




















In Britain, creationist theory is evolving
2. Comment #144527 by atheist1981 on March 16, 2008 at 9:40 am
Dawkins new to be released book about evolution is needed more than ever. I'll be jumping for joy when I get it in the mail one day.3. Comment #144535 by emmet on March 16, 2008 at 10:07 am
4. Comment #144538 by Partisan on March 16, 2008 at 10:10 am
5. Comment #144539 by Apathy personified on March 16, 2008 at 10:10 am
6. Comment #144541 by Geoff on March 16, 2008 at 10:15 am
7. Comment #144542 by Apathy personified on March 16, 2008 at 10:15 am
8. Comment #144546 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 10:21 am
9. Comment #144547 by KrisRamJ on March 16, 2008 at 10:22 am
10. Comment #144552 by jhm on March 16, 2008 at 10:27 am
11. Comment #144553 by Double Bass Atheist on March 16, 2008 at 10:27 am
"There is a lot of American influence, and there are a lot of moral and political and financial resources flowing from the United States to here"
12. Comment #144557 by Koreman on March 16, 2008 at 10:30 am
So, when evolution is banned everywhere and hospitals have been closed down by lack of medicine, what's next? Einstein? Quantum mechanics? Maybe children should be taught that nuclear power is just a trick of the devil cleverly deluding us. There is no such thing as atoms and molecules. Proof? You can't see them.13. Comment #144563 by epeeist on March 16, 2008 at 10:41 am
Further down the line - expect things like geology, archaeology, anthropology and ancient history to be hit first.
So, when evolution is banned everywhere and hospitals have been closed down by lack of medicine, what's next? Einstein? Quantum mechanics?
14. Comment #144567 by JanChan on March 16, 2008 at 10:47 am
Dawkins feels the effect. He said he is discouraged when he visits schools and gets questions from students who have obviously been influenced by material from Answers in Genesis. "I continually get the same rather stupid points straight from their pamphlets," he said.
15. Comment #144568 by Bonzai on March 16, 2008 at 10:51 am
JanChan,16. Comment #144572 by Geoff on March 16, 2008 at 10:54 am
17. Comment #144575 by notsobad on March 16, 2008 at 11:01 am
18. Comment #144576 by Verylee on March 16, 2008 at 11:03 am
19. Comment #144587 by BillySands on March 16, 2008 at 11:25 am
20. Comment #144596 by Steve Zara on March 16, 2008 at 11:36 am
Some RD.net members are going to be giving out flyers at the events (Steve Zara has been closely involved in the design of the flyer!).
21. Comment #144598 by Pattern Seeker on March 16, 2008 at 11:44 am
22. Comment #144607 by Zaphod on March 16, 2008 at 12:09 pm
23. Comment #144628 by Roy_H on March 16, 2008 at 1:08 pm
24. Comment #144638 by Inferno on March 16, 2008 at 1:48 pm
25. Comment #144639 by Buddha on March 16, 2008 at 1:51 pm
If dinosaurs evolved from amphibians, there should be, for example, fossil evidence of animals that are part dinosaur and part something else. However, there is no proof of this anywhere. In fact, if you go into any museum you will see fossils of dinosaurs that are 100% dinosaur, not something in between. There are no 25%, 50%, 75%, or even 99% dinosaursâ€"they are all 100% dinosaur!
26. Comment #144641 by Bonzai on March 16, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Other than saying evolution is wrong what is the central "theory" of creationism? What are its positive contents?27. Comment #144642 by Teratornis on March 16, 2008 at 1:55 pm
"There is a lot of American influence, and there are a lot of moral and political and financial resources flowing from the United States to here"
(...)
We need your influence here, not the other way around!
28. Comment #144657 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 2:19 pm
29. Comment #144662 by Bonzai on March 16, 2008 at 2:31 pm
Sanderson said the British government is taking over funding of about 100 Islamic schools even though they teach the Koranic version of creationism. He said the government fears imposing evolution theory on the curriculum lest it be branded as anti-Islamic.
30. Comment #144680 by D'Arcy on March 16, 2008 at 3:17 pm
He says that when he is asked to speak to science classes, he challenges the accuracy of radioactive dating which shows the world to be thousands of millions of years old and says that the Bible is a more accurate description of how mankind began. He personally believes the Earth is between 6,000 and 12,000 years old.
31. Comment #144681 by Matt7895 on March 16, 2008 at 3:21 pm
This is really frightening. 32. Comment #144683 by refuteist on March 16, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Sorry if this link has already been given--have not had time time to read all the posts:33. Comment #144692 by mattTR on March 16, 2008 at 3:44 pm
It seems this Answers in Genesis group is touring the UK over the nxt few months - anyone fancy going to the events & asking awkward questions? Or standing outside flyering people as they go in & out?34. Comment #144694 by mattTR on March 16, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Check out this Monty White guy on http://bcseweb.org.uk/index.php/Main/MontyWhite35. Comment #144696 by phasmagigas on March 16, 2008 at 3:58 pm
36. Comment #144698 by LeeC on March 16, 2008 at 4:02 pm
37. Comment #144699 by phasmagigas on March 16, 2008 at 4:04 pm
38. Comment #144700 by Steve Zara on March 16, 2008 at 4:05 pm
anyone fancy going to the events & asking awkward questions? Or standing outside flyering people as they go in & out?
Some RD.net members are going to be giving out flyers at the events
39. Comment #144701 by frederik on March 16, 2008 at 4:06 pm
I believe man and woman were conceived by the proverbial purple teapot circling the sun, and sent to earth to drink tea. The amount of proof available for the factual accuracy of my beliefs equals that available for the biblical story of creation. I demand the teapot theory be taught as an alternative to evolution in schools.40. Comment #144702 by heafnerj on March 16, 2008 at 4:08 pm
41. Comment #144703 by LeeC on March 16, 2008 at 4:08 pm
It seems this Answers in Genesis group is touring the UK over the nxt few months - anyone fancy going to the events & asking awkward questions? Or standing outside flyering people as they go in & out?
There's no use decrying the slow creep of creationism if we atheists arent willing to go out n challenge it
42. Comment #144704 by LeeC on March 16, 2008 at 4:12 pm
a few years ago i was talking to a head of science of a UK school, she had received some creationist material through the mail and went ballistic, she made sure it was used in the best possible way......via the recycle bin.
43. Comment #144710 by waffleface on March 16, 2008 at 4:24 pm
"I'm confident that this will never become popular in Europe. "44. Comment #144719 by phasmagigas on March 16, 2008 at 4:36 pm
I disagree... the best "possible way" would be to use the material in class as a critical reading exercise. Students need to be taught how to read this stuff with a smile :)
45. Comment #144726 by Richard Morgan on March 16, 2008 at 4:42 pm
What would music inspired by the fleas sound like?
Something to make them seem ridiculous, pathetic, desperate?
46. Comment #144752 by LeeC on March 16, 2008 at 5:21 pm
im not sure, even mentioning it is a bad idea unless you are very good teacher who knows evolution very well.
Not all science or even biol teachers know evo that well (one could argue that they should!) its like making an omlette, its very easy to do but also easy to get wrong.
A teacher not experienced in creationist arguments might find themselves in a compromised position if they are asked an anti evolution question they cannot answer well.
The notion of special critical thinking components to lessons is almost impossible in the average UK school and it is dangerous to include creation ideas there as its contentious anyway and bullshit to begin with. why not something like the history of the knowledge of the earths interior as an alternative.
47. Comment #144754 by FightingFalcon on March 16, 2008 at 5:27 pm
48. Comment #144758 by Cerberus on March 16, 2008 at 5:33 pm
By the way, this Monty White is an interesting fellow, earning a doctorate at the age of 19. At a christian university? Maybe that explains his problems with determining the date of events.
49. Comment #144760 by phasmagigas on March 16, 2008 at 5:36 pm
50. Comment #144766 by LeeC on March 16, 2008 at 5:40 pm
1. Comment #144526 by leodavinci on March 16, 2008 at 9:39 am
If you have a look at any religiously themed video (pick a random one) on YT you will see a strong majority on our side, it is heartening.
Other Comments by leodavinci