Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, July 19, 2007 | Science : Anthropology | print version Print | Comments

Document New Research Proves Single Origin Of Humans In Africa

by Science Daily

Thanks to Colin Walls for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070718140829.htm

Science Daily — New research published in the journal Nature (19 July) has proved the single origin of humans theory by combining studies of global genetic variations in humans with skull measurements across the world. The research, at the University of Cambridge and funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), represents a final blow for supporters of a multiple origins of humans theory.

Competing theories on the origins of anatomically modern humans claim that either humans originated from a single point in Africa and migrated across the world, or different populations independently evolved from homo erectus to home sapiens in different areas.

The Cambridge researchers studied genetic diversity of human populations around the world and measurements of over 6,000 skulls from across the globe in academic collections. Their research knocks down one of the last arguments in favour of multiple origins. The new findings show that a loss in genetic diversity the further a population is from Africa is mirrored by a loss in variation in physical attributes.

Lead researcher, Dr Andrea Manica from the University's Department of Zoology, explained: "The origin of anatomically modern humans has been the focus of much heated debate. Our genetic research shows the further modern humans have migrated from Africa the more genetic diversity has been lost within a population.

"However, some have used skull data to argue that modern humans originated in multiple spots around the world. We have combined our genetic data with new measurements of a large sample of skulls to show definitively that modern humans originated from a single area in Sub-saharan Africa."

The research team found that genetic diversity decreased in populations the further away from Africa they were - a result of 'bottlenecks' or events that temporarily reduced populations during human migration. They then studied an exceptionally large sample of human skulls. Taking a set of measurements across all the skulls the team showed that not only was variation highest amongst the sample from south eastern Africa but that it did decrease at the same rate as the genetic data the further the skull was away from Africa.

To ensure the validity of their single origin evidence the researchers attempted to use their data to find non-African origins for modern humans. Research Dr Francois Balloux explains: "To test the alternative theory for the origin of modern humans we tried to find an additional, non-African origin. We found this just did not work. Our findings show that humans originated in a single area in Sub-Saharan Africa."

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

RELATED ARTICLE: "The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation"
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v448/n7151/abs/nature05951.html

Comments 1 - 12 of 12 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #57475 by anshul on July 19, 2007 at 1:09 pm

Saw this on slashdot... An interesting comment here.. http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=252537&cid=19914697

Other Comments by anshul

2. Comment #57476 by Rtambree on July 19, 2007 at 1:15 pm

Christians: Science proves Genesis is right. There was an Adam.

Other Comments by Rtambree

3. Comment #57481 by BicycleRepairMan on July 19, 2007 at 1:29 pm

 avatar
represents a final blow for supporters of a multiple origins of humans theory


Its again interesting to note that until-now somewhat plausable, or atleast interesting ideas are discarded with such a "final blow", and obviously no scientist would raise an eyebrow. By the same standard, when will the "final blow" to religious ideas finally show up?

Oh, wait..

Other Comments by BicycleRepairMan

4. Comment #57483 by denoir on July 19, 2007 at 1:36 pm

 avatarSkulls? I thought that Y-DNA and mtDNA evidence had demonstrated the single-origin theory conclusively.

Other Comments by denoir

5. Comment #57487 by nancy2001 on July 19, 2007 at 2:07 pm

Even at an intutitive level it's a lot easier to believe the single origin theory than the multiple origin theory.

Other Comments by nancy2001

6. Comment #57557 by MrEmpirical on July 19, 2007 at 8:26 pm

It began in Africa-ca-ca-ca-ca-ca

It began in Africa-ca-ca-ca-ca-ca

It began in Africa-ca-ca-ca-ca-ca

It began in Africa-ca-ca-ca-ca-ca...

Other Comments by MrEmpirical

7. Comment #57558 by Goldy on July 19, 2007 at 8:28 pm

"Skulls? I thought that Y-DNA and mtDNA evidence had demonstrated the single-origin theory conclusively."
Convincingly, maybe, but probably need more for conclusively. And it's always good to have more evidence when it's available to help a theory along :-)

Other Comments by Goldy

8. Comment #57563 by LDmiller on July 19, 2007 at 10:34 pm

 avatarThis smacks of the discredited system of measurements advocated by Alphonse Bertillon (though approved by Sherlock Holmes ) before the discovery of the uniqueness of fingerprints.

Other Comments by LDmiller

9. Comment #57565 by Happy Hominid on July 19, 2007 at 10:42 pm

 avatarVery interesting... I also forwarded a version of this article to Dawkins.net from Live Science, which had a different take -

Welcome to the NEW LiveScience!
Scientist: Human Origin Impossible to Pinpoint
By Jeanna Bryner, LiveScience Staff Writer

posted: 18 July 2007 01:03 pm ET

Here's the link: http://www.livescience.com/health/070718_africa_origins.html

Apprarently they spoke with John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin-Madison who disputed the value of the skull size differences. Now, to me, this doesn't negate the "out of Africa" scenario. As has been stated, it seems conclusive from genetics. But Hawks point could still be valid that the skull difference is basically meaningless datum.

By the way, here is Hawks very interesting and valuable blog on population genetics - http://johnhawks.net/weblog/

Other Comments by Happy Hominid

10. Comment #57599 by Peacebeuponme on July 20, 2007 at 5:10 am

MrEmpirical

Never thought Chemical Brothers would be called upon on this site.

No complaints

Other Comments by Peacebeuponme

11. Comment #57615 by A on July 20, 2007 at 8:27 am

Black Adam Shocker !

Other Comments by A

12. Comment #57619 by Rtambree on July 20, 2007 at 9:23 am

Does this mean we can all apply for a Kenyan passport because we can prove our ancestry?

Other Comments by Rtambree
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: