Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, July 26, 2007 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Proboscidean Mitogenomics: Chronology and Mode of Elephant Evolution Using Mastodon as Outgroup

by Nadin Rohland et al.

Abstract

We have sequenced the complete mitochondrial genome of the extinct American mastodon (Mammut americanum) from an Alaskan fossil that is between 50,000 and 130,000 y old, extending the age range of genomic analyses by almost a complete glacial cycle. The sequence we obtained is substantially different from previously reported partial mastodon mitochondrial DNA sequences. By comparing those partial sequences to other proboscidean sequences, we conclude that we have obtained the first sequence of mastodon DNA ever reported. Using the sequence of the mastodon, which diverged 24–28 million years ago (mya) from the Elephantidae lineage, as an outgroup, we infer that the ancestors of African elephants diverged from the lineage leading to mammoths and Asian elephants approximately 7.6 mya and that mammoths and Asian elephants diverged approximately 6.7 mya. We also conclude that the nuclear genomes of the African savannah and forest elephants diverged approximately 4.0 mya, supporting the view that these two groups represent different species. Finally, we found the mitochondrial mutation rate of proboscideans to be roughly half of the rate in primates during at least the last 24 million years.

To continue the article go to:
http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0050207

Comments 1 - 11 of 11 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #58877 by Jiten on July 26, 2007 at 1:49 pm

 avatarWe're living in such interesting times when science is just exploding and it's impossible for any one person to keep up with all the advances in all the fields.

In biology we've got the final theory-now we're just filling in the details."just" filling in the details!! This endevour will occupy whole working lives of countless scientists.

Other Comments by Jiten

2. Comment #58880 by decius on July 26, 2007 at 2:00 pm

 avatarWhat would inmate Hovind say?

Other Comments by decius

3. Comment #58885 by Duff on July 26, 2007 at 2:15 pm

Inmate Hovind is probing the existential meaning of the loss of the bone in the penis of homo-erectus. He'll find it disappeared some millions of years ago, much to his disappointment. Did I say millions of years ago. Slap my face!

Other Comments by Duff

4. Comment #58893 by decius on July 26, 2007 at 2:35 pm

 avatarAn experiment called "Probing-by-being-probed".

Other Comments by decius

5. Comment #58903 by Pallinn on July 26, 2007 at 3:34 pm

 avatarWhile that is quite funny, the idea that some Americans think rape is somehow an acceptable part of the prison system (or at least that there are crimes for which it could be seen as just punishment) is one of those things that almost make me despise all Americans.

Until I realize that is totally unfair and I'm behaving like a raving fundie, that is.

Other Comments by Pallinn

6. Comment #58914 by Steve19 on July 26, 2007 at 4:41 pm

 avatarI agree it's very exciting how thorough our understanding of evolution and the world's ecosystems is becoming. I'm looking forward to that global species database that will be on the internet eventually (next few years maybe?). Hopefully it will include information on the divergence of each species from its related and more distant cousins, too.

Wouldn't it be great if we had a massive tree diagram, which was totally accurate, representing the genetic divergence of every species ever found in fossil form or alive today? Sort of like in "The Ancestor's Tale" but a million times more detailed?

Also, this article brings up the question: Will we ever be able to create a real Jurassic Park? And, could an elephant give birth to a Mastodon if we implanted a synthetic fertilized Mastodon egg?

Other Comments by Steve19

7. Comment #58917 by Nails on July 26, 2007 at 4:57 pm

 avatar6. Comment #58914 by Steve19 on July 26, 2007 at 4:41 pm

Also, this article brings up the question: Will we ever be able to create a real Jurassic Park? And, could an elephant give birth to a Mastodon if we implanted a synthetic fertilized Mastodon egg?

I'm sure that the differences in tissue type and immune responses would be a major problem here.
Something tells me the immune system of the 'mother' would reject her 'egg' almost immediatly

Other Comments by Nails

8. Comment #58920 by Goldy on July 26, 2007 at 5:11 pm

Will we ever be able to create a real Jurassic Park?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6246926.stm
Not sure Pleistocene Park has the same ring to it, mind...

Other Comments by Goldy

9. Comment #59040 by dvespertilio on July 27, 2007 at 3:18 am

So evolution rules. Rock on! Now if we'll only evolve to the next plane of human (or transhuman existence) and get on with it!. Like the bumper sticker says, "Evolve already, damn it!" Life flows on.

Other Comments by dvespertilio

10. Comment #59074 by Fezik on July 27, 2007 at 7:43 am

Regarding comment 58917 by nails:

I'm no expert on biology (my field is my alias), but while I agree that it might not be easy, I wouldn't rule out the possibility so fast. My personal hunch (and that's all it is, so I ask readers to bear with me or better yet correct me if you're more knowledgeable than I am), is based on the reality of cross-species hybrids between closely related species. If horse/zebra and lion/tiger hybrids can come to term, wouldn't it indicate that the mother can "endure" something with a somewhat foreign genome inside her?

Other Comments by Fezik

11. Comment #59174 by Spinoza on July 27, 2007 at 10:06 pm

 avatarPleistocene Park looks so cool.

Other Comments by Spinoza
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: