Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Saturday, April 28, 2007 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments

Document Atheism's Big Night In Little Rock

by John Brummett, The Morning News

Reposted from:
http://www.nwaonline.net/articles/2007/04/27/columns/john_brummett/042807brummett.txt

Dr. Richard Dawkins, an Oxford University biology professor, author and intellectual who probably is the world's most famous atheist and evolutionist, gave a lecture Thursday night in Little Rock.

Right there on the Bible Belt's buckle, they had to bring in extra chairs. Dawkins drew more than a thousand people to the Statehouse Convention Center, breaking Madeleine Albright's attendance record for lectures presented by the Clinton School of Public Service.

Everyone seemed friendly, ranging from those giving extended applause to those asking only the most polite of challenging questions.

I'd asked Skip Rutherford, dean of the Clinton School, if he expected trouble -- a shouting demonstration from zealous religious believers, perhaps.

"Could be," he said.

Someone had called him to explain that the state Constitution prohibits atheists from holding office, which, while true, is long superseded by federal rights. But Dawkins was not seeking office, Rutherford replied. But you're advancing atheism, the caller countered. "No, I'm advancing ideas," Rutherford concluded.

Rutherford, a church-going Methodist, said the left got mad at him for bringing in Karl Rove, so it was fair for the right to get mad at him for bringing in Dawkins. Those probably are symmetrical devils.

During the Q-and-A, a young man told Dawkins he chose to believe in a religion-based afterlife so that his departed loved ones would have a place to go where he could hope to see them again. Dawkins was not impolite, but direct, when he explained that what the young man described wasn't belief, but hope.

Little Rock City Attorney Tom Carpenter asked Dawkins how we could be capable of love if we descended from the propagation of the "selfish gene," as Dawkins famously theorized in a best-selling book. Dawkins answered that the ability or even propensity to love could be as much a part of the natural selection process as physical characteristics.

He also argued that nonbelievers' moral conduct comes from a healthy human choice rather than unhealthy fear of supernatural punishment.

Dawkins also got asked about the uncommon preponderance of religious practice in the United States, where we have a far greater church-going population than any other developed and well-educated Western nation. His answer was surprising. He speculated it might have to do with our insistence on separating church and state.

In Britain, the state has an official religion, the Church of England, and children are required to be exposed to it. The result, Dawkins said, is that religion becomes "boring." Look inside a church in England, he said, and you'll see four old ladies -- "cramming for finals," he joked, quoting an Austrialian friend.

To the contrary, he said that the United States, by separating religion from government, bestows the allure of freedom on religion and makes it a matter of "free enterprise, like selling soap flakes. And sell it they do."

Dawkins, who sometimes gets described as militant, opened with a series of broadsides on religion, some humorous. He managed to entertain in a mildly jarring way, since religion doesn't get talked about so disparagingly around here very often, much less before large, approving crowds. Then his remarks turned sufficiently esoteric on matters of biology and physics to make the audience a bit shifty, no doubt ready for the return to fun in the Q-and-A.

It's hard to imagine that he changed anyone's opinion.

"I'm not here to indoctrinate, but to raise consciousness," he said, shortly after saying how proud he was to be in the home state of the greatest president of his lifetime.

The audience seemed so friendly -- every nonreligious person in Arkansas must have been there -- that indoctrination would have been overkill. Surely there were resistant attendees, quietly taking offense on the basis of their religious faith.

Only they can say whether anything raised their consciousness.

Woman: "Look at all these people. It's a miracle."

Man: "Yeah, if you believe in that sort of thing."

Woman: "Which I don't."

-- Back-row conversation

------------

BigTen Talk:
http://info.detnews.com/sports/lettersindex.cfm?username=michigan%20razorback

Thu. 04/26/07 10:20 PM
richard dawkins
Tonight I was part of an overflow audience to hear Oxford professor Richard Dawkins lecture on his book The God Delusion.

Why? you ask. Hey, I'm nothing if not open-minded.

Dawkins is a brilliant, debonair witty man....whom I happen to disagree with on the existence of God.

But he gave a great lecture.

Closing to a standing ovation, he told a story about traveling last week to Brussels. There he spoke to a member of the European Parliament who told him he had recently been negotiating to get President Bush to travel to Brussels to speak.

The man told Dawkins negotiations broke down when Bush demanded a guaranteed standing ovation.

The place broke up.
michigan razorback, little rock, ar

Comments 1 - 25 of 25 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #35710 by Jimill on April 28, 2007 at 1:22 pm

 avatar"Closing to a standing ovation, he told a story about traveling last week to Brussels. There he spoke to a member of the European Parliament who told him he had recently been negotiating to get President Bush to travel to Brussels to speak.

The man told Dawkins negotiations broke down when Bush demanded a guaranteed standing ovation."

Ha! Could that be how Bush got a standing ovation at the state of the union adress?

Other Comments by Jimill

2. Comment #35716 by CDG on April 28, 2007 at 2:03 pm

I hope we can get this on video. I think the Profs conjecture on the seperation of church and state was interesting but not the real reason for America's religious fervor. I think it simply has more to do with the fact that America was much more rural than England and much bigger. That just meant alot more pockets of indoctinating ignorance running rampant for a few hundred years. Its going to take another 100 years or so to start to unravel it through consciousness raising connectivity.

In England, when somehting fell out of favor most people caught up to it rather quickly. Just like the latest style in clothing.

In the south in America, they are now just getting Sergio Valente jeans!!!

Other Comments by CDG

3. Comment #35717 by Nails on April 28, 2007 at 2:10 pm

 avatarI wish there was a video link for this, would have been good to see.
Would have made a nice change from seeing the American-style interviews which are bocoming quite monotonous.
Apart from the "sun goes up, sun goes down" type stupidity.

Other Comments by Nails

4. Comment #35726 by NormanDoering on April 28, 2007 at 3:13 pm

Rutherford, a church-going Methodist, said the left got mad at him for bringing in Karl Rove, so it was fair for the right to get mad at him for bringing in Dawkins. Those probably are symmetrical devils.

Actually, Karl Rove may be an atheist according to Christopher Hitchens. I got the quotes on my blog:
http://normdoering.blogspot.com/2007/04/is-karl-rove-atheist.html

http://normdoering.blogspot.com

Other Comments by NormanDoering

5. Comment #35727 by BaronOchs on April 28, 2007 at 3:14 pm

 avatarOne speculation concerning the comparative irreligiousity of Britain is religious decisions were made for the people from above. When successive Monarchs demand catholicism then protestantism and back again from the nation and people end up with the church of england that's not unlikely to breed a little scepticism.

Interestingly the catholic faith has wained slower in Poland and Ireland than in other countries, which may be because they both had non-catholic oppressors which made the faith a source of solidarity.

Other Comments by BaronOchs

6. Comment #35728 by maton100 on April 28, 2007 at 3:22 pm

 avatarCome to Nashville Richard! Toby Keith needs to be edukamated.

Other Comments by maton100

7. Comment #35734 by CDG on April 28, 2007 at 4:12 pm

Hey Maton100,
I live in MN but will be in Nashville next Friday PM to see my brothers band play (20 year together but a bit of a reunion). I used to live in Franklin.

Let me know if interested and I will get you the name of the club...And buy you a few rounds

Chris

Other Comments by CDG

8. Comment #35740 by MelM on April 28, 2007 at 5:26 pm

Hmmm. "Official religion", "four old ladies". I wonder why religion in the Islamic states isn't reduced to "four old ladies."

Other Comments by MelM

9. Comment #35741 by MelM on April 28, 2007 at 6:03 pm

Lessons in reality and reason.
...what the young man described wasn't belief, but hope.
I think this sort of statement, pointing people to reality, can be effective. The religious mind is out of focus when it comes to religion. Forcing such minds to sober up for a few seconds and to really understand the meaning of a belief will get people to see the absurdity of a particular view and also experience being in focus on a religious matter. In the example given, the man may never have heard--explicitly stated--that what one believes or feels or hopes, isn't true just because of the belief or feeling or hope. This can be a very critical antidote when one is tempted to indulge in wishes or fears. Providing such insights in lectures may not pull people away from religion right then and there, but it'll be a win for rationality which is what will be required to end religion. Look at it this way. If someone solidly and explicity concludes that wishes and hopes aren't facts, he will be immune to witch doctor arguments of that sort. Without teaching reason/reality, there's no way to win the battle against religion.

Other Comments by MelM

10. Comment #35742 by h2g2bob on April 28, 2007 at 6:12 pm

From the article: "In Britain, the state has an official religion, the Church of England, and children are required to be exposed to it." This is not true - school teaching on religion places emphasis on teaching multiple faiths. The CoE is the largest religion in the UK, but the only person who must be CoE is the Queen.

Other Comments by h2g2bob

11. Comment #35761 by MelM on April 28, 2007 at 7:49 pm

Comment #35742 by h2g2bob
...school teaching on religion places emphasis on teaching multiple faiths.
Hey, maybe this is a clue to the drop off in religion. If the kids are taught multiple "faiths", it would help them see the subjectivity of a selection. It should be clear that the "faiths" don't have knowledge but only dogma. I wonder how many religions have to be taught to convince the kids that they are all crazy. Hmmm.

Other Comments by MelM

12. Comment #35780 by Captain Yesterday on April 28, 2007 at 8:52 pm

 avatarI am so disappointed that I was not able to attend. Stupid job ;)

As a disclaimer to an undercurrent found in this article, there are surprisingly far more free-thinkers to be found here in Arkansas than one would imagine. While there are a great many churches (many, many, many churches) in the state, my experience has been that most believers are of the type that acknowledge a belief in a God but it plays almost no part in their actual lives. I actually know more atheists than I do theists!

Other Comments by Captain Yesterday

13. Comment #35783 by Convertedchristian on April 28, 2007 at 9:03 pm

I AM SO PISSED!! I live about an hour away from little rock and I had not idea this was going on. This was, I bet, was my only chance to see mr Dawkins for quite some time. Oh well. I am so happy he came here to arkansas. I agree with Captian Yesterday in that people here do belive in god but for a lot of them it never translates into any other day of the week but sunday.

Other Comments by Convertedchristian

14. Comment #35790 by Liveliest Crib on April 28, 2007 at 9:41 pm

Karl Rove and Richard Dawkins are "symmetrical devils?" I do hope the author meant that they are comparable in the reaction they engender rather than the reaction they deserve.

(Yes, I profoundly dislike Rove's politics, but I despise his political tactics even more. I would despise them even if he were on my side.)

Other Comments by Liveliest Crib

15. Comment #35873 by chrisrkline on April 29, 2007 at 7:00 am

I live in LR, and could not attend. It is true, mentioned above, that Arkansas is maybe not as bad as some might thing, but it is bad. There are many mega churches, and many, many, Baptists, and quite a few Pentecostals. You can buy both Dawkins and Harris' books at the two Barns and Nobel book stores.

Other Comments by chrisrkline

16. Comment #35881 by Captain Yesterday on April 29, 2007 at 7:29 am

 avatar[chrisrkline: You can buy both Dawkins and Harris' books at the two Barns and Nobel book stores.]

Yep, I have to go to the Jonesboro B&N to get my books (when I don't use Amazon). It annoys me that our Wal-Mart supercenter, which ostensibly carries a "bestseller" section of books does not contain any of the "atheist" literature, not even Ayaan Hirsan Ali. But boy, you can sure find plenty of theist bestsellers and books on the shelves ... and Sylvia Browne :(

Other Comments by Captain Yesterday

17. Comment #35892 by lt_zippy2 on April 29, 2007 at 7:59 am

Comment #35742 by h2g2bob on April 28, 2007 at 6:12 pm said...

- From the article: "In Britain, the state has an official religion, the Church of England, and children are required to be exposed to it." This is not true - school teaching on religion places emphasis on teaching multiple faiths. The CoE is the largest religion in the UK, but the only person who must be CoE is the Queen.

To a point but schools are still required by law to "provide a daily act of worship of a broadly Christian nature." Usually during school assemblies but sometimes in the classroom. Plus we still have the insult of Voluntary Aided State schools, ie state schools (in the US - public schools) that are part funded by religious institutions, most commonly the Anglican and RC churches. In those schools the Religious Education curriculum is set by the churches and I remember when I was teaching in an RC primary school (six years ago)following the approved Catholic RE curriclum which although did mention other faiths it did so as throw away comments at the end of each topic.

Even in non VA schools they recieve visits from the local vicar/preist/minister who leads school assemblies and prayers. Mind you it was from these visits, singing hymns and prayer in school for such a long period of time when I was a child I realised how much nonsense it really was!

Other Comments by lt_zippy2

18. Comment #35968 by Chris Davis on April 29, 2007 at 3:38 pm

 avatarMelM wrote:

...what the young man described wasn't belief, but hope.

I think this sort of statement, pointing people to reality, can be effective ... In the example given, the man may never have heard--explicitly stated--that what one believes or feels or hopes, isn't true just because of the belief or feeling or hope.


You have an interesting point. I've been spending some time recently in a certain pit of online gormlessness where a gallant band of atheists are fighting to save the minds of some of the thickest 'born-again' Christians I've ever encountered.

One of their recurring complaints really does go along the lines of 'why would you want to be an atheist when we Christians get to go and meet our deceased friends in heaven when we die, and so on. They really do believe that one's belief system should be chosen entirely on the basis of its benefits package. The degree to which it reflects reality is simply not a concern to them.

And they're not interested in hear about logical flaws in their chosen beliefs, either. Gross Biblical self-contradiction is simply answered with 'all things are possible with Jesus'. Pascal's Wager comes up several times a day. Evolution is the work of Satan, and is believed to encompass 'monkeys changing into men' - nonsense because there are still monkeys around; abiogenesis - 'pond-slime changing into men'; and cosmogony - 'where did all that matter for the Big Bang come from?'.

Certainly there's no sign that presenting people in such a forum with succinct facts has any obvious effects. Perhaps, if it were possible to make them really think about it, some consciousness could be raised, but as it is their minds are wrapped up so tightly in their warm and fluffy fantasy that only Jesus hisself could extract them from it.

CD

Other Comments by Chris Davis

19. Comment #35996 by sanjiv on April 29, 2007 at 7:51 pm

Chris Davis wrote:
but as it is their minds are wrapped up so tightly in their warm and fluffy fantasy that only Jesus hisself could extract them from it.
I doubt even Jesus could save the Christians from Christian nonsense. And I don't think they're going to believe a carpenter today.

Other Comments by sanjiv

20. Comment #36005 by a-teapot-ist on April 29, 2007 at 9:00 pm

--Hmmm. "Official religion", "four old ladies". I wonder why religion in the Islamic states isn't reduced to "four old ladies."

Where one's enforced at the end of a ruler during childhood, the other via gunpoint and machete for life, I think it's easy to understand. As for Bush, it's no surprise, since all speeches made away from his Blight House have an audience screened and rehearsed for his load of neo-con pabulum. I can't wait until this farce of an administration files out in '08. Then we can see to the damage control, and put some ointment on America's various bleeding orifices.

Other Comments by a-teapot-ist

21. Comment #36206 by asupcb on April 30, 2007 at 1:28 pm

This is such shit. I grew up in South Arkansas about an hour from Little Rock and I attend uni at Arkansas State in Jonesboro, except for this semester because I am studying abroad in Paris. Not only did I not know about this so I could inform my free-thinking friends back home about it but I used to intern for Senator Pryor in Little Rock and I've been to the Clinton School on multiple occasions. This is so frustrating the one time that Professor Dawkins will be in my state and I'm on his continent. Is there some kind of schedule so that we can see where he will be presenting along with others in the movement such as Sam Harris and Professor Dennet? If Professor Dawkins goes to Memphis or Nashville or even St. Louis I want to attend.

Other Comments by asupcb

22. Comment #36300 by apettway on April 30, 2007 at 9:21 pm

I too, live in Arkansas. I've been a fan of Dawkins since I read TSG about ten years ago. I visit this site often and wish I had known he was coming to town.

To the comment that it is not as bad in Arkansas as people think: yes and no. There are plenty of people that are not religious here, but they are a quite minority. Just tonight I was mildly confronted by a coworker that heard through the grapevine that I was a Bright. It's touch and go here as far as "outing" yourself.

Other Comments by apettway

23. Comment #37063 by Cormac on May 3, 2007 at 10:10 am

 avatar
Comment #35727 by BaronOchs on April 28, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Interestingly the catholic faith has wained slower in Poland and Ireland than in other countries, which may be because they both had non-catholic oppressors which made the faith a source of solidarity.


While it would seem this is true of Poland, it isn't really true of Ireland. Most people on this island would still describe themselves as catholic. However, when you question them about their actual beliefs, you'll find that they very quickly render themselves candidates for excommunication. Very few Irish people actually subscribe to or even know what the dogmas of the catholic church are. The reason the church has survived is the fact that they have a monopoly over the rites of passage - birth (christening) coming of age (communion, confirmation), procreation (marriage and christening), death (funerals). These are core elements of our culture, and so it will be very difficult to lever the church out of them. Aside from these, actual belief in things like "limbo" (recently abandoned by the church anyway), "hell", "the devil", "angels", "mortal sins", "venial sins", "purgatory" and the like just doesn't exist. In reality, the kind of catholicism Ireland is famed for only really existed for about 60 years, if that. And even then it was completely hypocritical. Read James Joyce's "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man". Note the scene when he leaves the Sodality (religious movement) and goes straight to the prostitute. (At the time, Dublin had more prostitutes than any other city in the British Empire).

Other Comments by Cormac

24. Comment #37245 by arkansasfreethinker on May 3, 2007 at 8:48 pm

We've been extremely lucky here in Little Rock to have three great authors/speakers come to discuss issues related to religious belief, all within a six week span. In addition to the Richard Dawkins event April 26, we also heard from Michael Shimmer on March 15, and Christopher Hitchens on April 22. Both Michael Shimmer and Christopher Hitchens spoke to standing room only crowds. Hitchens was on the Daily Show on April 30. If you'd like to be informed when events like these come up in the future in Central Arkansas, please e-mail us at: arkansasfreethinkers@mac.com

Other Comments by arkansasfreethinker

25. Comment #38048 by arkansasfreethinker on May 6, 2007 at 8:52 pm

Whoops, that should be Michael Shermer not Shimmer. I never was a very good speller, :-)

Other Comments by arkansasfreethinker
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE