Monogamy gene found in people2. Comment #241190 by Machinus on September 2, 2008 at 1:38 am
When do we start testing women for being "wife material?" What kind of sexist remarks will journalists make when we start to measure them for pragmatism, objectivity, and self-reliance?3. Comment #241207 by beeline on September 2, 2008 at 2:10 am
Monogamy gene...
...help to determine whether men are serial commitment-phobes or devoted husbands.
In prairie voles and marmosets, receptors for the two systems sit on adjacent cells, so social activity is highly rewarding, leading to monogamy.
4. Comment #241209 by JimmyGiro on September 2, 2008 at 2:11 am
5. Comment #241310 by skip on September 2, 2008 at 5:16 am
6. Comment #241346 by Cartomancer on September 2, 2008 at 6:15 am
7. Comment #241350 by Laurie Fraser on September 2, 2008 at 6:19 am
8. Comment #241359 by bugaboo on September 2, 2008 at 6:35 am
Perhaps a better way of doing this would have been to look at a cohort of mothers in monogamous relationships and then determine if there is any correlation with the alleles present and non-paternity of the children. :)9. Comment #241386 by Ishruul on September 2, 2008 at 7:07 am
10. Comment #241397 by jeremynel on September 2, 2008 at 7:20 am
It might be appropriate here to remind people of Richard's excellent essay entitled "Genes aren't us", from A Devil's Chaplain.11. Comment #241403 by debaser71 on September 2, 2008 at 7:26 am
I call bullshit but I am in favor of more science.12. Comment #241463 by Hasan on September 2, 2008 at 9:58 am
From the little I have read, i guess having a particulat gene is not necessarily a perfect predictor of behavior. It is gene expression that counts which is presumably depdenent on a lot of other factors including nurturing. However, I dont find it a problem if there is anything in our genes that encourages monogamy as opposed to polygamy, especially since many people, especially males, pull no qualms in touting their preference for multiple partners as arising due to their genetic makeup. They even go so far as to use the examples in the animal world, of which we are also a part, to support their case, which can be done for a myriad of other characteristics too including the nasty and brutish ones. So whether the science is right on this or not, I guess one should keep open to the possibility that monogamy may have some genetic scaffoldings. Whether one chooses monogamy or polygamy is a matter of personal preference, as long as it is a consensual relationship between all the parties involved. I personally find monogamy to be more satisfing and happen to know people who also agree although it is just a personal opinion having no bearing on science or other people's opinion.13. Comment #241467 by NewEnglandBob on September 2, 2008 at 10:16 am
...Finding viable relationships in the first place is entirely a matter of random chance, ruled by the pitiless vicissitudes of cruel fortune's wheel...
You know they will produce some kind of pill to fix the polygamist's problem, don't you?
14. Comment #241473 by bugaboo on September 2, 2008 at 10:46 am
HasanFrom the little I have read, i guess having a particulat gene is not necessarily a perfect predictor of behavior.
15. Comment #241477 by ggab7768 on September 2, 2008 at 11:17 am
16. Comment #241499 by Bonzai on September 2, 2008 at 11:59 am
Sigh* Here we go again from the genetic determinists.17. Comment #241503 by dochmbi on September 2, 2008 at 12:02 pm
18. Comment #241523 by InYourFaceNewYorker on September 2, 2008 at 12:44 pm
19. Comment #241526 by hopeful on September 2, 2008 at 12:51 pm
The research that was done on the link between oxytocin and promiscuity in voles is very interesting. One of the speakers (a neuro scientist I believe) at Beyond Belief 2006 (can't remember who) talked about this.20. Comment #241538 by bugaboo on September 2, 2008 at 1:11 pm
16. Comment #241499 by Bonzai21. Comment #241562 by amalthea on September 2, 2008 at 2:02 pm
22. Comment #243658 by Gunnar on September 6, 2008 at 4:19 pm
1. Comment #241173 by EarthChild on September 2, 2008 at 12:56 am
Shiiiiiiiiiittttttt !!!!!!! There goes my "it's in my genetic makeup" excuse. Hope the wife doesn't read this .....Other Comments by EarthChild