Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, June 8, 2008 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments

Document New Way To Think About Earth's First Cells

by Science Daily

Thanks to Alberto Sarmento for the link.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080604140959.htm

New Way To Think About Earth's First Cells

ScienceDaily (Jun. 6, 2008) — A team of researchers at Harvard University have modeled in the laboratory a primitive cell, or protocell, that is capable of building, copying and containing DNA.


Above is a three-dimensional view of a model protocell approximately 100 nanometers in diameter. The protocell's fatty acid membrane allows nutrients and DNA building blocks to enter the cell and participate in non-enzymatic copying of the cell's DNA. The newly formed strands of DNA remain in the protocell. (Credit: Janet Iwasa, Szostak Laboratory, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital)

Since there are no physical records of what the first primitive cells on Earth looked like, or how they grew and divided, the research team's protocell project offers a useful way to learn about how Earth's earliest cells may have interacted with their environment approximately 3.5 billion years ago.

The protocell's fatty acid membrane allows chemical compounds, including the building blocks of DNA, to enter into the cell without the assistance of the protein channels and pumps required by today's highly developed cell membranes. Also unlike modern cells, the protocell does not use enzymes for copying its DNA.

Led by Jack W. Szostak of the Harvard Medical School, the research team published its findings in the June 4, 2008, edition of the journal Nature's advance online publication.

"Szostak's group took a creative approach to this research challenge and made a significant contribution to our understanding of small molecule transport through membranes," said Luis Echegoyen, director of the NSF Division of Chemistry.

Some scientists have proposed that ancient hydrothermal vents may have been sites where prebiotic molecules--molecules made before the origin of life, such as fatty acids and amino acids--were formed.

When fatty acids are in an aqueous environment, they spontaneously arrange so that their hydrophilic, or water-loving, "heads" interact with the surrounding water molecules and their hydrophobic, or water-fearing, "tails" are shielded from the water, resulting in the formation of tiny spheres of fatty acids called micelles.

Depending upon chemical concentrations and the pH of their environment, micelles can convert into layered membrane sheets or enclosed vesicles. Researchers commonly use vesicles to model the cellular membranes of protocells.

When the team started its work, the researchers were not sure that the building blocks required for copying the protocell's genetic material would be able to enter the cell.

"By showing that this can happen, and indeed happen quite efficiently, we have come a little closer to our goal of making a functional protocell that, in the right environment, is able to grow and divide on its own," said Szostak.

"We have found that membranes made from fatty acids and related molecules -- the most likely components of primitive cell membranes -- have properties very different from those of the modern cell membrane, which uses specialized pumps, channels or pores to control what gets in and out," says Jack Szostak, PhD, of the MGH Department of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, the report's senior author. "Our report shows that very primitive cells may have absorbed nutrients from their environment, rather than having to manufacture needed materials internally, which supports one of two competing theories about fundamental properties of these cells."

Szostak's team carefully analyzed vesicles comprised of different fatty acid molecules and identified particular features that made membranes more or less permeable to potential nutrient molecules. They found that, while large molecules such as strands of DNA or RNA could not pass through fatty acid membranes, the simple sugar molecules and individual nucleotides that make up larger nucleic acids easily crossed the membrane.

To further explore the function of a fatty acid cell membrane, the researchers used activated nucleotides they developed for this study that will copy a DNA template strand without needing the polymerase enzyme usually required for DNA replication. After placing template molecules inside fatty-acid vesicles and adding the activated nucleotides to the external environment, they found that additional DNA was formed within the vesicles, confirming that the nucleotide molecules were passing through the fatty-acid membranes.

Co-authors of the Nature paper include Sheref S. Mansy, Jason P. Schrum, Mathangi Krishnamurthy, Sylvia Tobe and Douglas A. Treco of the Szostak Laboratory.

The research was supported with funding from the National Science Foundation (Division of Chemistry award number 0434507). Jack W. Szostak was also supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exobiology Program award number EXB02-0031-0018. Sheref S. Mansy was supported by National Institutes of Health award number F32 GM07450601.

Comments 1 - 14 of 14 | | View Alternate Comment Thread

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #190022 by History_Junky on June 8, 2008 at 8:18 am

 avatarIve always read about experiments that show that the initial evolutionary precursor to living things on this planet was a single cell but an experiment that shows how these cells functioned is a great step forward.

edit: I promise not to violate my response with a retarded, first!

oh wait...

Other Comments by History_Junky

2. Comment #190025 by Elles on June 8, 2008 at 8:38 am

 avatarCOOL!

Science just WINS! Science just RULES!

Other Comments by Elles

3. Comment #190038 by mordacious1 on June 8, 2008 at 9:11 am

OK explain it to me like I'm a four year old. Did they "create" a protocell from scratch, from compiled parts, or re-engineered downwards from an already existing cell?

Other Comments by mordacious1

4. Comment #190040 by Mike O'Risal on June 8, 2008 at 9:16 am

 avatarMordacious1:

This wasn't made from a pre-existing cell. The membrane and DNA are all de novo. It's a membrane made from scratch from fatty acids and the DNA itself is being replicated from free nucleotides.

Other Comments by Mike O'Risal

5. Comment #190058 by mordacious1 on June 8, 2008 at 9:43 am

Mike

"The membrane and DNA are all de novo". Wow, this is really something then, I AM impressed. I'll have to check out the original article and follow their research closely. We may be close to getting a solid theory on how the first cell emerged. One big gap filled in by mankind, one little mind for the believers...

edit: and by close, I don't mean tomorrow...but before I meet Satan hopefully.

Other Comments by mordacious1

6. Comment #190293 by moderndaythomas on June 8, 2008 at 6:09 pm

 avatar
The protocell's fatty acid membrane allows chemical compounds, including the building blocks of DNA, to enter into the cell without the assistance of the protein channels and pumps required by today's highly developed cell membranes. Also unlike modern cells, the protocell does not use enzymes for copying its DNA.


Addresses the "chicken or the egg" question well enough.

Other Comments by moderndaythomas

7. Comment #190294 by moderndaythomas on June 8, 2008 at 6:15 pm

 avatar
the researchers used activated nucleotides they developed for this study that will copy a DNA template strand without needing the polymerase enzyme usually required for DNA replication.


And presto, new DNA. But where's the finger of God?

Other Comments by moderndaythomas

8. Comment #190336 by mmurray on June 8, 2008 at 10:23 pm

 avatarInteresting. I had a quick look at the actual paper as my work has Nature. It's not my area but it looks like they haven't actually built a cell like in the picture just tested the constituent parts. Can anyone who knows this kind of stuff clarify

- Michael

Other Comments by mmurray

9. Comment #190343 by 8teist on June 8, 2008 at 10:46 pm

 avatardogs finger will be firmly up his nose past the second knuckle looking for a miracle.

Other Comments by 8teist

10. Comment #190370 by aussieatheist_111 on June 9, 2008 at 1:37 am

Very interesting. I'd love to see "life" engineered in the laboratory - the final straw for creationists. How do you think sophisticated (theist) theologians would handle this?

Other Comments by aussieatheist_111

11. Comment #190427 by Greyman on June 9, 2008 at 4:48 am

9. Comment #190336 by mmurray on June 8, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Interesting. I had a quick look at the actual paper as my work has Nature. It's not my area but it looks like they haven't actually built a cell like in the picture just tested the constituent parts. Can anyone who knows this kind of stuff clarify

They built it.  They got the lipids to form micelles, developed activated neucleotides, injected them into the protocell, and watched to see if the material could draw nutrients through the membrane and replicate itself.  It could!

Of course, since the replicated neucleotides remained inside the protocell, it's a long way from developing a fully Von Neuman cell, but it is a strong indicator of how early cells might have developed.



Other Comments by Greyman

12. Comment #190433 by mmurray on June 9, 2008 at 5:09 am

 avatar12. Comment #190427 by Greyman

Thanks - Michael

Other Comments by mmurray

13. Comment #190450 by dj2baduk on June 9, 2008 at 5:55 am

 avatarThis is really fascinating stuff, but sadly, won't budge IDiots one inch. I've just spent a fruitless couple of weeks debating IDers, Creationists and Bible/Koran Bashers in general and one thing I've learned is that there's simply no limit to the logical somersaults most believers will make to avoid accepting anything that undermines their chosen book's version of the origins of life. I mean, you can just hear them already with this article can't you; "Well, man 'designed' the cell so you've proved that the cell was 'designed' by a 'designer'".

I'm going to take a week off from my debating because I'm actually starting to feel less intelligent as a result of over exposure to the blind leading the ignorant.

Other Comments by dj2baduk

14. Comment #190722 by jdbartlett on June 9, 2008 at 12:53 pm

 avatarAnd it still doesn't have a soul!

Other Comments by jdbartlett
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: