Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Wednesday, January 23, 2008 | Reason : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Mixing Mammals

by Technology Review

Thanks to Steve Penland for the link.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Biotech/20092/

Putting bat DNA into mice sheds light on how limbs evolved.

By Anna Davison

By outfitting mice with a chunk of DNA that directs wing development in bats, scientists have created rodents with abnormally long forelimbs, mimicking one of the steps in the evolution of the bat wing. Their work gives weight to the idea that variations in how genes are controlled, and not just mutations in the coding regions of genes, are a driving force in evolution.

The slightly longer forelimbs of the transgenic mice "make them more batlike," says Nipam Patel, a professor of molecular and cell biology and integrative biology at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the work. "It seems like a subtle difference, but evolution works by these subtle differences."

The researchers focused on a gene, Prx1, that plays a part in the elongation of limb bones in mammals. The gene's expression is regulated by another sequence of DNA, called a Prx1 enhancer. To investigate how the enhancer shapes limb development, Richard Behringer, a professor of molecular genetics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and his colleagues around the country put the bat version of the Prx1 enhancer into mice so that it controlled the mouse Prx1 gene. These transgenic animals developed forelimbs that were on average 6 percent longer than normal by the time they were born. It was a significant difference, although "the mice look like mice," Behringer says. "They're not going to fly out of the cage." The researchers report their work in the latest issue of Genes and Development.

To have any chance of flying, mice would have to develop very different forelimbs, like those of bats, which are longer and have membranes stretched between the bones. Behringer says that he'd like to try replacing the limb enhancers in mice with those from other animals, such as whales or wallabies.

Charles Darwin contemplated the evolution of different kinds of limbs in On the Origin of Species. Starting with a basic limb pattern, "successive slight modifications," he wrote, eventually produce the various mammal limbs we see today: human hands, bat wings, whale fins.

"We think what we've done is made one of those slight modifications," Behringer says. "Maybe during evolution you'd have a lot of those and the limb would get a lot longer, and maybe some of the tissue would be retained between digits, ultimately leading to the structures that would allow a bat to fly."

"It's a very nice demonstration of something that people have been suspecting now for some time: that regulatory sequences rather than changes in protein sequences sort of drive evolution," says Susan Mackem, who heads the Developmental Biology Unit at the National Cancer Institute's Center for Cancer Research. Mackem was not involved in Behringer's research.

Behringer's team also found something unexpected. When the researchers created mutant mice that lacked the mouse Prx1 enhancer, the animals developed forelegs of a normal length. That suggests that more than one enhancer controls the expression of the Prx-1 gene in mice, ensuring what Behringer calls a "regulatory redundancy."

"As long as there is one copy to do the work, the other copy can be creative," says Ann Burke, an associate professor of biology at Wesleyan University.

Comments 1 - 25 of 25 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #115045 by Ian Bamlett on January 23, 2008 at 1:11 pm

 avatar
By outfitting mice with a chunk of DNA that directs wing development in bats


Come on everyone admit it; when you read up to there you already had an image in your head of a mouse with bat wings!

:-)

Other Comments by Ian Bamlett

2. Comment #115056 by Deepthought on January 23, 2008 at 1:24 pm

 avatarI was wondering but now I'm intriuged by the possibilities of a finned mouse. Hmmmmm... If this is possible is the Raburtle(rabbit+turtle) possible? A creationist and I used the Raburtle in a debate on micro- vs macro-evolution. He finished it by saying "That's too bad. I was looking forward to seeing a Raburtle." He may yet see one :)

Other Comments by Deepthought

3. Comment #115058 by shemp333 on January 23, 2008 at 1:28 pm

 avatarYeaaaaah... Mice with bat DNA... That'll happen...When monkeys fly out of my butt!!! Now I guess mice will fly out of my butt. LOL!

Other Comments by shemp333

4. Comment #115063 by shemp333 on January 23, 2008 at 1:34 pm

 avatarWhy are these scientists playing God?!?!

Answer: The job is quite vacant. Applicants may apply at will.

Other Comments by shemp333

5. Comment #115089 by Ian Bamlett on January 23, 2008 at 2:30 pm

 avatarHa! Nice one shemp333 (comment 4)

That's a good one liner I will try and use on the next theist who uses the 'scientists playing God' line.

Just wanted to give due credit before I use it!

:-)

Other Comments by Ian Bamlett

6. Comment #115099 by Corylus on January 23, 2008 at 2:45 pm

 avatar
The slightly longer forelimbs of the transgenic mice "make them more batlike"
Hmm. [stretches out...]

I vant to suck yourrr blud.

[Digs out old cape]

Other Comments by Corylus

7. Comment #115100 by Quetzalcoatl on January 23, 2008 at 2:50 pm

 avatarTransgenic mouse- "I want to suck your blood... and perhaps some cheese for afters".

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

8. Comment #115105 by Corylus on January 23, 2008 at 3:05 pm

 avatarOh crap! - I forgot snakes enjoy eating small rodents.

Scampers off. [Quickly]

Other Comments by Corylus

9. Comment #115120 by Synchronium on January 23, 2008 at 3:38 pm

Just how long are these forelimbs?

We need pictures, damnit!

Other Comments by Synchronium

10. Comment #115123 by shemp333 on January 23, 2008 at 3:43 pm

 avatarIan Bamlett,

I'm too silly too be taken with anything other than a smile. Please take and use it. I will tell others that I have communicated with you telepathetically. And when someone responds, "Oh my God," say mine too. I love to laugh at stupiditititie! LOL! I have too stop drinking so much! HAAAAAA!

Other Comments by shemp333

11. Comment #115125 by shemp333 on January 23, 2008 at 3:47 pm

 avatarHey Ian,

I should tell you... I love your bum. BOOM! I had not seen that infamous cartoon til your pic. Thanks for it. Love your style, dude. (Completely plutonic I assure.)

Other Comments by shemp333

12. Comment #115126 by Ian Bamlett on January 23, 2008 at 3:51 pm

 avatarSo glad you like my bum.

Does my head look big in it?

:-)

Other Comments by Ian Bamlett

13. Comment #115130 by shemp333 on January 23, 2008 at 4:04 pm

 avatarYour head looks like the sun rising on Easter morning. Then the Easter bunny see's his shadow. Six more weeks of winter. Damn. LoL!

Other Comments by shemp333

14. Comment #115304 by tieInterceptor on January 24, 2008 at 1:21 am

 avatarAs soon as possible they should try to do this with a pig,

flying pigs would make for excelent pets. And scare the hell out of the Taliban.

Other Comments by tieInterceptor

15. Comment #115305 by epeeist on January 24, 2008 at 1:28 am

 avatarComment #115304 by tieInterceptor
As soon as possible they should try to do this with a pig,

Having worked on a pig farm I wouldn't stand underneath.

Other Comments by epeeist

16. Comment #115358 by Azven on January 24, 2008 at 4:58 am

 avatarIt may be the article's fault here (which I think is quite badly written) but where is the real science here? Does this tell us anything that we didn't already know about evolution?

How does a 6% increase compare with normal variation amongs mice?

And surely "...mutant mice that lacked the mouse Prx1 enhancer..." are normal, un-mutated, mice!

Other Comments by Azven

17. Comment #115366 by Johnny O on January 24, 2008 at 5:19 am

 avatar
Come on everyone admit it; when you read up to there you already had an image in your head of a mouse with bat wings!


Isn't a mouse with bat wings... A Bat???

lol

Other Comments by Johnny O

18. Comment #115370 by Tyler Durden on January 24, 2008 at 5:23 am

 avatarNot long now before Mr. Burns gets his winged monkeys - "Fly, my pretties, fly!" :)

Other Comments by Tyler Durden

19. Comment #115376 by epeeist on January 24, 2008 at 5:39 am

 avatarComment #115366 by Johnny O
Isn't a mouse with bat wings... A Bat???
Of course it is, and it even has its own music - http://www.emusic.com/samples/m3u/album/10953423/0.m3u

Parent is http://www.emusic.com/album/Johanna-Strauss-Jr-Die-Fledermaus-MP3-Download/10953423.html

Other Comments by epeeist

20. Comment #115379 by Ian Bamlett on January 24, 2008 at 5:49 am

 avatar
Isn't a mouse with bat wings... A Bat???


Ahh... good point!

:-)

Other Comments by Ian Bamlett

21. Comment #115381 by Steve Zara on January 24, 2008 at 5:53 am

 avatar
Isn't a mouse with bat wings... A Bat???


Not at all. Mice are rodents, of the order Rodentia. Bats are of the order Chiroptera. There are the small echo-locating bats (the microchiroptera) and the very cute fruit bats (the megachiroptera). Bat classification is controversial, with some considering the fruit bats more closely related to primates. So they can be considered to be flying monkeys....

Other Comments by Steve Zara

22. Comment #115394 by Ian Bamlett on January 24, 2008 at 6:31 am

 avatarWith the parallel development of genetic engineering and nanobot type technology, how many generations before evolution by natural selection is done for and we chart are own path?

Just think a Borg with bat Wings. You know, that kind of stuff.

Fun times ahead!

Other Comments by Ian Bamlett

23. Comment #115438 by JFHalsey on January 24, 2008 at 7:44 am

I'm with Azven. What, exactly, is the purpose of this experiment? I'm all for splicing the ol' genes, but... a 6% increase? What does that tell us, really?

Other Comments by JFHalsey

24. Comment #115600 by flobear on January 24, 2008 at 11:43 am

 avatar
What, exactly, is the purpose of this experiment?


I'm not a biochemist, but I believe historically, scientists were mostly concerned with mutations in the actual genes themselves. In this paper perhaps they were trying to show that a mutation in the regulation of a gene (which occurs in a location outside the gene) is just as important.

Other Comments by flobear

25. Comment #115610 by liberalartist on January 24, 2008 at 11:58 am

 avatarI've learned more about bats than I ever thought I would....I just love the educational quality of this site :)

On the other hand, is it just me that is creeped out by "outfitting mice with a chunk of DNA that directs wing development in bats, scientists have created rodents with abnormally long forelimbs"? Poor little mouse.

Other Comments by liberalartist
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: