Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Friday, October 12, 2007 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document The benefits of 80 million years without sex

by PHYSORG

Reposted from:
http://www.physorg.com/news111332210.html

Scientists have discovered how a microscopic organism has benefited from nearly 80 million years without sex.

Bdelloid rotifers are asexual organisms, meaning that they reproduce without males. Without sex, these animals lack many of the ways in which sexual animals adapt over generations to survive in their natural environment. Although other asexual organisms are known, they are thought to become extinct after relatively short time periods because they are unable to adapt. Therefore, how bdelloid rotifers have survived for tens of millions of years has been a mystery to scientists.

Bdelloids typically live in freshwater pools. However, if deprived of water they enter a dehydrated state in which they can remain for many years, surviving almost complete water loss. They then revive, having suffered no ill effect, once water becomes available again.

The new research shows how Adineta ricciae, a species of bdelloid rotifer, has evolved without sex to cope with dry conditions. The research, led by Dr. Alan Tunnacliffe from the Institute of Biotechnology at the University of Cambridge, was published today in the journal Science.

Humans and most other types of organisms reproduce sexually - resulting in two copies (or a pair) of each chromosome within a cell, one copy inherited from each parent. The chromosomes contain genes, so there are usually two copies of each gene in the cell. As a result, the two nearly identical copies of each gene in each cell will create two proteins which are also often nearly identical.

However, the researchers discovered that the two copies of the gene lea in Adineta ricciae are different and therefore generate proteins with different functions which protect the animal during dehydration. One copy protects essential proteins from clumping together as the animal dries out, while the other helps to maintain the fragile membranes that surround its cells. This is the first time that this evolutionary trick has been shown in any asexual animal.

Dr. Alan Tunnacliffe commented on the findings: "We've known for a few years that gene copies that would have the same DNA sequence in sexual creatures can be quite different from each other in asexuals. But this is the first time we've been able to show that these gene copies in asexuals can have different functions.

"It's particularly exciting that we've found different, but complementary, functions in genes which help bdelloid rotifers survive desiccation. Evolution of gene function in this way can't happen in sexual organisms, which means there could be some benefit to millions of years without sex after all."

Source: University of Cambridge

Comments 1 - 13 of 13 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #78259 by Vendetta on October 12, 2007 at 10:01 am

 avatarThis is blasphemous, quit saying there could be benefits to years without sex.

Other Comments by Vendetta

2. Comment #78261 by konquererz on October 12, 2007 at 10:18 am

 avatarThanks V! Someone had to say it!

Other Comments by konquererz

3. Comment #78265 by Cartomancer on October 12, 2007 at 10:26 am

 avatarThese things make me feel hopelessly inadequate. I've gone three years without sex and I don't seem to have adapted to my environment one bit...

Other Comments by Cartomancer

4. Comment #78271 by Bonzai on October 12, 2007 at 10:31 am

Not having read the complete article yet but it sounds like there is scientific proof that celibacy is good for you. The Catholic Church is finally vindicated, the micro brains in the Vatican may soon declare it another "miracle".

Other Comments by Bonzai

5. Comment #78298 by GBile on October 12, 2007 at 11:34 am

 avatarNow I also understand why they have these freshwater pools at the entrances of the Catholic churches. Must be full of Bdeloid Rotifers.

Other Comments by GBile

6. Comment #78323 by A.Lex on October 12, 2007 at 12:33 pm

GBile: "Now I understand why they have these freshwater pools at the entrances of the Catholic churches. Must be full of Bdeloid Rotifers."

The question is whether they use them (pools) before or after the mess :)

Other Comments by A.Lex

7. Comment #78325 by A.Lex on October 12, 2007 at 12:38 pm

The expression "f**k yourself" doesn't sound offensive anymore. For rotifers, that is.

Other Comments by A.Lex

8. Comment #78395 by Planeten Paultje on October 12, 2007 at 4:34 pm

 avatarSome very nice pictures of these beasties are to be found here:
http://www.microimaging.ca/rotifer.htm

Other Comments by Planeten Paultje

9. Comment #78402 by bluebird on October 12, 2007 at 4:56 pm

 avatarPlaneten Paultje, thanks for the link :)...Rotifers are fascinating!

"Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties and mysteries of the Earth are never alone or weary of life".......Rachel Carson

Other Comments by bluebird

10. Comment #78435 by prettygoodformonkeys on October 12, 2007 at 9:42 pm

 avatarWhat a positively immaculate way to conceive!
No muss, no fuss.

Unless of course, they're married.
That's another way of explaining the lack of sex.

80 million years without sex, though.
That is a serious grudge.

On the other hand, these could be the chosen ones.
Not an unfaithful one in the bunch.

Some of them are pretty hot, though.
I'd totally do that little "Flosculariacea"!
www.microimaging.ca/rotifer4.jpg

I'll stop now.
(what are the odds?)

Other Comments by prettygoodformonkeys

11. Comment #78445 by madhatter on October 13, 2007 at 12:05 am

Erm, leaving the obligatory sex jokes aside, wouldn't sexual organisms with a larger genome be able to cope with these sort of scenarios as well?
(Disclaimer: my biology is mostly popular-science level)

Other Comments by madhatter

12. Comment #78473 by bladeScythe on October 13, 2007 at 4:57 am

Surviving novel situations is Dependant on novel mutations arising. The reason these guys have an advantage is the genes on each chromosome can adapt independently. evolving a new gene from scratch is a horribly unlikely event, where as getting new benefit from the modification of an old one is much more likely.

Sexual reproducing organism have 2 ways (that i know of off hand) to do this, they could duplicate their chromosomes. Although plant show evidence of having done this, it is fatal most animal species (especially humans). Or you can duplicate the individual gene, either from a copying error or due to a retroviral element. Depending on where the duplicated gene ends up, selection can start acting upon it independently, allowing adaption for novel function.

Both of these events are fairly rare, so as the study shows having independent chromosomes could be advantageous. However as the article also mentions there are some large disadvantages to not utilising sex. Recombination allows genes to be shuffled around, this allows selection to act independently in each gene.

thats my understanding of things anyway

Other Comments by bladeScythe

13. Comment #83102 by PJSPinheiro on October 29, 2007 at 12:42 am

 avatarI would say that sexual organisms use(kind of) the same strategy of 'independent chromosomes' by evolving them not in one body (like the Bdelloid rotifers do) but in TWO bodies (that is to say, males and females 'play the role' of independent chromosomes). Some say that the males are experiments of female genes...

Other Comments by PJSPinheiro
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: