Pastors Challenge Law, Endorse Candidates From Pulpit2. Comment #196723 by JLD Calgary on June 20, 2008 at 11:30 am
How much do you want to bet the IRS doesn't end up doing anything on this? Pretty disappointing.3. Comment #196729 by tybowen on June 20, 2008 at 11:33 am
4. Comment #196734 by Szkeptik on June 20, 2008 at 11:38 am
It's obvious they would lose in a federal court. This is not about free speech. They will not be fined or jailed, they will not be penalised in any way. They will simply lose a privilege because they broke the law.5. Comment #196736 by Epinephrine on June 20, 2008 at 11:40 am
6. Comment #196738 by sidfaiwu on June 20, 2008 at 11:47 am
7. Comment #196739 by FightingFalcon on June 20, 2008 at 11:51 am
8. Comment #196747 by Nick6742 on June 20, 2008 at 12:00 pm
9. Comment #196754 by sophia_mr on June 20, 2008 at 12:09 pm
10. Comment #196758 by prettygoodformonkeys on June 20, 2008 at 12:15 pm
"The Bible warns us .... lest God chasten us …"What the hell are they worried about? When is the last time anyone's seen any thunderbolts coming from that quarter?
11. Comment #196770 by Border Collie on June 20, 2008 at 12:27 pm
12. Comment #196782 by Edouard Pernod on June 20, 2008 at 12:35 pm
13. Comment #196805 by davem on June 20, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Me, I always thought God would have voted Republican, and Jesus would definitely be a Democrat, nay, maybe even a communist...14. Comment #196807 by EvidenceOnly on June 20, 2008 at 1:00 pm
With the current US government defiantly ignoring the US constitution, do you really think that they will go after any tax exempt organization telling their sheep to vote republican?15. Comment #196811 by quill on June 20, 2008 at 1:05 pm
16. Comment #196819 by Burt Likko on June 20, 2008 at 1:10 pm
17. Comment #196823 by ttheobald on June 20, 2008 at 1:15 pm
18. Comment #196870 by liberalartist on June 20, 2008 at 2:16 pm
19. Comment #196874 by black wolf on June 20, 2008 at 2:20 pm
20. Comment #196946 by TeraBrat on June 20, 2008 at 4:37 pm
What the hell are they worried about? When is the last time anyone's seen any thunderbolts coming from that quarter?
21. Comment #196950 by mordacious1 on June 20, 2008 at 4:48 pm
22. Comment #196957 by evolver23 on June 20, 2008 at 5:13 pm
I still prefer to have churches retain tax exempt status if it also means that they can't endorse political candidates or interfere in government.
23. Comment #196976 by dragonfirematrix on June 20, 2008 at 7:39 pm
24. Comment #196984 by adk on June 20, 2008 at 8:36 pm
"If you are a Christian, you cannot support a candidate like Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton for president."
25. Comment #196994 by Thor'Ungal on June 20, 2008 at 9:23 pm
26. Comment #197014 by irate_atheist on June 20, 2008 at 11:56 pm
27. Comment #197041 by geru on June 21, 2008 at 12:58 am
Laws don't apply to churches? What else is new..28. Comment #197145 by esuther on June 21, 2008 at 8:06 am
Hey Tetra,29. Comment #197235 by Mr. Forrest on June 21, 2008 at 12:16 pm
I hope the IRS smacks those silly church-people so hard, they'd say it was gods punishment.30. Comment #197260 by Fedler on June 21, 2008 at 1:31 pm
There is a distinction between the pastor and the pulpit," said a Democratic Party official. "We've made a significant effort to reach out to faith voters this year, but we're always making sure people know the law and the guidelines."Yeah, but the problem is...the sheep don't care, so to speak. Faith voters don't care what the law is or what the guidelines are. Deep down I think they know what the rules are, they just honestly don't care because they feel religion is exempt from scrutiny so, by default, religion wins. They don't care about the law. I realize that the Democratic party is reaching out to faith voters like never before (how can you not? they're tripping over themselves practically every night in the evening news to "court" the religious voter), but does the party seriously think they can rope in faith voters, while still touting the necessity of the separation of church and state? That seems like an oxymoron in this day and age. Why? Because the religious moderates who hold the middle ground and mostly recognize the obvious cognitive dissonance, refuse to acknowledge the problem in order to correct it. Why? Because they think it doesn't really effect them. Turst me, I've been there. It's like the large elephant in the room that no one will talk about. They may condemn it casually in passing, but then they don't give it a second thought. They figure it's someone else's problem.
31. Comment #197269 by quill on June 21, 2008 at 2:02 pm
Thank fuck I'm not American.
In a way it's sad to see you guys slipping back into the Dark Ages. Perhaps it will serve as a warning to others.
32. Comment #197270 by the great teapot on June 21, 2008 at 2:06 pm
yes. That is what "perhaps it serves as a warning" would mean.33. Comment #197289 by comet tail on June 21, 2008 at 3:32 pm
A month before I made the sermon I talked to the church leadership. I told them, 'If we do this we could lose our tax exempt status. Are you prepared for that?' We spent a week in prayer, and I felt God was telling me to make that speech.
34. Comment #198185 by mada2002 on June 23, 2008 at 10:23 am
1. Comment #196722 by SonOfSLJ on June 20, 2008 at 11:29 am
"The government is trying to censor me and other religious leaders," Booth told ABC News. "I may be taking on the IRS, but the IRS has taken on the Constitution unchallenged since 1954. I feel like the only law that should dictate what I am allowed to say is the First Amendment."
Completely agree with you Pastor Booth, provided that you finally pony up the membership fee for our dorky little USA Club that guarantees your religious institution the rights dictated by the First Amendment. Until then, it's really a question of whether you want to eat your cake or have it.
Other Comments by SonOfSLJ