









Sir John M. Templeton, Philanthropist, Dies at 952. Comment #206336 by Cartomancer on July 8, 2008 at 9:34 am
3. Comment #206338 by DrWinkie on July 8, 2008 at 9:36 am
I've always liked Templeton (He made me a 100% retrun on my investment in the early 90's!).4. Comment #206339 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 9:36 am
5. Comment #206341 by Gregg Townsend on July 8, 2008 at 9:38 am
7. Comment #206349 by Layla Nasreddin on July 8, 2008 at 9:46 am
8. Comment #206350 by Tyler Durden on July 8, 2008 at 9:46 am
9. Comment #206351 by mordacious1 on July 8, 2008 at 9:47 am
Why is it that people who acquire such wealth, seem to be off their rocker? I suppose one needs a driving force in their life to push one toward that goal. Although Warren Buffett seems normal.10. Comment #206352 by Gregg Townsend on July 8, 2008 at 9:48 am
11. Comment #206354 by mordacious1 on July 8, 2008 at 9:52 am
Layla12. Comment #206355 by Tyler Durden on July 8, 2008 at 9:52 am
13. Comment #206358 by al-rawandi on July 8, 2008 at 9:54 am
14. Comment #206359 by Lev-CapeTown on July 8, 2008 at 9:54 am
15. Comment #206360 by Gregg Townsend on July 8, 2008 at 9:55 am
16. Comment #206363 by HourglassMemory on July 8, 2008 at 10:02 am
It's a sad day... for those who care.17. Comment #206367 by Lucas on July 8, 2008 at 10:06 am
18. Comment #206369 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 10:10 am
I don't think it's appropriate to "dump" on the dead
19. Comment #206376 by brian faux on July 8, 2008 at 10:17 am
I notice that Templeton, like so many 'self made men' got his fortune by the manipulation of money (and a bit of luck) and not by the sweat of his brow. I wonder what Jesus would have said about that? (Maybe JT is in the process of finding out)20. Comment #206385 by WilliamP on July 8, 2008 at 10:25 am
Well, I guess he found the answers to his questions about the afterlife. Or, well, not really.21. Comment #206435 by Apathy personified on July 8, 2008 at 11:14 am
22. Comment #206442 by ronfac on July 8, 2008 at 11:22 am
"I refused to attend his funeral. But I wrote a very nice letter explaining that I approved of it."23. Comment #206447 by Tezcatlipoca on July 8, 2008 at 11:27 am
24. Comment #206471 by davem on July 8, 2008 at 11:51 am
I really don't see the point of being offensive here. So he was deluded? So are millions. There have been, and will be, far worse. Some people give billions to their pet dog, FFS. Maybe he didn't know Mother T. was a charlatan? Who did? At least have the decency to extend sympathy to the family.25. Comment #206473 by Tezcatlipoca on July 8, 2008 at 11:52 am
26. Comment #206474 by al-rawandi on July 8, 2008 at 11:54 am
27. Comment #206478 by Tezcatlipoca on July 8, 2008 at 11:58 am
28. Comment #206483 by al-rawandi on July 8, 2008 at 12:01 pm
29. Comment #206492 by action bastard on July 8, 2008 at 12:12 pm
Yeah, well Warren Buffet could kick his ass at investing that is. Buffet is not religious and plans to give most of his fortune to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. A secular charity that promotes education and world health. Btw, how are the two richest men in the world atheists? Must have sold their souls to the devil I guess.30. Comment #206495 by Tezcatlipoca on July 8, 2008 at 12:14 pm
31. Comment #206521 by brian faux on July 8, 2008 at 12:40 pm
Al Rawandi32. Comment #206532 by Border Collie on July 8, 2008 at 12:50 pm
I had my tonsils (sp?) taken out when I was seven or eight. I woke up from the surgery and there were about eight people standing around my bed praying at about sundown. It scared the hell out of me. I thought I had died. Oh, well.34. Comment #206537 by drbreakfast on July 8, 2008 at 12:54 pm
Like virtually everyone who regularly posts on this site, I certainly had no use for Templeton's objectives. However, the man had family and friends who will mourn his death. Therefore, I agree that it is in poor taste (and perhaps somewhat immoral) to speak ill of the dead unnecessarily.35. Comment #206550 by al-rawandi on July 8, 2008 at 1:05 pm
36. Comment #206619 by jmdoran on July 8, 2008 at 2:53 pm
This thread is an excellent example of why there are plenty of human flaws that are unassociated with religion.37. Comment #206648 by Szymanowski on July 8, 2008 at 3:49 pm
38. Comment #206710 by Quine on July 8, 2008 at 5:12 pm
39. Comment #206746 by acs on July 8, 2008 at 6:11 pm
His only redeeming feature seems to have been giving money to solzenitsyn who, despite having a deist approach, actually wronte some decent stuff about the negative effects of dogmatic belief structures in soviet era russia.40. Comment #206753 by Layla Nasreddin on July 8, 2008 at 6:29 pm
One cannot RIP. One rots, or goes up in a puff of smoke....whatever. To say RIP implies that one may not RIP, and what does that mean?
To paraphrase Hitch:
"You should speak only good of the dead. Sir John Templeton is dead. Good."
41. Comment #206755 by Brian English on July 8, 2008 at 6:35 pm
I think we should be honest about the dead. It would be ridiculous to paint Saddam Hussein, or dare I Godwin the thread, Hitler, as being basically nice if misunderstood. It would be silly to paint a fundamentalist as a liberal. However, there's probably no need to get all personal, unless one was personally affected. So, you could say, for example, that Templeton helped fund research into woo, and tried to suborn scientists into painting a favorable picture of religion and science frollicking in the meadow. For that he should be criticized. But it's probably pointless to call him all sorts of names and grin over the corpse. He's dead, it won't affect him......42. Comment #206759 by Layla Nasreddin on July 8, 2008 at 6:48 pm
43. Comment #206762 by Bonzai on July 8, 2008 at 7:07 pm
We are all going to die. What is there to gloat?44. Comment #206768 by Laurie Fraser on July 8, 2008 at 7:27 pm
45. Comment #206799 by mordacious1 on July 8, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Layla46. Comment #206841 by prettygoodformonkeys on July 8, 2008 at 9:40 pm
47. Comment #206945 by Clapton_is_God on July 9, 2008 at 2:19 am
48. Comment #206993 by Johnny O on July 9, 2008 at 4:41 am
49. Comment #207037 by nalfeshnee on July 9, 2008 at 5:38 am
Can't fault Templeton for his money making ability. He must have had some good backing. Ten grand was a LOT of monty to borrow during that time period.
50. Comment #207042 by curlyqlink on July 9, 2008 at 5:45 am
I'm disturbed at the overwhelmingly positive tone in the coverage of Mr.Templeton's legacy. I first heard of his death on National Public Radio, allegedly a "liberal" network, and I kept waiting for the other shoe to drop, so to speak. That is, some acknowledgment that the man was a crackpot, spending a vast fortune in a Quixotic quest to prove a scientific basis for religion.
1. Comment #206328 by Tyler Durden on July 8, 2008 at 9:26 am
Oh!
Other Comments by Tyler Durden