Top Scientists Warn of Water Shortages and Disease Linked to Global Warming2. Comment #25335 by Keinen_Gott on March 12, 2007 at 7:38 am
"There is absolutly nothing to worry about," says the christians. I saw a report yesterday about how we should continue what we are doing and not worry about a thing because God "says" in the Bible that he will keep the world in good shape until the coming of Jesus so I geuss Jesus isn't long from coming now. Should be here any minute.......... any minute now.......... well whatever. Anyway the moral is that we don't have to worry, we can continue destroying wildlife habitats and burning every ounce of natural resources on this planet because God won't let the world go to "hell". At least not until Jesus(he) comes.3. Comment #25345 by Linda on March 12, 2007 at 10:43 am
I am fed up with hearing about environmental issues without anyone raising the obvious elephant in the room issue and that is overpopulation. This is a small planet and we are depleting natural resources to support a huge human population. It is tragic that thanks to Roman Catholicism, Submission and other sundry fundamentalist ideologies over 2 billion exist in a state of illiteracy and without access to clean water or electricity. If all 6.66 (chortle) billion of us enjoyed a first world lifestyle the environment would be in even worse shape. Personally I believe that every human birth should be planned and all people deserve a reasonable quality of life.4. Comment #25346 by tattie on March 12, 2007 at 10:46 am
is this politics or science.5. Comment #25350 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 12, 2007 at 12:19 pm
6. Comment #25351 by Logicel on March 12, 2007 at 12:46 pm
7. Comment #25352 by Seti on March 12, 2007 at 12:56 pm
8. Comment #25353 by docter on March 12, 2007 at 1:10 pm
I agree with Linda wholeheartedly.9. Comment #25355 by DavidJGrossman on March 12, 2007 at 1:17 pm
10. Comment #25357 by Seti on March 12, 2007 at 1:29 pm
11. Comment #25359 by BigJohn on March 12, 2007 at 1:55 pm
12. Comment #25361 by Mikado on March 12, 2007 at 2:34 pm
"Is this science or politics?"13. Comment #25370 by Veronique on March 12, 2007 at 5:51 pm
14. Comment #25398 by kniggit on March 12, 2007 at 10:56 pm
15. Comment #25400 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 12, 2007 at 11:46 pm
16. Comment #25409 by Mikado on March 13, 2007 at 1:26 am
Could those of you who are worried about the size of the human population please explain why both France and Time magazine was very happy to report recently that the birth rate in France was rising again. I live in a country that pay women to have more babies and at the same time are worried about the world population.17. Comment #25414 by Veronique on March 13, 2007 at 2:23 am
18. Comment #25420 by Thad on March 13, 2007 at 2:58 am
It is environmentalism which has become a type of religion.19. Comment #25424 by Aussie on March 13, 2007 at 3:28 am
Total impact = PopulationSize x AverageIndividualConsumptionRate20. Comment #25426 by Aussie on March 13, 2007 at 3:47 am
Isn't it ironic that those whom you might expect to be the most conscientious stewards of Gods' creation are those who seem to care the least.21. Comment #25427 by epeeist on March 13, 2007 at 3:47 am
Total impact = PopulationSize x AverageIndividualConsumptionRate
22. Comment #25434 by tylersoap on March 13, 2007 at 5:05 am
23. Comment #25440 by Linda on March 13, 2007 at 6:25 am
Here there and everywhere Submission spreads ignorance by instilling in constituents the notion that females are brood sows this of course results in overpopulation. What a tragedy that Submission was forced on the people there upstaging original nature based superstitions. Then again the Indonesians if they were not infected with Submission would have got it up the rear from Roman Church imperialism/colonization.24. Comment #25447 by tomjlawson on March 13, 2007 at 7:04 am
25. Comment #25457 by Keinen_Gott on March 13, 2007 at 8:10 am
Global Warming has been a naturally occuring phenomenon forever in Earths history, but now that an animal with mild intelligence(us) has evolved on this Earth it has been sped up and I for one think that the issue is not addressed enough. I think that the world should follow China's example and limit 1 child per family, it may be a little rash, but i think that the population should be controlled. But, as long as the religions dominate this planet they will continue to follow their "holy" book and turn women into baby making machines until they cant make anymore. I myself am very optomistic of the "religious" future and think after a little time and more science education in schools the most popular "yo mama" joke will be that your mama is so old she still believes in God. As for the futures environment I just hope it wont be to late to make a drastic change of direction. I hope the paradigm happens soon.26. Comment #25466 by Seti on March 13, 2007 at 12:41 pm
27. Comment #25468 by misterpost on March 13, 2007 at 1:15 pm
tomjlawson said: It's seems ironic that our new power solutions should rely on nature when nature is causing us to change. We don't know what the weather will be like in fifty days, let alone fifty years, so why assume that windmills and solar panels are going to be of much use? What if the clouds block the sun for a hundred years? What if we lose the wind for months at a time?28. Comment #25491 by tomjlawson on March 13, 2007 at 5:28 pm
29. Comment #25506 by Veronique on March 13, 2007 at 10:14 pm
30. Comment #25513 by kniggit on March 14, 2007 at 12:36 am
Sounds to me that you are the one on the lunatic fringe in this discussion. Simply muddling along as we have, is the worst possible option, even if we accept whatever pseudo-scientific nonsense you're peddling at face value.
Wake up and smell the coffee, and at least get out of the way if you're not going to help. Prick.
31. Comment #25633 by Seti on March 14, 2007 at 11:59 am
32. Comment #25762 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 4:00 am
33. Comment #25811 by kniggit on March 15, 2007 at 9:16 am
34. Comment #25831 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 11:06 am
35. Comment #25836 by The Spaghetti Monster on March 15, 2007 at 11:37 am
Quick question for the "brighty brights"….36. Comment #25838 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 11:48 am
37. Comment #25842 by The Spaghetti Monster on March 15, 2007 at 12:17 pm
Comment #25838 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 11:48 am38. Comment #25843 by BaronOchs on March 15, 2007 at 12:23 pm
39. Comment #25845 by The Spaghetti Monster on March 15, 2007 at 12:32 pm
I don't know what you're advocating kniggit? do you really think our current actions will cause no problems for the future of the human race?40. Comment #25846 by BaronOchs on March 15, 2007 at 12:36 pm
41. Comment #25847 by Riley on March 15, 2007 at 12:44 pm
42. Comment #25848 by BaronOchs on March 15, 2007 at 12:47 pm
wouldn't it be logical to conclude that nature has selected us (humans) as the vehicle to bring about climate change?
43. Comment #25849 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 12:47 pm
44. Comment #25851 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 12:56 pm
45. Comment #25852 by steveroot on March 15, 2007 at 1:14 pm
46. Comment #25855 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 1:23 pm
47. Comment #25856 by The Spaghetti Monster on March 15, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Comment #25849 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 12:47 pm48. Comment #25862 by BaronOchs on March 15, 2007 at 1:41 pm
49. Comment #25864 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on March 15, 2007 at 1:46 pm
50. Comment #25868 by BaronOchs on March 15, 2007 at 1:58 pm
Quick question for the "brighty brights"….
Kudos to you my bright friend.
1. Comment #25332 by Frederiksen78 on March 12, 2007 at 7:19 am
Perhaps it's because it's not as nice. No eternal life or other cool stuff like an invisible friend.
Other Comments by Frederiksen78