War in Heaven: Hitchens Meets D'Souza on Home TurfD'Souza: How do we live in such a fine-tuned universe?
Hitchens: "We're in a tiny solar system in a tiny corner of the universe. The sun will eventually boil us alive. We're poised on a gigantic knife edge. Quite some design. Quite some designer!
Hitchens: "There is nothing secular about fascism. Hitler praised the church in Mein Kampf."
D'Souza: "Hitchens zooms in on Hitler, leaving untouched Communism. He didn't mention Mao, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il..."
Hitchens: "Bah!" (takes a drink).
"Take Russia in 1917. Is not the case that for centuries they've been told their head of state is a little more than human? Out of this were serfdom and similar delights born."
D'Souza: "Christianity has a lot to answer for. That's why we have forgiveness. But not Mao, Stalin, Hitler-people who would have wiped it off the face of the earth if they could have, as would Christopher Hitchens!"
2. Comment #80994 by Diacanu on October 23, 2007 at 9:23 pm
3. Comment #80996 by Mango on October 23, 2007 at 9:39 pm
And Mr. D'Souza got the last word, declaring that "the atheist is chafing under the laws of a world in which we are accountable. Atheism isn't an intellectual revolt, it's a moral one."
4. Comment #80997 by MIND_REBEL on October 23, 2007 at 9:40 pm
5. Comment #80998 by MIND_REBEL on October 23, 2007 at 9:42 pm
6. Comment #80999 by Theocrapcy on October 23, 2007 at 9:45 pm
7. Comment #81000 by Last Man In Europe on October 23, 2007 at 9:55 pm
8. Comment #81001 by JanChan on October 23, 2007 at 9:55 pm
The person described in the article doesn't sounds like Hitchens, I don't think he would ever let this statement go unpunished:"Atheism, not religion, is responsible for the mass murders of history,"
9. Comment #81003 by Atticus_of_Amber on October 23, 2007 at 10:07 pm
10. Comment #81004 by macros_man on October 23, 2007 at 10:08 pm
11. Comment #81005 by 82abhilash on October 23, 2007 at 10:11 pm
It is that courage to say bold faced lies with a great sense of conviction; that is what sets people like Dinesh D'Souza apart. What is sad is that many people will believe him and suffer because of it.12. Comment #81006 by Inoculatedcities on October 23, 2007 at 10:17 pm
13. Comment #81007 by Veronique on October 23, 2007 at 10:18 pm
14. Comment #81008 by eric.malitz on October 23, 2007 at 10:19 pm
Actually I find its often the case in these debates that the "atheist" dictators are hardly ever well exposed for what they are. Fascist ideologies and religions are 2 sides of the same coin. This isnt the first time (I havent watch the debate so I dont know for sure) that Hitchens hasnt properly addressed this issue in formal debate (except for his account of the "necro-cocy" of north korea).15. Comment #81009 by roach on October 23, 2007 at 10:23 pm
macros_man,16. Comment #81010 by TheCelestialTeapot on October 23, 2007 at 10:25 pm
Comment 81004 macros_man,17. Comment #81011 by Atticus_of_Amber on October 23, 2007 at 10:29 pm
18. Comment #81012 by thirdchimpanzee on October 23, 2007 at 10:34 pm
Since Dinesh D'Souza is of Indian origin, it would be interesting to hear his public stand on the veracity of Ram and his monkey army building a bridge to Sri Lanka 1.7 million years ago.19. Comment #81013 by stevencarrwork on October 23, 2007 at 10:41 pm
Is this the same D'Souza who writes in the book 'What's so great about Christianity' that '"Only by examining the text in relation to the whole can we figure out how a particular line or passage is best understood."'20. Comment #81014 by darek on October 23, 2007 at 10:43 pm
Inoculatedcities wrote:21. Comment #81016 by stevencarrwork on October 23, 2007 at 10:48 pm
D'Souza '“If right and wrong is determined by instinct...'22. Comment #81018 by 82abhilash on October 23, 2007 at 10:53 pm
thirdchimpanzee,23. Comment #81020 by DalaiDrivel on October 23, 2007 at 10:59 pm
Well...24. Comment #81023 by room101 on October 23, 2007 at 11:04 pm
"But seriously... we need someone speaking for atheists, who can cut right to the point on these topics - someone who is fast on their feet, concise, and who cuts right into the fallacies that are heavy in the minds of theists that watch these debates with abated breath."25. Comment #81025 by DalaiDrivel on October 23, 2007 at 11:14 pm
And "dyspepsia" means "indigestion." The use of this word caught me.26. Comment #81026 by stevencarrwork on October 23, 2007 at 11:16 pm
1.. Without the bible, there is no morality27. Comment #81027 by Russell Blackford on October 23, 2007 at 11:24 pm
I wonder why it would be a bad thing if atheism were interpreted as a moral revolt, as well as an intellectual revolt? The atheist critique is, in part, a revolt against the presumed moral authority of religious leaders and institutions, and against the ethics of misery. That sounds good to me.28. Comment #81028 by Vardu on October 23, 2007 at 11:30 pm
I suspect that the video will paint a very different picture than the one painted by the article above. It will certainly be interesting to see.29. Comment #81029 by SmartLX on October 23, 2007 at 11:31 pm
Freaking atheist-communist association. I'm tired of it. Has anyone brought up the following points before, here or in a debate?30. Comment #81031 by DalaiDrivel on October 23, 2007 at 11:32 pm
As long as theists reject evolution for the "Well-it's-in-the-Bible-and-it-says-it's true" creationism/intelligent design, atheism will be BOTH an intellectual and a moral revolt, and atheism will exist for the reasons of using your head and respecting the scientific method and evidence.31. Comment #81032 by Vardu on October 23, 2007 at 11:33 pm
Well put, Russell Blackford. If that's what the revolt entails, then it sounds good to me, too.32. Comment #81033 by menoone on October 23, 2007 at 11:36 pm
33. Comment #81034 by DalaiDrivel on October 23, 2007 at 11:38 pm
SmartLX,34. Comment #81035 by Belgian Beer on October 23, 2007 at 11:38 pm
In response to Comment #81023 by room101:35. Comment #81037 by Vardu on October 23, 2007 at 11:44 pm
A persons atheism only encompasses what they don't believe. One negation doesn't imply all negation.36. Comment #81039 by Philip1978 on October 24, 2007 at 12:09 am
37. Comment #81041 by Zakie Chan on October 24, 2007 at 12:17 am
38. Comment #81042 by mrmatt on October 24, 2007 at 12:25 am
39. Comment #81043 by kevin_2050 on October 24, 2007 at 12:30 am
Mind Rebel, GREAT avatar picture. I'm a Lennon fan, as you might guess.40. Comment #81044 by Quine on October 24, 2007 at 12:35 am
41. Comment #81045 by Philip1978 on October 24, 2007 at 12:45 am
42. Comment #81051 by Vaal on October 24, 2007 at 1:27 am
43. Comment #81055 by Nefrubyr on October 24, 2007 at 1:37 am
Last night at the Society for Ethical Culture, the big question was: whose body count is bigger? Atheism's or Christianity's?
"Atheism, not religion, is responsible for the mass murders of history," he declared triumphantly. "I think Hitchens by the end of the day should be chanting 'Thank God for Christianity.'"
44. Comment #81061 by Wadsworth on October 24, 2007 at 1:52 am
The Stalin/Pol Pot etc argument also bothers me: Some possible solutions:45. Comment #81062 by steve99 on October 24, 2007 at 1:53 am
Morality doesn't really exist. It's a religious concept and atheists shouldn't get dragooned into trying to "one up" religion at their own game.
46. Comment #81065 by infidel_michael on October 24, 2007 at 2:01 am
When I see discussion like this, I start to agree with Harris that the word "atheism" is really unfortunate, especially because lots of people which we don't agree with fall into this category (e.g. communists). There are better words describing today's atheist position:47. Comment #81069 by mrmatt on October 24, 2007 at 2:15 am
48. Comment #81072 by Monosilabbiq on October 24, 2007 at 2:28 am
I read a book some time ago (I think it was The Ugly American) set in a third world eastern country. Western diplomacy included the sending of masses of food as aid to the starving population. Each crate of food was marked "Produced and provided by the USA". But it was written in English. As the crates came through customs they were stamped with a sign that said in the local language "Provided by your fraternal communist friends from the USSR". As the American diplomats didn't speak the local language they didn't complain. D'Souza uses this technique when he tells Hitchens that he only gives blood and feels good about it because he has been brought up in christian world. And D'Souza's audience understood his language and not Hitchins' ! What a wonderful, illogical, argument for the religious world - everything good has been done because of religion.49. Comment #81075 by Monosilabbiq on October 24, 2007 at 2:42 am
Hitchens has used the argument about "heaven" not interferring in earthly matters during the first 98000 years of Homo Sapiens' existence on a number of occasions now. His presumtion (and I agree, in that I can see no other conclusion) being that all the people in that time were consigned to "hell" as they didn't aver a faith in gentle jesus meak and mild. However, this argument hasn't worked. Why not??? Because the christians couldn't give a fig about all those people.50. Comment #81076 by scooternyc on October 24, 2007 at 2:46 am
This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE
1. Comment #80993 by BAEOZ on October 23, 2007 at 9:19 pm
If this doesn't fire up the "Hitchens is a drunk who damages the atheist cause" meme I'll be surprised.
Sigh. This D'Souza might be the king of the non-sequitur.
Other Comments by BAEOZ