Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, November 11, 2007 | Reason : Political | print version Print | Comments

Document Dr Bari: Government stoking Muslim tension

by Rachel Sylvester and Alice Thomson, Telegraph

Thanks to Ian Griffiths for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/10/nbari110.xml

crazyThe head of the Muslim Council of Britain does not mince his words on integration, report Rachel Sylvester and Alice Thomson

There is fear and loathing in Britain. This week, the head of MI5 claimed there were 2,000 people involved in terrorist activity and children as young as 15 were being "groomed" to be suicide bombers.

Gordon Brown announced plans to require immigrants to learn English and Downing Street said the Prime Minister wanted to double the number of days that terrorist suspects can be detained without trial. Then, just as the Metropolitan Police was being censured for shooting the Stockwell One, the Lyrical Terrorist became the first woman to be convicted of terrorist crimes.

Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, the leader of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), thinks the Government is stoking the tension.

"There is a disproportionate amount of discussion surrounding us," he says. "The air is thick with suspicion and unease. It is not good for the Muslim community, it is not good for society."

The 53-year-old special needs teacher has a gentle manner and a quiet voice - he describes himself as a "community spokesman" rather than a "religious leader" - but he does not mince his words.

Britain must, he warns, beware of becoming like Nazi Germany.

"Every society has to be really careful so the situation doesn't lead us to a time when people's minds can be poisoned as they were in the 1930s. If your community is perceived in a very negative manner, and poll after poll says that we are alienated, then Muslims begin to feel very vulnerable. We are seen as creating problems, not as bringing anything and that is not good for any society."

There is, in his view, no such thing as Islamic terrorism.

"Terrorists are terrorists, they may use religion but we shouldn't say Muslim terrorists, it stigmatises the whole community. We never called the IRA Catholic terrorists." Dr Bari thinks Jonathan Evans, the head of MI5, made the extremists' job easier by giving a bleak picture of the threat on the eve of the Queen's Speech.

"I think it is creating a scare in the community and wider society. It probably helps some people who try to recruit the young to terrorism. Muslim young people are as vulnerable as any others. Under this climate of fear they will begin to feel victimised."

The Prime Minister's plan to increase the length of time terrorist suspects can be detained without trial is also, he believes, misguided.

"Even the police haven't asked for more than 28 days. As far as we know there is no clear evidence of the need for more time."

Control orders and stop and search powers are further increasing the sense of alienation among Muslims, Dr Bari says, and the Metropolitan Police are not helping matters either.

"There was institutional racism and institutions as massive as the Met find it hard to change. They need more Muslim police officers. I'm not going to use the term trigger happy - sometimes the police can make mistakes - but they need to do their job in a better way."

Sir Salman Rushdie should never have been knighted, he says. "He caused a huge amount of distress and discordance with his book, it should have been pulped."

Critics say the MCB - an umbrella organisation with 500 affiliates - has itself contributed to the growing sense of unease in Britain. The Government has cut funding to the council following claims that it had links with extremists. A Tory report this year accused it of promoting segregation.

Dr Bari insists he is simply trying to unite disparate communities. "On the one hand we are accused of not engaging, being insular, and on the other hand of being too political. We can't win."

The MCB was criticised for boycotting Holocaust Day but he says he did not mean to offend Jewish people: "It should be inclusive, commemorating all massacres."

According to a recent report by the Policy Exchange think-tank, the bookshop at the east London Mosque, which Dr Bari chairs, stocks extremist literature.

"The bookshops are independent businesses," he says. "We can't just go in and tell them what to sell … I will see what books they keep, if they have one book which looks like it is inciting hatred, do they have counter books on the same shelf?"

He is more careful about who is allowed to preach in the mosque. "If I hear of a specific preacher who is inciting hatred I will ban him from preaching but I cannot disallow him from praying."

In Dr Bari's view, suicide bombers are victims as well as aggressors. "I deal with emotionally damaged children," he explains. "Children come to hate when they don't get enough care and love. They are probably bullied, it makes a young person angry and vulnerable.

"The extreme case could be suicide bombers, it is all they have … The people who become suicide bombers are really vulnerable."

Although he stresses there is no justification for suicide bombing - "killing innocent people is completely forbidden, Islam is very emphatic on that" - he says British foreign policy has driven Muslims into the arms of the extremists.

"Criminal people have used that as a weapon to encourage young people, those who don't have any anchor in themselves, [to become suicide bombers]. Iraq has been a disaster, the country has been destroyed for no reason, that had an impact on the Muslim psyche."

His passion is to integrate Muslim and British cultures - he says integration must go both ways.

"Everybody can learn from everyone. Some of the Muslim principles can help social cohesion - family, marriage, raising children with boundaries, giving to the poor, not being too greedy."

British people could, in his view, benefit from arranged marriages. "I prefer to call them assisted marriages," he says.

"Marriage should not be forced on people but parents can be a catalyst … Young people are emotional, they want idealism. Older people have gone through all sorts of things and become a bit more experienced. A child will always want to eat chocolate but if he does then he will become fat. He needs to be given things that are good for him too."

"Alcohol is the worst drug long-term," he says, and adds that the Government should consider banning drinking in public places, as it has done with smoking.

Dr Bari believes Britain would benefit from a little more morality: "Religion has principles that can help society … Sex before marriage is unacceptable in Islam … On adultery and living together we should try to go back to the religiously informed style of life that helps society"

Abortion should also be made more difficult. "By the time a foetus is 12 weeks old our religion says that the child has got a spirit." Homosexuality is "unacceptable from the religious point of view".

Is stoning ever justified? "It depends what sort of stoning and what circumstances," he replies. "When our prophet talked about stoning for adultery he said there should be four [witnesses] - in realistic terms that's impossible. It's a metaphor for disapproval."

There should be more modesty too. "You shouldn't be revealing your body so much that it can be tempting to other people. I hope my daughter wouldn't wear a bikini but I also hope she wouldn't wear a burka."

Dr Bari runs guidance courses for parents of all faiths. "Children are like plants, if you don't look after them they will grow wild and weeds can come in." The same is true of Britain, he says. "There is plenty of freedom in Western society but boundaries are sometimes hard to see."

The CV

Name: Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari

Age: 52

Job: leader of the Muslim Council of Britain

Family: married with four children

Background: he grew up on a rice and jute farm in Bangladesh on the outskirts of Dhaka

Career: trained as a pilot, before moving to Britain and switching to academia, PhD in physics King's College London, science teacher in Haringey, special needs educator for Tower Hamlets.

Favourite things about Britain: fish and chips, cheese, shirts and ties

Comments 1 - 50 of 103 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #87226 by Mr DArcy on November 11, 2007 at 2:29 pm

 avatarAnother apologist for religion. Yuk! They make me sick. The poor persecuted muslims of Britain are members of the working class just as are the poor Christians, Jews, Hindhus and others. Their interests lie in forgetting about their religion, and remembering or discovering why "poor" or subservient classes exist at all.

Other Comments by Mr DArcy

2. Comment #87228 by BAEOZ on November 11, 2007 at 2:34 pm

 avatar
"Religion has principles that can help society … Sex before marriage is unacceptable in Islam … On adultery and living together we should try to go back to the religiously informed style of life that helps society"

Abortion should also be made more difficult. "By the time a foetus is 12 weeks old our religion says that the child has got a spirit." Homosexuality is "unacceptable from the religious point of view".

If that's morality, it's immoral.

Other Comments by BAEOZ

3. Comment #87230 by Bonzai on November 11, 2007 at 2:38 pm

I don't know why a nutter like this would be considered a "moderate". By that standard Pat Robertson would be a religious liberal. The bar of moderation for Muslims seems to be set very low.

I can also understand the growing anxiety about Muslims and Islam in the U.K. Britain doesn't need "more morality" according to Islam. Integrate or get out. The U.K should not allow fundamentalist Islam to fester like fundamentalist Christianity in the U.S. It is people like Dr. Bari who stroke tension.

Other Comments by Bonzai

4. Comment #87231 by He'sAVeryNaughtyBoy on November 11, 2007 at 2:38 pm

"Sex before marriage is unacceptable..."
"On adultery and living together we should try to go back to the religiously informed style of life"
"Homosexuality is unacceptable"
"It depends what sort of stoning"
"You shouldn't be revealing your body so much that it can be tempting to other people"


And people wonder why there is so much tension in the air - how about because the prat who said these statements is the leader of the Muslim Council of Britain.
These ideas are NOT compatable with the freedoms we enjoy as a democratic country.

Dr Bari ... go fornicate with yourself. (oops, can't do that, the invisible space magicican might see it and send you to hell!)

Other Comments by He'sAVeryNaughtyBoy

5. Comment #87235 by stereoroid on November 11, 2007 at 2:47 pm

 avatar"We never called the IRA Catholic terrorists."

It was never just about religion. Religion is just an "enabler" there.

Had the IRA "won", would the Irish government be forcibly converting people to Catholicism? This Scottish Atheist has lived in Ireland for 8 years now, and it hasn't been tried yet. I don't like the Catholic school system, but I don't get preached at, beyond the occasional street loonie.

So what are they fighting about, then? Why was Belfast Balkanized, then, if both the British and Irish governments support freedom of religion (and freedom from religion)? Your guess is as good as mine, but as long as I have that freedom, I hardly think nationality is worth killing people over.

Other Comments by stereoroid

6. Comment #87236 by He'sAVeryNaughtyBoy on November 11, 2007 at 2:47 pm

Sorry for the double post, but...

"Terrorists are terrorists, they may use religion but we shouldn't say Muslim terrorists, it stigmatises the whole community. We never called the IRA Catholic terrorists."

That would be because the IRA didn't go about claiming that what they were doing was in the name of their god or their religion. The chaps who murder people while blowing themselves up in the process are claiming they do it specificaly because of their religion.

Classic use of the no-true-Scotsman routine with the "That's not my god/religion/faith" excuse.

Other Comments by He'sAVeryNaughtyBoy

7. Comment #87239 by bladesman on November 11, 2007 at 2:50 pm

 avatarSo to promote better cohesion and integration betwixt Muslims and Britain, Britain should

1) Have arranged marriages
2) Force women to cover up
3) Ban homosexuality
4) Ban women from having the choice of having an abortion
5) Seriously consider stoning as a punishment
6) Worst of all, ban alcohol

And people wonder why we hate this vile religion.

Other Comments by bladesman

8. Comment #87240 by kraut on November 11, 2007 at 2:51 pm

"There is a disproportionate amount of discussion surrounding us," he says. "The air is thick with suspicion and unease. It is not good for the Muslim community, it is not good for society."

Maybe, just maybe there is a reason for this.
Midstream christian churches have learned to stay - most of the time - outside politics, for the muslim there is no separation between church and state. And that is what makes the muslim creed incompatable with a modern, secular society - as well as fundamentalist christian belief.

The solution is simple - democratic western society cannot condone muslims, whose ultimate goal is the subjugation of the body politics to their belief system. This tension will lead to further unavoidable clashes.
Since muslims think it is their right to further this process of subverting what is left of democracy after 9/11, and by their threatening stance further the deterioration of our democratic institutions - the only solution is to stop any more immigration of believers in this faith and either extract a pledge by those who are already in the country to protect and live within the democratic constitution, or deportation following violations of this pledge.

"His passion is to integrate Muslim and British cultures - he says integration must go both ways."

I am sorry, you came willingly to a country with established traditions, rules of law and a constitution.
You have the right to work for changes, as long as the basic tenets of this society are not threatened -i.e. equality before the law, gender equality, sexual preferences etc. But this society you entered into has no obligation at all to bow before the demands of immigrants.
I am speaking as an immigrant, and what really irks me more than anything else is the demand for special treatment by muslims and here in canada, the sikh society. Either join in or get the hell out.

Other Comments by kraut

9. Comment #87241 by Nick Good on November 11, 2007 at 2:52 pm

 avatarWell it's good for the Telegraph to bring this fellow's views to public attention, there is a public interest in knowing them.

After all, he heads the MCB. An organisation that has received UK tax payers money, is a charitable foundation, its previous chairman was knighted in 2005, it is an umbrella body for many UK Mosques, many of which are very well attended (more mosque attendees than bums on C of E pews). The MCB is tied to 400 or so Islamic affiliates organisation. It also purports, through its 'Mosques & Imams National Advisory Board' "to promote best practice in British mosques"...whatever that is!

He is a good example of how education and intelligence are not necessarily something that provides immunity from medieval superstition. He is a physics PhD!

It's an uncomfortable fact, that Islam, mainstream Islam - Koranic literalism - not some fringe, is a form of totalitarianism; it's a form of fascism. It's not just a religion, it's a political system too.

Islamaphobia - meaning 'an irrational fear of islam' - a rather common charge these days leveled at critiques of Isalm, is rather an oxymoron. There is nothing 'irrational' about having a healthy fear of these medieval, Koranic literalist 'kuffar-phobic' nutters.

Anyway; he's doing stirling service in bringing Islam into yet further disrepute.

Proud to be a Kuffar

Other Comments by Nick Good

10. Comment #87243 by steve99 on November 11, 2007 at 2:58 pm

 avatar
Britain must, he warns, beware of becoming like Nazi Germany.


In terms of views about Jews, women and homosexuals, the best way we can avoid that is to stop listening to him and his evil views.

Other Comments by steve99

11. Comment #87246 by IanG on November 11, 2007 at 3:07 pm

This really is serious stuff. The gloves are off.

This guy is politically important: he meets with Prime Ministers and their staff, is taken seriously as a moderate voice, and may one day be knighted in the same Tony-Blairish-fawning manner as was the unspeakable Sir Iqbal Sacranie whose answer to the question of the possible over-severity of the fatwah on Salman Rushdie was that, "Death, perhaps, is a bit too easy for him…"

Basically, Dr. Bari advocates a British society with arranged marriages and the pulping of Salman Rushdie's book; he doesn't rule out stoning if the circumstances are right, and he wishes us to understand that we are the problem - British society is becoming like Nazi Germany. It's not the nutters who fly planes into buildings. We are intolerant. We need a good dose of Islam to put us right.

Homosexuality is unacceptable, as is sex before marriage and, "we should try to go back to the religiously informed style of life that helps society."

Cleverly he picks on the obvious issues: alcohol and growing, general social unruliness, but then there's the usual breathtaking non-sequitur - these are the problems, therefore, Islam and the theocratic state is the answer. God of the Gaps again.

Scary stuff, openly stated in a superficially emollient style, but in worryingly confident and frank terms.

His passion is to integrate Muslim and British cultures – he says integration must go both ways.

This is the logic that says that if I think that killing Jews is hateful, genocidal stupidity and you are a Nazi who thinks that total extermination is the only option, we should settle on only killing half of them.

Salman Rushdie asked us, "Are you willing to die for short skirts and dancing?"

Time to step up folks.

I don't suggest that we get ready to arm ourselves and die just yet, but this is a full-frontal assault on everything that we believe in, couched in well-meaning, (even genuinely well-meaning, that's what's scary), terms.

This sort of thing, confidently articulated in a mainstream broadsheet British newspaper, could presage the beginning of end of the secular society.

Comment and reaction has hardly been seismic. So much for the Enlightenment, and hello to the new Dark Age.

I would just beg that we don't get provoked by his comments about suicide bombers being victims; he's right on that score.

Let's be charitable, believe the best of him and accept that he may truly feel, deeply, that this is the way to go. That he truly believes that the answer to our troubles is a good dose of Islam. That his intentions may be profoundly of good intent.

And then let's remember that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

The implications of this article are absolutely awful, and this sort of stuff has to be stopped in its tracks as best we can.

Other Comments by IanG

12. Comment #87248 by Goldy on November 11, 2007 at 3:10 pm

One could really have a go picking holes in his words here! Holocaust Day to cover all massacres...like the Armenian holocaust? Still hushed up by a Muslim nation (albeit a secular one). I dare say he'd not acknowledge that too highly either.
Irish were targetted during the IRA campaign. All Irish - it wasn't a religious thing as I can remember but a nationality thing.
My favourite
"The extreme case could be suicide bombers, it is all they have … The people who become suicide bombers are really vulnerable."

Like rich young Saudis and doctors?
In a way, I agree that they (the Muslims) are being targetted - witness all the articles and commentaries in the papers recently. But his response is to try and change us to be like them rather than them trying to become like the host country. Britain, indeed Europe, has to change to fit them. Don't think that'll work...

Other Comments by Goldy

13. Comment #87249 by Bonzai on November 11, 2007 at 3:10 pm

In terms of views about Jews, women and homosexuals, the best way we can avoid that is to stop listening to him and his evil views.


Ignoring them is not good enough. These people should be exposed, criticized and ostracized mercilessly. A strong message must be sent that their views are incompatible with and unacceptable in a liberal democratic society like Britain.

Instead these nuts are actually advising the government on integration! British politicians should understand that they can't buy the loyalty of Islamists by coddling them. The more you yield, the more they will demand. When appropriate secular society should have the courage to say no, shape up or ship out.

Other Comments by Bonzai

14. Comment #87250 by black wolf on November 11, 2007 at 3:12 pm

 avatar
"killing innocent people is completely forbidden, Islam is very emphatic on that"


Ok, let's find out who the innocents are, according to Koran, Sunna and Hadith:
hint: not the apostates

Other Comments by black wolf

15. Comment #87251 by IanG on November 11, 2007 at 3:14 pm

Rock on, Bonzai!!

Other Comments by IanG

16. Comment #87253 by scottishgeologist on November 11, 2007 at 3:20 pm

 avatarFuck em. Pull up the drawbridge and enforce a strict immigration policy: If you're a muzzie, you dont get in. End of story. No .not quite. FUCK OFF! There ,I feel better.... :-)

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

17. Comment #87255 by Goldy on November 11, 2007 at 3:22 pm

Heheheheh. You avatar, Scottishgeologist, is most appropriate to this comment of yours :-D

Other Comments by Goldy

18. Comment #87259 by steve99 on November 11, 2007 at 3:28 pm

 avatar
Ignoring them is not good enough. These people should be exposed, criticized and ostracized mercilessly. A strong message must be sent that their views are incompatible with and unacceptable in a liberal democratic society like Britain.


I was being too mild. You are right.

Other Comments by steve99

19. Comment #87261 by Goldy on November 11, 2007 at 3:37 pm

One wonders where they would go when they succeed and turning the country they are in into the country they left...

Other Comments by Goldy

20. Comment #87262 by Dr Benway on November 11, 2007 at 3:38 pm

 avatarYou Brits are in deep shit. Muslims aren't so brave over here.

PhD in physics working as a special needs teacher? Something is wrong with that dude.

Other Comments by Dr Benway

21. Comment #87263 by Mango on November 11, 2007 at 3:39 pm

 avatar
We never called the IRA Catholic terrorists.


Were the IRA conducting terrorist activities all over the world, as Muslims do, then we might refer to them as "Catholic terrorists."

Other Comments by Mango

22. Comment #87265 by liberalartist on November 11, 2007 at 3:45 pm

 avatarThis article gives me chills! creepy view of a future Europe, where Sharia law rules - arranged marriages, no pre-marital sex, no rights for women, and no alcohol - he must be insane! People should take this sort of thing seriously because a clash of culture/religion/politcal systems is taking place in the world. If we are a global world there is only room for one system. Do we want a free, enlightened word or do we want medieval barbarism?

Other Comments by liberalartist

23. Comment #87267 by scottishgeologist on November 11, 2007 at 3:47 pm

 avatarDr Benway:


PhD in physics working as a special needs teacher? Something is wrong with that dude


Got his PhD from Liberty U...... :-)))))

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

24. Comment #87273 by BaronOchs on November 11, 2007 at 4:02 pm

 avatarI disagree with the general drift of this thread. My initial reaction is to feel just a bit of warmth for someone who pulls themself of a farm in Dhaka to train as a pilot get a physics doctorate and, speaking as someone who has also worked for a short while with special needs children, done what is a rewarding and worthwhile line of work.

What is obvious from the article is the mind-numbing naivety of Dr Bari. As if the wonderful effects of practices like "assisted marriange" were obvious. Or British society could effortlessly adopt all these customs even if they were as natural and good as he thinks.

It is precisely because religious teachings get such an uncritical reception that an obviously intelligent man can come out with such ridiculous statements as these. Thus this goes to highlight the importance of consistently challenging religion and promoting reason. But I think Britain should try and become a place where as many people as possible can play a positive role in society and be at home. Muslims as much as anybody else and I don't think that should be conditional on their abandoning faith.

yeah so best wishes to y'all from the land of 4 million CCTV cameras, radical islam and detention without trial!

Other Comments by BaronOchs

25. Comment #87277 by kraut on November 11, 2007 at 4:19 pm

"Muslims as much as anybody else and I don't think that should be conditional on their abandoning faith."

If you do not understand that the muslim faith does not recognize any secular government, but only recognizes a faith based government, you will be feeling a lot more uncomfortable in the future.
Luckily the christian churches had to abandon their almost exclusive influence on government hundreds of years ago (starting with the reformation and the 30 year war) - and to think what a bloody struggle that was.

Do you want to go through the same with an ever increasing number of "unwilling to accept secular democracy" immigrants?
Funny to observe an atheist "apologist for faith" in action.

Other Comments by kraut

26. Comment #87292 by Steve Wrathall on November 11, 2007 at 5:07 pm

 avatar[quote]Sir Salman Rushdie should never have been knighted, he says. "He caused a huge amount of distress and discordance with his book, it should have been pulped."[/quote]
Those who want to pulp books will one day pulp people.

Other Comments by Steve Wrathall

27. Comment #87295 by BaronOchs on November 11, 2007 at 5:17 pm

 avatarkraut. no atheist apologist for faith me!

The large muslim population in Britain is not a wholly benign addition to a multicultural menagerie, but nor is it some army of insidious faith-based orcs welling up in our midst sharpening their axes.

Accepting a view of muslims as taking their first priority to be the establishment of sharia law and the conversion of the world is precisely what the radicals and quite often the leaders like Dr Bari want. Really we should be more intelligent and notice for most people, muslim or otherwise, even if they are quite devout, human and secular concerns take precedence in their lives. Of course this is not something believers are necessarily self-aware of. Most muslims growing up in britain today want the same things as their non-muslim neighbours, jobs, cars, housing, leisure and sociability. I say obstacles to acheiving these goals should be reduced for them and anyone else, regardless of issues related to their belief.

Even this muslim article (from 2004 but still relevant) points out 87% of muslims don't feel a problem with being British.

http://www.islamonline.net/english/contemporary/2003/10/Article01.shtml

Other Comments by BaronOchs

28. Comment #87302 by Goldy on November 11, 2007 at 6:12 pm

BaronOchs, his naivety could be inderstandable if he were fresh off the boat. But he is not - he is, in fact, a spokesman for the Muslim community. Now, I can understand his concern regarding the reporting of Muslim actions and the comments generated by these reports, but his naivety is pretty much inexcusable. He reads the papers like we do, he hears of the arranged marriage scandals (probably from both sides!), he is on the receiving end of pressure groups and detractors - how can he not hear of the bad parts, the mediaeval parts, of Islam as we Westerners hear it? What we hear is that we should become more like them in order that they may live with us better - is that right?
Having said that, I would like to know what he REALLY told the Telegraph... not that the press have a ahabit of changing and twisting words and focussing on what would be a rather innocuous remark...
Having met and lived with many Muslims, I can safely say the number who grow beards and quote Korans are directly proportional to the number of Christians that follow their faith to the same degree.

Other Comments by Goldy

29. Comment #87304 by kraut on November 11, 2007 at 6:15 pm

"I say obstacles to acheiving these goals should be reduced for them and anyone else, regardless of issues related to their belief."

I say make it easier for them to leave their religion. Punish hard those who threaten those leaving the muslim faith.
What is it that enamoures britons with the democracy endangering freedoms of muslims to express themselves through word and deed, who have nothing but scorn for our western society?

If they want to be scornful - let them do it from the distance of their homeland.

I still remember the mullah who could preach hate in english mosques for years, without ever being investigated.

If they immigrate - let them take an oath to uphold the constitution, the democratic values - and kick them out if it can be proven they violated this oath. What is so hard to understand about this concept? That does not prevent them at all to participate in the political process, but participation und british rules.

If they want to flourish in your society - that is fine, but under british law, not under sharia or any other nonsecular law - and get rid of the supremacy of the anglican church in the process. Sets a bad example.


PS - If I remember correctly: according to a latest poll almost 40% of young muslims in britain condone violent action, and over 30% still agree with the fatwa against rushdie.



Other Comments by kraut

30. Comment #87305 by PrimeNumbers on November 11, 2007 at 6:26 pm

 avatarThis Dr Bari is scary. He is absolutely not moderate in any way shape or form. This Dr Bari is exactly the kind of dangerous religious nutter we need to be shaming and ridiculing. His remarks on Rushdie alone should set him up for immediate deportation, his gross intolerance should have him deported ten times over.

Muslims have got to learn a few things....

Their religion doesn't make them special,
it doesn't put them above the rule of law,
it doesn't mean they can be treated differently to anyone else.
they're not liked because of the very words this so called leader of Muslims has just spoke.
That they are the problem, not us.
That if they keep going on like this, they'll not only be disliked, but be acted against to stop them preaching their doctrine of hate and intolerence.

Dr Bari should have:
Said, "although I personally don't agree with the Knighting of Sir Rushdie, I accept that he has been honoured, and that I regret that some Muslims have been distressed by this, but in a free and democratic society, we must learn to be tolerant of those we disagree with."
"Although I don't agree with adultary, stoning is absolutely wrong"
"Although I don't agree with homosexuality, they must not be harmed or discriminated against."
"Books that advocate violence should not be on sale in Mosques. I will make it my mission to remove such books from all Mosques in the UK because I understand that they are giving people a very bad impression of Muslims"

Now, he had the opportunity to show us all that Muslims are nice, decent people who don't want to impose themselves onto society, that they want to integrate and live in a democatic, secular society. But he didn't. He's got to go. He really does need to leave the UK and go somewhere else.

Other Comments by PrimeNumbers

31. Comment #87317 by Vinelectric on November 11, 2007 at 7:46 pm

 avatar
Muslims have got to learn a few things....

Their religion doesn't make them special,
they're not liked because of the very words this so called leader of Muslims has just spoke.
That they are the problem, not us.


I should add: "and that's for their own sake before anyone else's".

Other Comments by Vinelectric

32. Comment #87319 by Cartomancer on November 11, 2007 at 7:49 pm

 avatarAnother delicious irony - where did he learn about social compromise and the give-and-take of integration that he so espouses? That tissue of plagiarised nonsense he reads in the mosque every friday? The oh-so-progressive values of the muslim society he comes from? Or maybe from secular enlightenment values and modern European pluralism?

Other Comments by Cartomancer

33. Comment #87320 by Spinoza on November 11, 2007 at 7:55 pm

 avatar
"We never called the IRA Catholic terrorists."


Didn't we?

Other Comments by Spinoza

34. Comment #87339 by petermun on November 11, 2007 at 11:04 pm

Don't worry Dr Bari, once Charlie becomes king and establishes his "Defender of Faiths" position, you'll get your knighthood too - perhaps even a place in the House of Lords where you can promote your teetotal, misogynist views, pulping and stoning to your heart's content.

I abhor the intolerant when they expect absolute tolerance from others and whinge on interminably when, understandably, they don't get it

Other Comments by petermun

35. Comment #87345 by Nick Good on November 12, 2007 at 12:03 am

 avatarBari was interviewed by the Sunday Telegraph in September 2006, then his threats were rather more specific. Here's the 'money quote'...

"some police officers and sections of the media are demonising Muslims, treating them as if they're all terrorists — and that encourages other people to do the same.

If that demonisation continues, then Britain will have to deal with two million Muslim terrorists — 700,000 of them in London"

Source
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/09/10/nterr10.xml

Other Comments by Nick Good

36. Comment #87346 by Russell Blackford on November 12, 2007 at 12:06 am

I really hope his daughter is lying on a beautiful sunny beach somewhere, wearing her topless string bikini, smoking dope, drinking French Champagne, and discussing the finer points of Salman Rushdie's novels with her lesbian lover. (Or if she's not quite old enough for all that yet ... may it happen at the appropriate time, Zeus willing.)

I have no time for these miserable moralists.

Other Comments by Russell Blackford

37. Comment #87358 by suffolkthinker on November 12, 2007 at 1:11 am

He says:
Sir Salman Rushdie should never have been knighted, he says. "He caused a huge amount of distress and discordance with his book, it should have been pulped."

That sums it up. His view that books should be pulped just because he doesn't like them causes me and I suspect most here a huge amount of distress and discourdance.

Other Comments by suffolkthinker

38. Comment #87359 by Fanusi Khiyal on November 12, 2007 at 1:17 am

The nerve of these people. If anyone is stoking the tensions it is his co-religionists from Saudi Arabia, the Wahabis and the Deobandis. You don't see this kind of behaviour from any other community. Not from the Sikhs, not from the Hindus.

Nick Good thanks for the quote. Does anyone doubt that this is anything but a naked threat? And why are our elected representatives mot seeing it as such and making it absolutely clear that we wont stand for such barbarism?

Other Comments by Fanusi Khiyal

39. Comment #87376 by irate_atheist on November 12, 2007 at 2:05 am

 avatarDear Dr Bari,

Gnaaaar!!!!!!!!

Yours sincerely,

Irate Atheist

Other Comments by irate_atheist

40. Comment #87381 by Nick Good on November 12, 2007 at 2:21 am

 avatarHere's a related story about an open letter to the British Prime Minister, signed by 'Leading Muslims', published in the press in August last year.

A precis - Change your foreign policy to suit us, or else!

Its signatories included Bari in his capacity as head of the MCB, as well as by a Muslim Labour MP Shahid Malik - now a government Minister (rather ironically, 'Shahid' means 'holy martyr for Islam')!

The Story on BBC website


Full text of letter

Other Comments by Nick Good

41. Comment #87386 by Dinah on November 12, 2007 at 2:34 am

I have often wondered what these much fawned-upon Moderate Muslims actually believe in, and now I have the answers, viz:

Moderate Terrorism - only to be carried out when the wholly (holy?) peace-loving nature of Islam is wilfully misunderstood by the blood-crazed Infidel…(and we must feel sorry for those poor Moderate Suicide Bombers because obviously their Mummies didn't understand them…)

Moderate Stonings of Adulteresses and Homosexuals

Moderate Forced Marriages

Moderate Enforced Chastity

Moderate Covering Up of Women (he doesn't think his daughters should wear burqas folks! How Enlightened is that???)

Moderate Assassination of Sir Salman Rushdie

Moderate Boycotting of Holocaust Day and anything Remotely Jewish

Moderate Stocking of Moderate Muslim bookshops with Moderate Extremist Literature

Moderate Total Banning of Chocolate, Alcohol and Anything Else in Life that might give a Little Pleasure

Well, I'm glad we've cleared that one up.

Other Comments by Dinah

42. Comment #87394 by IanG on November 12, 2007 at 2:45 am

This is just a statement, from someone who sees his cause as reasonable and its prospects of success already close to certainty. We do indeed find it threatening to us.

The message is that there are over a million potential civil activists out there, if we continue to give offence, (he doesn't see them as terrorists - they are victims suffering prejudice). That's an army of pre-emptive size and force - he really does believe that the battle is pretty much over, which is why he is so open about his views. He is encouraged by the absence of any serious firm rejection of these statements by any politician. He genuinely believes that any mobilisation of this army against us will truly be our own fault for leaving them with no option but to stand up for themselves. All of this is our fault, in his eyes.

There has not been one politician of note who has made any comment on Dr. Bari's view of the future for our country. Recently a political working party decided not to enact specific legislation making illegal the practice of coercively transporting British-born ethnically-Asian girls and women to Pakistan, for the purpose of marriage to Pakistani local men, for fear that such legal enactment might do more harm than good.

On one particular issue, you might want to juxtapose two separate parts of his statement.

Look at this:

"Sir Salman Rushdie should never have been knighted", he says. "He caused a huge amount of distress and discordance with his book, it should have been pulped."


Then look at this:

"According to a recent report by the Policy Exchange think-tank, the bookshop at the east London Mosque, which Dr Bari chairs, stocks extremist literature.

"The bookshops are independent businesses," he says. "We can't just go in and tell them what to sell … I will see what books they keep, if they have one book which looks like it is inciting hatred, do they have counter books on the same shelf?"


It is my guess that Dr Bari is reasonably confident that, as regards the UK, it really is just a matter of time now, before there is a progressive shift to widespread de facto Sharia and, ultimately de jure Sharia.

He correctly gauges that, because they are willing to die to put an end to short skirts and dancing and we aren't willing to die to defend those activities, we are now in the end-game.

For those abroad, like Dr Benway, you might be interested to hear that, a little while ago, an Asian youth stabbed another Asian youth; yes, stabbed, as in with a knife.

The families of the two youths put it to the Police that they wished to deal with this as a "family matter" under Sharia custom, rather than through the UK courts. The Police agreed. No charges, no court case.

An incidental consequence of this is, of course, that the knife-wielding assailant has no criminal record.

If he stabs me next week, he is of previously unstained character.

We now have, de facto, two systems of jurisprudence operating in the UK coupled with an assumption on one side that if we don't meet theocracy half way then what ensues will be a consequence of our own unreasonable intransigence.

Things don't look too good.

Other Comments by IanG

43. Comment #87400 by Titus on November 12, 2007 at 3:20 am

Sir Salman Rushdie should never have been knighted, he says. "He caused a huge amount of distress and discordance with his book, it should have been pulped."



"The bookshops are independent businesses," he says. "We can't just go in and tell them what to sell … I will see what books they keep, if they have one book which looks like it is inciting hatred, do they have counter books on the same shelf?"


Flagrant bloody hypocrisy! And we're supposed to take this tit seriously?
If you don't like the way we live in this green and pleasant land (that provided you with your education and comfortable living standards)sod off back to Bangladesh and leave we poor apostates to what we do best - drinking and fornicating. :-)))

Other Comments by Titus

44. Comment #87405 by IanG on November 12, 2007 at 3:31 am

Titus,

We have to take him very seriously: he wields much more power and influence than you and I do.

Other Comments by IanG

45. Comment #87408 by epeeist on November 12, 2007 at 3:40 am

 avatarComment #87405 by IanG

We have to take him very seriously: he wields much more power and influence than you and I do

Agreed.

The only good thing to come out of this particular incident is the fact that he has made an enormous tactical error. As people have said, the cat is now out of the bag. It is now obvious what his end game and people do seem to have woken up to the fact.

Other Comments by epeeist

46. Comment #87415 by Bob Russell on November 12, 2007 at 4:04 am

Thank goodness for "free speech." It certainly leaves no question who the morons of the world are. As much as I detest this idiot's opinions, at least we know what they are and do not force him into the closet in some mosque somewhere. Let's hear what these nutters (like Fred Phelps etc) really think.

Other Comments by Bob Russell

47. Comment #87416 by Titus on November 12, 2007 at 4:04 am

Comment by IanG
We have to take him very seriously: he wields much more power and influence than you and I do


Sadly I agree, we must also take very seriously the apologists both in local and national government who are giving these people credence.
It is up to all of us to point out the extremist agenda; particularly when voiced by so called moderates and articulated in a way as to seem reasonable. There are those, I am sure, who would read that article from a xtian viewpoint and agree with much that he said. There lies the danger.
Sometimes you just want to have a rant though!

Other Comments by Titus

48. Comment #87417 by Bob Russell on November 12, 2007 at 4:21 am

16. Comment #87253 by scottishgeologist on November 11, 2007 at 3:20 pm

....FUCK OFF!....

I like it...I wish someone, especially an interviewer, would just come out and say this to these people when they spout this nonsense. No mincing of words here...they will know right away what we think of their insane beliefs. This applies to the Billy Grahams, and Pat Robertsons of the world as much as this imbecile. Intelligent arguement has its limits. Plain English is sometimes is needed.


Sir Salman Rushdie should never have been knighted, he says. "He caused a huge amount of distress and discordance with his book, it should have been pulped."
Interviewer: "Fuck off."

"The extreme case could be suicide bombers, it is all they have … The people who become suicide bombers are really vulnerable."
Interviewer: "Fuck off"

British people could, in his view, benefit from arranged marriages. "I prefer to call them assisted marriages," he says.
Interviewer: "Fuck off."


I know it is not intelligent discourse but when I read this shite these words do come to mind.

Other Comments by Bob Russell

49. Comment #87419 by IanG on November 12, 2007 at 4:23 am

Titus,

Nothing wrong with a good cathartic rant now and again!

As time ticks by and youth disappears into the mists behind me, I have noticed that, lately, I seem to catch myself shouting at the television quite a lot, even though I know it can't hear me.

(It can't, can it??)

I suppose that what worries me most is the known epidemiology and aetiology of this particular memetic infection: Communities of the faithful, already gathered together in semi-isolated populations, begin to practise Sharia internally without reference to the established legal system. By the time this is sufficiently widespread to get noticed by the host society, it is too late: there is no way that these folk are now going to relinquish the system that they use to manage their community affairs. That's the conclusion of Phase 1; the localised de facto phase.

People like Bari then begin to transmit a new message: "This is a fact that should now be formally recognised. Failure to do this will arouse the righteous anger of millions of people who are already happy with this system and will never relinquish their established right to use it. Formal Sharia should now be legislatively approved for those communities that want it."

That's Phase 2; the localised de jure phase.

Phase 3 is pretty obvious.

Other Comments by IanG

50. Comment #87420 by black wolf on November 12, 2007 at 4:25 am

 avatarI recommend to all commenters here to leave their comments on the telegraph site via the 'Your View' link in the left margin.

Other Comments by black wolf
Reload Comments | Back to Top

More Comments: 1 2 3 | Next | Last

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: