Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, October 23, 2006 | Reason : Children and Religion | print version Print | Comments

Document A God State of Affairs

by Ben Hope

Reposted from:
http://www.thetalent.org/Indice/Show/Articoli-HTML/frm-main.php?show=266

Patrick Henry College (PHC) is evangelical, fundamentalist, literalist, Christianity at its stomach-churning worst. But is this cause for concern? Surely in the Land of the Free, people should have the right to educate children as they please. Aren't such institutions harmless expressions of the liberty of a great nation? Far from it. PHC is not just an abhorrent affront to science and truth. It is a factory, a well-oiled production-line, churning out intellectual clones in sharp freshly-pressed suits to fulfil the PHC mission of moulding the culture of America to their vision of a fundamentalist Christian republic.

Boy am I glad to live in the UK.

Such was the prevailing feeling as the credits rolled on God's Next Army, a documentary charting the lives of students at Patrick Henry College (PHC), Loudoun County, Virginia (1). It was like watching an episode of Star Trek. You know, one of those where the crew has been taken over by a mysterious alien mind-virus. In this case, the symptoms are losing the ability to think critically, coupled with an uncontrollable urge to smile absolutely all the time, except when swaying open-palmed and shut-eyed at the sound of particularly naff, happy-clappy songs.

Yes, PHC is evangelical, fundamentalist, literalist, Christianity at its stomach-churning worst. Despite its Ivy-League appearance (minus the ivy), the college is only six years old and, with around 300 students, is still relatively small. The vast majority are experiencing the class-room environment for the first time, having been cocooned and home-schooled in a bubble of delusion by parents too afraid to let them interact with the real world. Indeed, the college was set up with precisely such people in mind. Its founder is one Michael Farris, who in 1983 also co-founded the Home School Legal Defense Association, to "preserve and advance the fundamental, God-given, constitutional right of parents and others legally responsible for their children to direct their education."

Every class at PHC is taught from a Biblical perspective. This of course extends to biology, about which their website proudly states:

Creation. Any biology, Bible or other courses at PHC dealing with creation will teach creation from the understanding of Scripture that God's creative work, as described in Genesis 1:1-31, was completed in six twenty-four hour days… In this context, PHC in particular expects its biology faculty to provide a full exposition of the claims of the theory of Darwinian evolution, intelligent design and other major theories while, in the end, teach creation as both biblically true and as the best fit to observed data (2).


Evidence of how strictly the doctrine is applied at PHC emerged in May this year when five "professors" left the college because of what they described as limitations on their academic freedom. One of the professors, David Noe, said faculty members were reprimanded for writing that the Bible "is not the only source of truth."

But is any of this cause for concern? Surely in the Land of the Free, people should have the right to educate children as they please. Aren't such institutions harmless expressions of the liberty of a great nation? Far from it. Leaving aside the idea that teaching a pupil the Universe is only 7,000 years old and was literally formed in 7 days might, to say the least, be morally questionable, I think we should be deeply worried and for a number of reasons.

Firstly, PHC is not just an abhorrent affront to science and truth. It is a factory, a well-oiled production-line, churning out intellectual clones in sharp freshly-pressed suits to fulfil the PHC mission of moulding the culture of America to their vision of a fundamentalist Christian republic.

The soldiers are being deliberately prepared for political warfare. They are smooth operators, with skills honed for attaining positions of authority and influence. Farris, a high-profile lawyer, is personally involved in coaching students in the art of debating and moot court which are central to the college's activities. As their considerable success in intercollegiate debating tournaments shows, they mean business. The influence of Farris should not be underestimated here. There's no denying he is an impressive and ambitious figure. One of his goals is, in his own words, "to raise up a few people that are really at the top of the legal profession and get in the zone where they can become the attorney general of their state... maybe the Supreme Court of the United States."

And the small size of PHC is no reason to be reassured. In George W. Bush, God's Next Army already has its Commander-in-Chief in place and they are too close for comfort. Farris is extremely well-connected with members of Congress, not to mention the president himself. In the spring of 2004, seven of the 100 or so interns working in the White House were from PHC, and in its first four years, the college provided interns for no less than 22 conservative members of Congress (3). They have even had interns working for the president's senior political adviser at the time, Karl Rove, and the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad. As Farris says, "Personnel is policy. If you can get the right people there, you will change the way the nation works." It seems his focussed determination is paying off.

Secondly, PHC is not some isolated case punching above its weight thanks to fortuitous White House connections. It is indicative of the much deeper problem of widespread right-wing Christian fundamentalism in the United States.

Conservative politicians taking on interns from institutions like PHC do so because, according to Farris, they share their own deeply-held values. Moreover, the Republican Party, which they serve, would not be in control of every branch of US government had over half the participating electorate not voted them in. Of course, the correlation between Republicanism and this brand of religion is not absolute. There are fundamentalist Christian Democrats and, no doubt, Republicans who despise the current trends in their party, but the voice of the latter is disturbingly quiet. The truth is that graduates of PHC enter a world more willing than ever to receive them. They become an active part of the population which twice elected the Bush administration, a regime littered with a catalogue of religiously-inspired, ill-considered legislation, matched only by the verbal gaffs of its leader.

Perhaps the most damning manifestation of this has been the attacks on science. From the much-documented opposition to stem-cell research to the somewhat more underhanded, semantically-driven interference with NASA (4), the actions and policy of the Bush administration towards science has shocked the academic community. Yet is it at all surprising that this is tolerated by so many given that over half the population, according to the polls, deny that evolution by natural selection ever happened? (5)

And all this is occurring in a country which explicitly separates Church and State in its constitution. Yet, ironically, perhaps this is not causally unrelated. It could be argued that this very separation is a significant factor in the rise of fundamentalism. It is as though panic sets in and people feel the need to go to increasingly bizarre and extreme lengths to subvert the system and ensure their moral and metaphysical voice is heard. Churches become more like cynical businesses competing for bums-on-pews while bottom-of-the-range academics invent devious schemes like "intelligent design theory" and the "wedge strategy" in a vain attempt to get creationism into schools.

Richard Dawkins recently said on the Charlie Rose Show, "we do have ignorant fools in Britain. The difference is that they don't get political power". And he's right. On the whole, the religious madness seen in the US doesn't happen in Europe. To be sure, the forms of Christianity found here, for all sorts of cultural reasons, tend to be far more liberal and progressive than that which dominates in the US, but perhaps it is also no coincidence that there is often a mature state-established Church. In the UK, for example, a number of bishops of the Church of England are automatically members of the House of Lords, as are other religious leaders. This may be illogical and democratically suspect but, historically at least, perhaps it has removed an element of religious paranoia leaving the politicians to get on with real politics.

So, far from being separated, American politics has become so infused by evangelical Christianity from the inside that, anyone who doesn't conform, simply has no voice. Indeed, at present, openly atheist candidates stand very little chance of being elected to Congress, regardless of their policies. Instead, the system throws up governors like Bush with a twisted Christian worldview, hopelessly divorced from reality. Remember this is a man who openly claims he went to war because God told him to, a man so deluded that, by many accounts, he believes in Armageddon and the Second Coming. And he has his finger on the button of the most destructive arsenal of weapons ever known. That surely is reason to be worried.

Bush may only have two of his "four more years" left, but with slick operations like PHC up and running, there is a real danger that he could be just the beginning. Wake up! The "ignorant fools" have their act together. The virus is spreading fast and, unlike on The Enterprise, there is no logically-minded Spock guaranteed to save the day. Political and ideological action is needed, both at and away from the ballot box, by the people who read more than one book. Atheists, agnostics, sceptics, non-believers, critical-thinkers, secular humanists and, yes, sophisticated theists of America: it's down to you.

Comments 1 - 10 of 10 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #2718 by Martin on October 23, 2006 at 4:38 am

Seems this satirical picture is becoming more and more true.

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/funnypictures/ig/100-Funny-Pictures/Jesusland.htm

One has to wonder what might happen to the US in the future. If the religious nuts are not held in check and soon, then I can see another Civil War in the US, drawn along the lines of this image above.

Possibly more frightnening even than that is the situation where the intelligent people leave the US for places like Europe, Australia and Asia, where they can work without (well almost) bigoted interference. So that eventually only the nut cases remain. Imagine that lunatic asylum in charge of nukes and with dreams of a cataclysmic destruction to herald the 2nd coming of christ!

My first warning of just how bad thing were in the USA (being thoroughly eurpean) was when Bush came to power and I was left speechless by the nonsense he was talking. For the first time in my life, I could forsee a time when Europe might have to go to war with the US. I doubt very much it will be in my generation, nor the next, but even to just contemplating that possiblity is frightening enough in itself.

It disgusts me to think that in a few years time we might be thinking of the US in terms we now use describe places like Iran, or North Korea.

I wonder just how many atheists and seculars and liberal religious people didn't vote last time. Could they tip the balance? In the end though, all people like me can do is sit on the side-lines, shout advice and hope that enough rational people still exist in the US with the will (and the votes) to make a difference.

2. Comment #2745 by Russ on October 23, 2006 at 7:50 am

One of Professor Dawkins' objectives in the The God Delusion is to encourage critical thought - no doubt a noble undertaking. Sadly, living in the US, I see it this way. Pick 100 Americans completely at random, and maybe one will be able to tell you what critical thinking is. From that same 100, only one will not be able to tell you the day and time that Desperate Housewives shows on television. Yes, of course these numbers are contrived, but I can tell you that in the US only a small fraction of the population will even know what critical thinking is and a significantly smaller percentage will be able to do it. Professor Dawkins can encourage all he likes, but that still will not change the fact that Americans have Clergy, Corporations, and Politicians to tell them exactly what they think and when they think it. What's even more chilling is I think they like it that way.

For most of my compatriots, I think "The God Delusion" has the capacity to stir their emotions and that has the potential to get a conversation started. Predictably, however, those emotions will rise, simply from their having learned what the subject matter is, not, as one might hope, from a careful consideration of that subject matter.

Among America's religious minions, judging a book by its cover is such an important part of their thought control arsenals, that they obsess over how to package an object of vilification - a book, an author, a concept - to maximize disdain toward it. For instance, some religious people work full time packaging Darwin, evolution, and On the Origin of Species as a grotesque affront to their sect. They fully understand that the right cover alone can assure that, among their adherents, the contents will never be read.

Concerning possible impact, when all is said and done "The God Delusion" might sell a few hundred thousand copies, mostly to the proverbial choir, while books from the likes of Coulter and Dobson are selling tens of millions. It is quite conceivable, in fact, that "The God Delusion" will promote an increase in the sale of religious and pseudoscience books as the superstitious close ranks.

Sadly, it is not at all unfair to think of most of the US population as in living in an intellectually stagnant backwater. Americans claim to value education - though not intellectualism, and precisely as their religious behavior belies claims of faith and exposes their religious hypocrisy, so too does their day-to-day behavior contradict their claim of valuing education. Americans rarely consider themselves enriched by formal education, independent scholarship, self-instruction or any other form of learning unless it pays cash dividends. Even then, only the cash is seen as having worth. They see no value in informed argument. They see no merit in engaging science on equal footing by learning it. They see freely embraced servile ignorance as more meritorious than an education that might challenge treasured beliefs.

3. Comment #2746 by Alan on October 23, 2006 at 8:16 am

I'm an American, and, against the odds, I DO know what critical thinking is, and I DO NOT know when Desperate Housewives in on television.

And sadly Russ, your assessment of the intellectual attitudes and abilities of the average American, from my perspective as an observant citizen, is spot on correct.

How else could a tranparent idiot like Bush get elected? This country, unfortunately, has the president it deserves.

4. Comment #2784 by William on October 23, 2006 at 12:33 pm

There are many Americans on this feed! I think you are being too hard on yourselves! I have visited the States twice and I'm going again in October 2007.

I've found Americans to be well-mannered, hospitable, warm and easy to get on with. If many still believe in a Deity, then maybe it is more to do with the education system per se and NOT that you are all a bunch of right-wing evangelicals!

Here in England, we have many who are die-hard about faith. The Jehovah's witnessess are the WORST! I'd rather share a bath with a 1000 wasps than have a conversation with those idiots. And they are idiots. The neurotic beliefs they peddle are nonesense. They have knocked my door on 6 occasions this year alone AND REFUSE TO ACCEPT THAT I DON'T BELEIVE IN THEIR RUBBISH. My soul doesn't need saving. I don't subscribe to the idea of God anymore. And I am now free to explore other more interesting subjects such as science. Working out how things work, instead of pretending it's the handy-work of God, is far more rewarding.

Don't be so hard on yourselves. As Professor Dawkins states - NOBODY can be 100% certain there is NOT a God. It is just most unlikely. And Centuries of fear, superstition, ignorance and power, that the church propogated will take a long time to jettison. I doubt the die-hards will EVER give up their faith - which is fine by an Atheist like me - as long as they RESPECT MY RIGHT to NOT believe in their ideals. Sadly, most Theists turn their nose up at you in intellectual arrogance and superiority when you announce that you are Atheist. Just because they have a Bible, doesn't mean they are right. HOW do they know the Bible is right? HOW do they know it is 'The Word of God'?

Kind Regards, William.

5. Comment #2787 by Russ on October 23, 2006 at 12:53 pm

While it is the case that many people homeschool their children for religious reasons, there are other reasons, too. I know some families who homeschool because they want to deeply reinforce to their children that life-long learning is their own responsibility, even as a youngster. Some of these kids are intellectually truly amazing. Some have grown up with natural selection as part of every biology lesson - that won't happen in public schools anytime soon. Twenty years ago, one atheist family told me that, if they has children, they were going to homeschool and, in addition to the standard cirriculum, they were going to emphasize religious studies. I thought they were a bit nuts, but, now, their two sons, both well-reasoned atheists, are the most religiously knowledgeable people I know. One claims to be intimately familiar with over one hundred distinct creation myths, at age 17.

For others public school is simply too slow. Here, in the US, through high school's 13 years of schooling, the typical student will work through approximately 60 textbooks. If assigned additional reading amounts to 10 books a year, we would expect that to get through high school, a student would need in the neighborhood of 200 books, total. Some homeschooled finish the high school requirements by 14 or 15 and go to community college. Throw out just a couple of hours of television a day and that same thing could be accomplished by most public school students, if the drive existed to do it.

Some parents homeschool for the most selfish secular reason of all: they love their children and they want them to have the highest quality educational experiences they can provide.

6. Comment #2959 by Randy Ping on October 25, 2006 at 1:04 am

Try growing up surrounded by these people.
It's no cake walk.

7. Comment #4426 by Jenna on November 3, 2006 at 8:30 pm

Dear William,
Thanks for defending the Americans. It's nice to know that not all Europeans think that we're all Bush clones. As for why Christians "know" the Bible is the truth, well, because IT'S IN THE BIBLE! Isn't that the most ridiculous line of reasoning that you've ever heard? My book is correct because it says so in the book itself. I always wondered why, when Martin Luther had enough common sense to question the validity of the Catholic dogma, he didn't go one tiny step further and ask the question, "If what the Church teaches is false, how can we believe anything in the Bible as well?" I believe that the world will be a much better place when the god of the desert takes his rightful place among the now defunct gods of antiquity.
Kind Regards,
Jenna

8. Comment #4930 by Jenna on November 6, 2006 at 11:51 pm

That university is so scary. Has anyone read the novel "A Handmaid's Tale"? I read it in the early 1990's and thought it was a bit far fletched, but now it seems like, word for word, it's coming true.

9. Comment #14563 by LucyFir on December 23, 2006 at 8:41 am

This college seems anti-intellectual:
"While there are many very worthy cases, I hope you will join me in believing that the effort by PHC to offer a truly world-class alternative to the New Atheists and internationalists is among the most urgent issues of our day. Our opponents know that this is a long-term battle, and while we match their determination, we need your help.

Please consider Patrick Henry College in your year-end giving plans. Fighting something with nothing doesn't work. Help us reach our financial goal so that, small as we are, yet working together, we can continue to achieve great victories for God and country."
http://www.stpns.net/view_article.html?articleId=21147611026532716

Other Comments by LucyFir

10. Comment #22385 by Curious_George on February 15, 2007 at 9:58 pm

I personally thought the article was a little one-sided, but then I'm not surprised. Objectivity does tend to be in short supply around the world. However, I would like to talk to this home-schooled Bandon Decker, if he's willing. My e-mail address is christian_concern@yahoo.com

Other Comments by Curious_George
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: