Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Wednesday, April 25, 2007 | Science : Astronomy | print version Print | Comments

Document Potentially habitable planet found

by AP, Yahoo

Thanks to Ranjani for the link.

Reposted from:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070425/ap_on_sc/habitable_planet;_ylt=AuqQGr6eV9GSVm_ddfLk..us0NUE

planetWASHINGTON - For the first time astronomers have discovered a planet outside our solar system that is potentially habitable, with Earth-like temperatures, a find researchers described Tuesday as a big step in the search for "life in the universe."

The planet is just the right size, might have water in liquid form, and in galactic terms is relatively nearby at 120 trillion miles away. But the star it closely orbits, known as a "red dwarf," is much smaller, dimmer and cooler than our sun.

There's still a lot that is unknown about the new planet, which could be deemed inhospitable to life once more is known about it. And it's worth noting that scientists' requirements for habitability count Mars in that category: a size relatively similar to Earth's with temperatures that would permit liquid water. However, this is the first outside our solar system that meets those standards.

"It's a significant step on the way to finding possible life in the universe," said University of Geneva astronomer Michel Mayor, one of 11 European scientists on the team that found the planet. "It's a nice discovery. We still have a lot of questions."

The results of the discovery have not been published but have been submitted to the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Alan Boss, who works at the Carnegie Institution of Washington where a U.S. team of astronomers competed in the hunt for an Earth-like planet, called it "a major milestone in this business."

The planet was discovered by the European Southern Observatory's telescope in La Silla, Chile, which has a special instrument that splits light to find wobbles in different wave lengths. Those wobbles can reveal the existence of other worlds.

What they revealed is a planet circling the red dwarf star, Gliese 581. Red dwarfs are low-energy, tiny stars that give off dim red light and last longer than stars like our sun. Until a few years ago, astronomers didn't consider these stars as possible hosts of planets that might sustain life.

The discovery of the new planet, named 581 c, is sure to fuel studies of planets circling similar dim stars. About 80 percent of the stars near Earth are red dwarfs.

The new planet is about five times heavier than Earth. Its discoverers aren't certain if it is rocky like Earth or if its a frozen ice ball with liquid water on the surface. If it is rocky like Earth, which is what the prevailing theory proposes, it has a diameter about 1 1/2 times bigger than our planet. If it is an iceball, as Mayor suggests, it would be even bigger.

Based on theory, 581 c should have an atmosphere, but what's in that atmosphere is still a mystery and if it's too thick that could make the planet's surface temperature too hot, Mayor said.

However, the research team believes the average temperature to be somewhere between 32 and 104 degrees and that set off celebrations among astronomers.

Until now, all 220 planets astronomers have found outside our solar system have had the "Goldilocks problem." They've been too hot, too cold or just plain too big and gaseous, like uninhabitable Jupiter.

The new planet seems just right — or at least that's what scientists think.

"This could be very important," said NASA astrobiology expert Chris McKay, who was not part of the discovery team. "It doesn't mean there is life, but it means it's an Earth-like planet in terms of potential habitability."

Eventually astronomers will rack up discoveries of dozens, maybe even hundreds of planets considered habitable, the astronomers said. But this one — simply called "c" by its discoverers when they talk among themselves — will go down in cosmic history as No. 1.

Besides having the right temperature, the new planet is probably full of liquid water, hypothesizes Stephane Udry, the discovery team's lead author and another Geneva astronomer. But that is based on theory about how planets form, not on any evidence, he said.

"Liquid water is critical to life as we know it," co-author Xavier Delfosse of Grenoble University in France, said in a statement. "Because of its temperature and relative proximity, this planet will most probably be a very important target of the future space missions dedicated to the search for extraterrestrial life. On the treasure map of the Universe, one would be tempted to mark this planet with an X."

Other astronomers cautioned it's too early to tell whether there is water.

"You need more work to say it's got water or it doesn't have water," said retired NASA astronomer Steve Maran, press officer for the American Astronomical Society. "You wouldn't send a crew there assuming that when you get there, they'll have enough water to get back."

planetThe new planet's star system is a mere 20.5 light years away, making Gliese 581 one of the 100 closest stars to Earth. It's so dim, you can't see it without a telescope, but it's somewhere in the constellation Libra, which is low in the southeastern sky during the midevening in the Northern Hemisphere.

"I expect there will be planets like Earth, but whether they have life is another question," said renowned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking in an interview with The Associated Press in Orlando. "We haven't been visited by little green men yet."

Before you book your extrastellar flight to 581 c, a few caveats about how alien that world probably is: Anyone sitting on the planet would get heavier quickly, and birthdays would add up fast since it orbits its star every 13 days.

Gravity is 1.6 times as strong as Earth's so a 150-pound person would feel like 240 pounds.

But oh, the view. The planet is 14 times closer to the star it orbits. Udry figures the red dwarf star would hang in the sky at a size 20 times larger than our moon. And it's likely, but still not known, that the planet doesn't rotate, so one side would always be sunlit and the other dark.

Distance is another problem. "We don't know how to get to those places in a human lifetime," Maran said.

Two teams of astronomers, one in Europe and one in the United States, have been racing to be the first to find a planet like 581 c outside the solar system.

The European team looked at 100 different stars using a tool called HARPS (High Accuracy Radial Velocity for Planetary Searcher) to find this one planet, said Xavier Bonfils of the Lisbon Observatory, one of the co-discoverers.

Much of the effort to find Earth-like planets has focused on stars like our sun with the challenge being to find a planet the right distance from the star it orbits. About 90 percent of the time, the European telescope focused its search more on sun-like stars, Udry said.

A few weeks before the European discovery earlier this month, a scientific paper in the journal Astrobiology theorized a few days that red dwarf stars were good candidates.

"Now we have the possibility to find many more," Bonfils said.



___

On the Net:

The European Southern Observatory: http://www.eso.org

RELATED: Truthdig.com picks up the story, with comments

Comments 1 - 23 of 23 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #34845 by Phaderus on April 25, 2007 at 12:39 pm

 avatarSo, I wonder how far the Xians will have to bend over backward to explain life on other planets when it is confirmed?

Other Comments by Phaderus

2. Comment #34849 by Goodwithwood on April 25, 2007 at 1:01 pm

 avatar"Far out"

Other Comments by Goodwithwood

3. Comment #34850 by ghostbuster on April 25, 2007 at 1:01 pm

I suspect earth isn't an exception to the rule but rather an example of the rule. I also heard that double star systems could hold habitable planets too. I wonder if somebody hasn't looked our way and found us, asking if there is intelligent life. Sadly, most of it isn't.
Little green men? Beats a guy talking to a burning bush any day.

Other Comments by ghostbuster

4. Comment #34855 by Rtambree on April 25, 2007 at 1:10 pm

Religious pilgrims take note. Name a Space Shuttle the 'Mayflower', and off you go.

Other Comments by Rtambree

5. Comment #34867 by Phaderus on April 25, 2007 at 1:29 pm

 avatarGreat idea, let all of the Xians colonize the new planet and leave us alone. Come to think of it, that's what England did, all the crack pots left for the new world and all of the low key Xians stayed behind and religion almost died out. Of course, now I think the crackpots over here are starting to cross-polinate back to the UK and stir things up there again.

Other Comments by Phaderus

6. Comment #34881 by Devolution on April 25, 2007 at 1:53 pm

 avatarIt saddens me that a planet exists out there, possibly full of intelligent life, and none of them have heard the word of Jesus Christ! We must use all available resources to seek this planet out and convert them all to the word of the one true God.

Other Comments by Devolution

7. Comment #34890 by Fishpeddler on April 25, 2007 at 2:09 pm

 avatarThe coldest it gets is 34 degrees F? It's looking more and more likely that ours is the only planet in the universe that supports hockey-playing life forms.

Other Comments by Fishpeddler

8. Comment #34900 by catchy_nick on April 25, 2007 at 2:18 pm

To paraphrase Carl Sagan, "Sometimes I look at a star in the sky and wonder if theres a planet going around it, and then I wonder if theres life on it, and then further wonder if theres an intelligent being on it looking at my sun wondering the same thing". Its so sad that we work hard to find planets out there remotely like ours so the human species might potentially inhabit it in the future, you know as in long term planning, and there are people on this rock who think the world was created for them and they can trash it all they want and God will come floating down on a cloud to save the day. Jesus F@#$ing Christ!

Other Comments by catchy_nick

9. Comment #34901 by pissinintothewind on April 25, 2007 at 2:18 pm

You will all be pleased to hear that the vatican has already been thinking this one through and in their view there is reason to believe that the resurrection of JC applies to all creation. Lucky extraterrestrials eh, they dont know what they are in for.

Other Comments by pissinintothewind

10. Comment #34903 by cybercoma on April 25, 2007 at 2:19 pm

 avatarPerhaps this is a stupid point, but...

There is a very big jump from a planet being able to support "life" and finding "intelligent life," no?

Other Comments by cybercoma

11. Comment #34916 by mmurray on April 25, 2007 at 3:06 pm

 avatar

Perhaps this is a stupid point, but...

There is a very big jump from a planet being able to support "life" and finding "intelligent life," no?

No that's not stupid at all. It is a very big jump.

Michael

Other Comments by mmurray

12. Comment #34938 by M31 on April 25, 2007 at 3:57 pm

 avatar"There is a very big jump from a planet being able to support "life" and finding "intelligent life," no?"

Indeed, it's by no means clear that this planet actually could support life either. There is some reason to think that any volatiles (like water) that might have been present during the formation of this planet were boiled off long ago when the star was quite a bit brighter than it is now (M-dwarfs take a long time to settle down onto the main sequence, and they remain active for billions of years). I think the best you can really say is that it's the first exo-planet that we cannot summarily rule out having a surface with liquid water. If we could find one of these things in transit then you could determine the planets density and maybe have an idea of whether or not it's an ocean planet... but even then, as you say, the leap from a planet with liquid water to life (and then intelligent life) is by no means secure.

Other Comments by M31

13. Comment #34939 by M31 on April 25, 2007 at 4:00 pm

 avatarNonetheless, this is still an incredibly cool result! Particularly that they can detect a planet that's only 5 earth masses with radial velocity!

Other Comments by M31

14. Comment #34973 by panajache69 on April 25, 2007 at 7:32 pm

 avatarI propose we immediately launch a probe to GL581c carrying a Chuck Berry CD and player.

Other Comments by panajache69

15. Comment #34991 by TheCelestialTeapot on April 25, 2007 at 8:56 pm

In response to Phaderus' idea of sending Xians to colonize the newly discovered planet, well I'm all for it except that 120 trillion miles just doesn't seem far enough away....

Other Comments by TheCelestialTeapot

16. Comment #35003 by gobbles on April 25, 2007 at 10:52 pm

I think sending a probe their is a bit too much for 20 lightyears. By the way, interstellar flights in a human lifetime is actually technologically feasable today. Project orion, which was tested during the 1960's could reach up to 15% of the speed of light using nuclear bombs detonated behind it. For obvious reasons, many people were against it just from the sound of the idea, but the maths said that it'd work, and the cold war didn't fit very well into the whole americans sending warheads into space. But if they find similar planets, and ones that are within say... 5 lightyears distance, then there's always the possibilty of a 30-60 year mission...

Other Comments by gobbles

17. Comment #35032 by Underachiever on April 26, 2007 at 3:37 am

 avatarNo need to send Xians, we can send a probe with bacteria on board so that when it arrives the bacteria can evolve into Creationsists over time!

Other Comments by Underachiever

18. Comment #35063 by eoinc on April 26, 2007 at 5:44 am

Imagine a consignment of alien missionaries from another world arriving at our planet, eager to convert us to the message of their one true faith. That would be fun.

Other Comments by eoinc

19. Comment #35067 by Luthien on April 26, 2007 at 5:59 am

 avatar
17. Comment #35032 by Underachiever on April 26, 2007 at 3:37 am
No need to send Xians, we can send a probe with bacteria on board so that when it arrives the bacteria can evolve into Creationsists over time!


Haha, brilliant!

Other Comments by Luthien

20. Comment #35070 by mmurray on April 26, 2007 at 6:05 am

 avatar

But if they find similar planets, and ones that are within say... 5 lightyears distance, then there's always the possibilty of a 30-60 year mission...


According to this interesting site Google found

http://www.solstation.com/stars/s10ly.htm

the only stars in 5 ly are the Alpha Centauri binary pair and Proxima Centauri.

Michael

Other Comments by mmurray

21. Comment #35078 by Underachiever on April 26, 2007 at 6:23 am

 avatar
But if they find similar planets, and ones that are within say... 5 lightyears distance, then there's always the possibilty of a 30-60 year mission...
Whoever is on that mission is going to be really pissed of when they get waved at by the passengers on the spaceship passing them which set off 30 years after they did!

Other Comments by Underachiever

22. Comment #35145 by maton100 on April 26, 2007 at 10:36 am

 avatarThey must have the same God on that planet too. Because, as O'Lielly said: "Sun go up, sun go down."

Other Comments by maton100

23. Comment #35273 by Astroboy on April 26, 2007 at 6:44 pm

 avatar
No need to send Xians, we can send a probe with bacteria on board so that when it arrives the bacteria can evolve into Creationsists over time!


And eventually, they will call the spaceship that transported them their 'Garden of Eden'.

Other Comments by Astroboy
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: