Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Saturday, February 17, 2007 | Reason : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Native American populations share gene signature

by Roxanne Khamsi, New Scientist

Reposted from:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11178?DCMP=NLC-nletter&nsref=dn11178

The proportion of people with the 9RA gene marker (indicated in red) is high throughout the Americas (image: Royal Society/Schroeder et al)

A distinctive, repeating sequence of DNA found in people living at the eastern edge of Russia is also widespread among Native Americans, according to a new study.

The finding lends support to the idea that Native Americans descended from a common founding population that lived near the Bering land bridge for some time.

Kari Schroeder at the University of California in Davis, US, and colleagues sampled the genes from various populations around the globe, including two at the eastern edge of Siberia, 53 elsewhere in Asia and 18 Native American populations. The study examined samples from roughly 1500 people in total, including 445 Native Americans.

The team looked for a series of nine repeating chunks of DNA, known as 9RA, which falls in a non-coding region of chromosome 9.

They found the 9RA sequence in at least one member of all the Native American populations tested, such as the Cherokee and Apache people. The two populations in eastern Siberia, where the Bering land bridge once connected Asia to North America, also tested positive for the 9RA sequence.

The 9RA sequence did not appear in any of the other Asian populations examined in the study, including those from other parts of Siberia, from Mongolia or Japan.

Multiple migrations?

According to Schroeder, the high prevalence of this gene marker among native populations of North and South America - and its absence in most of Asia - lends strong support to the idea that Native Americans can trace their ancestry to a common founding population.

The 9RA mutation probably occurred in an ancestral population located at the eastern edge of Siberia, which subsequently migrated over the Bering land bridge, Schroeder says (watch how the land bridge was gradually submerged as see levels rose). There may have been multiple migrations from this founding population, occurring thousands of years apart, she adds.

"How many times did people cross the Bering land bridge? That would be a very difficult question to answer," says Jeffrey Long at the University of Michigan Medical School in Ann Arbor, Michigan, US, who contributed to the new study.

Other experts have previously suggested that Native Americans do not share a common ancestry because of the linguistic and dental differences among populations.

Journal reference: Biology Letters (DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0609)

Comments 1 - 12 of 12 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #22445 by Veronique on February 17, 2007 at 8:59 pm

 avatarI find this absolutely fascinating. It has been posited by Tim Flannery, and maybe others including Stephen Oppenheimer, that the first influx of peoples into the Americas was probably about 11,000 years ago across the Bering Straits. They were named Clovis man because of the tool sites found.

That DNA analysis can potentially identify the movements of peoples is another link between scientific disciplines. It helps to close even more gaps in understanding us since we came out of Africa.

Good to see; I hope there is more of it.

Other Comments by Veronique

2. Comment #22455 by MIND_REBEL on February 18, 2007 at 6:31 pm

 avatarAwesome. I bet the Pope will argue that all those indians are just a couple thousand years old so it won't conflict with the official vatican doctrine that the world is only 6000 y/o.

Other Comments by MIND_REBEL

3. Comment #22461 by mmurray on February 18, 2007 at 10:47 pm

 avatar2. Comment #22455 by MIND_REBEL on February 18, 2007 at 6:31 pm
Awesome. I bet the Pope will argue that all those indians are just a couple thousand years old so it won't conflict with the official vatican doctrine that the world is only 6000 y/o.

I don't recall Vatican doctrine supporting the earth being only 6000 y/o. Have you got a reference for this ?

Michael

Other Comments by mmurray

4. Comment #22462 by DNAtheist on February 19, 2007 at 1:51 am

 avatarThat isn't the position of the Catholic church, Mind Rebel.

Other Comments by DNAtheist

5. Comment #22468 by MartinSGill on February 19, 2007 at 4:55 am

 avatarDespite what I generally think about the Catholic church, I have to admit that of all the Christian sects they are the one that most supports scientific truth (at least in the last 100 years or so).

Quite possibly because they've been burnt so often buy opposing science and losing.

Pope J-P II even spoke out about the validity of evolution and how it doesn't conflict with catholic doctrine.

Of course, that doesn't make him any less a murderer for banning the use of condoms and therefore dooming thousands of his followers to slow agonising deaths from AIDS.

Other Comments by MartinSGill

6. Comment #22598 by urfree2think on February 19, 2007 at 9:53 pm

Well, I doubt the Mormon Church will respond to this. They usually just ignore this kind of evidence.

Other Comments by urfree2think

7. Comment #22610 by Aussie on February 19, 2007 at 10:54 pm

Does anybody have a view on where the native US populations got their ideas on city building from. Some incredibly elaborate cities have been found in Central and South America with quite advanced civilisations.

Did cities develop independently in the New World and the Old World or did the city building technology come across from Eurasia in migrations later than 11,000 years ago.

There were no cities anywhere 11,000 years ago.

Other Comments by Aussie

8. Comment #22671 by urfree2think on February 20, 2007 at 1:03 pm

Aussie,

I don't know about building technology, but the Mayans did develop a written language independently. They were pretty advanced and wouldn't surprised if their building technology was developed independently as well.

Other Comments by urfree2think

9. Comment #22910 by Kleis on February 24, 2007 at 8:37 am

I saw a special on television wherein they found artifacts, on the west coast of South America, made of the same rare jade used in Chinese antiquity.

Other Comments by Kleis

10. Comment #22942 by killer_rabbit79 on February 24, 2007 at 7:06 pm

I love stuff like this. Take THAT Native American Spirituality fundamentalists!

Other Comments by killer_rabbit79

11. Comment #23283 by neander on February 27, 2007 at 1:53 pm

 avatarAussie, you need to read "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jarred Diamond for a full and coherent understanding of why/where cities came from.
This is a great article, and good science.

Other Comments by neander

12. Comment #23804 by adamhaar on March 2, 2007 at 8:56 pm

Re: Comment #22468 by MartinSGill
Your final comment was off topic, but I hink it deserves a response:
Please keep in mind that the Catholic Church also forbids sex outside of marriage. Do we really think that people who ignore the Pope's rules on sex would obey on condoms?

Other Comments by adamhaar
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: