Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Monday, April 30, 2007 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments

Document Army to EO Reps: 'Discrimination Against Atheists OK'

by Wayne Adkins, American Chronicle

Reposted from:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=25659

armyIt was bad enough when Army chaplains and leaders like Chief of the National Guard Bureau Lt. Gen. H. Steven Blum were disparaging atheists in the press. It was bad enough when my formal EO complaint was thrown away by the National Guard Bureau EO office. It was bad enough when the Department of the Army Inspector General's office refused to follow regulations and send me a written response to my formal EO complaint. It was bad enough when I had to file for documents pertaining to my complaint under the Freedom of Information Act to discover its disposition. It was bad enough when those documents revealed that, despite the unlawful discrimination that had occurred according to Army Regulation 600-20, the Army concluded that "Lt. Gen. Blum's remarks, though perhaps insensitive, did not rise to the level of an offense".

Now the Army National Guard is telling its unit level Equal Opportunity representatives that it is OK to discriminate against atheists. They are using my formal EO complaint as a training scenario in which a Lieutenant files a formal EO complaint against a general officer for claiming that there are no atheists in foxholes. The Sergeant Major who conducted the EO training for Ohio's unit level EO reps told them that "since atheism is not a religion, atheists are not protected by the regulation and it is acceptable for officers and chaplains to disparage their own soldiers". This is, of course, a fallacy. To discriminate against a soldier because he has no religion is still discrimination on the basis of religion. The Army's position on this is like saying that discriminating against someone because they are black is illegal, but discriminating against someone because they are "not white" is fine.

This only further confirms that the problem of bigotry towards atheists in the Army is a systemic one. The Army not only looks the other way when officers and supposed leaders disparage soldiers because they lack a belief in the supernatural, the Army systematically ignores formal EO complaints by atheists and refuses to enforce its own regulations. Now, being the efficient machine it is, the Army is training its EO reps to ignore legitimate EO complaints by atheists at the lowest possible level. I am so glad I submitted my resignation as an officer. The Army has disgraced itself by protecting bigots and allowing unlawful discrimination to continue.

1LT Wayne Adkins

Comments 1 - 17 of 17 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #36283 by Pastor's_Son on April 30, 2007 at 7:38 pm

I found my atheism after my enlistment was over, but I still work with the Army and find this view to be the norm. This gentlemen is a hero to atheists everywhere and should be treated as one.

Other Comments by Pastor's_Son

2. Comment #36284 by mdowe on April 30, 2007 at 7:43 pm

 avatarThis is just warped -- especially when you consider the US army has loosened regulations about accepting people with criminal records (see: http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/2/14/111649/573 ). It sounds like the US military establishment can forgive ex-cons, but they have a problem treating law-abiding atheists with the same respect given to the religious? Still ... I guess atheists are getting red-carpet treatment compared to homosexuals.

Other Comments by mdowe

3. Comment #36285 by wagnerpe on April 30, 2007 at 7:52 pm

I had an army officer come to speak to my class about a medical school scholarship for students. He said "if you have DWI's, whatever," that they can just ignore them. I guess it's better to have convicted criminals in the army than people who have no belief in the afterlife.

Other Comments by wagnerpe

4. Comment #36290 by krogercomplete on April 30, 2007 at 8:33 pm

At least they are not claiming atheism is a religion like so many other theists do. Silver lining.

Other Comments by krogercomplete

5. Comment #36299 by will young on April 30, 2007 at 9:20 pm

 avatarNo atheists in foxholes huh…then there are no theists in hospitals.

Mr. Adkins you are true American hero, thank you for your service and your steadfast conviction towards equality.

Other Comments by will young

6. Comment #36303 by Goodwithwood on April 30, 2007 at 9:28 pm

 avatarIt's really Ironic how the military tried to used Pat Tillman as a hero by lying about his death and even more ironic that he was killed by his fellow soldiers, because Pat Tillman was an atheist.

I think that there is more to his death than is being revealed.

GWW

Other Comments by Goodwithwood

7. Comment #36310 by chionactis on April 30, 2007 at 10:20 pm

 avatarThank you for speaking out about this.

I have been reading a book called "Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism" which reminds the reader of our founding fathers' desire for separation of church and state, and for believers and non-believers alike to have equal rights and representation.

The Army's actions in this matter are not only juvenile, they are un-American.

Other Comments by chionactis

8. Comment #36311 by Jolly Wally on April 30, 2007 at 10:26 pm

I hereby publicly declare that I am better than these people. There is nothing else to say.

Other Comments by Jolly Wally

9. Comment #36313 by Shatite on April 30, 2007 at 10:35 pm

 avatarWhen I went through Basic Combat Training at Fort Leonard Wood several years back, they took us off post for a "day off" in a rural town nearby. We were led to believe that it was simply going to be a mini-R&R experience, but it turned out to be one long sermon as they herded all of us into a Church and kept us there for the majority of the day. Funny, I don't remember them asking if anyone wanted to participate or if everyone was even Christian for that matter.

The reason things like this happen is simply because the military draws its ranks from society. As such, most people in the military reflect the religious demographics of the nation by being overwhelmingly Christian. Unlike society, however, soldiers in the military have hardly any authority to oppose institutional religious bigotry, especially those amongst the enlisted ranks. The religious know this, and take every advantage of it.

When given the opportunity, the Christian majority in this nation can and would dissolve the rights of others as they pridefully shove their garbage down the throats of everyone else without batting an eye.

Other Comments by Shatite

10. Comment #36320 by WTOC on April 30, 2007 at 11:07 pm

I retired from the Army in 2004. I knew LTG Blum before he became the Chief of the National Guard Bureau (NGB), where I had worked since 1997. Like most senior military officers, he became increasingly politically correct while rising in rank. I too found the comments he made last year quite offensive, although I do not believe it was intentionally delivered as so. The directors and Chief of the NGB) all have speech writers. LTG Blum was speaking to a group of African American military members, thus using religion as a common thread to communicate effectively. Like it or not, this was the case.

I would like to share some my experiences as an atheist officer at the National Guard Bureau. Firstly, I was rather outspoken about it during my final three years, to the point that I displayed a Darwin fish emblem and a Thomas Jefferson quote in my cubical. Indeed I was the exception and not the rule. Most, choose to keep their non-belief hidden then face biased scrutiny.

Both my bosses, a lieutenant colonel and colonel, respected my views. In fact, when we had our annual holiday party, there were no prayers offered before the meal. I believe that I had something to do with this.

One of my previous bosses is now a colonel. I used to debate with him when the issue of a god arose and he would always deault to his ID view and my inability to disprove an exsistence. Strangely, he also held the belief that the violence in the Middle East has nothing to do with religion.

My most memorable experience was with a ranking colleaugue who passionately spoke about his belief in the christian god. When I shifted the conversation to the fact that his viewpoint was devisive and caused non-believers to feel separate, he responded by stating, "This is a democracy. Christians are the majority. If they don't like it, they can leave (the US)." So much for a West Point education...

William

Other Comments by WTOC

11. Comment #36357 by Buddha on May 1, 2007 at 1:42 am

 avatarI too came across discrimination during a short stint in the Royal Navy several years ago. Whilst undergoing induction at Britannia Royal Naval College I dared put "Atheist" as my religion on one of the many forms. I was duly threatened with the wrath of Commander 'such-and-such' and forced to "fill it out correctly" with Christian/Church of England.

Needless to say, I managed to dodge church service every sunday during my officer training by hiding in the attic of the divisional mess block with a motley bunch of lapsed catholics and lazy buggers!

Other Comments by Buddha

12. Comment #36377 by CloudedHills on May 1, 2007 at 2:38 am

 avatarWell done, Mr Adkins. A very brave thing, and right.

Other Comments by CloudedHills

13. Comment #36422 by _J_ on May 1, 2007 at 4:56 am

 avatarI agree: well done, Mr Adkins.

I'm no expert and have none of the first-hand experience that several posters here have, but to theorise for a second: reading across from the logic of the 'Why the Gods are not winning' article, you'd *expect* the military to be vigorously religious. It's a group in which members are faced with the risk of death and dismemberment, and may be charged with visiting the same upon others. Compared with this, the anxiety of keeping up with the Joneses in modern-day civilian USA pales into nothingness. An atheistic regard for mortal life as the most valuable (indeed the only) thing we have might be considered above-averagely subversive in such a context.

Needless to say, none of this justifies the apparent discrimination against atheists, and Mr Adkins is once again to be applauded. Particularly so, in fact: I'm quite keen for the people with the guns to have a clear-eyed, rational understanding of what life is worth. But you can imagine why this discrimination is more likely to thrive here than elsewhere. I suspect there'll be chaplains in the armed forces as long as there's even a dying breath of religion in the world at large.

Other Comments by _J_

14. Comment #36425 by Dizzlski on May 1, 2007 at 5:05 am

As a member of the US Navy, and a non-believer, this disturbs me greatly. I get the feeling that were I to believe in one of the non-bible religions it wouldn't be any better. One simply has to spend 2 minutes in the chaplains office of the building I work in to see which religions they endorse. There are literally hundreds of christian publications, boxes upon boxes of little copies of the gospel and psalms; many in desert camouflage. There is one copy of the tanak, and no other religion is represented. Not to mention the multiple pamphlets scattered through out the building directing you to the chaplain or a church (christian) when experiencing loss or grief. And you cannot even imagine the anti-islamic grumblings I hear throughout many of the enlisted ranks.

Other Comments by Dizzlski

15. Comment #36465 by Smith on May 1, 2007 at 8:08 am

 avatarHey people, check out this comics block on Tillman's death, afterlife and atheism by Tom Tomorrow.



Other Comments by Smith

16. Comment #36611 by DNAtheist on May 1, 2007 at 6:19 pm

 avatar
mdowe wrote

This is just warped -- especially when you consider the US army has loosened regulations about accepting people with criminal records (see: http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/2/14/111649/573 ). It sounds like the US military establishment can forgive ex-cons, but they have a problem treating law-abiding atheists with the same respect given to the religious?


It makes perfect sense when you consider the example of Jesus. According to the gospels he welcomed all manner of criminals into his company and he treated them well, but when he encountered people that he considered blasphemers his immediate reaction was to assault them and vandalize their property.

Other Comments by DNAtheist

17. Comment #37084 by Gustaf Sjoblom on May 3, 2007 at 10:58 am

This story is compleately unbelieveable. How can america be about 100 years behind the rest of the western world in these issues?

Other Comments by Gustaf Sjoblom
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: