Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, September 7, 2008 | Reason : Physics and Chemistry | print version Print | Comments

Document Closest Look Ever At Edge Of A Black Hole

by Science Daily

Thanks to Brian Burgess for the link.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080903172415.htm


Closest Look Ever At Edge Of A Black Hole

ScienceDaily (Sep. 4, 2008) — Astronomers have taken the closest look ever at the giant black hole in the center of the Milky Way. By combining telescopes in Hawaii, Arizona, and California, they detected structure at a tiny angular scale of 37 micro-arcseconds - the equivalent of a baseball seen on the surface of the moon, 240,000 miles distant. These observations are among the highest resolution ever done in astronomy.

"This technique gives us an unmatched view of the region near the Milky Way's central black hole," said Sheperd Doeleman of MIT, first author of the study that will be published in the Sept. 4 issue of the journal Nature.

"No one has seen such a fine-grained view of the galactic center before," agreed co-author Jonathan Weintroub of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA). "We've observed nearly to the scale of the black hole event horizon - the region inside of which nothing, including light, can ever escape."

Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), a team of astronomers led by Doeleman employed an array of telescopes to study radio waves coming from the object known as Sagittarius A* (A-star). In VLBI, signals from multiple telescopes are combined to create the equivalent of a single giant telescope, as large as the separation between the facilities. As a result, VLBI yields exquisitely sharp resolution.

The Sgr A* radio emission, at a wavelength of 1.3 mm, escapes the galactic center more easily than emissions at longer wavelengths, which tend to suffer from interstellar scattering. Such scattering acts like fog around a streetlamp, both dimming the light and blurring details. VLBI is ordinarily limited to wavelengths of 3.5 mm and longer; however, using innovative instrumentation and analysis techniques, the team was able to tease out this remarkable result from 1.3-mm VLBI data.

The team clearly discerned structure with a 37 micro-arcsecond angular scale, which corresponds to a size of about 30 million miles (or about one-third the earth-sun distance) at the galactic center. With three telescopes, the astronomers could only vaguely determine the shape of the emitting region. Future investigations will help answer the question of what, precisely, they are seeing: a glowing corona around the black hole, an orbiting "hot spot," or a jet of material. Nevertheless, their result represents the first time that observations have gotten down to the scale of the black hole itself, which has a "Schwarzschild radius" of 10 million miles.

"This pioneering paper demonstrates that such observations are feasible," commented theorist Avi Loeb of Harvard University, who is not a member of the discovery team. "It also opens up a new window for probing the structure of space and time near a black hole and testing Einstein's theory of gravity."

In 2006, Loeb and his colleague, Avery Broderick, examined how ultra-high-resolution imaging of the galactic center could be used to look for the shadow or silhouette of the supermassive black hole lurking there, as well as any "hot spots" within material flowing into the black hole. Astronomers now are poised to test those theoretical predictions.

"This result, which is remarkable in and of itself, also confirms that the 1.3-mm VLBI technique has enormous potential, both for probing the galactic center and for studying other phenomena at similar small scales," said Weintroub.

The team plans to expand their work by developing novel instrumentation to make more sensitive 1.3-mm observations possible. They also hope to develop additional observing stations, which would provide additional baselines (pairings of two telescope facilities at different locations) to enhance the detail in the picture. Future plans also include observations at shorter, 0.85-mm wavelengths; however, such work will be even more challenging for many reasons, including stretching the capabilities of the instrumentation, and the requirement for a coincidence of excellent weather conditions at all sites.

"The technical capabilities that have been developed for the Smithsonian's Submillimeter Array on Mauna Kea are a crucial contribution to this program," said Jim Moran, one of the CfA participants in this work.

Other CfA or former CfA researchers who participated on the project include Ken Young and Dan Marrone.

Headquartered in Cambridge, Mass., the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) is a joint collaboration between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Harvard College Observatory. CfA scientists, organized into six research divisions, study the origin, evolution and ultimate fate of the universe.

Headquartered in Cambridge, Mass., the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) is a joint collaboration between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Harvard College Observatory. CfA scientists, organized into six research divisions, study the origin, evolution and ultimate fate of the universe.

Comments 1 - 26 of 26 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #243840 by Mr Blue Sky on September 7, 2008 at 1:52 pm

 avatarAlways been interested in astronomy but still cannot really grasp the scale of it all. What a great time to be here and watching... Harry Hayes my old teacher would be in his element!

Other Comments by Mr Blue Sky

2. Comment #243857 by cacahahacaca on September 7, 2008 at 2:39 pm

Any link to an image of what they actually photographed?

Other Comments by cacahahacaca

3. Comment #243860 by mdowe on September 7, 2008 at 2:44 pm

 avatarI don't think anyone can *really* grasp the distances involved at a visceral level -- we just don't experience reality on anything remotely near that scale. Fortunately most of us can do a bit of math, and that at least lets us know we don't really grasp the distances involved.

Other Comments by mdowe

4. Comment #243867 by heathen01 on September 7, 2008 at 2:56 pm

Any link to an image of what they actually photographed?


cacahahacaca

This was radio astronomy. No optical telescope could probe the galatic core because of intervening dust clouds. Even without the dust the angular width would be too small for any optical telescope to resolve an image.

Other Comments by heathen01

5. Comment #243870 by Friend Giskard on September 7, 2008 at 3:09 pm

 avatarHere's a link to a picture of the black hole
http://tinyurl.com/3q7p9

Other Comments by Friend Giskard

6. Comment #243875 by Border Collie on September 7, 2008 at 3:25 pm

Way over my head, but I've always loved astronomy ... I think Texas schools are going to start teaching the controversy, you know, astronomy vs. astrology ... just kidding ...

Other Comments by Border Collie

7. Comment #243889 by Rawhard Dickins on September 7, 2008 at 4:47 pm

 avatarFriend

I think you'll find that was a brown hole!

They don't quite fall into the same category as they have been known to emit gaseous clouds.

Other Comments by Rawhard Dickins

8. Comment #243890 by debacles on September 7, 2008 at 4:48 pm

 avataryippers...i love black hole updates

Other Comments by debacles

9. Comment #243891 by mark65 on September 7, 2008 at 4:54 pm

I don't know what the big deal is, we'll all get to see a black hole close up on wednesday once the Hadron collider does its thing.

Other Comments by mark65

10. Comment #243894 by Diacanu on September 7, 2008 at 5:27 pm

 avatarRawhard Dickens-

Goddammit!! Your username tricked me for the 47th time!!

Someday, it's gonna be one time too many, and I'll snap!!

Then I'll snap at all your posts!!

Then, one day, I'll get double-tricked, and snap at the real Richard Dawkins!!

I'll be screaming in his face, spraying salava, ranting and hooting about how he has big pulsating rolls of heaving fat that represent the sum of his epicurean evils, and he'll be sitting there, shedding little tears down his adorable little British face, and when I realize what I've done, I'll have to hand in my badge, and my soldering iron!!

And it'll be all your fault, monkey man!!

You, and your pulsating rolls of sweaty heaving fat!!

FAAAAATT!!! OOHHHHH!!!
(Sprays spittle)

Other Comments by Diacanu

11. Comment #243895 by Upgrade01A on September 7, 2008 at 5:31 pm

 avatarYou will not see any black holes from the Hadron collider. If theoretical black holes emerge, which is doubtful, they will be subatomic in size, disappear almost instantly, and not produce enough energy to light up a flash light.

The earth receives cosmic rays from deep space every day. Some of these rays far exceed the energy to be produces at CERN.

Other Comments by Upgrade01A

12. Comment #243896 by Diacanu on September 7, 2008 at 5:34 pm

 avatar..*sigh*...I've gone off the deep end.

Cartooning for too many hours straight.
:P

Need a break.

Other Comments by Diacanu

13. Comment #243909 by RickM on September 7, 2008 at 7:29 pm

 avatarSomewhere out here on the web is a vid showing how researchers first located our central black whole. They tracked several stars whizzing in there orbits around it.

Ah ha, here's an article with a vid;

http://www.mpe.mpg.de/ir/GC/index.php

Other Comments by RickM

14. Comment #243917 by DalaiDrivel on September 7, 2008 at 10:34 pm

I do enjoy perusing rd.net for science news that appears to have no implication upon religion.

Nevertheless, if there was ever one activity in the whole history of humanity that could safely be considered a total black hole...

Friend Giskard,

You had me hooked there. Nice one. Awful (and by that I merely mean grotesque) humour has its place too...

EDIT: After just googling images of black holes, I wonder if any of them are feasibly accurate.

Somehow I doubt it. Aww, but they're so pretty...

That's it! i will invoke the "Argument from Aesthetic Preference" to declare Google Images of Black Holes as Real!

As Edward Current wryly puts it:

"Checkmate!"

Other Comments by DalaiDrivel

15. Comment #243965 by dvespertilio on September 8, 2008 at 3:35 am

Can we ship all of the bigots and do good faith heads to the center of the galaxy and watch them slip over the event horizon into the black hole?

Other Comments by dvespertilio

16. Comment #243974 by Philster61 on September 8, 2008 at 4:59 am

Dianacu.................seek help

Other Comments by Philster61

17. Comment #243979 by DamnDirtyApe on September 8, 2008 at 5:37 am

 avatarRadio only folks... The thing about space, right, is its black. And the thing about black holes...

Its cool they're starting to build massive arrays by linking world telescopes like that. Its a pretty sensible thing to do. I'm looking forward to big arrays of space telescopes in the near future working together to composite even bigger high resolution recordings.

Well we might get a pretty good look at a black hole this week, assuming things don't go horribly wrong!

(Did anyone send CERN a crowbar just in case of the 'other' possible situation?)

Other Comments by DamnDirtyApe

18. Comment #243980 by Quetzalcoatl on September 8, 2008 at 5:43 am

 avatarDamnDirtyApe-

You know as well as I do that that crowbar's going to be useless without an HEV suit.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

19. Comment #243983 by Synchronium on September 8, 2008 at 5:53 am

DamnDirtyApe, Quetzalcoatl - Fingers crossed for the first headcrab sighting.

Other Comments by Synchronium

20. Comment #243985 by Quetzalcoatl on September 8, 2008 at 6:01 am

 avatarSynchromium-

I'll be wearing a hat for the next few weeks, just in case.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

21. Comment #244163 by Rawhard Dickins on September 8, 2008 at 11:38 am

 avatarDianacu

Easy dude!

How could Richard Dawkins possibly be confused with raw hard dickin'

RD

Other Comments by Rawhard Dickins

22. Comment #244239 by A on September 8, 2008 at 1:20 pm

WTF !! There is a baseball on the moon !!

This more than anything proves Islam is true.

Other Comments by A

23. Comment #244324 by SASnSA on September 8, 2008 at 2:52 pm

15. Comment #243965 by dvespertilio
Can we ship all of the bigots and do good faith heads to the center of the galaxy and watch them slip over the event horizon into the black hole?


Personally, I'd like to put them through Douglas Adams' Total Perspective Vortex, then ask them (should their mind survive of course) what would a god who could create all that (if he existed) care if beings as utterly insignificant as us believe in him or not. It seems beyond anal-retentive to me

Other Comments by SASnSA

24. Comment #244500 by sent2null on September 9, 2008 at 12:06 am

 avatarAll the joking aside (you guys are nuts!)

Is scientific discovery awesome or what ?

Other Comments by sent2null

25. Comment #244520 by bluebird on September 9, 2008 at 3:59 am

 avatarRickM thanks for that link.

Music of the Spheres-- wonder if this black hole emits a "note". I remember reading that Perseus BH hums a B flat, albiet 57 octaves below middle C. John Cage would be jealous!

Also, kudos to ESA for hot off the press pics of Asteroid Steins. (APOD 9/8)

Other Comments by bluebird

26. Comment #244529 by Cluebot on September 9, 2008 at 5:25 am

 avatarThanks, Friend Giskard. With all this talk of "brown holes" I was finally motivated to choose an avatar image.

Other Comments by Cluebot
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: