Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Tuesday, January 23, 2007 | Science : Psychiatry and Psychology | print version Print | Comments

Document Activation Of Brain Region Predicts Altruism

by Science Daily

Reposted from: Duke University Medical Center
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070121162756.htm

Duke University Medical Center researchers have discovered that activation of a particular brain region predicts whether people tend to be selfish or altruistic.

"Although understanding the function of this brain region may not necessarily identify what drives people like Mother Theresa, it may give clues to the origins of important social behaviors like altruism," said study investigator Scott A. Huettel, Ph.D., a neuroscientist at the Brain Imaging and Analysis Center.

Results of the study appear Sunday, Jan. 21, in the advance online edition of Nature Neuroscience and will be published in the February 2007 print issue of the journal. The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Altruism describes the tendency of people to act in ways that put the welfare of others ahead of their own. Why some people choose to act altruistically is unclear, says lead study investigator Dharol Tankersley, a graduate student in Huettel's laboratory.

In the study, researchers scanned the brains of 45 people while they either played a computer game or watched the computer play the game on its own. In both cases, successful playing of the game earned money for a charity of the study participant's choice.

The researchers scanned the participants' brains using a technique called functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which uses harmless magnetic pulses to measure changes in oxygen levels that indicate nerve cell activity.

The scans revealed that a region of the brain called the posterior superior temporal sulcus was activated to a greater degree when people perceived an action -- that is, when they watched the computer play the game -- than when they acted themselves, Tankersley said. This region, which lies in the top and back portion of the brain, is generally activated when the mind is trying to figure out social relationships.

The researchers then characterized the participants as more or less altruistic, based on their responses to questions about how often they engaged in different helping behaviors, and compared the participants' brain scans with their estimated level of altruistic behavior. The fMRI scans showed that increased activity in the posterior superior temporal sulcus strongly predicted a person's likelihood for altruistic behavior.

According to the researchers, the results suggest that altruistic behavior may originate from how people view the world rather than how they act in it.

"We believe that the ability to perceive other people's actions as meaningful is critical for altruism," Tankersley said.

The scientists suggest that studying the brain systems that allow people to see the world as a series of meaningful interactions may ultimately help further understanding of disorders, such as autism or antisocial behavior, that are characterized by deficits in interpersonal interactions.

The researchers are now exploring ways to study the development of this brain region early in life, Tankersley said, adding that such information may help determine how the tendencies toward altruism are established.

C. Jill Stowe, a decision scientist in Duke's Fuqua School of Business, also participated in the research.

Comments 1 - 12 of 12 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #18864 by Logicel on January 23, 2007 at 9:43 am

 avatar"The scientists suggest that studying the brain systems that allow people to see the world as a series of meaningful interactions may ultimately help further understanding of disorders, such as autism or antisocial behavior, that are characterized by deficits in interpersonal interactions."

and

"...adding that such information may help determine how the tendencies toward altruism are established."
_____

Fascinating and encouraging.

Other Comments by Logicel

2. Comment #18866 by Linda on January 23, 2007 at 9:55 am

Why cite Mother Teresa as an example of altruism?

Christopher Hitchen's wonderful essay 'the Missionary Position' exposes MT as a person who seemed to enjoy the suffering of others as well as the media spotlight for herself. No one has yet accounted for the millions she bilked from so many while proselytising. Hitchens rightly accuses her of "crimes against humanity". Was she a card-carrying member of Opus Dei?

If MT is an example of altruism then the word needs redefinition.

Other Comments by Linda

3. Comment #18868 by Logicel on January 23, 2007 at 10:12 am

 avatarLinda, Mother T always horrified me, decades ago. I will read Hitchen's essay, thanks.

Other Comments by Logicel

4. Comment #18890 by Sancus on January 23, 2007 at 1:28 pm

Logicel, Hitchens is a godsend for his book on MT. :)

Definitely, Linda. I've been trying to redefine altruism in the forum, but without much success. Many of the things people currently think are altruistic today really are not. People used to think that slavery was altruistic, so I don't see why that should be surprising.

"We believe that the ability to perceive other people's actions as meaningful is critical for altruism," Tankersley said.


Do they mean "meaningful" in the general causative sense or in the positive sense?

Other Comments by Sancus

5. Comment #18891 by Vadjong on January 23, 2007 at 1:31 pm

 avatarIs my baloney detection kit hyperactive, or does this "scientific research" seem a bit dodgy to me ?
It could be a case of the usual journalistic misrepresentation, but these methods and conclusions as described don't impress me much.

Other Comments by Vadjong

6. Comment #18897 by scottishgeologist on January 23, 2007 at 2:03 pm

 avatarInteresting that it was Duke University Medical Center that is involved in this. DUMC did a study into prayer a few years ago that showed it offered no benefits whatsoever. Link here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3193902.stm

Incidentally, the response of the Bishop of Durham to this experiment was a cracker: "This is like setting an exam for God to see if God will pass it or not."

Of course he wont. A non existent candidate cannot possibly pass any sort of test!

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

7. Comment #18898 by Damien White on January 23, 2007 at 2:20 pm

This study would seem to devalue the religious claim that altruism stems from religion.

Of course, I also wonder what Ayn Rand would have to say...

Other Comments by Damien White

8. Comment #18931 by Martha on January 23, 2007 at 6:17 pm

 avatarWas Mother Thersa REALLY altruistic?!

Quote: "According to the researchers, the results suggest that altruistic behavior may originate from how people view the world rather than how they act in it."

What?!?!? People act according to how they perceive the world! So what the hell is that sentence suppose to mean?

Question for Richard Dawkins are you, in some way, responsible for the "TRIPE" that get posted on your website, such as this particular post?

Other Comments by Martha

9. Comment #18932 by Martha on January 23, 2007 at 6:21 pm

 avatar"We believe that the ability to perceive other people's actions as meaningful is critical for altruism," Tankersley said."

Yes, and its also a fact that some are very good at perceiving other people's actions (and feelings) and EXPLOITING them to the hilt!

Other Comments by Martha

10. Comment #18959 by aleprechaunist on January 24, 2007 at 2:16 am

It's hard to imagine what it would be like to perceive other peoples' actions as 'meaningless'.

I'm assuming what's being referred to is 'empathy' or lack thereof, which would make a bit more more sense.

It's a pretty uninformative article either way...

Other Comments by aleprechaunist

11. Comment #18974 by Azven on January 24, 2007 at 5:41 am

 avatarWhat the UMC seem to have discovered here is a laziness detector. "I" recognize that "you" are doing something. I don't see what this has to do with altruism! Obviously this has something to do with being a social animal, but what? For all we know it's an internal policeman/parent/big brother: "I can see what you're up to".

More likely all they've found is that when asked questions some people visualise situations better. I wonder if questions about who you'd invite to a fantasy dinner party would have evoked the same response?

Other Comments by Azven

12. Comment #142051 by bewitchednour on March 11, 2008 at 7:18 pm

No such thing as selfless acts, humans do most of their acts for their own reasons. This is the design of natural selection I think since people that do things for others more than themselves probably got killed much easier.

Other Comments by bewitchednour
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: