










The Scientists Speak2. Comment #89347 by thirdchimpanzee on November 20, 2007 at 11:03 am
Nobody said humans are evil in ignoring global warming, just stupid. En masse, we appear to have the herd intelligence of deer, and we do know better. This crisis could yet have a positive outcome in terms of comprehending our global impact, and our global connectedness - but make no mistake, this is a very big crisis.3. Comment #89350 by thompjs on November 20, 2007 at 11:08 am
arogop, Take a look at Scientific American from a couple of months ago. They have great article on climate change, modeling of climate change. I think it is great starting point to investigate the subject.4. Comment #89351 by Matt7895 on November 20, 2007 at 11:15 am
I think the denial of global warming is similar to the denial of evolution. In both cases, those in a state of denial are only doing so because they would be the ones to lose if the general consensus accepted them. So their goal is a contrarian approach - to steadfast hold an illogical position against overwhelming evidence. In global warming, it is the oil lobby. In evolution it is the fundamentalist mega-church lobby. Both are very powerful. 5. Comment #89356 by Klaatu barada nikto on November 20, 2007 at 11:30 am
6. Comment #89361 by annabanana on November 20, 2007 at 11:49 am
7. Comment #89363 by Erik on November 20, 2007 at 12:08 pm
arogop,8. Comment #89365 by Jamougha on November 20, 2007 at 12:19 pm
Andrew,
1. Doesn't the historical record say the CO2 levels increase after warming occured and thus may not have that great of a green house effect?
2. Doesn't the historical record show (to the best of our knowledge) that these warming spells happen routinely and do in fact happen over short and long periods of time.
9. Comment #89367 by bluebird on November 20, 2007 at 12:35 pm
10. Comment #89372 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on November 20, 2007 at 1:12 pm
11. Comment #89375 by annabanana on November 20, 2007 at 1:25 pm
12. Comment #89379 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on November 20, 2007 at 1:33 pm
13. Comment #89394 by SilentMike on November 20, 2007 at 2:04 pm
This is one of those cases where one needs to consider all available evidence -about the changing climate and about human nature- and reach a logical conclusion about how one must handle this very serious crisis.14. Comment #89542 by nickthelight on November 21, 2007 at 3:31 am
15. Comment #89543 by steve99 on November 21, 2007 at 3:42 am
I have heard that CO2 the amount of which we humans are responsible for generating pales in comparison to the amount resulting from normal volcanic activity.
16. Comment #89545 by steveroot on November 21, 2007 at 4:07 am
17. Comment #89568 by annabanana on November 21, 2007 at 6:02 am
18. Comment #89626 by arogop on November 21, 2007 at 9:29 am
19. Comment #89629 by arogop on November 21, 2007 at 9:33 am
20. Comment #89647 by octopus on November 21, 2007 at 11:03 am
It is very unfortunate that this scientific issue always ends up as republicans against democrats.21. Comment #89837 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on November 21, 2007 at 9:49 pm
22. Comment #91857 by arogop on November 29, 2007 at 1:06 pm
23. Comment #143501 by FusionBeliever on March 14, 2008 at 6:56 am
It might be that the Earth is getting warmer; the cause is rising levels of carbon dioxide; the rise is all due to humans; the drop in global average temperatures 1940-1970 was due to aerosols; if the rise continues there will be serious consequences; the ill effects will overwhelm the benefits; climate model forecasts are accurate; there will be a tipping point, after which the situation cannot be recovered; Government action is needed, will work and will not have catastrophic unintended consequences.This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE
1. Comment #89345 by arogop on November 20, 2007 at 10:54 am
1. Doesn't the historical record say the CO2 levels increase after warming occured and thus may not have that great of a green house effect?
2. Doesn't the historical record show (to the best of our knowledge) that these warming spells happen routinely and do in fact happen over short and long periods of time.
Andrew
Other Comments by arogop