Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, October 7, 2007 | Science : In the News | print version Print | Comments

Document The Squirrel Wars

by D.T. Max

Reposted from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/magazine/07squirrels-t.html?ref=science



When you think of England, Rupert Redesdale is who you think of. He has a slanting forehead, a nose shaped like an adze and the pink face of an aristocrat from the Georgian era. But in fact his family is far older: it is one of five in Britain that can trace its roots directly back to William the Conqueror, the last successful invader of England, in 1066. "Our original name was Bertram," he told me recently. "We were Normans." Redesdale, a 40-year-old baron, can stand on a Northumberland hilltop and see the Rede Valley, with the Rede River running through it. He is able to say things like, "Our family had a castle in Mitford, but Robert the Bruce, the sod, knocked it down."

I first met Lord Redesdale one day in August in the Lake District, about 80 miles southwest of his home in the Rede Valley. The Lake District, in the north of England, is on the front lines of a new Hundred Years' War. It is a war between rodents. Since the 19th century, gray squirrels, an American import, have been overtaking Britain's native red squirrels and claiming their territory. The grays have moved up from the south of England, thinning out the reds along the way. The reds now survive mostly in Scotland and the English counties, like Northumberland, that border it. The grays are larger and tougher and meaner than the reds. They can eat newly fallen acorns, and the reds cannot. They cross open lands that the reds are scared of. They are more sociable than reds, allowing for higher population densities. Although gray males cannot mate with red females, they often intimidate red males out of doing so. "It's like: 'That's my girl. You move away!' " Redesdale said.

The situation has now reached a crisis point: there are only an estimated 160,000 red squirrels left in Britain, whereas there are more than 2 million grays. Without human intervention, reds could be gone from England in 10 years. The red squirrel is a national icon, and the British government is trying hard to save it. Deliberately killing a red squirrel or disturbing its nest, called a drey, is a crime. Last year the government set up more than a dozen refuges for red squirrels in the north of England. The country's National Lottery granted £626,000 to a group called Save Our Squirrels to run the reserves. Save Our Squirrels, or S.O.S., is a who's who of British conservation organizations, among them the Mammals Trust and Natural England. It has a toll-free number for reporting sightings of grays and reds and works to raise public awareness of the red's plight.

Redesdale, too, has planted his standard on behalf of the red army. Last year, with a grant of £148,000 from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, he founded an organization called the Red Squirrel Protection Partnership. The work of Redesdale's organization is different from that of S.O.S. It shoots, or traps and then smashes on the head, every gray it can find. It currently has 20 core members, with another 150 or so irregulars.

The day I met Redesdale, he had broken off the long summer holiday from the House of Lords to try to enlist new recruits. A woman named Sue Southworth, the proprietor of the Squirrels Pantry Tea Room, was holding a meeting in her home in Cockermouth on the red squirrel. Redesdale had driven two hours to be there. He told me he knew the crowd would not be big, but his organization practices retail species elimination — he says he wants a trap in every backyard from Carlisle to Newcastle - and every pair of hands counts. He is enthusiastic and unapologetic about his work and does not use euphemisms the way the S.O.S. organizations do. "What is this 'method of cranial concussion'?" Redesdale asked Southworth and the two other women who met him in Southworth's high-ceilinged living room, quoting something he had heard at a red-squirrel preservation conference. "Why not just say 'hit on the head'? Sounds better."

Red squirrels evoke strong emotions in many Britons, especially in the north where people still grow up seeing them. And to be sure, these women, Southworth in particular, were passionate about them. There was a set of Beatrix Potter figurines on a shelf in Southworth's living room, including one of Squirrel Nutkin, the eponymous red squirrel of one of Potter's best-known books, and there were red-squirrel pillows and fleece blankets. Outside in her garden, Southworth had a red-squirrel topiary, with two bumps for paws, evocative of the Venus of Willendorf in shrub.

"Can I, um, suggest something?" Redesdale said to the three women. He was seated on a couch with a red-squirrel throw. "I was thinking . . . it would be great to form a sort of mobile kill group." He explained: "We just knock on people's doors and find out if there's a gray and get them to put the traps in." One person a day, he said, would go around and do the actual killings. The women gave Redesdale a "Candid Camera" look. Was this a joke?

Redesdale doesn't travel alone. Always by his side is a man named Paul Parker. Parker is a professional pest controller from Newcastle. He keeps 300 dead grays in his freezer, seven of them skinned, waiting for the day he will have time to cook them. When I asked Redesdale how many squirrels the Red Squirrel Protection Partnership had killed to date, he said, "We've taken 2,000 whatsis. . . ." and Parker added, in his heavy Newcastle accent, "2,000 - 300 - 32." They laughed like boys killing flies for sport.

"And then at the end of the week," Redesdale continued, speaking to the three women, "we'll probably have 1,000 squirrels taken out. If we do that, that will knock them back two years in their advance." He added, "We'd get a lot of publicity."

"And the fun of killing them as well," Parker said. Parker and Redesdale laughed again, Falstaff and Prince Hal. This time the women smiled too, a bit nervously.

So did the women want to be part of the solution? Redesdale asked.

They hesitated. Redesdale and Parker seemed like pranksters. On the other hand, they were government-financed pranksters.

"Aye," they said.

"Brilliant," Redesdale said.

Parker took out his business card. The women looked a bit doubtful again. It had a three-dimensional image of a mole on it and the words: "Ants, Bees, Wasps, Bed bugs, Fleas. Cluster flies, Woodworm, Snails. Rapid response."

The first gray squirrels came to Britain to amuse the rich, probably in the early 19th century. Landed gentry kept grays in cages as animal exemplars of can-do Yankee spirit. But in 1876, the gray passed from guest to resident in the British Isles. A Mr. Brocklehurst, who had brought over gray squirrels from America, released two on his property near Cheshire in central England. Many more releases took place. The wealthy had grown bored of the grays and set them loose.

They spread quickly. By 1910, they were spotted in Woburn, about 50 miles to the northwest of London, and they reached Wales, 150 miles away, by the mid-1920s. Few Britons were pleased, but little was done about the problem. It was the more numerous native red squirrel that was in the rifle sights of the time. In the early decades of the century, for instance, a hunting association called the Highland Squirrel Club killed 82,000 red squirrels, in part to protect the timber industry. (Squirrels damage trees by stripping off the bark.)

But over time the red squirrel became beloved in Britain. It supplanted the realm's old icon, the lion, as the symbol of a gentler, more evolved nation. There was Squirrel Nutkin, Potter's irreverent playful red, and also Tufty Fluffytail, the Safety Squirrel, a public-service creation whose warnings about danger on the road began in the early 1950s and lasted until the '80s. As the red rose in popularity, the gray sank in public esteem. Potter's attempt to follow up Squirrel Nutkin with a story about a gray squirrel, Timmy Tiptoes, did not achieve the same success. In 1922, a government permanent secretary was quoted in The Times of London calling grays "sneaking, thieving, fascinating little alien villains."

A nationalist subtext attached to the objections to the grays. "I know of more than one patriotic Englishman who has been embittered against the whole American nation on account of the presence of their squirrels in his garden," wrote the Oxford squirrel authority A. D. Middleton in 1931. When the Forestry Commission began an investigation in the late '20s of the effect of grays, a New York Times article bore the headline "American Squirrel on Trial for His Life in England" and suggested a fair jury would be hard to find. In 1932, Britain indicted the gray: it classed it as a pest and made it a crime to release one into the wild. That meant there was only one way out for any gray caught in a trap. A National Anti-Grey Squirrel Campaign enforced the sentence.

Many bad things were said about grays at the time, but then as now, the heart of the English objection to the grays comes down to this: they outcompete the reds. They are simply better at the job of being squirrels. Britain's taste for unfettered competition has always been fitful, and how much it tipped the playing field in favor of the reds varied. At first, the job of controlling grays was largely left to the private landowners who had first imported them. But as the grays pushed up England, the government got involved. Beginning in the 1930s, it offered half a shilling per gray-squirrel tail, eventually raising the bounty to 2. The arrangement was politically popular but flawed: farmers and ranchers had a good reason to kill gray squirrels but no reason to eliminate them entirely. In the late '50s, the government called off the program after estimating that there were more grays than before. From then until the early 2000s, and especially during the Thatcher-Major years, when the British government re-enthroned competition in Britain, the gray was left alone, and it extended its range, at the expense of the red, from the top of Wales to the Scottish border.

Redesdale and Parker didn't tell me there was going to be a gray squirrel in the trunk of their car. We were in the gift shop at the south end of the Northumberland national park, near the town of Hexham. It was the day after the meeting in Sue Southworth's living room, and Redesdale had promised to take me to see a place where he had cleared out grays and the reds had come back in. He and Parker had been busy. The gray toll was now 2,353, up 21 from the day before.

Redesdale sat with Parker, who was dressed in the exterminator outfit he wears: toxic-green sweater and pants. With them was a local groundskeeper. They were looking at maps of Northumberland, seeing how the war was going. Redesdale explained the Red Squirrel Protection Partnership to the groundskeeper. "So you on board for being part of the killing team?" he asked the man.

"Aye."

"Brilliant."

Redesdale has a strained relationship with the main red-squirrel protection groups: they need him; they call him sometimes when they get a gray squirrel sighting over their toll-free hot line; but he takes up a lot of their time. Carri Nicholson, the project manager for S.O.S., told me that she thinks of Redesdale as a kind of naughty child. "If you can't play nicely, you'll have to go to your room," she said she tells him.

Most of all, S.O.S. officials say they wish Redesdale would trap squirrels only where reds and grays are currently competing, in the north, rather than in areas more toward the south, like Hexham, which are considered a lost cause. "Lord Redesdale wants to get rid of grays all over Northumberland," Peter Lurz, an ecologist at Newcastle University, told me. "I think it's a tall order. You're dealing with a rodent that has two litters a year." He added, "Unless you remove 70 percent of the rodents you're just making room for the litters." He suggested that Redesdale's efforts had only "psychological impact."

Lurz was an architect of the plan for the red-squirrel reserves that the government established last year: 16 in the north of England. He based his plan on the observation he made in the field that because the red squirrel is smaller than the gray, it can live on less food. It does fine, for instance, in a conifer forest, without rich acorns and beechnuts; in such an environment the grays will leave for a better habitat elsewhere. As it happens, the large conifer forests in Britain are in the north, where the reds remain. According to the initial government plan, S.O.S. would monitor the red and gray squirrel populations in the refuges. The Forestry Commission would replenish conifer trees that make the habitat desirable for reds. And the government would establish buffer zones along the perimeters - places where it would encourage landowners to kill any grays they found. The reserves seemed a fitting solution for postcolonial Britain. The gray would keep what it had won. The red, like the British themselves, would content itself with a small homeland in return for peace.

The refuges might have held the grays back, at least for a while, but as they were being created, it became clear to Lurz that any contact between grays and reds - even the minimal amount occurring in the refuges - was going to be catastrophic. This is because grays have yet another weapon in their arsenal: they carry a virus, to which they appear to be immune, that kills the reds. The disease, called squirrelpox, is awful to see: it turns the soft tissues around their eyes, ears and nose to sludge. Death comes within two weeks. Last summer, Lurz, having carefully studied squirrel-population records, calculated that where infected grays mixed with reds, the reds very quickly disappeared. "It was too much of a coincidence," Lurz told me. In fact, he noted, "dirty" grays took land away from reds at roughly 20 times the rate healthy grays did.

Lurz estimates that two-thirds of grays carry the squirrelpox virus. In light of Lurz's work, it was clear that buffer zones alone would not save the red squirrels. The only solution was to start killing grays and to kill them quickly. Scotland, which has refuges that are administered separately from those of England and Wales, took up arms. It hired two culling officers to trap at key spots along its border with England. (I asked to meet with them but was told that "for their safety" I would not be allowed.)

In England, however, nothing similar happened. The blue-chip organizations associated with S.O.S. spoke passionately of saving the reds, but, sensitive to the opposition of animal-rights groups, they have not made trapping a priority. "They just keep faffing around," Redesdale says. He calls them "talking shops." In fact, the hands of S.O.S. are somewhat tied: its National Lottery grant specifically forbids using its funds to cull grays. "Until we can get better funding," Nicholson, the project manager for S.O.S., says, "the most we can achieve is stasis."

There may not really be any reason to do more: red squirrels, after all, are not scarce outside the British Isles. In fact, worldwide - reds live throughout Europe and Asia - they probably outnumber grays. It is only in Britain (and more recently in Italy, where grays were introduced in 1948) that the red is considered threatened. In addition, Britain is not a place where killing animals goes down easily anymore. Animal-rights advocates put themselves between the hunter and the fox he pursued until hunting with hounds was outlawed a few years ago after extensive parliamentary debate. Highways have toad crossings. Many people prefer to build little bridges for squirrels over roadways - the S.O.S. Web site provides a blueprint - than to spend their time killing animals.

This mood shifts only when an animal threatens the carefully set ecological dinner party that is rural England. I saw this force at work when Redesdale and Parker set out to convert a woman at the gift shop at the Northumberland national park. Like many people Redesdale talks to, she was at first surprised at what he told her. She said she thought she was part of the effort already: she supported Save Our Squirrels.

Redesdale clarified: "There are two organizations. They promote red squirrels; we kill grays. We just kill grays."

"We just kill grays, that's all," Parker echoed.

The woman, who looked to be in her 60s, gave the "Candid Camera" look.

"But surely the two go together, don't they?" she asked.

Redesdale explained why they did not. He said that to preserve reds you had to wage war on the grays without pity.

"We used to often see red squirrels, but I don't think we've seen any recently," the woman said.

Redesdale laid out the details of his trapping plan. "We can probably give you a trap today - we just have to get rid of the occupant," Redesdale said, referring to the one in the trunk of his car. He and Parker laughed. Redesdale gave his handsome goofy smile, flashed his excellent teeth.

The woman held on: "It's a shame because they are quite nice in a way" - grays - "when they are climbing the tree."

Redesdale broke in: "If they weren't wiping out the reds we wouldn't be doing this. The other thing is they do wipe out the birds."

This seemed to give her pause. Songbirds are popular in rural England. "I had a nice mistle thrush nesting at the bottom of my garden and the magpies came," she remembered sadly.

Sensing his opportunity, Redesdale told Parker to give the woman his card.

She took it and read it. She looked like she had been tricked.

"We've got to get you a proper card made up," Redesdale said to Parker.

In March 2006, the House of Lords debated the question of the red squirrel, one of its favorites. It was logical that the august body would be interested in red squirrels. Many members of the House own lots of land, their taste tends to be nostalgic and they themselves might be seen as endangered - the government has cut the number of hereditary peers in the House nearly 90 percent in the last decade.

Earl Peel rose to call attention to the decline in numbers of the reds and its significance. "To many," he said, "the red squirrel represents an integral part of our woodland landscape - an iconic creature, immortalized by Beatrix Potter, through the charismatic character of Squirrel Nutkin." But before turning his attention to Squirrel Nutkin, Earl Peel proposed conducting "a brief health check" of various other Beatrix Potter characters. "Starting with Tabitha Twitchit and Tom Kitten" - both cats - "they are truly on top of their game. . . . Let us now consider the status of Mr. Tod, the fox. On second thoughts, given that he has taken up 700 hours of parliamentary time, it would be somewhat hypocritical of me to prolong the debate." He went on: "That brings me on seamlessly to the other really controversial character that graced the class of 1912 — and that of course is Tommy Brock," Potter's badger. "Hasn't he done well?"

Peel continued: "Despite suffering from and carrying tuberculosis, he has successfully managed to establish himself in the hearts and minds of the nation as being more important than dairy cows or, indeed, farmers' livelihoods, and like Mr. Tod, has managed to secure his very own legislation."

Peel concluded his health check: "Squirrel Nutkin must look back on his alma mater and think to himself, 'How could it have all gone so wretchedly wrong for me?' "

Redesdale rose to congratulate Peel. "My Lords," he said, "I thank the noble earl, Lord Peel, for initiating the debate and commend him for his bravery. It takes a brave man to initiate a debate that had Radio 4 saying this morning that he would be calling for an immediate cull of gray squirrels. I hate to say that his postbag will immediately be filled with letters from irate people who love gray squirrels."

He continued: "One of the problems in the public perception is that gray squirrels are the only squirrels they see. They see them in parks and gardens, and they are sociable and friendly animals. Yesterday, I walked through St. James's Park and watched tourists feeding gray squirrels crisps by hand. In Regent's Park, a gray squirrel came up to my son and me and actually climbed up my leg to look in my pocket."

Lord Hoyle soon cut off Redesdale: "My Lords, perhaps they are friendlier in Regent's Park than they are in St. James's Park. One that ran up my leg bit me."

Redesdale resumed: "Efforts involving buffer zones have been undertaken to halt the advance of the gray squirrel. It is unfortunate that in Northumberland, when there was talk of a cull of gray squirrels, there was such public outcry that much of that work had to be deferred."

Lady Saltoun of Abernethy, the 21st to hold that title in Scotland, then spoke to point out the inherent superiority of the red over the gray squirrel: "Red squirrels," she said, "are rather like quiet, well-behaved people who do not make a nuisance or an exhibition of themselves or commit crimes and so do not get themselves into the papers in the vulgar way gray squirrels do." She continued: "Red squirrels do not strip bark from trees; damage arable crops, market gardens and garden plants; dig up bulb and corms from recently sown seed; eat birds' eggs; or eat telephone wires and electricity cables, as gray squirrels do." Lady Saltoun suggested some research be done on whether gray squirrels tasted good. She foresaw a fight at the dinner table: "I have a nasty feeling that . . . children in particular would say, 'Oh, no, I couldn't possibly eat that,' just as they say they cannot eat dear little bunny rabbits. But this is worth having a look at."

Lord Inglewood concluded with a call to action. "We have been far too intellectual about this and tried to be far too clever," he said. The matter was simple: "There has to be at least some killing of gray squirrels." To Inglewood's mind, British governments over the years, regardless of political persuasion, were guilty of "squeamishness." And "as far as the red squirrel is concerned," he went on, "squeamishness spells nemesis for this lovely and iconic creature. Those involved with trying to preserve the red squirrel in this country have adopted a policy of appeasement towards the grays. The red squirrels have had Chamberlains and not Churchills, but it is Churchills that they need." Inglewood finished with a dark prediction: "Unless something radical and imaginative is done . . . Squirrel Nutkin and his friends and relations are going to be toast."

The gray in the trunk of the car still awaited us. "We gray squirrels who are about to die salute you," Redesdale said. We walked back to the vehicle, parked near the gift shop. Parker had said he wanted me to shoot the squirrel - that grays were in Britain was, after all, my fault as an American - and I did not want to. He had also asked Redesdale to shoot the squirrel, and he did not want to either. Now Redesdale seemed to be summoning his nerve. "We keep on being told by the bunny-huggers, you know the wildlife-trust people, I mean I'm all for - I mean killing things to me is bad," he said. "I'm all for it but at some point you have to nail your colors to the mast."

I had by that point learned more about Redesdale: he and his wife met at a human rights conference; he has mixed feelings about being a lord ("No one really cares if it's you that shows up"); when he first sat in the House of Lords, at age 23, he looked across at a cousin who was the Tory whip and remembers thinking, "I'd rather eat warm vomit," after which he joined the Liberal Democrats, a party that, he points out proudly, is to the left of Labor; and he does not like guns ("I don't see the sport in hunting").

All the same, Redesdale was the officer; Parker, the enlisted man. If Redesdale did not kill the squirrel, he would never be able to lead. And had his family not led for 1,000 years? So we drove to an isolated parking lot, and Parker took the cage out of the trunk. He put the trap - "it's me killing trap," he said - on the asphalt. This was the place this animal was going to die.

The squirrel, large and dark gray with just a hint of red to his fur, wheeled around the cage looking for a way out. Then it made a piteous noise, a whee-whee-whee sound. Parker handed the air rifle to Redesdale, and he pointed it.

"That's the, uh, trigger?" Redesdale said.

"That's right," Parker said.

The squirrel paused. Redesdale steadied the barrel over its head. Then came the shot.

"You've got it," Parker said softly.

But he hadn't.

"Is it dead?" I asked stupidly.

The squirrel raced around the cage, blood dripping from somewhere around its mouth. WHEE-WHEE-WHEE. The same noise.

"I know it's bad when they run," Redesdale apologized. I thought I saw the warm-vomit look in his eyes.

The squirrel kept running and finally stopped when it realized there was still nowhere to go. Redesdale once more placed the rifle over its head. POP! The squirrel fell on its side and shook, scrabbled and shimmied twice around the cage like a break dancer.

"They're dead when they do that, aren't they?" Redesdale said, sounding more Macbeth than Prince Hal. Parker assured him it was dead: these were just the death throes. Parker put the dead squirrel - number 2,354 - and the cage back in the trunk, and we trooped out of the parking lot to look for reds.

Parker said he had done a lot of trapping in the area. Some of his traps are just cages on the ground, but here Parker had set one about two feet off the ground, connecting a blackthorn tree and a pine tree via a cross-strut. Some bird feed and a half a coconut dangled above. The gray was supposed to sample the coconut and feed and then come down the trunk and try Parker's trademark hazelnuts, drilled for easy access, inside the trap. The smell of the grays caught earlier in the trap is supposed to keep the reds away. But today the trap was empty. An owl waited high in a tree, looking down at us from above its white-ruffled collar. Redesdale's mobile rang. It was Sky TV. They wanted him to be on to talk about the new foot-and-mouth outbreak and were willing to send a van to his home. "Brilliant," he said.

Then we saw movement in the blackthorn tree. There was a red-orange flash high off the ground. We drew together and watched a red squirrel from behind a stone building as it silently tumbled and turned. In direct sunlight, its plush tail seemed almost blonde. Other times it was russet. It stood on its hind legs.

This was the red-squirrel money shot, the one on the fund-raising postcards: rounded rump, fluffy russet tail curled up and over the back, almost to the point of touching the squirrel's head. The head itself is inclined slightly, and the paws are brought together around the acorn or beechnut. In this position the red looks like a tiny country vicar giving advice to a young married couple or like a trusted servant who is suggesting gently that His Grace might wish to come to dinner. Seen in profile, the paws are where breasts would be and convey a sense of the delicacy and femininity of the animal.

I could see even from below how soft the red's fur was. Its belly was white, giving it a two-toned Twenties sort of elegance. Its plushness made me think of bunnies or maybe even baby bears or lemurs. The red squirrel's head was wide and gave the face a roundness, which combined with the huge ears suggested a newborn baby. There were no tufts on this one - reds loose their tufts in summer - but even without them, it looked like an old man who had rolled out of bed.

Like millions of Americans, I see gray squirrels in my yard every day. They have that helter-skelter, fritzed-out agitated and agitating quality, that urban jumpiness. They always seem to be watching you. This red, by contrast, was uninterested in us, benignly disdainful, like one of the spirits of the forest, the trolls under the bridge and the wise little sprites who appear on tree limbs to play tricks. It wanted to be there. It belonged there. But it was hard to believe it would be there long.

D. T. Max, a frequent contributor, is the author of "The Family That Couldn't Sleep: A Medical Mystery," a scientific and cultural history of prion diseases, which is now out in paperback.




Comments 1 - 27 of 27 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #76779 by Dr Benway on October 7, 2007 at 8:27 am

 avatarYou Brits ought to come get a few of the reds from my back yard. In spite of their small size, they're twice as fierce as the grays, perhaps due to long, close association with their larger rivals. I have video evidence.

I've got one pic of a red and gray squirrel together in my flickr collection.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tuff_titmouse

Other Comments by Dr Benway

2. Comment #76781 by USA_Limey on October 7, 2007 at 8:35 am

 avatarIs there an example of a successful intervention to stop a non native species over running a native species once they have been introduced and Darwinian selection kicks in?

If so I am unaware of it. I feel this campaign is destined to be nothing but a failure.
__________________________________________________
Carousel is a lie. There is no renewal!

~ Logan

Other Comments by USA_Limey

3. Comment #76783 by USA_Limey on October 7, 2007 at 8:40 am

 avatarNice pictures Doc!

I see the wellspring of so many of your previous avatars!

I grew up in the South West of England and remember seeing a red once or twice when I was young; by the time I left to live in the States a few years ago I don't remember having seen one for a good ten years. (Anecdotal I know).

I'm pessimistic that anything realistically can be done. And really, without wanting to sound cold; should we even bother trying?

Other Comments by USA_Limey

4. Comment #76799 by weavehole on October 7, 2007 at 10:01 am

Can we please just cull the toffs instead? Seriously, don't they have anything better to do?
Hmm...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLgttg2olmU

Other Comments by weavehole

5. Comment #76802 by USA_Limey on October 7, 2007 at 10:14 am

 avatarComment #76799 by weavehole:

Yeah, here's another English Toff with nothing better to do:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wVADKznOhY

Still, nice Trebuchet.

Other Comments by USA_Limey

6. Comment #76809 by bluebird on October 7, 2007 at 10:45 am

 avatarRed squirrels have been all but eradicated by the invasion of Gray squirrels in our city and suburbs. There is a fairly healthy population of Red squirrels in the country/forests.

U.S. eco-systems suffers from numerous invasive species; Kudzu and Zebra Mussels are just a few (a full list is at the website www.Invasive.org).

Other Comments by bluebird

7. Comment #76810 by Dr Benway on October 7, 2007 at 10:51 am

 avatarHead bonking will keep a few sadistic old farts with more money than sense off the streets several days per year.

Where I live, the grays own the lightly wooded areas while the reds are more prevalent deeper into the forest. Perhaps if Britain had sufficiently wide runways of unmolested forest north to south, the little buggers would recover.

Other Comments by Dr Benway

8. Comment #76833 by SilverTiger on October 7, 2007 at 12:24 pm

The killing of the squirrel disgusts me. The reporter who witnessed it should have reported this oik Redesdale to the police or the RSPCA.

An animal is defined as a pest by man, not by nature. There is no excuse for treating animals with cruelty whatever their species.

First this idiot imprisons the squirrel (why?), causing it fright and alarm and then kills it in the clumsy way causing pain and distress.

By what right does he set himself up as judge and jury and, worse still, incite others to go around hitting squirrels on the head? The man is a fool and and a sadist.

Other Comments by SilverTiger

9. Comment #76841 by Dr Benway on October 7, 2007 at 12:58 pm

 avatarWell SilverTiger, even sadists have their ecological niche to fill. Lunch would be far less delicious were it not for a few unblinking humans working the slaughterhouse.

If head bonking the grays would save the reds it might be a reasonable intervention. Seems unlikely, however.

The slight difference in habitat preference between the gray and red squirrels suggests that the red might be saved by expanding dense forest growth. Perhaps global warming will help.

Other Comments by Dr Benway

10. Comment #76865 by Veronique on October 7, 2007 at 1:59 pm

 avatarWhat lovely photos Dr Benway:-)

The number of silly, ill-thought things that people do are legion. The British introduced the red fox and rabbits into Australia for sport. The damage that these animals do to Australia's native wildlife and sparse grasses is enormous.

Then there was the cane toad, introduced from South America to control pests in the sugar cane fields of Queensland. It has proved impossible to stop the spread of these loathesome creatures across the top end of Australia. They are infiltrating Western Australia, destroying the natural fauna as they go. They have spread south and are getting closer to Sydney (if not there already). They have upset the balance of snakes and we now have many more of the deadly King Brown snakes. They eat the native frogs, well – they eat anything. I kill them because the poison they spit can blind my cats. They also eat the fish fry in my creek and pond. I have no compunction about killing them. Each year we have a cane toad drive with bounties. The kids collect thousands of them. And they are still out of control.

We learnt to control the prickly pear cactus that was introduced with the First Fleet. Cactoblastis was a biological control that actually worked. A disaster weed, the pear spread all across New South Wales. The amount of legislation passed to deal with this pest was extraordinary during the 19th and 20th centuries. Now it sits high on the noxious weed list. As does lantana, introduced by British ladies as a hedge plant that is now destroying tropical rain forests. Same with the Camphor Laurel from South China. The oil from its leaves and seeds pollute our rivers and render the soil dead to native tree generation. There's a long list of noxious plants, all brought in from other countries.

There are heaps of other disasters and I am sure all of you have similar stories about your own countries. No one really understood what a fragile ecology exists in Australia and thought to colonise it with European ideas. Bad move. Very short-sighted. We still farm this country as though it were Europe. We are in dire straits.

I am starting to rant – better stop:-).

Cheers
V

I didn't bother reading all of the article. A bit too precious for my tastes:-). I got the drift without wading through the verbiage.

Other Comments by Veronique

11. Comment #76872 by BaronOchs on October 7, 2007 at 2:17 pm

 avatarA more worrying problem than squirrels is the plague of "Himalayan Balsam" now afflicting Britain. Which may in time wipe out the lovely site of a Bluebell carpet, as well as several other species of plant.

Though V I expect all this may be slight compared with the damage done to Australia's ecology?

Other Comments by BaronOchs

12. Comment #76879 by Veronique on October 7, 2007 at 2:45 pm

 avatar11. Comment #76872 by BaronOchs

I am sure your vegetation has changed over the millenia. I think that because we have only been here for a little over 200 years, the changes and damage is just so much more observable and recorded. And the introduced species were recorded and logged.

I have elected to go down the laneway that borders the side of my house every year with black plastic bags and secateurs to cut down the Madeira vine that was introduced. Not one of my neighbours does anything about it, so I have to and ensure it doesn't get into my block of land. The vine thrives in the sub tropics and has become #2 pest with wandering jew the #1 pest. Then there's Ochna - birds drop the seeds in the forests. One tough bloody plant to eradicate. And people still plant it! I feel like Teratornis, not much respect for people because of the vexing things they do:-)

Ah, darlin', don't get me started:-) I can talk about this stuff all day.

Cheers
V

Other Comments by Veronique

13. Comment #76884 by USA_Limey on October 7, 2007 at 3:10 pm

 avatarVeronique,

Yes Australia has suffered terribly from the introduction of non indigenous species.

I remember watching a documentary on the attempts to deal with the rabbit problem through infection by myxomatosis . Horrible, just horrible. I am sure you would know more about it though. I'd be interested in hearing what the current state of play on the rabbit problem is.

__________________________________________________
Carousel is a lie! There is no renewal!

~ Logan

Other Comments by USA_Limey

14. Comment #76885 by BaronOchs on October 7, 2007 at 3:21 pm

 avatarV well I'm sure your fighting the good fight, though I expect in britain we'd have put some highly paid committee together just to find a more pc name for wandering jew!

Other Comments by BaronOchs

15. Comment #76891 by Veronique on October 7, 2007 at 3:51 pm

 avatarBaron
Haha. Very un-PC of me wasn't it? Tradescantia is what the committee would insist on it being called:-).

Logan
Status of rabbits eh?
Gee – I go for a walk at dusk and the first rabbits I see are about 150 yards from my house. Mullum, in parts, has them by the dozen. There's a continuing problem in that pet shops sell the cute, white, fluffy little blighters, kids love them and eventually they escape and – well – breed like rabbits among the wild population:-).

Rabbit Calcivirus is used these days and it is infectious and therefore more effective. There's a web page called The Doombunny's homepage:

http://www.grendel.org/hunter/db/textual/calcivirus_lauded.html

We have a kangaroo problem as well. We have a culling scheme but everyone outside the grazing community sees them as doe-eyed beauties and, of course, unique. So there are campaigns staged by dewey-eyed city-dwelling women (mainly) to stop the culling.

They are not so much of a problem on the east coast but west of the Divide they are in plague proportions. We enable their very clever breeding regime by planting stock feed and building farm dams. They are fascinating characters. I reared a couple of orphans years ago and they were very beautiful. Mind you, I have also shot adult kangaroos for food when I lived in the bush. Ah, the bush. There's nothing quite like the Australian bush.

Now I am starting to wax lyrical:-). Come down here and check Oz out before global warming changes this country forever.

I'd love to see some of you guys here
V

Other Comments by Veronique

16. Comment #76984 by black wolf on October 8, 2007 at 2:49 am

 avatarDr. Benway wrote:
I've got one pic of a red and gray squirrel together in my flickr collection.


Interestingly, German red squirrels that I see daily look very different from the ones you photographed.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europ%C3%A4isches_Eichh%C3%B6rnchen
The ones in your picture appear to be both Sciurus carolinensis. This is obvious when you look at the tail shape and the ears. The carolensis commonly have a reddish fur tinge, but far from the full red-brown of the vulgaris.
edit: I just noticed that you're not writing from Britain, so never mind. Enjoy the squirrel pics ;)

Other Comments by black wolf

17. Comment #77033 by prettygoodformonkeys on October 8, 2007 at 8:56 am

 avatarReally, you guys: squirrels?

I chased off a black bear in my driveway last month, with a slingshot.

1n 1960, when I first came here (British Columbia), as children we could roam the bushes and climb small mountains (wilderness, right up to the edge of town) and never see a bear. No one ever saw a bear, of any kind, near the city (20,000 pop). A friend came for dinner last night and had a black bear running along beside her car; she slowed down so it could cross the road in front of her (we had a lovely dinner, Thanksgiving here in Canada). Another work mate had a black in his carport last week, right in town, and two years ago I saw an Ursus Horribilis cross the road (less than a block from my office) in front of two ladies out for their morning stroll; it was only interested in the apple orchard nearby, but still……

Hunters forty years ago would travel for days on the highway to get to a moose area, and would then skillfully track one on foot through the forest. Last week a friend filled his family's cooler just two kilometers from my house. Anyone without hunting skill can do it now. Yesterday I made fences around my apple and flowering crab to save them from browsing moose. BTW: I don't hunt. I'm not against it; I'm just busy with other things.

Likewise with cougars: no mention, no sightings, impossible that they should be in this area when I was a child. My neighbour has lost three Labrador retrievers to cougars over the last 20 years; 2009 will mark the first official cougar hunting season, ever, in this area. I have seen prints in the snow on a much-used, only an hour-long, recreational trail on the edge of town.

This has been all within my own lifetime, but no problem: one hikes with a rifle now. Something worth noting, though, is that it is not we primates in most of the above cases that are encroaching on these habitats.

The pest that is the most obnoxious (no, not the mosquito – they're really not that bad here) is the little flower that was introduced in the 1800's from somewhere across the pond to someone's window-box or flower pot in New York City: the dandelion. They have choked out most of the diversity in many residential areas. Which is why I like to hike.

Veronique: #1 pest - Wandering Primate!

Cheers to all,
PGFM

Other Comments by prettygoodformonkeys

18. Comment #77047 by bentleyd on October 8, 2007 at 9:34 am

 avatarInteresting article and commentary. But what does this have to do with religion, atheism, or even evolution? Ahhh! Perhaps the Gray squirrels are a metaphor for radical Islam invading and out-populating the peaceful secular Red Squirrels?

Other Comments by bentleyd

19. Comment #77052 by d4m14n on October 8, 2007 at 9:59 am

Interesting article and commentary. But what does this have to do with religion, atheism, or even evolution? Ahhh! Perhaps the Gray squirrels are a metaphor for radical Islam invading and out-populating the peaceful secular Red Squirrels?


The site, afaik, is dedicated to reason and science. I believe ecology fits in the science bracket.

Other Comments by d4m14n

20. Comment #77053 by Vendetta on October 8, 2007 at 10:06 am

 avatarThis article is almost comically vile. At some points I thought perhaps it was satire, but unfortunately it wasn't.

Entire species are wiped out every day for many reasons, the biggest perhaps being loss of habitat. Trying to protect a species that is on the brink of extinction because of our careless growth is one thing, but systematically slaughtering a species because it is out-competing the species we 'like' is quite another. Anyone that cannot see the difference here is, in my opinion, just plain wrong.

We (humans, no distinction here between Americans and Brits) introduce the gray squirrel to this environment and it flourishes, so now we must exterminate them?? Huh?

The article admits that the gray squirrel is just "better at the job of being a squirrel." Because of this, it must die, for red squirrels are near and dear to our hearts. Sad.

Other Comments by Vendetta

21. Comment #77162 by Veronique on October 8, 2007 at 4:03 pm

 avatar17. Comment #77033 by prettygoodformonkeys

blockquoteVeronique: #1 pest - Wandering Primate!

Ah, PGFM, it saddens me to have to agree with you 200%. We really are. It isn't getting any better either, even though we can see the beginnings of the effects of our residence on this planet.

Our fatal flaw is that we see ourselves as more important than anything else. Even our, and our co-existent species', habitat.

Your poor black bears and cougars. Of course we have encroached on their habitat. Of course we are so responsible. And yet no leader of any country accepts this responsibility. All of them are interested in the economy, not one of them will address the underlying reason for these environmental stressors. It is too politically difficult to say out loud that their populations have to limit population growth.

My fear is that it is too late. Global population is exponential, the RC pope is culpable, aids programmes to poor countries that put a ban on any aid being used for reproductive health (US & Australia. I don't know if there are other countries that do this), the terribly culpable Christian missionaries… list goes on.

Sad, so sad. I know your pest #1 comment didn't deserve this response from me:-). It's never far from my mind though. It's a very clever comment BTW:-).

I need tea
V

Other Comments by Veronique

22. Comment #77404 by prettygoodformonkeys on October 9, 2007 at 8:01 am

 avatarTake heart, V; didn't mean to make anyone sad, but what did I expect from such a black little comment? It's just sport.

The odd thing here is that the logging over the last 100 years (mostly too expensive now) has created habitat for bears, cougars, moose, deer, wolves in this area - they weren't really here before. I hope that helps a little.

I just meant to remind (myself, us) that we are primates (hence the PGFM). In an odd way it soothes, because it is amazing that we have accomplished what we have, even though it's not all good; it's not so amazing that we haven't done it perfectly. It reminds me of the monkeys typing for a hundred years and coming up with all of Shakespeare's plays - that's exactly what we've done, and more!

And here we are, still typing away, still trying to figure it out; it's good.

Tea is important; we have to cut ourselves some slack.

Cheers,
FGFM

Other Comments by prettygoodformonkeys

23. Comment #77578 by Fouad Boussetta on October 9, 2007 at 6:28 pm

 avatarI agree with SilverTiger (8.) and Vendetta (20.). And I think that those who feel otherwise are monsters.

This Redesdale guy is the one who deserves to have his head smashed, preferably with a big rock, the Biblical way.

This article left me really sad.

Other Comments by Fouad Boussetta

24. Comment #77592 by Goldy on October 9, 2007 at 7:32 pm

PGFM - liked you last post. Kinda reminded me of this...http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/science/09babo.html
Gotta feel for a baboon called Royal...

Other Comments by Goldy

25. Comment #77759 by slummingangel on October 10, 2007 at 12:17 pm

 avatarwe've the same experience in ireland apparently a basket of grey squirrels were a gift for a wedding and got out it developed from there.
there was an article on the news yesterday about the red squirrel's demise http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/1009/squirrel.html

Other Comments by slummingangel

26. Comment #78204 by Canuck#1 on October 12, 2007 at 6:08 am

I can understandthe concerns expressed in terms of flora and fauna and the effects of what seemed at the time to be harmless acts... but at least these plants and animals are doing what is natural...humans on the other hand have no excuse...I wonder what kind of life my grandchildren and great grandchildren will have...if even 50% of what is predicted comes about life will be very different...I tried not to make this a rant...but maybe that is what is needed...

Other Comments by Canuck#1

27. Comment #79677 by hakija on October 18, 2007 at 6:18 am

 avatarI'm with Vendetta. This article is more appropriate for the SciAm or Science Daily site, don't you think?

I'd rather read reports on California's "Campus Crusade for Christ" suing to allow grads of creationist high schools to apply to state universities.

Now that's relevant.

Other Comments by hakija
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

Send a letter to the editor of the original media outlet.
letters@nytimes.com