Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, June 19, 2008 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments

Document Thinking ahead: Bacteria anticipate coming changes in their environment

by Phys Org

Thanks to SPS for the link.

http://www.physorg.com/news133063666.html

Thinking ahead: Bacteria anticipate coming changes in their environment Microbes may be smarter than we think. A new study by Princeton

University researchers shows for the first time that bacteria don't just react to changes in their surroundings -- they anticipate and prepare for them


The findings, reported in the June 6 issue of Science, challenge the prevailing notion that only organisms with complex nervous systems have this ability.

"What we have found is the first evidence that bacteria can use sensed cues from their environment to infer future events," says Saeed Tavazoie, an associate professor in the department of Molecular Biology, who conducted the study along with graduate student Ilias Tagkopoulos and post-doctoral researcher Yir-Chung Liu.

The research team, which included biologists and engineers, used lab experiments to demonstrate this phenomenon in common bacteria. They also turned to computer simulations to explain how a microbe species' internal network of genes and proteins could evolve over time to produce such complex behavior.

"The two lines of investigation came together nicely to show how simple biochemical networks can perform sophisticated computational tasks," says Tavazoie.

In addition to shedding light on deep questions in biology, the findings could have many practical implications. They could help scientists understand how bacteria mutate to develop resistance to antibiotics. They may also help in developing specialized bacteria to perform useful tasks such as cleaning up environmental contamination.

In one part of the study, the researchers studied the behavior of Escherichia coli, the ubiquitous bacterium that travels back and forth between the environment and the gut of warm-blooded vertebrates. They wanted to explain a long-standing question about the bug: How do its genes respond to the temperature and oxygen changes that occur when the bacterium enters the gut? The conventional answer is that it reacts to the change -- after sensing it -- by switching from aerobic (oxygen) to anaerobic (oxygen-less) respiration. If this were true, however, the organism would be at a disadvantage during the time it needed to make the switch. "This kind of reflexive response would not be optimal," Tavazoie says.

The researchers proposed a better strategy for the bug. During E.coli's life cycle, oxygen level is not the only thing that changes -- it also experiences a sharp rise in temperature when it enters an animal's mouth. Could this sudden warmth cue the bacterium to prepare itself for the subsequent lack of oxygen? To test this idea, the researchers exposed a population of E. coli to different temperatures and oxygen changes, and measured the gene responses in each case. The results were striking: an increase in temperature had nearly the same effect on the bacterium's genes as a decrease in oxygen level. Indeed, upon transition to a higher temperature, many of the genes essential for aerobic respiration were practically turned off.

To prove that this is not just genetic coincidence, the researchers then grew the bacteria in a biologically flipped environment where oxygen levels rose following an increase in temperature. Remarkably, within a few hundred generations the bugs partially adapted to this new regime, and no longer turned off the genes for aerobic respiration when the temperature rose. "This reprogramming clearly indicates that shutting down aerobic respiration following a temperature increase is not essential to E. coli's survival," says Tavazoie. "On the contrary, it appears that the bacterium has "learned" this response by associating specific temperatures with specific oxygen levels over the course of its evolution."

Lacking a brain or even a primitive nervous system, how is a single-celled bacterium able to pull off this feat? Whereas higher animals can learn new behavior within a single lifetime, bacterial learning takes place over many generations and on an evolutionary time scale, Tavazoie explains. To gain a deeper understanding of this phenomenon, his team developed a virtual microbial ecosystem, called Evolution in Variable Environment. Each microbe in this novel computational framework is represented as a network of interacting genes and proteins. An evolving population of these virtual bugs competes for limited resources within a changing environment, mimicking the behavior of bacteria in the real world.

To implement this framework, the researchers had to deal with the sheer scale and complexity of simulating any realistic biological system. They had to keep track of hundreds of genes, proteins, and other biological factors in the microbial population, and observe them as they varied over millions of time points. "Simulations at this scale and complexity would have been impossible in the past," says Tagkopoulos. Even with the vast number crunching power the supercomputers provided by the University's Computational Science and Engineering Support Group, their experiments took nearly 18 months to run, says Tagkopoulos.

In this virtual world, microbes are more likely to survive if they conserve energy by mostly turning off the biological processes that allow them to eat. The challenge they face then is to anticipate the arrival of food and turn up their metabolism just in time. To help them along, the researchers gave the bugs cues before feeding them, but the cues had to appear in just the right pattern to indicate that food was on its way.

"To predict mealtimes accurately, the microbes would have to solve logic problems," says Tagkopoulos, a fifth-year graduate student in electrical engineering and the principal architect of the Evolution in Variable Environment framework.

And sure enough, after a few thousand generations, an ecologically fit strain of microbe emerged which did exactly that. This happened for every pattern of cues that the researchers tried. The feeding response of these gastronomically savvy bugs peaked just when food was offered, says Tagkopoulos.

When the researchers examined a number of fit virtual bugs, they could at first make little sense out of them. "Their biochemical networks were filled with seemingly unnecessary components," says Tagkopoulos. "That is not how an engineer would design logic-solving networks." Pared down to their essential elements, however, the networks revealed a simple and elegant structure. The researchers could now trace the different sequences of gene and protein interactions organisms used in order to respond to cues and anticipate mealtimes. "It gave us insights into how simple organisms such as bacteria can process information from the environment to anticipate future events," says Tagkopoulos.

The researchers say that their findings open up many exciting avenues of research. They are planning to use similar methods to study how bacteria exchange genes with one another (horizontal gene transfer), how tissues and organs develop (morphogenesis), how viral infections spread, and other core problems in biology.

"What is really exciting about our discovery is that it brings together and establishes deep connections between the traditionally separate fields of microbial ecology, network evolution, and behavior," says Tavazoie.

Source: Princeton University, Engineering School

Comments 1 - 18 of 18 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #196345 by riemann on June 19, 2008 at 6:25 pm

This is truely exciting and scientific way of thinking at its best. However i have one difficulty getting my head around. I fail to see how this new emergent adaptation is one that's "learned" by the bacteria, rather than a particular genetic variaton selected by artificial selection to adapt to the newly introduced feeding patterns.
"And sure enough, after a few thousand generations, an ecologically fit strain of microbe emerged which did exactly that. This happened for every pattern of cues that the researchers tried."
This sentence highly suggests to me that it's ordinary selection at work, not an undetermined (by genes that is) way of dealing with enviroment at large, or even one determined but with a loose leash. I am not even sure what anything less than a fully determined trait would mean for a bacteria. Surely it's not the individual bacterium that acquires the new trick, but its descandants? The best i can relate to the premise of this experiment is this: "Genetic variation to adapt for any feeding pattern exists almost readily for bacteria, and therefore the ones that have these variations tend to fare better than the rest of them." Right? But isn't this the very definition of natural selection? If so, what's the fuss all about? I am sure though it's me who's missing a point, rather than the researchers. Further elobarations would be much appreciated.

Other Comments by riemann

2. Comment #196402 by Greyman on June 19, 2008 at 9:53 pm

It's about how the regulatory mechanisms controling the activation of other genes, and thus the cell's metabolic processes, behave as though they are anticiplating changes in their environment.

They have a network of trigger and responses so that the bacteria can respond to changes in one condition just in time to take best advantage of the opportunity presented by an another changing condition before it happens.

"Oh, it's getting hotter.  I better switch over to aerobic respiration so I'll be ready for the oxygen when it gets here."

More remarkable, these algorithyms change over generations.  The population learns to recognise when rising temperatures means they should switch to aerobic respiration, and when it means they should switch to anaerobic.

"Oh, it's getting hotter.  I'd better switch over to anerobic respiration so I'll be ready for when the oxygen level drops."

The process of selection is optiming the response triggers patterns over generations, enabling the bacteria population to learn.  The simulation they used demonstrates how this is possible without a designer reprogramming the cells.  The networks of trigger and responses evolve into working algorithyms; but the code they develop displays a lot of useless kruft.

Design without a designer.



Other Comments by Greyman

3. Comment #196408 by jaytee_555 on June 19, 2008 at 10:08 pm

I had only read a half dozen lines of this article when I thought, hey!....what's all this 'thinking ahead', 'learning' and 'smart' stuff? This is all very interesting, for sure, but it is STILL basic natural selection.

I see "Riemann" came to the same conclusion, and hit the nail on the head by pointing out that it's not the individual bacterium that acquires the new trick, but its descendants.

Once again, it seems that the science is good, but the reporting is misleading.

Other Comments by jaytee_555

4. Comment #196413 by mordacious1 on June 19, 2008 at 10:57 pm

Hey, these little guys have survived for a wee bit of time now, and will be here when we are long gone. The fact that they are adaptable this way doesn't suprise me. Finding the evidence that they sense cues is good stuff.

I wonder why god made them this way? She sure thought ahead, since...oh, wait, she produced mankind and bacteria at the same time, forgot.

Other Comments by mordacious1

5. Comment #196418 by 8teist on June 19, 2008 at 11:23 pm

 avatarI enjoy reading your posts Mord 1. Maybe we are the bacteria and bacteria the intelligent lifeform,they are the ones that don`t need religion.

Other Comments by 8teist

6. Comment #196424 by King of NH on June 20, 2008 at 12:06 am

 avatarThis is interesting as a bacterial study, but also in how it uses terms like 'learn.' It's easy to say that bacteria can't learn without a brain, and that this is just natural selection. But then what is learning? Obviously, this is not one organism learning a new behavior in one lifetime. There is a difference there. But there is no special magical box in our brain that 'learns' and 'thinks.' I guess I'm very interested to know if our brain cells are using the same mechanism to learn that the bacteria is using, just with better cooperation and specialization of cells. Perhaps the generational, natural selection/learning of bacteria is very, very similar to what we mean by 'learn.'

Other Comments by King of NH

7. Comment #196432 by mordacious1 on June 20, 2008 at 12:29 am

8teist

Well I know E. Coli don't need religion. There's enough crap where they live.

Other Comments by mordacious1

8. Comment #196433 by 8teist on June 20, 2008 at 12:37 am

 avatarThey live in heaven ?

Other Comments by 8teist

9. Comment #196435 by mordacious1 on June 20, 2008 at 12:47 am

One can define heaven anyway they want, since it doesn't exist, and I'm sure the lower GI tract is Nirvana for them.

Other Comments by mordacious1

10. Comment #196449 by riemann on June 20, 2008 at 1:56 am

Fair point, King of NH, but there are fundamental differences between how a bacterium regulates its behaviour and, for instance, we do. As in any aspect of nature, there are of course all sorts of intermediate stages from fully genetically determined bactaria behaviour to not-so-much genetically determined human behaviour, which Dan Dennett dubbed "The Tower of Generate-And-Test." You can check out what he means from the link below. Seen in this light, the difference between cognition or lack of it really, functionally matters. Therefore phrases like "thinking" and "learning" cannot be used as mere metaphors with vauge definitions. That's the reason i objected to the conclusions of the experiment.

http://everything2.com/e2node/Tower of generate-and-test

Other Comments by riemann

11. Comment #196477 by Telic on June 20, 2008 at 2:56 am

 avatar


To predict mealtimes accurately......


Pavlov's Bug experiment :D


Its certainly interesting, but I have to agree with the objections others have made about use of words like "thinking" and "learning".

This is the kind of inaccurate use of language that scientists should not indulge in; Just read the recently posted news item about Einstein...

Other Comments by Telic

12. Comment #196487 by Greyman on June 20, 2008 at 3:21 am

No.  Thinking and learning are the proper terms.

The bacteria have the collective ability to solve a problem and react with learned behaviour.  The solving and learning just does not take place on an individual level and they store the information in gene regulation networks rather than networks of neurons.

Using the Tower of Generate and Test definitions, riemann provided above, individual bacterium are first tier, or "Darwinian", creatures but over generations a population acts effectively like a single second tier, or "Skinnerian", creature.



Other Comments by Greyman

13. Comment #196499 by He'sAVeryNaughtyBoy on June 20, 2008 at 3:51 am

Thanks Greyman, I would have jumped to the conclusion that this was meerly natural selection in action but your last two posts explain the significance of this very well. Thanks.

Other Comments by He'sAVeryNaughtyBoy

14. Comment #196890 by kornyjorge on June 20, 2008 at 2:51 pm

 avatari for one welcome our new bacterial overlords.

Other Comments by kornyjorge

15. Comment #196895 by mordacious1 on June 20, 2008 at 2:58 pm

[rant]: If you've been reading these posts for awhile, you may realize that it is one of my pet peeves to attribute human atributes, like "deciding to grow a hard shell for protection", to other species. It's usually journalists translating science articles for the "laymen" and it pisses me off. Make the laymen more knowledgeable, not less. [Rant ended]

Other Comments by mordacious1

16. Comment #196991 by Thor'Ungal on June 20, 2008 at 9:08 pm

 avatar
i for one welcome our new bacterial overlords.


Welcome? they've been dominating the food chain for a while now. Where do you think the idea of black magic came from. A guy you wish harm to is walking along and starts to get progressively ill, no one stabbed him and he ate the same meal you did so you review what you did the previous day while thinking how much you'd like to stick the fellow.

Bacteria, can't live without them. Likely to kill you in the end. Almost certain to get at your corpse when you're done with it.

Aka above us in the food chain.

Oh, I too welcome our old bacterial overlords.

Thor'Ungal

Other Comments by Thor'Ungal

17. Comment #197385 by King of NH on June 22, 2008 at 12:11 am

 avatarriemann:
Therefore phrases like "thinking" and "learning" cannot be used as mere metaphors with vauge definitions.


No, you're absolutely right, here. As a scholar, I can't stand arbitrary definitions. But here is the very base of the problem. What, exactly, does it mean to think? Where is that line? This is not a metacognition Descartian "wow man, that's deep" question. This is a serious question that needs to be answered before we can say that generational adaptation does not count. If we do say, to the end goal of defining thought, that such change over time does not count, then we have moved closer to finding where the first 'thought' originated and what it was (as in physical attributes, though I'm almost positive the first thought was something like 'I gotta pee').

Other Comments by King of NH

18. Comment #198458 by Telic on June 24, 2008 at 2:51 am

 avatarThinking and learning are absolutely NOT the correct terms to use.

A clear case of muddy thinking from scientists who have read too much science fiction and have a vested interest in getting carried away with their own conclusions....

Comparing natural selection to a multi-generational 'genetically stored' algorithm is fine in one sense; But just confuses things and invites misunderstanding.

This is Natural selection 'solving' the problem at a hard-wired individual organism level over multiple generations of mutations; It doesn't involve thinking, or choice at the individual's software level.

Other Comments by Telic
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: