Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Tuesday, April 8, 2008 | Reason : Physics and Chemistry | print version Print | Comments

Document In search of the God particle

by Independent

Thanks to Michael for the link.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/in-search-of-the-god-particle-805757.html

Science is all about big ideas. But few come bigger than the 'Higgs bosun' — a theory that may unlock the universe's deepest secrets. Steve Connor reports on the experiment of the century

It is not everyday that someone's name becomes inextricably linked with God. But it is not everyday that someone comes up with a theory that could help to unify the many disparate forces of the universe. All the more strange, then, for the man behind the sub-atomic "God particle" to be an unassuming grandfather living in modest retirement in one of the more sedate districts of Edinburgh.

Indeed, Professor Peter Higgs, 78, is modesty personified. A theoretical particle physicist, it took him 20 years before he could even bring himself to call the God particle by its more scientific name — the Higgs boson. Up to that point, he preferred the more prosaic term, "scalar boson".

He still squirms when people refer to it by the deified moniker coined many years ago by a brasher colleague. "I find it embarrassing because, although I'm not a believer myself, it's the sort of misuse of terminology that might offend some people," he said. And if Peter Higgs is anything, he's not someone to go around offending people.

He first formulated the theory behind the sub-atomic particle named after him in the 1960s, and for almost half a century it has remained as elusive as stardust. That could all change later this year, however, when one of the world's biggest experiments is switched on deep beneath the Alpine meadows on the Franco-Swiss border, the home of the European Centre for Nuclear Research (Cern) near Geneva.

Within a 27km-long, circular tunnel — as big as the Circle line on the London Underground — atom will be smashed into atom at something approaching the speed of light. The machine, called the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), is built to produce energy levels expected to be powerful enough to shake out the elusive Higgs boson from its seemingly inescapable prison within the atomic nucleus.

The Higgs is just one of the discoveries that the LHC is expected to make. The international team of physicists behind the project believes that the LHC will almost certainly produce a jewel box of discoveries that will light up the infinitesimally small world of sub-atomic physics.

"The actual discovery of the Higgs boson, if it happens, is only one part of the programme. There is vastly more for the machine to do," Professor Higgs said. "I'm most excited for instance about the possible identification of super-symmetry particles — symmetrical particles of the particles we already know".

Supersymmetry refers to the "grand dance" of particles in the universe. We know of about a dozen sub-atomic particles, which have exotic names such as quark, lepton and neutrino. Yet for every kind of particle, there may a super-symmetrical partner.

The trouble is, we can only see one of the partners in each dancing couple, with the "significant others" remaining invisible. If supersymmetry is confirmed by the LHC it will help scientists towards the ultimate goal of a unified theory for the fundamental forces of nature — in particular the force of gravity which so far lies outside the realm of the forces known at the quantum level of the sub-atomic particle.

"The reason it's exciting is that I'm interested in a unified theory of forces, in particular quantum gravity," Professor Higgs said.

Although long retired from research, he still possesses a child-like wonder of the world which we cannot see but which is so critical to some of the most important questions at the centre of our understanding of creation, the universe and the end of time.

Professor Higgs was speaking to the press yesterday after spending much of the weekend seeing the LHC for the first time, before it is sealed in preparation for the switch-on in summer. It was the first time he had been to Cern since 1985, and the first time he had spent any appreciable time there since a short research project in 1976.

"The sheer scale of the detectors is overwhelming. It's far more impressive than anything you get out of photographs," he said. The detectors in question are four huge underground instruments, some as big as a gothic cathedral, which will act as microscopes to identify a Higgs particle in a fraction of the split second it takes to make an appearance before it disappears once more.

Professor Higgs said he is 90 per cent certain the LHC will find his particle when it reaches its full working potential, perhaps in a year's time. If the machine does find the Higgs, it will cap an extraordinary career for the Bristol-born mathematician, given that he first proposed the idea more than 40 years ago when he was a young theoretical physicist at the University of Edinburgh.

It will also solve one of the most pressing problems in science because the Higgs boson lies at the heart of matter itself. In particular it is supposed to explain why objects have mass and while some phenomena — such as light — do not.

Professor Higgs was the first to propose the theory that the reason why objects have mass is because they interact with an invisible field, now called the Higgs field. Heavier particles interact more strongly, whereas photons (light particles) do not interact at all. Without this Higgs field, everything — from proton to planet — would be as insubstantial as a light beam.

When Higgs first came up with the idea, few people took him seriously and even the then editor of a leading physics journal — who was based at Cern — thought it was too conjectural to be published. "At the time I started this work, it was rather an unfashionable thing to be interested in, certainly on this side of the Atlantic ... my colleagues thought I was a bit of an idiot," Professor Higgs recalled.

"A colleague told me that at Cern they didn't see what I was talking about had much to do with particle physics. So I added on a few extra paragraphs [to the original scientific paper] and sent it off across the Atlantic to [the journal] Physical Review Letters, which did accept it," he said.

Four decades later, Cern is in pole position in the race to be first to find the Higgs although its advantage has been eroded. The LHC should have opened three years ago but, as with all big engineering and construction projects, it was dogged by delays.

Meanwhile, another atom smasher at the Fermi Laboratory in the United States may have come close to solving the problem. Professor Higgs said the Fermi Lab scientists may have already done it, but may not yet be in a position to prove it because the critical evidence may still locked up in data obscured by background noise.

Professor Higgs said that it's not something he's going to mention to the people at Cern. "It's a possibility. I think the race is a very close thing. Fermi Lab are obviously trying very hard, they have a disadvantage compared to LHC when it starts, in terms of lack of luminosity, comparatively speaking — so it's for them to find it," he said. "But it could be there in their data, but not just found in the analysis, yet. They are certainly hoping that they'll get their first indication before the LHC gets going."

But time is running out for the Fermi Lab, as the giant, supercooled magnets at the LHC are being prepared for their task of keeping the particle beams swirling round the tunnel with pin-point accuracy at the rate of more than 22,000 times a second.

Just the amount of supercooling involved is stupendous — enough deep freeze to keep 140,000 kitchen fridges just above absolute zero, which is —273C. In fact, when it is fully operational, the LHC will be the coldest place in the known universe. There are enough supercooled cables in the LHC to go around the equator 6.8 times, and enough filaments in the cable strands to stretch to the sun and back five times — and enough left over for a few return trips to the moon.

The immense energies involved in making the atomic collisions happen have already generated unwelcome publicity for the LHC. Some scientists have suggested that they may generate mini black holes, which have led others to suggest that these black holes could somehow merge to form a larger, destructive entity that could swallow up the entire earth.

"The black hole business has become rather inflated," said Professor Higgs, irritated by the suggestion that the LHC could become an unwitting doomsday machine. "Even the theorists who are suggesting that mini-black holes are things that could be produced are not predicting black holes large enough to swallow up chunks of the universe. I think the publicity has rather got out of hand and some people have misunderstood it," he said.

Hysteria aside, Professor Higgs seemed pleased that so many people outside the rarefied world of particle physics and cosmology are taking an interest in what will happen at Cern in the coming few years. He for one is certain that something awesome is about to happen, even if his particle is not found — although he thinks that is unlikely.

"I'd be very puzzled if it wasn't discovered ... If you don't have something like a Higgs boson ... if it's not that, what the hell is it? If it's not found, I no longer understand what I think I understand," he said.

And if it is found? "I shall open a bottle of something."

Comments 1 - 46 of 46 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #156718 by black wolf on April 8, 2008 at 7:28 am

 avatarI really like this man. His thinking alone is so much greater than the God theologians have painstakingly painted over centuries.

Other Comments by black wolf

2. Comment #156727 by padster1976 on April 8, 2008 at 7:52 am

 avatarAs I understood it, the Higgs Boson is the only fundamental particle that has been predicted yet not found.

It's a shame that he squirms about the 'god' title - I absolutely agree with him however that in todays world, you just know that some people will not get the reference and take it literally!

It's like when I say 'god knows' when asked something.

Like maybe I'm thinking about this too much - I need a holiday.

Patrick.

Other Comments by padster1976

3. Comment #156728 by Quetzalcoatl on April 8, 2008 at 7:55 am

 avatarI'll be keeping my eyes open for the findings of this.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

4. Comment #156737 by Geoff on April 8, 2008 at 8:08 am

 avatarMe too, Quetz, but the "Higgs Bosun" in the introduction made me smile!

God just keeps getting smaller and smaller, doesn't he?

Other Comments by Geoff

5. Comment #156750 by Pattern Seeker on April 8, 2008 at 8:18 am

 avatarAnd if it is found...

Prof. Higgs replied "I shall open a bottle of something."

Perhaps we can start a "Professor Higgs Bottle Of Something Celebration Fund." :)

I'd chip in a few bucks.

Other Comments by Pattern Seeker

6. Comment #156758 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:27 am

 avatar5. Comment #156750 by Pattern Seeker -

I might, or might not, chip in a few bucks. The envelope may - or may not - contain cash. Only by opening the envelope will we find out.

Other Comments by irate_atheist

7. Comment #156759 by AdrianB on April 8, 2008 at 8:27 am

 avatarHere is The Times article of the same story:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3701645.ece

This article allows comments, and the amount of rubbish posted by religious wingnuts is staggering.

Other Comments by AdrianB

8. Comment #156765 by Quetzalcoatl on April 8, 2008 at 8:32 am

 avatarirate-

it's also possible that the envelope, upon being opened, could be found to contain a very pissed-off cat.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

9. Comment #156767 by Pattern Seeker on April 8, 2008 at 8:36 am

 avatarWould that be Schrodinger's Cat...

Other Comments by Pattern Seeker

10. Comment #156772 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:42 am

 avatar7. Comment #156759 by AdrianB -
This article allows comments, and the amount of rubbish posted by religious wingnuts is staggering.
"Only two things are infinite - the Universe and human stupidity - and I'm not sure about the Universe." - Albert Einstein

Spot on Al, spot on.

Other Comments by irate_atheist

11. Comment #156779 by Storeo on April 8, 2008 at 8:49 am

 avatarFrom the Times article;

"Jesus will put a stop to this ungodly experiment." Thomas Jones, London, UK.

lulz, o rly Thomas?

Other Comments by Storeo

12. Comment #156785 by Quetzalcoatl on April 8, 2008 at 8:55 am

 avatar
"Jesus will put a stop to this ungodly experiment." Thomas Jones, London, UK


I doubt it, Thomas.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

13. Comment #156786 by hungarianelephant on April 8, 2008 at 8:57 am

 avatarThe Times refused my comment, which was a kind offer to bet every one of the sceptics $100 that the experiment would not cause the end of the world.

Worth a try, I thought.

Other Comments by hungarianelephant

14. Comment #156789 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:03 am

 avatar12. Comment #156785 by Quetzalcoatl -

He was referring to Jesus Harrington. The well known wrecker of various scientific experiments. He really screwed up one by Schrodinger when he brought a tin of 'Whiskas' into the lab. Boy, were they mad about that.

Other Comments by irate_atheist

15. Comment #156799 by Pattern Seeker on April 8, 2008 at 9:21 am

 avatar14. Comment #156789 by irate_atheist-

Little did Jesus know, but that can of 'Whiskas' was in quantum superposition consisting of both dead and alive animal by-products...yet when he opened that tin he expected to find one state or another, not a mixture of dead and alive animal by-products.

Other Comments by Pattern Seeker

16. Comment #156805 by DamnDirtyApe on April 8, 2008 at 9:23 am

 avatarUrgh! Reading those comments for the Times, I haven't been as annoyed with people's ignorance since that program on BBC on sunday morning with the good professor, that horrible woman, and those idiotic debate topics!

Other Comments by DamnDirtyApe

17. Comment #156827 by BigJohn on April 8, 2008 at 9:58 am

 avatarI have a feeing that as more powerful accelerators are built more particles will be found, ad infinitum. Just a weird idea I have had since I was a youth.

Well, it is obvious that the people worried about the destruction of the world by a black hole generated by the LHC are not fundamentalist christians because isn't that exactly the Armageddon they are looking for? Oh, maybe not. What if God couldn't find the Earth if it was swallowed by a black hole. How could he rapture all of the "good" people?

Other Comments by BigJohn

18. Comment #156835 by SPS on April 8, 2008 at 10:03 am

Professor Higgs seems like an awesome guy.
This is very exciting, however, beyond the threat of mini black holes, they have completely overlooked the possiblity of someone falling into the collider, thereby being granted superpowers. This will likely be a geeky scientist who doesn't know quite what to make of his new found abilities, and will have to decide whether to use them for good or evil.

Other Comments by SPS

19. Comment #156839 by Wosret on April 8, 2008 at 10:09 am

 avatarOh, the God particle? This must prove god, looks like I can't be an atheist anymore. Because a particle could exist that people have nick-named the god particle.

Hmm? Tt is unlikely that this will destory us all? Good to know, good to know.

I hope to hear more about this.

Other Comments by Wosret

20. Comment #156840 by AshtonBlack on April 8, 2008 at 10:10 am

 avatar12. Comment #156785 by Quetzalcoatl
I doubt it, Thomas.


:) clever ;)

Other Comments by AshtonBlack

21. Comment #156847 by Wosret on April 8, 2008 at 10:16 am

 avatarSPS, there was a supervillian on Spider-man that developed superpowers and was able to control black holes. I believe he called himself "The Spot".

Other Comments by Wosret

22. Comment #156853 by Steve Zara on April 8, 2008 at 10:26 am

 avatarComment #156827 by BigJohn

I have a feeing that as more powerful accelerators are built more particles will be found, ad infinitum. Just a weird idea I have had since I was a youth.


It's not weird at all - it is an idea shared by some physicists. There is a LOT of space between the particles we know and the smallest possible size (the Planck length). Protons and neutrons are about 1.6 x 10^-15 m in diameter, and the smallest length is 1.6 x 10^-35 m. That is 20 orders of magnitude.

If the Planck length was enlarged to the size of, say, a family car, then a proton would be around the size of our galaxy.

Other Comments by Steve Zara

23. Comment #156855 by hungarianelephant on April 8, 2008 at 10:29 am

 avatarSee, if I were a scientist, and I had an experiment that (a) had a good chance of discovering something important, but (b) had a small chance of destroying the planet, I'd probably think "fuck it" and go ahead anyway. And you know that this is what they are thinking too.

The last words spoken on Earth will be not "Allahu Akhbar", but "What would happen if we did this?"

Other Comments by hungarianelephant

24. Comment #156857 by Steve Zara on April 8, 2008 at 10:36 am

 avatarComment #156855 by hungarianelephant

Just to put minds at rest, the chance of anything nasty happening is very, very remote. The reason why we can be confident of this is that particle collisions of far greater energy happen every day when cosmic rays strike the atmosphere. Nature has already done this experiment, and nothing happened.

Other Comments by Steve Zara

25. Comment #156864 by hungarianelephant on April 8, 2008 at 10:44 am

 avatarBut I notice no denial ...

(For the avoidance of doubt, the raised eyebrow doesn't work too well on the internet, and I am not at all worried about this experiment. For one thing, if it does go awry, we'll all be dead in seconds, right?)

Other Comments by hungarianelephant

26. Comment #156871 by AdrianB on April 8, 2008 at 10:53 am

 avatarComment #156855 by hungarianelephant

I'm with you on this. I think the future survival of our species is so dependant on discoveries that may arise from experiments like this, that even if, unlikely as it may be, something did go wrong, my last thoughts would be "well it was worth a try."

Other Comments by AdrianB

27. Comment #156887 by gyokusai on April 8, 2008 at 11:14 am

 avatarAt the comments section of the timesonline.co.uk article, the goddidits' unbridled bigotry and the dogooders' feed-a-hungry-child-instead self-pompousness are really battling it out for world-dominance. Unbelievable.

^_^J.

Other Comments by gyokusai

28. Comment #156903 by Bigorra on April 8, 2008 at 11:32 am

 avatar
Some scientists have suggested that they may generate mini black holes, which have led others to suggest that these black holes could somehow merge to form a larger, destructive entity that could swallow up the entire earth.

If only Ben Stein would make a movie about particle physics, a hastily thrown together piece of trash full of misconstrued statements, non-sequiturs and ad hominem attacks, we could stop these horrible, evil scientists from going against the will of God. I'll even supply him with another ridiculous pair of short-pants, because if anything says, "Take me seriously!", it's a grown man dressed like a 10 year old boy.

Other Comments by Bigorra

29. Comment #156923 by Vadjong on April 8, 2008 at 11:55 am

 avatar
The last words spoken on Earth will be not "Allahu Akhbar", but "What would happen if we did this?"


In my younger years I once wrote the longest short-story ever. It went something like this:
Time machine, first test run in 3.. 2.. 1.. 1.. 1.. 1../


Other Comments by Vadjong

30. Comment #156960 by Thor'Ungal on April 8, 2008 at 12:40 pm

 avatarhaving read only a small selection of the comments on the times site I think:

a) calling it the 'god' particle brings out the nut jobs big time

b) I did not understand the shear depth of human stupidity, I am truly in awe

oh and "Science, it works bitches"

Other Comments by Thor'Ungal

31. Comment #156976 by black wolf on April 8, 2008 at 1:00 pm

 avatar
SPS, there was a supervillian on Spider-man that developed superpowers and was able to control black holes. I believe he called himself "The Spot".


Naw, he just had a whole bunch of holes that he could drop and jump (or punch) through. Unfortunately for him, Parker lured him into dropping so many of them that he didn't have any left, and Spot was knocked out. Much like theists who try to defend their arguments here.

Other Comments by black wolf

32. Comment #156982 by black wolf on April 8, 2008 at 1:05 pm

 avatarI couldn't read their comment page beyond this gem, which should be high on the 'darndest things fundies say' list:
If there was such a thing as a "God Particle" as the so called "wisdom" of intellectual man calls it then why is Earth the only planet around that sustains life???? Why is there not life on all other planets in the universe? Or on maybe a few others around? That is my question. I laugh at articles like this. Turn to your bibles and in the first few versus that "God Particle" that you people are so convinced exists talks to you.

Manny, aurora, colorado


Other Comments by black wolf

33. Comment #156986 by Peacebeuponme on April 8, 2008 at 1:09 pm

I'm a bit sad reading those comments over on the Times link. Why can't they post here and give us a bit of fun?

Other Comments by Peacebeuponme

34. Comment #157050 by hoops mccann on April 8, 2008 at 2:06 pm

 avatarBigora: "If only Ben Stein would make a movie about particle physics, a hastily thrown together piece of trash full of misconstrued statements, non-sequiturs and ad hominem attacks, we could stop these horrible, evil scientists from going against the will of God. I'll even supply him with another ridiculous pair of short-pants, because if anything says, "Take me seriously!", it's a grown man dressed like a 10 year old boy."


They should name a particle just for him: the "bozon".

Other Comments by hoops mccann

35. Comment #157341 by Hobbit on April 9, 2008 at 12:33 am

 avatarComment #156986 by Peacebeuponme

I'm a bit sad reading those comments over on the Times link. Why can't they post here and give us a bit of fun?


I'm with you. Where are all the religious fuck knuckles when you need a good laugh?

Fides, are you there fides? Artful? Clear Thinker? Wee Flea? We have more questions for you to avoid!

Any hoo. I must admit that most of this physics stuff is way beyond me. But it does sound very exciting indeed and I look forward to reading the results of this research, and then having the people on this site explain them to me in language that even a religious moron might be able to understand. Over to you Steve and Eepist!

Other Comments by Hobbit

36. Comment #157388 by j.mills on April 9, 2008 at 3:15 am

 avatar
Just the amount of supercooling involved is stupendous â€" enough deep freeze to keep 140,000 kitchen fridges just above absolute zero, which is â€"273C. In fact, when it is fully operational, the LHC will be the coldest place in the known universe. There are enough supercooled cables in the LHC to go around the equator 6.8 times, and enough filaments in the cable strands to stretch to the sun and back five times â€" and enough left over for a few return trips to the moon.

Hubba! All this number-porn is making me hot! More zeroes! Dirty talk! Whisper Avogadro's Number again!

[Rushes off for cold shower.]

Other Comments by j.mills

37. Comment #157403 by j.mills on April 9, 2008 at 3:52 am

 avatarLimerick Summary News Service!

The hunt for the Godly Higgs Boson
Might cause an 'Almighty' explosion
As the universe falls
Into teensy black holes,
But what's more likely is life simply goes on!

Other Comments by j.mills

38. Comment #157465 by GregPhillips on April 9, 2008 at 6:07 am

 avatarComment #156976 by black wolf

"SPS, there was a supervillian on Spider-man that developed superpowers and was able to control black holes. I believe he called himself "The Spot".


Naw, he just had a whole bunch of holes that he could drop and jump (or punch) through. Unfortunately for him, Parker lured him into dropping so many of them that he didn't have any left, and Spot was knocked out. Much like theists who try to defend their arguments here. "

blackwolf, I am sorry but this explanation is just full of holes.

:D

Greg

Other Comments by GregPhillips

39. Comment #157533 by rod-the-farmer on April 9, 2008 at 8:34 am

 avatarOh, no......a lawsuit has been filed to prevent the Large Hadron Collider from starting up.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080405/black_hole_080405/20080405?hub=Specials

Other Comments by rod-the-farmer

40. Comment #157553 by Reg on April 9, 2008 at 8:57 am

Comment #157533 by rod-the-farmer


"Oh, no......a lawsuit has been filed to prevent the Large Hadron Collider from starting up."


You might think that the laws of nature would insist on one sphincter per person, but no, there far more arseholes out there than brains.

Other Comments by Reg

41. Comment #157657 by Barbara on April 9, 2008 at 11:45 am

 avatarOkay! I'm completely ignorant about what this LHC thing can be used for. So, at the risk of making a complete fool of myself, I have a question.

If, when fully operational, the LHC will be the coldest place in the universe, will science be able to find a way to use some of this 'cold' to maybe stop the Earths' ice caps from melting?

My protective gear is in place. Let the onslaught begin.

Other Comments by Barbara

42. Comment #157667 by nother person on April 9, 2008 at 11:55 am

I am not a physicist but I recall reading in, "Nothingness: the science of empty space," by Henning Genz that some physicists have raised a concern about very high energy collisions such as performed by LHC that has nothing to do with black holes.

As I understand it (perhaps not very well) the concern has something to do with the Higgs field and the possibility of a sort of 'crystallization' or 'condensation' of a state of (matter? space/time?) other than the state our universe exhibits. Apparently the conditions we find in our universe represent only one, perhaps randomly occurring, out of a range of possibilities set at or during the big bang. If conditions in an experiment were to ever replicate those of the first instant in which these values were set for our universe, might they not, in that instance, "re-crystallize" with different parameters and might such a change propagate?

Mr. Genz did not present this idea in an alarmist manner, but simply as something not categorically excluded by current theoretical physics. He was at pains to make clear that the probability is small that this would happen and that the LHC, for all its power, might not achieve the energy in collisions that would be prerequisite.

Though I have tried very hard to follow Mr. Genz's reasoning, I undoubtedly am mis-representing him here. His book was a serious and accurate exposition of his subject. If what I wrote above sounds like nonsense that is most likely due to my vague apprehension of the subject.

Other Comments by nother person

43. Comment #157702 by Reg on April 9, 2008 at 12:42 pm

Rod the farmer. This seems to be a hoax. Yu gorra larf


http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/forums/viewthread/6525/

Other Comments by Reg

44. Comment #157765 by bluebird on April 9, 2008 at 2:05 pm

 avatarAll of this is fascinating, but,
It's taking a lot of sittin' to hatch this chicken (LHC)! Assorted delays, and a possible lawsuit (mentioned a few weeks ago by another poster,too).

I hope this project gets the green light soon, to see what discoveries may lie within the "jewel box"!

Other Comments by bluebird

45. Comment #158069 by Partisan on April 10, 2008 at 3:38 am

 avatar
Steve Zara:Just to put minds at rest, the chance of anything nasty happening is very, very remote. The reason why we can be confident of this is that particle collisions of far greater energy happen every day when cosmic rays strike the atmosphere. Nature has already done this experiment, and nothing happened.


This reminds me, rather geekily, of the PC game Half-Life which begins with a physics experiment and a phrase similar to "don't worry, the chance of something going wrong is infinitesimal" before all hell breaks loose.

Other Comments by Partisan

46. Comment #158078 by Steve Zara on April 10, 2008 at 3:53 am

 avatarComment #158069 by Partisan
This reminds me, rather geekily, of the PC game Half-Life which begins with a physics experiment and a phrase similar to "don't worry, the chance of something going wrong is infinitesimal" before all hell breaks loose.


It is also the plot behind the "Doom" series of games.

Other Comments by Steve Zara
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: