Germany Cites Koran in Rejecting Divorce2. Comment #27037 by MartinSGill on March 23, 2007 at 1:54 am
"When the Koran is put above the German constitution, I can only say, 'Good night, Germany,' " Ronald Pofalla, general secretary of the main conservative party in the country, the Christian Democratic Union, said to the mass-market paper Bild.
3. Comment #27039 by Fouad Boussetta on March 23, 2007 at 2:11 am
4. Comment #27046 by Octavion on March 23, 2007 at 3:13 am
I have to agree with Fouad Boussetta isn't that what you sign up for when you join one of those "cults".5. Comment #27054 by denoir on March 23, 2007 at 3:47 am
yes, the Christian Democratic Union. So... if the judge had referred to the Bible, instead of the Koran to negate national law, would our friend here still be up in arms?
6. Comment #27066 by BaronOchs on March 23, 2007 at 4:16 am
Isn't that what you sign upto when you join one of those cults?
7. Comment #27068 by Zappi on March 23, 2007 at 4:23 am
8. Comment #27073 by MiloC on March 23, 2007 at 5:06 am
Here in the Montana town where I live, the school board has ruled that Native Americans will be allowed to bring their 'cerimonial tobacco' to school. They decided this because the Native American community wants to be allowed to practice the cultural and religious hertiage and the school board has agreed. There are no Native Americans on the board. I think this whole "respect for religion" thing is getting out of hand. Makes me wonder what's next!9. Comment #27076 by fonex_86 on March 23, 2007 at 5:14 am
BaronOchs,10. Comment #27087 by faouloki on March 23, 2007 at 5:37 am
11. Comment #27102 by The author on March 23, 2007 at 6:32 am
12. Comment #27103 by Luthien on March 23, 2007 at 6:41 am
13. Comment #27108 by Deimos on March 23, 2007 at 6:57 am
The Judge was biased to a favourable outcome to the Muslim man. She thought the Muslim man might want to kill her too.14. Comment #27109 by anotherclinton on March 23, 2007 at 7:03 am
15. Comment #27113 by Skeptic Jim on March 23, 2007 at 7:14 am
>yes, the Christian Democratic Union. So... if the judge had referred to the Bible, instead of the Koran to negate national law, would our friend here still be up in arms?16. Comment #27130 by cerad on March 23, 2007 at 8:41 am
17. Comment #27132 by pastafarian82 on March 23, 2007 at 8:43 am
Comment #27108 by Deimos on March 23, 2007 at 6:57 am18. Comment #27144 by nickthelight on March 23, 2007 at 9:24 am
19. Comment #27155 by BaronOchs on March 23, 2007 at 9:56 am
20. Comment #27158 by Deimos on March 23, 2007 at 10:04 am
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/058.sbt.html#005.058.23421. Comment #27160 by Luthien on March 23, 2007 at 10:04 am
22. Comment #27164 by karlJ on March 23, 2007 at 10:25 am
23. Comment #27172 by fotomatt on March 23, 2007 at 10:49 am
24. Comment #27188 by The author on March 23, 2007 at 1:00 pm
25. Comment #27194 by alexander77 on March 23, 2007 at 1:35 pm
I feel ashamed of my country's justice system from time to time, especially now.26. Comment #27195 by alexander77 on March 23, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Maybe judge Christa Datz-Winter should be married to the husband for a while as she is so understanding...27. Comment #27198 by Bremas on March 23, 2007 at 1:46 pm
All in one article:28. Comment #27203 by Monsterbeach on March 23, 2007 at 2:11 pm
29. Comment #27210 by Monsterbeach on March 23, 2007 at 2:44 pm
30. Comment #27233 by MelM on March 23, 2007 at 3:50 pm
Hopefully, this outrage will put an end to the idea of two sets of laws."Reaction to the decision has been almost as sulfurous as it was to the cancellation of the opera."Good! Anger is called for. Defiance is needed.
31. Comment #27235 by ghostbuster on March 23, 2007 at 3:52 pm
This comes after my last post on veils in school in Britain ie Secular laws being overshadowed by religious law. Canada was smart enough to turn it down. Many religious laws are against human rights and human rights are NOT relative values. Soon, Hindus will want theirs, Old Testament laws, now being pushed by Dominionism in the US, will raise their ugly heads--on and on it will go. If a person cannot go to a country and accept its laws, then DON'T GO THERE.You certainly won't find me moving to Iran anytime soon and please take a gander at those countries that practice theocracy--they are not friendly democracies and why should they be---religion has never been freedom-friendly, and is, in fact, extremely hierarchal. They can't stand each other, even when they do believe in the same god. So why are we running so scared of offending them? Religion more often than not CREATES offensiveness but all demand respect. I will not respect any system that believes in injustices, inequalities, ignorance and abuse. And, nor should secular governments.32. Comment #27245 by MelM on March 23, 2007 at 4:13 pm
Comtemptible, irrational, religious superstitions should not be indulged and should not be woven into regulations and laws. The more superstition is indulged, the worse it will get. If some people feel hurt, it's their own fault and not ours. "Sensitivity" to the irrational is wrong, wrong, wrong.33. Comment #27254 by jonecc on March 23, 2007 at 4:29 pm
Muslim opinion on the age of Aisha at marriage varies from 6, with the marriage being consummated at 9, to 23.34. Comment #27257 by the great teapot on March 23, 2007 at 4:35 pm
This should be published in the liverpool echo-35. Comment #27268 by jonecc on March 23, 2007 at 4:50 pm
ghostbuster36. Comment #27271 by Bremas on March 23, 2007 at 5:04 pm
Unfortunately, it seems this story is making its rounds in the christian right news circles here in the states. It seems to be reinforcing their view that Europe is too far gone down the road of socialism and multiculturalism.37. Comment #27272 by mmurray on March 23, 2007 at 5:05 pm
38. Comment #27297 by ghostbuster on March 23, 2007 at 7:24 pm
That it got a ruling in the first place is cause to pause. And, I am speaking of Canada, not Britain, where secular law IS being threatened. The Knights of Columbus (Catholic) refused to host gay marriage receptions on religious grounds. Judges refusing to perform civil ceremonies re gays (they've been excused, but I say if you can't do the job....), pharmacies not wanting to sell certain medications on religious basis, Sharia law was shut down--barely--but we have a very religious right wing political leader of the same ilk as Bush who would probably hold a majority government if put to the vote today and to get votes, he does pander. THAT does concern me. While Britain and much of Europe does not seem to pander to religion and in fact tend to have a non-religious majority, I come from a country that is very much inclined to do so(Quebec alone is a heavily Catholic province while Alberta holds the West in evangelical leanings--the province that our Prime Minister comes from.) So excuse me if I get alittle up tight about religious law in a secular country. My country is most certainly timid about upsetting religious elements, more particularly Christian elements, but certainly Muslim as well. We are being Americanized in every concievable way, including the importation of fanatical religious organizations under the banner of multi-culturalism. Morality is NOT relative, either to cultures or religions. The very fact that we have to waste precious time discussing the same crap that was discussed in the 4th Century while the world is winding down into an ecological abyss makes religion an even bigger crime against humanity than it already has been.39. Comment #27634 by Russell Blackford on March 25, 2007 at 9:05 pm
Oil on water? Surely she meant petrol (or gasolne) on the fire? Quite the opposite!40. Comment #27676 by Nessie on March 26, 2007 at 5:03 am
Anyone else notice the surprising omission? I wrote this letter to the NY Times:41. Comment #27703 by HunterZolomon on March 26, 2007 at 8:08 am
42. Comment #27930 by Thrall on March 27, 2007 at 9:47 am
Female Genital Mutilation is ok, because it's religously based. Treating Blacks as lesser people is ok, because they wear the mark of Cain. Israel can have nukes, because the bible says so. Anyone who attacks israel will get destroyed by any christian country, because the bible says to. Women should be slaves because it's what the culture says.43. Comment #28125 by Nessie on March 28, 2007 at 5:09 am
Hunter,
1. Comment #27030 by MihaiC on March 22, 2007 at 11:47 pm
The hell with cultural background.
The prick compromised his honor on the first act of violence against his wife.
Other Comments by MihaiC