he spoke to someone there who told him SDS had received a cargo-container-size shipment of books, "with everything prepaid and labeled. It just went all over the country."


Doesn't exactly instill too much confidence in homeland security. They just send a cargo container from a country generally hostile to the US and the stuff gets distributed, no questions asked?

Other Comments by denoir

22. Comment #57151 by happyatheist on July 18, 2007 at 12:15 pm

LOL! Good point denoir.

"Perhaps it could be filed under 'C' for 'crapola' --- or maybe it could be used as a door stop?"

Don't rule out recycling it as cat litter either, Barbara. LOL!

Other Comments by happyatheist

23. Comment #57164 by bluebird on July 18, 2007 at 12:40 pm

 avatarIf these had gone thru the U.S. Postal Service, the Postal Inspectors would of checked it out.
My husband is a letter carrier and hates/resents having to deliver religious crap. If he had to deliver these, he'd s*** a brick.

Other Comments by bluebird

24. Comment #57216 by HarryHUK on July 18, 2007 at 3:10 pm

scottishgeologist.

Nice observation,the religious fundies(of whatever faith) all seem to rounding themselves up into the same pen,and with the same "woolly" arguments.

Harryh

Other Comments by HarryHUK

25. Comment #57228 by mandrellian on July 18, 2007 at 3:48 pm

If the mere fact of this wannabe 007 supervillain's existence wasn't enough of a concern, I found a rather disturbing comment following the Pharyngula article:

"Do not be funny, guys. I'm fron Turkey, the sad country which spawned that Harun Yahya monstority. His deeds include so many crimes that a little plagiarism can be easily forgiven.

His real name is Adnan Oktar and he begun using his pen name Harun Yahya after he was sentenced for running a cult. His cult was mainly based on sex, blackmail and religion (a great combination, by the way).

He changed his name, yet his favorite method of operation is still black mailing. Let me tell you. Harun Yahya / Adnan Oktar loves beautiful women. He also loves hidden cameras. He employs a lot from both. So, this scenario is played often:

- Harun Yahya opponent / critic meets an incredible, stunning young lady.
- HY critic spends an incredible night with that dream lady.
- HY critic receives a very well prepared, great video of the aforementioned night.
- HY critic decides to pursue other interest, rather than criticising Mr. Yahya.

So, do not mess with him, Mr. Myers. :) You can be sure that they are also monitoring this blog, along countless others. He runs a very well organised and well funded cult. Unfortunately, his anti-evolutionist propaganda is only fit for grade school children, yet he is quite successful in Turkey.

Take care... Evo-Front"


So, not just a well-funded, disingenuous, dishonest, religious funda-mental-ist but also a blackmailing cult-leading ho-popping pimp to boot! I'm shocked Adnan - what would Allah say?

.m.

Other Comments by mandrellian

26. Comment #57356 by njwong on July 19, 2007 at 2:55 am

 avatarI found that you could download his book as a PDF file from his web site:

http://www.harunyahya.com/index.php

He is very prolific. There are actually 2 versions of "Atlas of Creation" (labelled as volume 1 and volume 2). Make sure you get both volumes :-)


http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation/atlas_creation_01.php

http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation_II/atlas_creation_II_01.php

(The zip files can be downloaded from the "Acrobat PDF" hyperlink from the above pages.)

Both versions (volumes) are 800 pages each. I think their contents are similar, but the emphasis is different (based on the Table of Contents). The second version presents the same facts, but is written as a direct refutation of Evolution.

I've got to admit that the production values of this publication is really staggering. The book is really beautifully illustrated.

His home page is also very colourful, and lavishly designed with all kinds of interactive animations.

His books and web site reminds me of the Creation Museum usage of 3D special effects, beautiful animatronic dinosaurs, models of Noah's Ark etc. Amazing eye candy designed to sway gullible people.

The problem is that children and naive adults are very susceptible to these visual tricks (beautiful book => implies content must be true. Otherwise, why would they publish it?).

Comparing Dawkins/Harris/Hitchens/Dennett's books, which are just dry words on dry pages, versus the eye candy spewing out of every page in this 800 page tome, the child's mind can be easily persuaded into accepting its false teachings.

The battle between Religion and Science is starting to look interesting....

Other Comments by njwong

27. Comment #58205 by pewkatchoo on July 24, 2007 at 2:30 am

 avatarIt seems like Mr Yoyo is a legend in his own mind! http://www.living-fossils.com/about_author.php

He also seems to like his own face! But is that plastic surgery or is he just carefully preserved?

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

28. Comment #58527 by steveroot on July 25, 2007 at 5:49 am

 avatar
27. Comment #58205 by pewkatchoo on July 24, 2007 at 2:30 am
http://www.living-fossils.com/about_author.php

He also seems to like his own face! But is that plastic surgery or is he just carefully preserved?

Maybe _HE_ is the "living fossil"! lol
Steve

Other Comments by steveroot

29. Comment #58528 by Quetzalcoatl on July 25, 2007 at 5:55 am

 avatarThere is a somewhat plastic quality about him.

And of course living fossils exist. Have none of you seen "Night at the Museum"?

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

30. Comment #58541 by Philip1978 on July 25, 2007 at 6:45 am

 avatarErm what exactly is Mr Adnan Oktar.on if it isn't the cocaine he is "allegedly" to have found hurtling around his bloodstream?

And why does he like having his photo taken only showing his right side whilst his hand is pulling on something we cant see? Perhaps he is watching "Night at the Museum" on the tv and he is holding the remote to rewind bits!

Other Comments by Philip1978

31. Comment #58544 by Quetzalcoatl on July 25, 2007 at 6:51 am

 avatarYeah, that must be it. Hopefully.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

32. Comment #58549 by pewkatchoo on July 25, 2007 at 7:04 am

 avatarPhilip
I think he is getting in touch with his spiritual side.

Other Comments by pewkatchoo
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

Send a letter to the editor of the original media outlet.
letters@nytimes.com