Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Monday, January 29, 2007 | Reason : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Did humans wipe out Australia's big beasts?

by Rachel Nowak, New Scientist

Reposted from:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19325884.200?DCMP=NLC-nletter&nsref=mg19325884.200
First-known complete skeleton of the marsupial 'lion' Thylacoleo carnifex (Image: Clay Bryce, Western Australian Museum)

To animals unfortunate enough to fall in, it was a death trap. To palaeontologists, it was a sensational discovery. Now the first detailed analysis of a spectacular cache of fossilised prehistoric "marsupial lions", giant wombats and kangaroos, owls and parrots discovered in a cave in Australia suggests that humans killed off the continent's megafauna.

The cache, found in the Nullarbor Plain in south-central Australia, contains fossils of 69 species of mammal, bird and reptile, and includes many complete skeletons, including the first of a marsupial lion (see right). There are also eight species of kangaroo that had never been recorded before.

The site was discovered by cavers in 2002, but its size and depth - 20 to 70 metres below the desert - means that it has taken a team led by Gavin Prideaux of the Western Australian Museum in Perth four years to collect and analyse the fossils.

The team found that the animals fell into the caves (pictured below right) between 800,000 and 200,000 years ago. To work out what they had been eating - and hence the kind of climate they experienced - the team analysed the oxygen and carbon content of the tooth enamel from fossils of 13 kangaroo species, including several giants, and one species of giant wombat. The composition was similar to that of the tooth enamel of kangaroos and wombats living today on the parts of the Nullarbor that are extremely dry, indicating that the fossil animals had also lived in an arid climate (Nature, vol 445, p 422).

However, the wide variety of herbivore species represented by the bones - 23 species of kangaroo alone, some of which could climb trees - suggests that the Nullarbor must once have had much more varied vegetation than the few species of shrub it sports today.

"It's astonishing. I never imagined tree kangaroos on the Nullarbor Plain. Australia's arid zone was clearly once capable of supporting a much wider variety of browsing animals," says Tim Flannery of Macquarie University in Sydney. Climate may play a smaller role in determining species diversity in Australia than has been thought, he says.

Computer-aided artist's impression of Thylacoleo carnifex (Image: Western Australian Museum)

Australian megafauna died out roughly 40,000 years ago, and Prideaux says the discovery that they survived in an arid environment undermines one of two popular theories for what killed them off - namely, that ice-age aridity was responsible. That leaves the second theory, which suggests that the giant kangaroos and wombats were wiped out by the actions of humans, either through habitat destruction or hunting, says Prideaux.

That conclusion is supported by other discoveries by teams led by Prideaux in the Naracoorte caves in south-eastern Australia. Fossils here showed that many species of megafauna survived the recent ice ages - except the last one, which occurred after humans had arrived (Geology, vol 35, p 33).

"We're never going to find a diprotodon [one of the largest extinct marsupials] with a spear in it, but this is as close as you can get to nailing the argument," says team member John Long of Museum Victoria in Melbourne.

Not everyone is convinced, however. "You can say that a species was arid-adapted 200,000 years ago, but you can't then extrapolate to 40,000 years ago and say 'So humans must have done it,'" says Judith Field of the University of Sydney. "It's far too simplistic."

Field argues that archaeological finds from Cuddie Springs in south-eastern Australia, the only place where human and megafauna remains have been found in the same place, do not show that the animals were hunted.

Gavin Prideaux excavating a short-faced kangaroo skull from the floor of Leaena's Breath Cave, Nullarbor Plain. (Image: Clay Bryce, Western Australian Museum)

She prefers the idea that different species were driven to extinction at different times and places. Combinations of events, including the stress of the later, more severe ice ages, could have been responsible, she says.

From issue 2588 of New Scientist magazine, 24 January 2007, page 10.

Comments 1 - 7 of 7 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #19733 by roach on January 29, 2007 at 4:31 pm

Those megafauna are awesome.

Other Comments by roach

2. Comment #19734 by thalesian on January 29, 2007 at 4:38 pm

 avatarI don't understand how this can't be any more obvious - I'm generally skeptical of simplistic extinction theories (astroid, etc.) but the extinction of Australia's megafauna at ~40,000 BP and the North-South American extinctions at ~11,000 BP coincide almost exactly with the arrival of humans. Wouldn't a blast of aridity at 40,000 years ago have shown extinction-effects elswhere than Australia? This is, quite literally, a smoking gun.

There is an additional flaw in Dr. Field's reasoning. Her argument:

"You can say that a species was arid-adapted 200,000 years ago, but you can't then extrapolate to 40,000 years ago and say 'So humans must have done it,"

...is fallacious. For several taxa to spontaneously adapt in the same manner between 200,000 - 40,000 years is way too coincidental and rapid for environmental change. If they survived/thrived through it 200,000 years ago, they will most likely not go through massive multi-taxa extinction because of the same factors a mere 160,000 years ago (~). The rapidly expanding rival populations competing for the same resources are a better bet.

At any rate, fantastic article.

Other Comments by thalesian

3. Comment #19751 by -TheCodeCrack- on January 29, 2007 at 6:49 pm

 avatarthe pc police got to her.

40,000 years ago man arrived, 40,000 years ago tens of species went extinct.

I think it was ddd...daaaaah d daaaah climate!

I think humans collapsed the system. knocked one or two out.. then 3 4 5 6....and so on.

fire practise were horrific for native animals! So they need to stop somehow warping the fact that continually burning down the bush-land is, wait for it, 'cultivating, replenishing,' bull bull bull bull bull bull. and maybe, Bull!
This article is very, and most likely true.

Other Comments by -TheCodeCrack-

4. Comment #19774 by Russell Blackford on January 29, 2007 at 10:08 pm

Well, I think we should still be open-minded about this - the debate has been going back and forward for some time and is not yet fully resolved.

I can't help feeling, though, that there's an element of political correctness motivating those who oppose the theory that extinctions of prehistoric megafauna were caused by human activity. I get a sense of, "Oh no, only evil, modern Westerners cause extinctions. Surely not those nice native peoples who have their wonderful 'other ways of knowing' and live in such harmony with nature!"

Other Comments by Russell Blackford

5. Comment #19828 by Azven on January 30, 2007 at 4:59 am

 avatarI don't find this a smoking gun at all. Having said that, there is probably a great deal of truth in this article. I think that all we can say at this time is that we need more evidense. It may be that climate change killed [some of] these animals; it may be that human migration affected their populations; it may be that climate change made (or aleast allowed) the humans to migrate.

Other Comments by Azven

6. Comment #19919 by neander on January 30, 2007 at 4:31 pm

 avatarThe idea that aboriginal Australians did not cause this extinction is not just PC, it is inherently racist!
It assumes that aboriginal Australians were somehow different to other humans and incapable of hunting or killing large easy targets. Just like ALL of us today, primitive human societies only undertake ecological steps when we have to.

Other Comments by neander

7. Comment #20650 by Jonathan Dore on February 5, 2007 at 12:33 pm

Thalesian wrote: "...the extinction of Australia's megafauna at ~40,000 BP and the North-South American extinctions at ~11,000 BP coincide almost exactly with the arrival of humans."

And Russell Blackford wrote: "I can't help feeling, though, that there's an element of political correctness motivating those who oppose the theory that extinctions of prehistoric megafauna were caused by human activity."

Yes indeed. Two even more recent examples: New Zealand, uniquely, evolved an ecosystem in which birds (albeit huge flightless ones) became top predators; but all species of moa known from skeletal finds (mostly washed into caves in underground rivers) became extinct within a few centuries of the arrival of humans in New Zealand, which was probably no more than 1,500 years ago. As far as I know no-one seriously denies this link, as to do so would strain credulity beyond breaking point, but I see no reason to imagine the Australian example is any different.

And even more recently, Aepyornis Maximus, a giant flightless bird (rivalling the largest moas) from Madagascar, became extinct around 1500, a few centuries after the first settlement of that island by the Malagasy.

Since both these examples occurred within relatively recent history (within the range of oral tradition, folklore, and even written evidence) they give us a rare chance to glimpse on a smaller scale the kind of processes that occur when humans enter an ecosystem for the first time, and which must have occurred on a bigger scale in the continental settlements of Australia and the Americas. Whether the human agency was direct (hunting) or indirect (habitat destruction) it's surely childishly squeamish to pretend that "native" peoples are somehow above such activities.

Other Comments by Jonathan Dore
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: