Are You There, God? It's Me, Hitchens2. Comment #36254 by mjwemdee on April 30, 2007 at 4:30 pm
3. Comment #36255 by Civilized Worm on April 30, 2007 at 4:40 pm
4. Comment #36264 by MIND_REBEL on April 30, 2007 at 5:16 pm
5. Comment #36271 by Hip_Priest on April 30, 2007 at 6:00 pm
Gross.6. Comment #36273 by foxfire on April 30, 2007 at 6:20 pm
More please.
7. Comment #36277 by Jack Rawlinson on April 30, 2007 at 6:47 pm
8. Comment #36291 by mintcheerios on April 30, 2007 at 8:36 pm
Saying you're an atheist when trying to get elected president in the US now is probably one of the best ways to lose. It's like saying you're gay and trying to be the next pope.9. Comment #36306 by scooternyc on April 30, 2007 at 9:51 pm
10. Comment #36309 by waxwings on April 30, 2007 at 10:20 pm
11. Comment #36318 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on April 30, 2007 at 11:03 pm
12. Comment #36319 by NormanDoering on April 30, 2007 at 11:07 pm
I'm amazed no one here has noted that Hitches thinks Rove and maybe Bush are atheists. (Well, Bush is just not sincere about dumping the booze.)Has anyone in the Bush administration confided in you about being an atheist?
Well, I don't talk that much to them—maybe people think I do. I know something which is known to few but is not a secret. Karl Rove is not a believer, and he doesn't shout it from the rooftops, but when asked, he answers quite honestly. I think the way he puts it is, "I'm not fortunate enough to be a person of faith."
What must Bush make of that?
I think it's false to say that the president acts as if he believes he has God's instructions. Compared to Jimmy Carter, he's nowhere. He's a Methodist, having joined his wife's church in the end. He also claims that Jesus got him off the demon drink. He doesn't believe it. His wife said, "If you don't stop, I'm leaving and I'm taking the kids." You can say that you got help from Jesus if you want, but that's just a polite way of putting it in Texas.
13. Comment #36343 by sanjiv on May 1, 2007 at 1:02 am
We need all kinds. Dawkins, Harris and Barker have their own style and get the message across to different audiences. But we also need someone like Hitchens. His style is more down-to-earth. Praying for an erection! Man that's funny - most people would connect with that kind of stuff! I can't imagine Dawkins or Harris talking like that!14. Comment #36446 by MrEmpirical on May 1, 2007 at 6:54 am
Hey Hitchens, why won't America use its power to remove psychopathic regimes in other countries (e.g Zimbabwe)? Oh yeah, that's right, there's no oil in those other countries. Whoops. And yeah, Iraq's society really was in a terrible state before the American invasion, what with the civil war between the Sunnis and Shiites...oh wait, the civil war started AFTER the invasion, silly me. At least Iraq now has adequate electricity, water, and sanitation supplies...oh wait, their infrastructure has been devasted. Well, at least the invasion of Iraq has helped to reduce the threat of Islamic extremism...oh wait, all of the analyses suggest that the invasion has actually provoked greater levels of recruitment within extremist groups. Well, Saddam was a terrible man, and he killed many of his own people. And we wouldn't want innocent Iraqis to die, would we? Oh hang on, over 600,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed during the last four years of the invasion. Whoops! Well, at least America is going to leave Iraq in a better state than that in which it was found, once all the reconstruction is completed, and a legitimate government is created, and...oh hang on, America's probably going to pull out pretty soon, isn't it? Oh dear... Well, at least no one can say that these problems were predicted before the invasion of Iraq...oh wait, these problems WERE foreseen by opponents of the planned invasion. But we all know it's silly to listen to the warnings of people who are opposed to war, because their warnings are always wrong...oh wait, in the case of the Iraq invasion, the warnings were valid. Hmmm, well at least we got rid of all those nasty WMDs...oh, silly me, they never existed.
1. Comment #36251 by Nails on April 30, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Havn't heard of Hitchings before his new book became big news, but I think I like his outlook on things. I think many people will be able to identify with him; unlike Dawkins who, genious that he is, is rather aloof. Few of us could ever be the next Richard Dawkins (I'm just not that intelligent) but the next Hitchings?
Maybe.
Other Comments by Nails