Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Tuesday, March 20, 2007 | Science : Psychiatry and Psychology | print version Print | Comments

Document Your Mom Was Wrong: Horseplay Is An Important Part Of Development

by ScienceDaily

Reposted from ScienceDaily:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070319111228.htm

Playground roughhousing has long been a tradition of children and adolescents, much to the chagrin of several generations of parents who worry that their child will be hurt or worse, become accustom to violence and aggression. But animal research may paint a different portrait of rough and tumble play; one that suggests that social and emotional development may rely heavily on such peer interaction.

In an article published in the April issue of Current Directions in Psychological Science, Sergio and Vivian Pellis of the University of Lethbridge reviewed multiple studies involving animals, and found a link between rough and tumble play and social competence.

For example, adult rats deprived of peer interaction, (and thus rough and tumble play), reveal an inability to comprehend the hierarchy of social structures. In the rat kingdom, when a young male attempts to establish residency in a colony, he is promptly targeted for attack by the dominant male rat. Rats that have been reared with peers quickly learn to remain crouched and motionless in such an instance in order to avoid the dominant male's attention. Play deprived rats, on the other hand, continue to scurry about which ultimately invites further serious attacks.

Coordinated movements appear to suffer in the absence of rough and tumble play as well. Rats, as most other mammals, rely heavily on coordinated movement for both cooperative (e.g. sex) and competitive (e.g. defending a piece of food) situations. Rats that are reared in isolation have impaired ability to coordinate their movements appropriately with opponents. This coordination, say the authors, can be learned through the constantly shifting body motions that take place during playfighting.

Deprivation from peer interaction appears to have neurological consequences as well. Juvenile play fighting has been found to stimulate the release of certain chemical growth factors in the cerebral cortex, an area the authors describe as the "social brain." Among the structures in the social brain is the orbitofrontal cortex, an area known to be involved in social discrimination and decision. As logic would tell us, the less growth is promoted in this area, the greater the likelihood of impaired movement coordination, perception of social cues, and the like.

But the does the behavior of rats provides any insight into our own, seemingly more complex development? Apparently so, say the authors, who cite evidence that there is considerable overlap between animal and human play, particularly for play fighting.

"The knowledge thus gained," writes Pellis "can provide the clues to the correlated consequences of those processes that can be studied in humans."

This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Association for Psychological Science.

Comments 1 - 10 of 10 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #26583 by debaser71 on March 20, 2007 at 3:35 pm

"For example, adult rats deprived of peer interaction, (and thus rough and tumble play)..."

"Rats that are reared in isolation have impaired ability ..."

Sounds very flawed.

And what of rats that aren't isolated but who also do not roughhouse. Didn't the author of the article (and perhaps the pyschologists who did the experiment) consider the possiblity that isolation of the rats is bad for them instead of saying that the lack of roughhouse play was bad?

Anyway I call BS. Any link to the actual study, I enjoy finding flaws.

Other Comments by debaser71

2. Comment #26591 by Luthien on March 20, 2007 at 4:39 pm

 avatarHey, I still like to play fight with people, but now only with people who are very close to me. I think it does help you form a bond, especially among siblings when they are children.

Other Comments by Luthien

3. Comment #26592 by Richard Morgan on March 20, 2007 at 4:42 pm

 avatarWell, yes.

Of course!

I'm a teacher, and I have been in contact with rowdy teenagers for over thirty years. And not only is it clear that "playground roughhousing " is normal adolescent behaviour, many researchers have already concluded that it is an important part of development. Not surprisingly, the most interesting explicative theories come from evolutionary psychologists.


So what's new, doc?

This is a case where our poor little rodent friends could have been left in peace, it seems to me.

But, talking about dominant male rats, we've got presidential elections coming up in France soon.
A bon entendeur.....

Other Comments by Richard Morgan

4. Comment #26602 by Nails on March 20, 2007 at 5:02 pm

 avatari'd agree with that. I'm in my thirties and still messa round with people at work.
It's a male bonding thing, you understand....

Other Comments by Nails

5. Comment #26607 by The author on March 20, 2007 at 5:12 pm

 avatarI always said that pogo makes sense, but nobody ever wanted to believe me. Now I got the proof!

Other Comments by The author

6. Comment #26613 by Bremas on March 20, 2007 at 5:27 pm

Seems like common sense to me.

Other Comments by Bremas

7. Comment #26765 by jeepyjay on March 21, 2007 at 2:39 pm

 avatarOn the other hand, if you read the biographies of great thinkers, like Einstein or Newton, it seems they did not get involved in play with their contemporaries at school, but kept aloof and went their own way. This doesn't seem to have affected their ability to survive in society.

Other Comments by jeepyjay

8. Comment #26770 by fonex_86 on March 21, 2007 at 3:06 pm

jeepyjay,

Unfortunately, neither Einstein nor Newton were particularly sociable men: one (Newton) was downright cruel, selfish and arrogant, while the other (Einstein) was a skirt-chaser and rather dreamy idealist.

It is also my experience that too-introverted people often develop a rather perverse view of others, which all-too-often further distances them from society. Needless to say, this often turns into a rather vicious cycle. The fact that these figures survived is probably more due to the level of tolerance displayed by modern societies than the "survivability" of their social behavior.

Other Comments by fonex_86

9. Comment #26855 by Martha on March 22, 2007 at 2:48 am

 avatar".....reveal an inability to comprehend the hierarchy of social structures."

Hierarchies are anti-social in terms of HUMAN societies. Normally developed human beings are individuals and are therefore merely DIFFERENT - not superior or inferior - to each other.

Those who cherish hierarchical systems (e.g., the Catholic Church) only do so because it suits their psycological immaturity, i.e., their undeveloped (blocked) humanity. It is for this reason that such hierarchical institutions are inherently anti-social.

Other Comments by Martha

10. Comment #27127 by C. Heroldt on March 23, 2007 at 8:32 am

The needs for social interaction and "playground roughhousing" for children are proven in the animal world, where young lion - cubs playfight, then move on to pouncing on (and killing) small rodents, and eventually, larger prey.

Children who are too protected during their early years of physical development will undoubtedly find themselves unprepared for the social and physical conflicts and challenges of their adult years, and possibly even turn out to be antisocial and introverted deppressives.

Other Comments by C. Heroldt
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: