Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Monday, August 27, 2007 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document The world's oldest bacteria

by Physorg.com

Thanks to Florian Widder for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.physorg.com/news107454554.html

A research team has for the first time ever discovered DNA from living bacteria that are more than half a million years old. Never before has traces of still living organisms that old been found. The exceptional discovery can lead to a better understanding of the ageing of cells and might even cast light on the question of life on Mars.

The discovery is being published in the current issue of PNAS (Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences). The discovery was made by Professor Eske Willerslev from the University of Copenhagen and his international rearch team.

All cells decompose with time. But some cells are better than others to postpone the decomposing and thus delay ageing and eventually death. And there are even organisms that are capable of regenerate and thereby repair damaged cells. These cells – their DNA – are very interesting to the understanding of the process of how cells break down and age.

The research team, which consists of experts in, among other things, DNA-traces in sediments and organisms, have found ancient bacteria that still contains active and living DNA. So far, it is the oldest finding of organisms containing active DNA and thus life on this earth. The discovery was made after excavations of layers of permafrost in the nort-western Canada, the north-eastern Sibiria and Antarctica.

Our project is about eg. examining how bacteria can live after having been frozen down for millions of years. Other researchers has tried to uncover the life of the past and the following evolutionary development by focusing on cells that are in a state of deadlike lethargy. We, on the other hand, have found a method that makes is possible to extract and isolate DNA-traces from cells that are still active. It gives a more precise picture of the past life and the evolution towards the present because we are dealing with cells that still have a metabolistic function – unlike "dead" cells where that function has ceased, says Eske Wilerslev.

After the fieldwork and the isolation of the DNA, the researchers compared the DNA to DNA from a worldwide gene-bank in the US to identify the ancient material. Much in the same way the police compares fingerprints from a crime. The researchers were able to place the DNA more precisely and to place it in a context.

There is a very long way, of course, from our basic research towards understanding why some cells can become that old. But it is interesting in this context to look at how cells break down and are restored and thus are kept over a very long period. Our methods and results can be used to determine if there was ever life on Mars the way we perceive life on earth. And then there is the grand perspective in relation to Darwin's evolution theory. It predicts that life never returnms to the same genetic level. But our findings allows us to post the question: are we dealing with a circular evolution where development, so to speak, bites its own tail if and when ancient DNA are mixed with new", says Eske Willerslev.

Source: University of Copenhagen

Comments 1 - 6 of 6 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #65996 by roach on August 27, 2007 at 6:27 pm

This article confused me.

Other Comments by roach

2. Comment #66004 by Spinoza on August 27, 2007 at 7:04 pm

 avatarThat there is a science journal called "PNAS"... makes me laugh.

Other Comments by Spinoza

3. Comment #66007 by BAEOZ on August 27, 2007 at 7:26 pm

 avatar
Darwin's evolution theory. It predicts that life never returnms to the same genetic level.

It does? I though it explained speciation and adaptation through natural selection of chance mutations.
Clarification please any Evilutionists who are loitering. Is Richard Dawkins hanging about with time to burn?

Other Comments by BAEOZ

4. Comment #66009 by quicksilver on August 27, 2007 at 7:42 pm

 avatarCaution: don't let the cosmetics industry get wind of this! :-)

But seriously, couldn't one post the question about circular evolution without the present findings, indeed without any findings at all?

Other Comments by quicksilver

5. Comment #66014 by monkey2 on August 27, 2007 at 8:25 pm

 avatarI think this article may have lost something in translation. Some of the words seemed to have lost letters too.

The news is exciting - the oldest 'active' cells ever found. It would be nice to know where they were found. Was it nort-western Canada, Sibiria or the Antarctic?

Their project was about examining how bacteria can live after having been frozen down for millions of years. I hope they weren't too disappointed with their find being only half a million years old!

Other Comments by monkey2

6. Comment #66066 by RickM on August 28, 2007 at 7:37 am

 avatarApparently the article was written by an English-second-language person, which is perhaps why it's a bit hard to follow.

But, a metabolically active cell that is 500,000 yo; that's something to write home about.

Also, see this article:

http://www.extremescience.com/OldestLivingThing.htm

250,000,000 yo bacteria were "revived".

Other Comments by RickM
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: