Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Monday, September 24, 2007 | Reason : Political | print version Print | Comments

Document The Saudi connection that belittles Britain

by Nick Cohen, The Observer

Thanks to rowed for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2175213,00.html

At last, there are signs the shameful censoring of Saudi critics in this country is to be challenged

The riches keep rolling in from Saudi Arabia. On top of the £21bn from the al-Yamamah arms deal, the Saudis agreed to pay a further £4.3bn last week for 72 Eurofighters. Spare parts will probably bring in another billion or so and there are plenty more billions where they came from. So much money, but at what price?

The last days of Tony Blair made it painfully clear that if it came to a choice between the rule of law on the one hand and British manufacturing's dependence on Saudi arms orders and the West's dependence on Saudi oil on the other, the rule of law would have to go.

When the then Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, ordered the Serious Fraud Office to stop its investigation into allegations that BAE had paid off Saudi royals, he showed that zero tolerance had its limits and New Labour was prepared to be soft on crime and the causes of crime in order to keep the Saudis sweet.

As scandalous as the allegations the authorities find it convenient to ignore are the accusations they are willing to pursue. While alleged fraud goes unexamined, the West Midlands police case against Channel 4 for investigating Saudi funding of extremist mosques goes on and on. In the long run, what is being done to Channel 4 is more significant than the nobbling of the Serious Fraud Office.

It goes to the heart of Britain's failure to come to terms with the Saudi attempt to convert Europe's Muslims to wahhabhism and its sister creeds. There has been nothing to match the scale of its propaganda effort in British history.

True, the Soviet Union secretly funded its supporters in the 20th century, but the British Communist party was never much more than a small sect and, in any case, yesterday's 'Moscow gold' was small change in comparison to today's Saudi petrodollars. If Christian plutocrats returned the compliment and poured money into Saudi Arabia to convert Muslims to Protestant fundamentalism, I think we would hear a good deal about it.

However, as the public celebration of and proselytising for non-Muslim religions are illegal in Saudi Arabia, and a Muslim converting to another faith faces the death penalty, the opportunities for Europeans to do to Saudi Arabia what Saudis are doing to Europe are limited.

The traffic is all one-way, but few dare complain as it streams by. Official unwillingness to upset the suppliers of oil and buyers of arms isn't the only reason for the silence. British Muslims have been intimidated.

One prominent figure, who is occasionally allowed on to the airwaves to balance the Muslim Council of Britain, told me he never used the words 'Saudi Arabia' or 'Wahhabism'.

When he wanted to discuss either, he referred fuzzily to 'foreign funding for extremist doctrines'. He knows that if he speaks out, he will be banned from Saudi Arabia. Blacklisting is a formidable sanction for him and others as he has a religious duty to make a pilgrimage to Mecca.

He is also frightened of being sued - as is everyone else. Britain's repressive libel laws are becoming a threat to security and racial harmony. 'Saudi money is now a major source of income for London libel firms,' one lawyer told me. 'School fees and second homes depend on it.'

It is against this stifling background of journalists and Muslim activists biting their tongues and pulling their punches that the unprecedented decision of the West Midlands police and Crown Prosecution Service to hound Channel 4 should be seen.

As with the Satanic Verses, Brick Lane, Behzti and the Danish cartoons, it is a little hard to see why Undercover Mosque provoked a fuss when you go back to the original. The camera shows Abu Usama, at the Saudi-influenced Green Lane mosque in Birmingham, denouncing unbelievers and saying of women: 'Allah has created the woman, even if she gets a PhD, deficient. Her intellect is incomplete, deficient.'

The shots of the Saudi clerics pouring out their loathing of unbelievers are all genuine. So too are the pamphlets and DVDs that attack women, Jews, Christians and explain that Aids is a Western plot. They are available at the bookshop of London's Regent's Park mosque, which was built with Saudi money and is run by a Saudi diplomat,

With Blue Peter lying to children, condemnations of TV fakery are all the rage at the moment. But the rules governing television documentaries remain incredibly tight. Channel 4 stuck to them. It substantiated every allegation and then gave the people it criticised a right of reply. Even so, the West Midlands police referred it to the television watchdog and, in the process, sent a message to other journalists thinking of exposing religious extremism to back off if they didn't want the cops on their case as well.

I could, if I wanted, go into a despairing peroration about a country so blinded by greed and stupefied by relativism it allows its police officers and libel lawyers to turn on those who report on hate-spouting imams.

Fortunately, there are a few grounds for optimism. Ofcom will rule on Undercover Mosque in a few weeks and it looks like it will dismiss as laughable the West Midlands police's claims that Channel 4 framed innocent preachers. The 56 hours of film shot by the documentary makers show that the crew didn't turn tolerant men into howling bigots by using trick camera work and crafty editing but merely reported what its journalists found.

The Crown Prosecution Service, whose lawyers played an ignoble role in this attack on investigative journalism, seems to have realised it has gone too far and is telling anyone who will listen that the complaint to Ofcom is the sole responsibility of the West Midlands police.

More cheeringly, moderate British Muslims are soon to lead an overdue attack on Saudi influence as the result of a long inquiry they have conducted. They are finding the courage to do what the Attorney General, high court, West Midlands police and Crown Prosecution Service won't do and stand up for the best values of their country.

Comments 1 - 17 of 17 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #73365 by BAEOZ on September 24, 2007 at 9:57 pm

 avatarThe west seems to want to kill itself in the name of tolerance. Relativism sucks.

Other Comments by BAEOZ

2. Comment #73366 by Mango on September 24, 2007 at 10:01 pm

 avatarI'm always puzzled why the UK and America support a repressive monarchical country like Saudi Arabia. Puzzled, that is, until I remember the arms we sell to them and oil we buy from them.

Other Comments by Mango

3. Comment #73376 by Russell Blackford on September 24, 2007 at 10:21 pm

You'd think the police in a liberal democracy like the UK would have better things to do than try to suppress freedom of speech - but what do I know?

Other Comments by Russell Blackford

4. Comment #73383 by Theocrapcy on September 24, 2007 at 10:58 pm

 avatarThe police dept in this case should be reprimanded and fined for wasting taxpayers money and the courts time.

Other Comments by Theocrapcy

5. Comment #73456 by AdrianT on September 25, 2007 at 2:50 am

 avatarI fear, until we stop being dependent on Saudi oil, this kind of stuff will go on and on and on.

One other comment in the last para: are muslim moderates or muslim liberals going to attack Saudi Wahhabi influence? A big difference!! Since the governemnt is so impotent, we are crying out for a British version of Irshad Manji to change things.
(http://www.muslim-refusenik.com/aboutirshad.html)

Other Comments by AdrianT

6. Comment #73465 by Jiten on September 25, 2007 at 3:24 am

 avatar
You'd think the police in a liberal democracy like the UK would have better things to do than try to suppress freedom of speech - but what do I know?

A liberal democracy Russell?It is a complete sham.Wake up and smell the money.Nothing comes in the way of making money.To hell with any consequences.

Other Comments by Jiten

7. Comment #73467 by tieInterceptor on September 25, 2007 at 3:39 am

 avatarI was very upset about the police move on 'dispatches' undercover mosque.

that docu had long uninterrupted speeches , In no way it was edited to sound worst that it was.


by the way,

Have you guys seen the president of Iran, Ahmadinejad pulling an Al-taquiyya move? He is asked about gay executions, and he starts rambling about drug trafficking, then he is asked again, he is cornered "why we execute homosexuals in Iran?"

the he answers.....

wait ... I wont spoil it, watch it yourselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xou92apNN4o

... lost for words.

Other Comments by tieInterceptor

8. Comment #73516 by Yorker on September 25, 2007 at 7:06 am

 avatar6. Comment #73465 by Jiten

Correct.

Politicians are simply whores in the service of money-mongers and will do whatever it takes to stay in office. The notion of freedom and democracy in the UK is complete bollocks, but it's slightly better than the the almost identical USA version. The only difference is that God Dollar has competition in the form of God Jesus which stifles the population. In the UK, God Pound is undisputed and that allows us a little more leeway in our dealings with each other.

Having lived in both countries I feel qualified to make that statement.

Other Comments by Yorker

9. Comment #73540 by Vinelectric on September 25, 2007 at 8:08 am

 avatarThat's politics for you, the survival of the smartest. If it is in the interest of the British economy to do business with the Saudis then all we need is for the smart-ass big mouths to shut up and look at yet a bigger picture than their god-forsaken ideals.

Moreover, according to the reporting Channel 4 political analyst, it is in the interest of the Americans to upgrade the Saudi army lest it be overwhelmed by an Iranian strike.

By the way, the Saudis have always responded in a small way to Western pressure. Bin Laden was "excommunicated" and expelled several years ago, the violent Quranic passages removed from the school curricula and the clerics were instructed to refer to the Hamas bombers as suicidal acts and not as acts of martyrdom like the rest of the muslim world does.

You may not be impressed but that's quite a bit for the Saudis. Be optimistic. If you expect much more very soon then you should just come down to earth for a minute.

Other Comments by Vinelectric

10. Comment #73553 by NormanDoering on September 25, 2007 at 9:12 am

tieInterceptor asked:
Have you guys seen the president of Iran, Ahmadinejad pulling an Al-taquiyya move? He is asked about gay executions, and he starts rambling about drug trafficking, then he is asked again, he is cornered "why we execute homosexuals in Iran?"

Ahmadinejad is dangerous and religiously delusional, but keep something in mind: There may be radically different cultural concepts and translation problems going on when trying to talk about homosexuality. Ahmadinejad speaks Farsi, not English, and has to be translated. It sounds like "gay" got translated into something that means merely "sexual criminal" with the emphasis on the "criminal."

I don't think Ahmadinejad was able to understand the question due to an Orwellian distortion that's happening to the Farsi language.

I blogged on it:
http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/09/no-gays-in-iran.html

Other Comments by NormanDoering

11. Comment #73627 by mjwemdee on September 25, 2007 at 3:20 pm

 avatarOn the prompting of RD, I wrote a letter to my MP (Anne Milton, Cons., Guildford) asking her to demand an explanation why the CPS should be considering prosecuting the programme-makers at Channel 4 for this daring piece of investigative journalism.
To her credit, my letter was handled efficiently by her office who sent a prompt reply. But I fear the dear woman must be a bit confused. Her answer read:

'...You may be very disappointed to hear that the CPS is not prosecuting the makers of the programme...'

An attachment from the CPS itself, dated 7 September and signed by the DPP, Sir Ken MacDonald QC, states:

'...The prosecutor decided that, on the available evidence, there was insufficient evidence of incitement to racial hatred'.

So I have an MP who cannot understand where I am coming from, and a DPP who clearly doesn't recognise incitement to racial hatred when it is put in front of him. We are all doomed.

Other Comments by mjwemdee

12. Comment #73636 by Damien White on September 25, 2007 at 4:43 pm

The sooner we move to solar power and electric/hydrogen cars, and therefore the sooner money stops flowing into the Middle East, the better off we'll all be.

Other Comments by Damien White

13. Comment #73754 by Mysturji on September 26, 2007 at 4:36 am

 avatar"More cheeringly, moderate British Muslims are soon to lead an overdue attack on Saudi influence as the result of a long inquiry they have conducted. They are finding the courage to do what the Attorney General, high court, West Midlands police and Crown Prosecution Service won't do and stand up for the best values of their country."
I have been waiting far too long for the overdue attack of which Mr. Cohen speaks. But it is not only the Attorney General, high court, West Midlands police and Crown Prosecution Service who lack courage: Look at the byline and the source of this article.
The Observer should be ashamed!
Bravo, Guardian!

Other Comments by Mysturji

14. Comment #73755 by pewkatchoo on September 26, 2007 at 4:43 am

 avatarmjwemdee
I got the same from my MP John Bercow. Yes the Tory who wants to work for Gordon! He completely misunderstood where I was coming from and I got a similar reply to yours.

They are all Fsckwits.

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

15. Comment #73775 by Yorker on September 26, 2007 at 6:26 am

 avatar"They are all Fsckwits."

You're probably right Pewk, but I also wonder if it's just some pratt following a generalised directive who answers the mail.

Other Comments by Yorker

16. Comment #73779 by Russell Blackford on September 26, 2007 at 6:41 am

Damien White:


The sooner we move to solar power and electric/hydrogen cars, and therefore the sooner money stops flowing into the Middle East, the better off we'll all be.


Agreed. The dynamic would be different if the West were not so dependent on Middle Eastern oil.

Other Comments by Russell Blackford

17. Comment #73889 by Jez on September 26, 2007 at 2:01 pm

http://www.sauduction.com/welcome.html

It's just one offence among many...

Other Comments by Jez
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE