Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Friday, November 24, 2006 | Science : In the News | print version Print | Comments

Document To be Read at my Funeral

by Richard Dawkins

"I want to feel my sense of awe sparked, want to be captivated, want to be reminded of the breathtaking fortune of living in such an interesting universe." That was Anthony Doerr in his Boston Globe review. The God Delusion, as he rightly said, doesn't achieve this. To do so, it would have to be a different book. It might be called Unweaving the Rainbow. In fact it was.

Doerr's words reminded me that I once put together a brief extract from Unweaving the Rainbow, with the thought that it might be suitable for reading at funerals - including my own when the time comes.


"We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die because they are never going to be born. The potential people who could have been here in my place but who will in fact never see the light of day outnumber the sand grains of Sahara. Certainly those unborn ghosts include greater poets than Keats, scientists greater than Newton. We know this because the set of possible people allowed by our DNA so massively outnumbers the set of actual people. In the teeth of these stupefying odds it is you and I, in our ordinariness, that are here.

Here is another respect in which we are lucky. The universe is older than 100 million centuries. Within a comparable time the sun will swell to a red giant and engulf the earth. Every century of hundreds of millions has been in its time, or will be when its time comes, 'the present century.' The present moves from the past to the future, like a tiny spotlight, inching its way along a gigantic ruler of time. Everything behind the spotlight is in darkness, the darkness of the dead past. Everything ahead of the spotlight is in the darkness of the unknown future. The odds of your century's being the one in the spotlight are the same as the odds that a penny, tossed down at random, will land on a particular ant crawling somewhere along the road from New York to San Francisco. You are lucky to be alive and so am I.

We live on a planet that is all but perfect for our kind of life: not too warm and not too cold, basking in kindly sunshine, softly watered; a gently spinning, green and gold harvest-festival of a planet. Yes, and alas, there are deserts and slums; there is starvation and racking misery to be found. But take a look at the competition. Compared with most planets this is paradise, and parts of Earth are still paradise by any standards. What are the odds that a planet picked at random will have these complaisant properties? Even the most optimistic calculation will put it at less than one in a million.

Imagine a spaceship full of sleeping explorers, deep-frozen would-be colonists of some distant world. Perhaps the ship is on a forlorn mission to save the species before an unstoppable comet, like the one that killed the dinosaurs, hits the home planet. The voyagers go into the deep-freeze soberly reckoning the odds against their spaceship's ever chancing upon a planet friendly to life. If one in a million planets is suitable at best, and it takes centuries to travel from each star to the next, the spaceship is pathetically unlikely to find a tolerable, let alone safe, haven for its sleeping cargo.

But imagine that the ship's robot pilot turns out to be unthinkably lucky. After millions of years the ship does find a planet capable of sustaining life: a planet of equable temperature, bathed in warm starshine, refreshed by oxygen and water. The passengers, Rip van Winkles, wake stumbling into the light. After a million years of sleep, here is a whole new fertile globe, a lush planet of warm pastures, sparkling streams and waterfalls, a world bountiful with creatures, darting through alien green felicity. Our travellers walk entranced, stupefied, unable to believe their unaccustomed senses or their luck.

As I said, the story asks for too much luck; it would never happen. And yet, isn't it what has happened to each one of us? We have woken after hundreds of millions of years asleep, defying astronomical odds. Admittedly we didn't arrive by spaceship, we arrived by being born, and we didn't burst conscious into the world but accumulated awareness gradually through babyhood. The fact that we gradually apprehend our world, rather than suddenly discovering it, should not subtract from its wonder."

Comments 1 - 31 of 31 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #9214 by Daniel DeCastro on November 24, 2006 at 6:22 am

Sorry, my name was misspelled above, it's Daniel not Dabiel.

2. Comment #9228 by fun2bfree on November 24, 2006 at 7:11 am

RE #9211-

That is precisely my feeling as well--I used to thnk about what I would like done at my funeral and realized that the most honest position for the committed atheist/materialist that I am --is indifference--I will be gone-- if they want and or need to they can have a Catholic mass --it won't matter to me and I will never know.

I note Richard talks about reading this at funerals including possible his own...so this is submitted as a possible non-relgious thing for those who are looking for such, not just as what he wants at his own funeral.

3. Comment #9244 by Hugo on November 24, 2006 at 8:12 am

#9228
Even though I know that I will be gone and will not be ghosting around, I would still like people to remember me and I would like to have had an impact on some, even as an atheist there can be some meaning to life.
Off-course that little speech after I'm dead is not gonna change anything if my life itself was not worth it, so I better get to it :)

4. Comment #9261 by Grace on November 24, 2006 at 9:21 am

Hm...bit of a morbid topic since I'm (hopefully) several decades from a funeral, but I'd like to have some use or existence after I'm dead.

That's why I'm listed as an organ donor on my driver's license, and why I want to donate my body to science. I'm not 18 yet, but in a few more months, get me those forms.

I totally agree with what Daniel said, but I think there's something even more wonderful than our bodies simply being recycled naturally. Why not use them to better the world after we're dead? Our consciousness ceases to exist as such when our brains shut down, but for a brief period of time, the tissues and organs that make up our bodies can be still used to save the life of another. Or perhaps for scientific research and the spread of science--I just saw Gunther von Hagens' Body Worlds, which displays real, dissected human bodies preserved by plastination. The donors gave their bodies for the education of laypeople about the wonders of the human body and biology. Isn't that a form of immortality more wonderful than any religion?

5. Comment #9267 by Ian Armer on November 24, 2006 at 9:37 am

Actually, before his spectacular U-Turn (?) in that God programme, Robert Winston addressed this issue (of our bodies breaking down and the atoms becomming part of something else again) in 'The Human Body' (BBC). THAT to me is a much kinder - and frankly much more comforting - notion of an 'afterlife' (or Continuation) than people suffering to get into God's good books.


If that awe inspiring fact is not spiritual, I don't know what is.

6. Comment #9269 by Ian Armer on November 24, 2006 at 9:37 am

ps - forgive the spelling errors, my keyboard is knackered! Lousy recycling atoms!!!

7. Comment #9271 by Ian Armer on November 24, 2006 at 9:40 am

And in response to Grace's post - another superb idea. Organ donation is a spectacularly selfless way to assist people after you're gone.

8. Comment #9288 by Anonymous on November 24, 2006 at 10:46 am

Hugo-
nothing I said should have implied anything about the meaning of life...merely the meaning of my "wishes" regarding my funeral- as you point out it is what happens while you are alive that is important...it is not that I do not care what happens after I am gone i--it is that after I am gone I will not be able to care.

9. Comment #9293 by Paul Caira on November 24, 2006 at 10:59 am

I'm not convinced that it's any comfort to know that my atoms will become 'star stuff' - especially since that will constitute me then won't (unless my death is much more imminent than I'm guessing!) be the atoms that constitute me now. We are beings of change, ever-changing in our constitution and our minds.

I am persuaded by one thing - though my death will mean the complete extinction of my identity and my consciousness and memories, I will not 'suffer' non-existence, because all that happens to things which don't exist is that they don't exist. I won't be lying in my grave, inert, wishing that I could re-join the party, I simply won't exist.

I'm intrigued by one question. The time after my death will not exist for me, same as the time before my birth did not exist for me. But there is the problem of other minds, which I believe to be real, by induction with my own - I would guess that most rationalists do. The only reason that I'm not someone else is that I'm me. When I'm not me, I won't exist. But someone else will. To say 'I will be someone else' would be wrong (and meaningless) since there is no continuity (compared to some kind of reincarnation). But to not exist is impossible, as there is no mind there experiencing the non-existence. So if I'm not me, I'd have to be someone else - maybe at a a completely different time (past or future), or maybe even someone whose life overlaps my own.

So, if the alternative to being me is to be someone else, anyone else from history or the future, should I be optimistic? Since I am a comfortably off member of an advanced Western democracy, and (statistically speaking) almost everyone in the world in the past and present is worse off than me, no I don't suppose I should...

Ooh, I seem to have talked myself back into a fear of death.

Is this incoherent babble, or just something I'm failing to express?

10. Comment #9305 by Ian Armer on November 24, 2006 at 11:25 am

Please note that I said that I was quite happy to be SOMETHING not SOMEBODY else!

And when I say 'I' - well, you know!

It's being aware of the cycle as an awe inspiring event that takes place in the universe. I personally find it amazing that I am parts of other people, stars, plants, oceans, animals etc. I'm not that bothered about 'me' surviving death. I cannot remember before I was born and I can only assume that it's exactly the same once I've kicked the bucket! Looking at it that way, I lose the fear.

It's also being aware of the scienctific reality being more amazing than the old 'Heaven' rubbish. I am friends with certain individuals in the entertainment industry that make a lot of money off being psychic, or being 'experts' on psychic phenomena - and I know for a FACT that it's all showbiz and for money. I wish somebody would do a scientific 'afterlife' programme to shut these idiots up and put forward an infinitely more complex and beautiful natural cycle of life and death and 'recycling' than what dear old Aunti Mabel has to say on the 'other side' (of sense probably).

11. Comment #9307 by Ian Armer on November 24, 2006 at 11:27 am

Heck why don't I do it?! I'm in the 'biz'! Any contributors???

12. Comment #9309 by Louis Perry on November 24, 2006 at 11:33 am

Thanks to Daniel DeCastro.

I couldn't have expressed my personal (and public!) attitude toward death more accurately.

Here! Here!

13. Comment #9325 by Vadjong on November 24, 2006 at 1:04 pm

*note : "Star Stuff" is really nuclear fall-out from immense atomic explosions eons ago. (Well, at least it beats being some flimsy eternal soul.)

14. Comment #9342 by Vadjong on November 24, 2006 at 2:17 pm

Richard, if you're reading this : you should step to the Natural History Dept. of the BBC and propose to make "Carl Sagan's COSMOS" for the 21st century in HDTV. Make it simple, beautiful and heartfelt. Ask people like Dan Dennett, William Calvin, E.O. Wilson, Ian Stewart & Jack Cohen, Michael Shermer, Michio Kaku, Pen & Teller, Antonio Damasio, Derren Brown, Stuart Kauffman, Douglas Hofstadter and others you can think of to bring idea's. With beauty-shots from space telescopes and nature and some next-gen computer graphics. Music by the likes of George Fenton, Hans Zimmer and Philip Glass.
We'll re-watch that at your funeral and be moved to tears (because it's so ... well, moving and inspiring, ofcourse). Call it "Credo", er ... no, make that "Cognosco" or something like that (I know no Latin).
Forget the hopeless zealots and make it for bright children. Convert them (and their parents) to Bright-ianity.

15. Comment #9346 by seals on November 24, 2006 at 2:28 pm

Sorry this is a bit nihilistic, but I cant see why anyone would waste a single second of their life thinking obout death, if they believe that after death, there is nothing. Surely, well in my opinion, the only thing that makes death worth thinking about is that we don't actually know what happens to our consciousness? If there's nothing after death, there's nothing for the whole of humanity, not just ourselves as individuals.

As for the recycling, all well and good, but it's gonna happen anyway whatever we do! In fact why bother with the life that took place in between - might as well stay as star stuff all along... reminds me of an old joke about skipping sex and going straight for the cigarette...

16. Comment #9347 by toomanytribbles on November 24, 2006 at 2:34 pm

paul caira, your 'babbling' seems eerily familiar to my restless mind.

17. Comment #9353 by Mike on November 24, 2006 at 2:50 pm

Catholic sabbath?

Jewish Sabbath?

A little help from some peeps?

18. Comment #9364 by TIKI AL on November 24, 2006 at 3:13 pm

Those who wish to do so may place a flower on my grave, and those who feel quite differently may stradle it and mimic the incontinent.

Unable to give thanks or outrage, there will be no need to hook up the Houdini horn, I won't be talking.

19. Comment #9367 by Daniel DeCastro on November 24, 2006 at 3:28 pm

Actually the fact that I am part of this world in such a way encourages me all the more to do good for it, and for others on this planet. It is our actions which ultimately determine whether or not the earth we live in is a good or bad place to live. I'd like to know that once my body is recycled, that it's constituent parts end up being part of a wonderful planet. This is idealistic, too idealistic for some, but it is a motivator for me. Nice guys finish first.

20. Comment #9373 by Randy Ping on November 24, 2006 at 3:44 pm

I know it's a long shot, but I'm shooting for immortality. Cryo, baby. Screw the abyss and death itself. We can beat it if we stop the defeatist attitudes.

21. Comment #9378 by rob on November 24, 2006 at 4:06 pm

One thing that Richard doesn't mention is that the great majority of us, as products of evolution, have a deep seated, low level "avoidance of death" instinct.

As much as you can try to logic yourself out of it, it is still there. At least for me it is. You might as well tell me that being torture shouldn't bother me because all it is is a bunch of molecules and electricity and stuff. Logic doesn't make it hurt less.

I find it impossible to just say "because I'm lucky to have been alive, I'm quite ok with dying". That's ridiculous.

22. Comment #9382 by Daniel DeCastro on November 24, 2006 at 4:27 pm

I would only fear death more if the world I leave behind when I die is one of chaos and disorder. Otherwise, if things seem to be going the right way, I'll die contently. If worse comes to worse, I'll ask that my ashes be scattered somewhere in Japan with those of my wife. I have high hopes for that culture. Hopefully they don't dissapoint me like the U.S. has, otherwise, I'd choose another land for me to be apart of.

23. Comment #9599 by Anonymous on November 25, 2006 at 8:31 am

It seems that the concept of "I" seems to precede in value that which allows your identity ("I"), to come to being in the first place. It is almost like saying that "I" have nothing to do with my environment. I just can't agree with this solipsism.

Due to the scientific fact that our bodies are atom bound, and that the roles of those atoms once contributed to the life and matter of the planet (Or perhaps even never at all), I can no longer accept the concept of "I" as preceeding my very being here. I value most which I am made of for without the atoms, there would be no "I".

I can concede that I only value consciousness because I've experienced it. This does not mean I don't appreciate the chance to have lived it. As Mark Twain said, "I was dead many years before I got here, and it didn't bother me one bit."

It is more than just the idea of our atoms "spread across the cosmos" that grants comfort. You are oversimplifying what myself and other people think about this.

24. Comment #9846 by Daniel DeCastro on November 26, 2006 at 8:01 am

It's interesting that you mention "Katamary Damaci" Joe!

Its a Japanese video game that gets you conceptually geared towards the atomic binding of compounds ;)!

Those Japanese never fail to amaze me. Considering the fact that the early part of their history was violent due to rejection of Buddhist doctrines, I'd say they've made quite the progress. It's funny that Scott Adran suggested to Sam Harris that religion has nothing to do with human violence when early Japanese history shows the contrary, namely in 552 A.D. and the victory of the Soga.

25. Comment #9969 by David Williams on November 26, 2006 at 7:45 pm

A hundred years after we die no one will even know our name. Look at any headstone and you will see two dates, the date of birth and the date of death. Between these two dates there is a dash, and that insignificant dash, my friends, is our entire life. It doesnt matter when we are born and it doesnt matter when we die its what we do with that 'dash'. As to the words at my funeral, I know what they will be (read the last page on Arthur Clarke's Childhoods End and you will know). I know there is no life after death and to think otherwise is foolish and at best immature but as I write these words and knowing what will be said makes me feel good, and everybody needs that.
Professor Dawkins, you are a legend. Have a great dash.

26. Comment #10121 by thegashman on November 27, 2006 at 5:56 am

To those that don't care what is said at their funeral, I think you are wasting a rare opportunity.

The common criticism of atheists is that we are all nihilistic, apathetic and full of "don't care" selfishness. You should take the opportunity at your funeral to "preach" to your captive audience about your atheism and also how they should give up their own religious beliefs.

I recall being heavily preached to at a friends wedding by an extremely unpleasant and over-zealous vicar who quite plainly stated that he only saw young people at weddings, christenings and funerals these days and never at normal Sunday worship or other run-of-the-mill religious calendar events. Basically, we hey only appeared when we wanted something - that's kids for you!

He took the opportunity of the captive audience to rail against those that had spurned him and his cobwebbed religion and who only came to church to get what they wanted (wed, christened etc).

I'm going to preach to my captive audience at my funeral (a good mixture of mainly Christians with some agnostics and atheists) and tell them exactly what I'm expecting on the other side, nothing. I'm going to tell them my reasons, present strong arguments for my atheism and urge them to stop wasting their precious time worshipping a non-existent deity and his made up rules and regulations. Je ne regrette rien.

Unless they want to get shouted down by the rest of the congregation, they won't be able to argue back. And I'll give explicit instructions to eject anyone from the gathering if they are seen praying for me! :0)

27. Comment #10208 by thegashman on November 27, 2006 at 1:14 pm

ps - obviously I'm not condoning some kind of zombie style resurrection to address your family and friends, but maybe tape a speech or write one for a partner or friend etc. I didn't want to get labelled as a witch doctor as well as an apathetic, nihilistic, etc etc

28. Comment #12063 by ei muista on December 10, 2006 at 2:51 am

Prof. Dawkins' notion of us being 'lucky' implies that some unborn people are unlucky! That's just nonsense. Dawkins writes "You are lucky to be alive and so am I." That might even spur some unwanted laughter by the grave. I guess what he intends to say is "... and so WAS I".
I wish Richard Dawkins had honed his check-out speech before going public with it. It IS a serious matter. To me it seems that after a life of campaigning against religious belief prof. Dawkins wants to get sentimental. I feel very awkward about this.

Other Comments by ei muista

29. Comment #15396 by meganmills on December 31, 2006 at 1:13 am

Re Comment #9346 by seals on November 24, 2006 at 2:28 pm

I don't know where the following came from, it just 'popped out' of me one day. I've got a strong feeling I've read it somewhere ages ago and can't remember (really, I got epilepsy a few years ago and it seems to 'wipe' some of my memories, jolly nuisance...) If anyone knows the author please let me know? Anyway, it pretty much sums up my attitude:

If you're just dying to live
While life is slipping on by
Then turn the tables on death
And Live! Until you die.

Other Comments by meganmills

30. Comment #62800 by mikeofdoom on August 11, 2007 at 1:28 pm

'scuse me for signing up then dredging up old threads, but i think it pertinent to point out that Sagan's comment about us being "starstuff" refers to the fact that the elements heavier than hydrogen & helium were ALL forged in dying stars.
Aleister Crowley said much the same thing (from a waaay different angle) as "Every man and every woman is a star".

The most fundamental laws of physics seem to show that all of spacetime, energy and matter are one and the same, we are indeed all one as Buddha would have it.
Personally i find that way more beautiful than anything religion can come up with.

Other Comments by mikeofdoom

31. Comment #117439 by preachingyourfuneral on January 28, 2008 at 7:54 pm

Richard Dawkins memorial service will be held on Friday Febuary 1, 2008. Pilgrim Baptist Church will be officating the funeral service.

Richard Dawkins has proven to be one of the most wicked human beings to ever walk the earth.

Preachingyourfuneral.com plans to have a funeral service for Mr. Dawkins On Friday.

Any requests for an interview should be sent to comment@preachingyourfuneral.com

Other Comments by preachingyourfuneral
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: