










God Answers Prayers Of Paralyzed Little Boy: 'No' Says God
SAN FRANCISCO–For as long as he can remember, 7-year-old Timmy Yu has had one precious dream: From the bottom of his heart, he has hoped against hope that God would someday hear his prayer to walk again. Though many thought Timmy's heavenly plea would never be answered, his dream finally came true Monday, when the Lord personally responded to the wheelchair-bound boy's prayer with a resounding no.
Asked for comment, God said: "This kind-hearted child's simple prayer hath moved Me. Never before have I seen such faith. His trusting soul, so full of innocent devotion to Me, hath offered seventy times seven prayers asking, 'God? Can I please walk again?' It was indeed right and fitting that I, in My infinite wisdom, should share with him the One True Answer to this long-repeated question he put before Me."2. Comment #60738 by toastmonster on August 2, 2007 at 7:08 pm
Please point out clearly that material from the Onion is parody when reposting, if you must repost.3. Comment #60744 by monkey2 on August 2, 2007 at 7:22 pm
4. Comment #60747 by k1mgy on August 2, 2007 at 7:30 pm
5. Comment #60749 by Archaeoangel on August 2, 2007 at 7:35 pm
6. Comment #60751 by monkey2 on August 2, 2007 at 7:38 pm
If only I could walk, this would be the greatest day of my life
7. Comment #60759 by monkey2 on August 2, 2007 at 7:48 pm
8. Comment #60764 by Russell's Teapot on August 2, 2007 at 7:53 pm
9. Comment #60805 by LeeLeeOne on August 2, 2007 at 9:41 pm
10. Comment #60807 by pewkatchoo on August 2, 2007 at 10:33 pm
11. Comment #60826 by itman on August 3, 2007 at 12:37 am
God surely does work in mysterious ways - poor Timmy had his accident 4 years before he was born!12. Comment #60855 by nickthelight on August 3, 2007 at 2:33 am
13. Comment #60857 by nickthelight on August 3, 2007 at 2:37 am
14. Comment #60859 by aitchkay on August 3, 2007 at 2:40 am
15. Comment #60949 by Dirty_Heathen on August 3, 2007 at 7:02 am
Oh my, I would hope that so many atheists are not so gullible.16. Comment #60963 by JanChan on August 3, 2007 at 7:29 am
I'm not sure if it's worse if religion tells the truth (something like the above), where they'll say that God can't heal you, and you must suffer. Or if religion perpetuate the lie it has been doing for centuries, where they'll say that God can heal you, all you need is unquestioning, unwavering, blind faith.17. Comment #61004 by konquererz on August 3, 2007 at 9:46 am
18. Comment #61006 by geckoman on August 3, 2007 at 9:51 am
Come on people, wakey wakey.19. Comment #61011 by TinyRobot on August 3, 2007 at 10:01 am
Now THIS is funny!20. Comment #61014 by HarryHUK on August 3, 2007 at 10:25 am
Is this not truly,unequivocally,beyond doubt and further still,an example of "gods" amazing grace.21. Comment #61017 by Klaatu barada nikto on August 3, 2007 at 10:31 am
22. Comment #61032 by Steven Mading on August 3, 2007 at 11:34 am
One thing that really annoys me is whenever someone mistakes sarcasm for the real thing, people are quick to criticize the reader for it when rarely is it the reader's fault for not getting it. It's not the reader's fault that no matter how hard you may try to sarcasically portray religious belief, you still can't make it absurd enough that people will be certain you're kidding. The blame for that lays with religion. If there's a group of people who's genuine beliefs are indistinguishable from sarcastic portrayals of their beliefs, that reflects badly on THEM, not on the third party observers who didn't recognize the sarcasm.23. Comment #61055 by coretemprising on August 3, 2007 at 1:06 pm
Hey Steven, I agree completely that you can't out-do the absurdity of the real thing. But seriously, shouldn't "The Onion" as the "news organization" give anyone pause? Even if you've never heard of The Onion, surely the name alone ought to make one think something isn't quite, ummm, kosher... yah?24. Comment #61086 by Duff on August 3, 2007 at 2:42 pm
Geckoman, you and toastmonster deserve each other. Here I thought the Onion was a subsidiary of The New York Times. Now you've spoiled everything!25. Comment #61103 by captain underpants on August 3, 2007 at 3:37 pm
26. Comment #61123 by geckoman on August 3, 2007 at 7:08 pm
Hey Duff27. Comment #61130 by Dr Benway on August 3, 2007 at 7:40 pm
It's not the reader's fault that no matter how hard you may try to sarcasically portray religious belief, you still can't make it absurd enough that people will be certain you're kidding.I must disagree. God gives an interview here. If people don't smell something fishy in that, they're not reading; they're skimming. Or English is a second language.
28. Comment #61669 by captain underpants on August 6, 2007 at 8:37 am
29. Comment #61734 by Steven Mading on August 6, 2007 at 2:46 pm
Dr Benway, I know it's absurd that they allegely "interviewed" God. But is it MORE absurd than genuinely held religious beliefs, absurd enough that you can tell people are kidding? I say no. There's a lot of absurdity in religion that you're competing against here. Given the obvious fact that we are a fragile species on a tiny obscure fragile spec around an ordinary sun on the fringe of an ordinary galaxy among so many other galaxies, the notion of a god that cares specifically about us more so than anything else he did in his creation is no less absurd than the notion that if such a god existed you can get interview answers from him. There are people who seriously believe they talk to god and get answers back. So I repeat my point - that a reported claim about religion is absurd does not prove that the speaker was kidding and it's satire.30. Comment #105875 by Skepticus on January 2, 2008 at 3:23 am
1. Comment #60734 by dhweaver on August 2, 2007 at 7:02 pm
Other Comments by dhweaver