Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Wednesday, August 29, 2007 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments |

Document A Daddy Longlegs Tells the Story of the Continents' Big Shifts

by Carl Zimmer

Reposted from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/science/28daddy.html?ref=science

Few people have heard of the mite harvestman, and fewer still would recognize it at close range. The animal is a relative of the far more familiar daddy longlegs. But its legs are stubby rather than long, and its body is only as big as a sesame seed.

To find mite harvestmen, scientists go to dark, humid forests and sift through the leaf litter. The animals respond by turning motionless, making them impossible for even a trained eye to pick out. "They look like grains of dirt," said Gonzalo Giribet, an invertebrate biologist at Harvard.

As frustrating as mite harvestmen may be, Dr. Giribet and his colleagues have spent six years searching for them on five continents. The animals have an extraordinary story to tell: they carry a record of hundreds of millions of years of geological history, chronicling the journeys that continents have made around the Earth.

The Earth's land masses have slowly collided and broken apart again several times, carrying animals and plants with them. These species have provided clues to the continents' paths.

The notion of continent drift originally came from such clues. In 1911, the German scientist Alfred Wegner was struck by the fact that fossils of similar animals and plants could be found on either side of the Atlantic. The ocean was too far for the species to have traveled themselves. Wegner speculated - correctly, as it turned out - that the surrounding continents had originally been welded together in a single landmass, which he called Pangea.

Continental drift, or plate tectonics as it is scientifically known, helped move species around the world. Armadillos and their relatives are found in South America and Africa today because their ancestors evolved when the continents were joined. When South America and North America connected a few million years ago, armadillos spread north, too.

Biogeographers can learn clues about this history by comparing related species. To do so, they must also recognize cases where species crossed great stretches of water.

The island of Hawaii, for example, was home to a giant flightless goose that has become extinct. Studies on DNA extracted from its bones show that it evolved from the Canada goose.

Based on its DNA, scientists estimated that the giant goose branched off from Canada geese half a million years ago. That is also when geologists estimate that Hawaii emerged from the Pacific.

When species jump around the planet, their histories blur. It is difficult to say much about where cockroaches evolved, for example, because they can move quickly from continent to continent. This process, known as dispersal, limits many studies.

"Most of them tend to concentrate on particular parts of the world," Dr. Giribet said. "I wanted to find a new system for studying biogeography at a global scale."

Dr. Giribet realized that mite harvestman might be that system. The 5,000 or so mite harvestmen species can be found on every continent except Antarctica. Unlike animals found around the world like cockroaches, mite harvestmen cannot disperse well. The typical harvestman species has a range of less than 50 miles. Harvestman are not found on young islands like Hawaii.

"It’s really hard to find a group of species that is distributed all over the world but that also don’t disperse very far," said Sarah Boyer, a former student of Dr. Giribet, now an assistant professor at Macalester College in St. Paul.

What mite harvestmen lack in mobility, they make up in age. Their ancestors were among the first land animals, and daddy longlegs fossils have been found in 400 million-year-old rocks. Mite harvestmen evolved long before Pangea broke up and have been carried along by continental drift ever since.

"They've managed to get themselves around the world only because they've been around for hundreds of millions of years," Dr. Boyer said.

Dr. Boyer, Dr. Giribet and their colleagues set off around the world to collect a diverse group of mite harvestmen. They ended up gathering thousands of animals from which they extracted DNA.

The gene variations helped the scientists build an evolutionary tree. By calculating how quickly the DNA mutated, the scientists could estimate when lineages branched off. They then compared the harvestmen evolution to the movements of the continents.

"The patterns are remarkably clear," Dr. Boyer said.

She, Dr. Giribet and colleagues are publishing their results papers to appear in The Journal of Biogeography, Cladistics and other journals.

The scientists found that they could trace mite harvestmen from their ancestors on Pangea. One lineage includes species in Chile, South Africa, Sri Lanka and other places separated by thousands of miles of ocean. But 150 million years ago, all those sites were in the same region of southern Pangea, Gondwana.

The harvestmen preserve smaller patterns of continental drift, as well as bigger ones. After analyzing the DNA of a Florida harvestman, Metasiro americanus, the scientists found that it was not related to other North American species. Its closest relatives live in West Africa.

"It was a big surprise," Dr. Giribet said.

Dr. Boyer then began investigating the geological history of Florida and found recent research to explain the mystery. Florida started out welded to West Africa near Senegal. North America then collided into them as Pangea was forming.

About 170 million years ago, North America ripped away from West Africa, taking Florida with it. The African ancestors of Florida’s harvestmen came along for the ride.

Dr. Giribet is now searching for other groups of animals that do an equally good job of recording geological history. By comparing dozens or hundreds of animals, he hopes to find clues about the plate tectonics that a single animal could not show.

"This is the beginning of a quest," he said.

Comments 1 - 13 of 13 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #66214 by Mango on August 29, 2007 at 11:03 am

 avatarIt amazes me that just a few years ago I had a geology professor who had serious doubts about continental drift. He was a conservative Christian and I think that's not a coincidence.

Other Comments by Mango

2. Comment #66221 by ksskidude on August 29, 2007 at 11:22 am

 avatarInteresting! I found myself thinking about my Xtian friend, wondering what he would think about this. Probably that that's what god intended to happen. Right....

Oh Yeah, I got my Dawkins T-Shirt the other day. It really does feel great wearing it, both emotionally and phyically. Its a fantastic T-shirt!!

PS i did not get paid to say this :)

Other Comments by ksskidude

3. Comment #66223 by robotaholic on August 29, 2007 at 11:24 am

 avatarscience is so awesome

Other Comments by robotaholic

4. Comment #66225 by BigJohn on August 29, 2007 at 11:37 am

 avatarHow does an invertebrate biologist support himself?

Other Comments by BigJohn

5. Comment #66240 by Ultraviolet G on August 29, 2007 at 12:20 pm

>>Big John
How does an invertebrate biologist support himself?

..I expect he gets a grant from Harvard.

za-ZING!

Other Comments by Ultraviolet G

6. Comment #66247 by Buddha on August 29, 2007 at 12:45 pm

 avatarDid you hear about the agnostic biologist who had twins? She baptized one and kept the other as a control.

Baddum-tshh!

Other Comments by Buddha

7. Comment #66261 by LordSummerisle on August 29, 2007 at 1:39 pm

 avatarWell, you won't find that interesting bit of information on Discovery Institute's web site.

Score 11 897 for science.

Other Comments by LordSummerisle

8. Comment #66323 by BlaiddDrwg on August 29, 2007 at 5:28 pm

 avatarI love articles like this, because they illustrate what most christians don't understand about science. Listening to fundie arguments gives the impression that scientists construct elaborate theories around a single piece of evidence. Many I have talked to think that evolution is based solely on fossil evidence. This article shows that most scientific theories have multiple layers of corroborating evidence, all leading to the same conclusion. Keep up the good work!

Other Comments by BlaiddDrwg

9. Comment #66384 by Veronique on August 29, 2007 at 10:13 pm

 avatar4. Comment #66225 by BigJohn

Nice one John!! LOL

Terrific bit of sleuthing on the part of this biogeographical team. The gaps keep narrowing. Isn't it a treat?

Cheers
V

Other Comments by Veronique

10. Comment #66445 by ridelo on August 30, 2007 at 2:40 am

 avatarI ask myself: "How can they know how so small an animal looked some millions years ago? Was it then also almost legless that it couldn't migrate?"
I suppose it's no easy task to find fossils of mite harvestmen. Or are they preserved in drops of amber, like the insects from Jurassic Park?

Other Comments by ridelo

11. Comment #66700 by DNAtheist on August 31, 2007 at 3:16 am

 avatarObviously these creatures were distributed by Satan in just the right way to trick good people into believing the lies of atheistic Darwinianists like Dawkins. The Devil is so much more clever than we are. And since only an omnipotent creator could make someone as smart as Satan, then God must exist. So much for that issue.

Now about fairies...

Other Comments by DNAtheist

12. Comment #66708 by Jonathan Dore on August 31, 2007 at 3:55 am

Informational note for UK readers confused by the Daddy Longlegs reference: while in the UK a Daddy Longlegs is a cranefly (i.e. an insect), in the US it refers to a type of spider (i.e. an arachnid), so the genetic connection is not as remote as it seems (harvestmen are also arachnids).

Other Comments by Jonathan Dore

13. Comment #66743 by phasmagigas on August 31, 2007 at 7:44 am

 avatarfascinating.

its amazing to think then that the florida mite harvestman and its west african relatives have remained 'similar' for 170 my or so, well to the extent that they are still easy to recognise as mite harvestmen, i suppose creationists might say something like 'see they didnt evolve much did they??' when you compare our common ancestor with a whale (pluse all the others in the clade)at the 170 mya mark (im not sure what we were back then, were we still 'with' whales??) great changes have occured.

BUT thats the point as we have a bias towards noticing differences in humans/mammals/land tetrapods we miss the difference in inverts that maywell really be there, a man may be very different from mouse, but a bugs eye view may see two rather similar creatures, rather like a person may compare a dragonfly to a damselfly. so my point from the first it is that even though the two mite harvestmen have been separated for 170my and seem similar maybe they truly are as different as a man and an echidna, or are they??? i wonder how one can measure amount of difference?? morphology?? genetic difference could be better and does that always coincide with morphological differences. ITs funny but we can recognise all the people we know but the layperson will see a spider or a fly and scream BUG!! i wonder for eg is a man and a lizard more or less similar than a spider is to a scorpion or a fern is to a daisy, actually i'll hazard a guess that its the fern and daisy that are most dissimilar.

Other Comments by phasmagigas
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

Send a letter to the editor of the original media outlet.
letters@nytimes.com