









Researchers Discover Remnant of an Ancient 'RNA World'2. Comment #212957 by lievemebe on July 17, 2008 at 10:55 pm
One more poke in the eye for creationists.3. Comment #212970 by HitbLade on July 17, 2008 at 11:55 pm
show me each transitional form. each generation. no? well that's proof of god's existence!4. Comment #212985 by garywheron on July 18, 2008 at 12:39 am
The God of the gaps just got a little smaller.5. Comment #212986 by cyberguy on July 18, 2008 at 12:41 am
"We predicted that there would be an ancient 'RNA city' out there in the jungle, and we went out and found it,'' Breaker said.
...a molecule that mimics cyclic di-GMP could be used to disable or disarm bacterial infections such as cholera, he said.
6. Comment #212990 by Cluebot on July 18, 2008 at 1:02 am
Still seems a way off identifying a credible "first replicator," but perhaps another step closer to a detailed biogenesis theory?7. Comment #212992 by Shane McKee on July 18, 2008 at 1:11 am
8. Comment #212998 by Goldy on July 18, 2008 at 1:30 am
Seems a good night for gap closure...9. Comment #213023 by bugaboo on July 18, 2008 at 3:03 am
Goldy10. Comment #213031 by Tyler Durden on July 18, 2008 at 3:28 am
11. Comment #213048 by Chris Davis on July 18, 2008 at 4:11 am
Oh, that's wonderful! Looks as though we're creeping up on abiogenesis. The fossils are still there after all12. Comment #213063 by someonefree on July 18, 2008 at 5:36 am
No wonder the US is sliding down the development index: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7511426.stm13. Comment #213069 by Mitchell Gilks on July 18, 2008 at 5:52 am
14. Comment #213078 by Ishruul on July 18, 2008 at 5:58 am
15. Comment #213091 by GBile on July 18, 2008 at 6:29 am
Interesting, very interesting.16. Comment #213136 by gr8hands on July 18, 2008 at 7:54 am
Since we already have proven that in ice, chemicals naturally combine to form pre-RNA and RNA . . . this is another nail in the coffin to those saying "life cannot come from non-life." We have all but one of the steps -- going from simply RNA to DNA.17. Comment #213175 by thewhitepearl on July 18, 2008 at 8:42 am
"We predicted that there would be an ancient 'RNA city' out there in the jungle, and we went out and found it,'' Breaker said.
18. Comment #213277 by edwaltthespisactor on July 18, 2008 at 11:08 am
19. Comment #213280 by PristinePanda on July 18, 2008 at 11:11 am
20. Comment #213325 by Lucas on July 18, 2008 at 11:41 am
21. Comment #213334 by squinky on July 18, 2008 at 11:47 am
22. Comment #213500 by D'Arcy on July 18, 2008 at 1:58 pm
23. Comment #213628 by Dhamma on July 18, 2008 at 5:13 pm
24. Comment #213630 by 8teist on July 18, 2008 at 5:19 pm
25. Comment #213635 by Dhamma on July 18, 2008 at 5:38 pm
26. Comment #213638 by Quine on July 18, 2008 at 5:42 pm
The problem I have with it is that all the heavy lifting is done now by extremely sophisticated enzymes (proteins) that perform functions nearly impossible to imagine how catalytic RNA could do ...Yes, that is true, if you want them to do as good a job as is done today. However, if you have an environment in which running reactions very slowly does not mean you get eaten before you can grow up, you can get by on catalytic systems that have very much lower efficiency and specificity. You will grow very slowly, and take a long time to collect the molecules you need to replicate, but as long as your neighbors are in the same situation, what's time to a molecule? Also remember that it need not be pure RNA. T-RNA manipulates an amino acid. Various other RNA and amino acid hybrids could have been doing some of the work that is now done better by proteins. It is exciting to see this kind of new knowledge coming so fast, now.
27. Comment #213825 by cyberguy on July 19, 2008 at 2:05 am
28. Comment #213829 by Steve Zara on July 19, 2008 at 2:16 am
Or am I just naive to think they'll ever accept the evolution?
29. Comment #213976 by fizhburn on July 19, 2008 at 10:13 am
30. Comment #214758 by spoo on July 20, 2008 at 9:39 pm
Articles like these really need some figures/images to try to visualise all these things that can be hard to understand by just reading text :P31. Comment #214765 by Quine on July 20, 2008 at 9:53 pm
32. Comment #214770 by Quine on July 20, 2008 at 9:55 pm
1. Comment #212956 by kraut on July 17, 2008 at 10:54 pm
They believe that billions of years ago, single strands of nucleotides that comprise RNA were the first forms of life and carried out some of the complicated cellular functions now done by proteins.there is a gap in here somewhere...
Other Comments by kraut