Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, July 26, 2007 | Science : Psychiatry and Psychology | print version Print | Comments

Document Resisting peer pressure: new findings shed light on adolescent decision-making

by PhysOrg

Reposted from PhysOrg:
http://www.physorg.com/news104590011.html

The capacity to resist peer pressure in early adolescence may depend on the strength of connections between certain areas of the brain, according to a study carried out by University of Nottingham researchers.

New findings suggest that enhanced connections across brain regions involved in decision-making may underlie an individual's ability to resist the influence of peers.

The study, published in the July 25 issue of The Journal of Neuroscience, suggests that brain regions which regulate different aspects of behaviour are more interconnected in children with high resistance to peer influence.

Professor Tomas Paus and colleagues at The University of Nottingham used functional neuroimaging to scan adolescents while they watched video clips of neutral or angry hand and face movements. Previous research has shown that anger is the most easily recognised emotion.

Professor Paus and his team observed 35 ten-year-olds with high and low resistance to peer influence, measured by a questionnaire. The researchers then showed the children video clips of angry hand movements and angry faces and measured their brain activity.

They found that the brains of all children showed activity in regions important for planning and extracting information about social cues from movement, but the connectivity within these regions was stronger in children who were marked as less vulnerable to peer influence.

Those children were also found to have more activity in the prefrontal cortex, an area important for decision-making and inhibition of unwanted behaviour.

Professor Paus said: "This is important if we are to understand how the adolescent brain attains the right balance between acknowledging the influences of others and maintaining one's independence."

Future research will involve follow-ups with the same children to determine whether their resistance to peer influence is related to the brain changes observed in this study.

The work was a supported by grants from the Santa Fe Institute Consortium and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Source: University of Nottingham

Comments 1 - 12 of 12 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #59033 by JanChan on July 27, 2007 at 3:03 am

Ok, now if we can only do the same for religious beliefs... probably something like measuring which part of the brain activates when blind belief is thrown in our faces.

Other Comments by JanChan

2. Comment #59035 by Quetzalcoatl on July 27, 2007 at 3:06 am

 avatarJust getting people to engage their brains when religion is thrown at them would be an important step. Critical thinking is one of the most under-rated attributes humans possess.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

3. Comment #59083 by Cyboman on July 27, 2007 at 8:18 am

What would the world be like if a safe drug could be developed that could strengthen these decision making connections. Could unjustifiable conformity be ended? Would children stop smoking to fit in? Would gang related behavior diminish? Would radio and TV be better? Would war hysteria be harder to achieve? Would religion die?

Other Comments by Cyboman

4. Comment #59130 by LeeLeeOne on July 27, 2007 at 1:28 pm

 avatarIf a person has an area of brain that is "doubtful" (susceptible) and if these areas are exposed to reinforcement with information, does this mean that other less reactive areas become dormant or die out? Are any of these areas reactive ever again in the life of their host?

In other words - those so-called "fence sitters" who happen to respond to delusional religious ideology, life-styles, paranormal psychology, etc., is there truly any way to reactivate the part of the brain that was "doubtful" in the first place?

Other Comments by LeeLeeOne

5. Comment #59139 by Kakashi_monkey on July 27, 2007 at 2:27 pm

 avatarPeers pressure each other for many things, religion among them. Some christian kids bother the atheist ones, "You don't belive in god?! You should!" I have resisted peer pressure from my peers in my elementary school days about religion, and I stand strong for atheism. I hope most atheist kids and adults are capable of fending off religion attacks.

Other Comments by Kakashi_monkey

6. Comment #59150 by Nails on July 27, 2007 at 3:46 pm

 avatar6. Comment #59139 by Kakashi_monkey on July 27, 2007 at 2:27 pm

Peers pressure each other for many things, religion among them. Some christian kids bother the atheist ones, "You don't belive in god?! You should!" I have resisted peer pressure from my peers in my elementary school days about religion, and I stand strong for atheism. I hope most atheist kids and adults are capable of fending off religion attacks.

nice one kid, but take a good look around - most of us are more than capable of standing up to the 'righteous'.
In fact, I'm suprised at how easy it is to refute most religious arguments. I've yet to test myself against a member of the clergy but i'm trying to bait a friend of my mothers (who is a retired minister) into trying to convert me....
Should be interesting!

Other Comments by Nails

7. Comment #59163 by Duff on July 27, 2007 at 5:35 pm

No religious person has a reasoned response to the innocent query of how their belief in god is any different in their childhood belief in Santa. It leaves them sputtering and making silly remarks about how one is nothing like the other, but they can never give a cogent statement as to how they differ, except that one is based on "scripture" and the other on...well, who knows what.
The scripture part is easy and the similarities of the two fantastical beliefs should be rubbed in their stuttering, sputtering faces at every opportunity.
No respect and no quarter!!

Other Comments by Duff

8. Comment #59193 by BT Murtagh on July 28, 2007 at 4:17 am

 avatarJanChan quoth:
Ok, now if we can only do the same for religious beliefs... probably something like measuring which part of the brain activates when blind belief is thrown in our faces.


Sounds like a job for prospective Doctor Sam Harris to me!

Other Comments by BT Murtagh

9. Comment #59218 by Henri Bergson on July 28, 2007 at 11:14 am

 avatarWhat an amazing discovery, who would have thought it: that will power has something to do with the brain!

I always thought that will power came from the big toe on the left foot, now it's proven that it comes from brain connections.

Other Comments by Henri Bergson

10. Comment #59309 by ? on July 28, 2007 at 6:56 pm

 avatarActually it is pretty interesting in that it is one more peice of info. supporting a naturalistic view of human consciousness. The brains of people who think and behave defferently are structured differently. This poses serious challenges (to say the least) to any theory of a separate, independent "mind" that merely "uses" the brain.

If it had turned out that all brains were more or less identical, we can be sure the dualists (and enthusiasts of outdated "blank slate" theories) would be overjoyed. They would say brain states cannot be the primary cause of behavior since there is not enough variation in the measurable attribues of brains to account for the full spectrum of human behavior. In fact they WERE saying things like that in the days when detailed measurement of the brain was unknown or much more difficult.

Other Comments by ?

11. Comment #59590 by Rieux on July 29, 2007 at 8:41 pm

 avatar
I always thought that will power came from the big toe on the left foot....
This reminds me of the hilarious Monty Python quiz show sketch ( http://orangecow.org/pythonet/sketches/takepick.htm ):
Michael Miles: What swims in the sea and gets caught in nets?

Woman: Henri Bergson.


Other Comments by Rieux

12. Comment #91035 by dweebs on November 27, 2007 at 3:32 am

I constantly had someone at my old school try to convert me. I'd been atheist since I was ten and I saw no reason to change simply because one spotty little oik said I was going to hell.

Other Comments by dweebs
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: