Turkey bans biologist Richard Dawkins' website202. Comment #250141 by Nautilus20 on September 19, 2008 at 2:00 am
If i use OpenDNS, Turkish Telekom Service Provider can't do anything about it.I can visit wherever i want and they can't ban.There's no such thing like removing site ip.I'm not even related with Turkish Telecom Service Provider when i use OpenDNS.I hope you got it...203. Comment #250151 by e1011001 on September 19, 2008 at 2:14 am
they can ban n20 they can. when youtube banned i can visit by open dns. but when they ban youtube from ip it didnt work anymore. an dns server hold ip and site name. when name removed yo can get site by ip. but when ip removed yo can get site only by anonym proxy servers.204. Comment #250155 by midwinterspring on September 19, 2008 at 2:22 am
Well, I'm writing from Turkey and the site doesn't seem to be blocked at the moment. Even if they get around to blocking it, anyone will be able to access it through a proxy server. Youtube has been banned for months because Greeks keep posting insulting videos about Ataturk, the secularist tyrant who founded Turkey. But that hasn't stopped anyone. The law that allows such bans is a national joke.205. Comment #250175 by Aynur K. on September 19, 2008 at 3:05 am
I am Turkish, live in Istanbul and have no trouble accessing this site. That is probably because I use OpenDNS. However, it doesn't change the fact that this ban exists. This ban is the result of a law concerning internet publications. I would like to call this law simply censorship on Internet. I believe this law is one of the deeds of our irresponsible government with mean intentions. Having said that and needlessly adding that Turkish Internet users are deeply concerned, noone from EU, which,I understand, Turkey does not deserve to join according to some previous comments, criticised or even reacted to this law of censorship. Of course this doesn't lessen the responsibility of Turkish citizens on this situation. All I can say is that Turkish people are reacting and doing what they can in an atmosphere of corrupt politics, a press half of which unconditionally sides with the government which is seriously abusing power. And it wouldn't hurt to feel some EU support behind them.206. Comment #250176 by Jack Rawlinson on September 19, 2008 at 3:05 am
207. Comment #250190 by TIKI AL on September 19, 2008 at 3:37 am
I agree that site banning is a step in the wrong direction, but Turkey has made great progress in advanced flotation methods for witch detection.208. Comment #250195 by RoniRoni69 on September 19, 2008 at 3:51 am
Turkey banned you tube and many other info sharing sites. what do you expect a country like Turkey to be when she is ruled by military &religious elites?209. Comment #250211 by peter.ogroup on September 19, 2008 at 4:38 am
210. Comment #250212 by friskydiscus on September 19, 2008 at 4:43 am
er you guys.211. Comment #250225 by Pertwee's Bouffant on September 19, 2008 at 5:32 am
212. Comment #250227 by odag on September 19, 2008 at 5:41 am
Hello, I'm an atheist from Turkey. I agree that the web site banning is not effective (if you look at here "http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?cc=TR&ts_mode=country&lang=none" you can see youtube is the 11th most popular site in Turkey despite being censored for months.) but I don't think it is trivial. It clearly shows that the goverment doesn't want people to see or read things that don't agree with their own ideology. And I think that Adnan Oktar should not be blamed for this ban, he is just a mad man with a lot of money and good lawyers. The real problem is the laws about internet which was prepared by people who had no idea about it. (More info in Turkish here; http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k5651.html) Basicly, if you have enough money and lawyers, you can block any website with a little trolling, if they write negative comments about you, then the site can be banned easily.213. Comment #250233 by celerity on September 19, 2008 at 5:50 am
214. Comment #250263 by mulder on September 19, 2008 at 7:28 am
215. Comment #250269 by greekatheist on September 19, 2008 at 7:55 am
216. Comment #250274 by shad0w on September 19, 2008 at 8:15 am
Yet they want Full E.U membership ? REALLY ? How rediculous. Maybe come back in a few decades.217. Comment #250275 by lllolll on September 19, 2008 at 8:16 am
Turkey is a secular country for over 80 years and has established a true democratic administration unlike many EU countries. Turkey had kicked out his royal VIP's about 100 years ago. Women have right to vote decades before many EU countries accepted equal representation of all citizens.218. Comment #250276 by friskydiscus on September 19, 2008 at 8:19 am
aaaaaaaaaa219. Comment #250283 by Roger Stanyard on September 19, 2008 at 8:51 am
220. Comment #250284 by liberalartist on September 19, 2008 at 8:57 am
221. Comment #250287 by THWOTH on September 19, 2008 at 9:20 am
His press assistant, Seda Aral, said: "We are not against freedom of speech or expression but you cannot insult people."
222. Comment #250289 by destriker on September 19, 2008 at 9:31 am
to Sarmatae:223. Comment #250294 by odag on September 19, 2008 at 9:47 am
@friskydiscusthere is very little difference between a religious extremist and a commenter on richarddawkins.net site who generalizes and judges people according to their nationality.
224. Comment #250298 by friskydiscus on September 19, 2008 at 10:03 am
too many people fail to grasp the point that the Turkish courts are not being religiously over-zealous. They are not religious225. Comment #250299 by passutoba on September 19, 2008 at 10:05 am
I live in Qatar, a pretty conservative Islamic state ( they practice a less militant version of wahhabism-although hypocrisy is never far away...) and i have access to this site and any others like it....Turkey is supposed to be a democratic secular state? Thats the polar opposite of here. Can people see this site in Saudi Arabia?226. Comment #250300 by TurkishAtheist on September 19, 2008 at 10:06 am
227. Comment #250308 by Sargeist on September 19, 2008 at 11:04 am
His press assistant, Seda Aral, said: "We are not against freedom of speech or expression but you cannot insult people."
228. Comment #250309 by Quetzalcoatl on September 19, 2008 at 11:06 am
His press assistant, Seda Aral, said: "We are not against freedom of speech or expression but you cannot insult people."
229. Comment #250315 by Hellene on September 19, 2008 at 11:34 am
230. Comment #250323 by Ultraviolet G on September 19, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Well, so far the "ban" has caused a 1000% increase in posts from Turkey!231. Comment #250326 by phaedrus on September 19, 2008 at 12:29 pm
I have no problems logging to the website from Turkey. Because i always use free DNS servers. And also Adnan Oktar, in my opinion is just a pawn. The threat is coming from the Gulen Mouvement. And yes there has been a conference in London for his "beautiful" ideas. By te way not all of the Turks want to join the stupid EU.232. Comment #250331 by ChAoS_CoSmiC on September 19, 2008 at 12:42 pm
I'm in Turkey and I'm Turk. What? Turkey bans Richard Dawkin's website? Ha ha ha I don't know. I can access all the website. Adnan Oktar(Harun Yahya) deceitful,charlatan,unprosressive,anti science, ıslamic inquisition priest,sufi path.. Turk telekom is idiot. But We have access the all internet website. Crack youtube block,crack many blocked website. Turkısh people are illegal internet user. Because its communication monopoly Turk Telekom.233. Comment #250333 by phaedrus on September 19, 2008 at 12:51 pm
Turkey needs to decide if its going to stay in the middle east dark ages or join the western enlightenment. Can a muslim country liberate itself and allow true freedom? So far, it looks like the answer is no.234. Comment #250334 by larhule on September 19, 2008 at 1:09 pm
235. Comment #250355 by oekaki on September 19, 2008 at 2:03 pm
As other people have already pointed out, this is NOT a case of religious extremism, this is simply a case of state authoritarianism being manipulated by a wealthy lunatic. The root of the problem is a controversial internet law that was put into effect last year (known in Turkey by its number, 5651), which allows courts to ban websites if somebody simply complains that the content "violates his/her rights". (odag already provided a link to the full (Turkish) text of the law.) Of course, if you have an army of lawyers working for you and tons of money to "lubricate" legal proceedings, you are more likely to have things your way.If I were a Turkish citizen I would want this Oktar fellow dead.
236. Comment #250369 by memberxxx on September 19, 2008 at 2:41 pm
I can access the website from Turkey now? Without any chances on my DNS. I don't know who Richard Dawkins is but I am against banning.237. Comment #250383 by JMCARVAS on September 19, 2008 at 3:25 pm
238. Comment #250389 by Wampeter on September 19, 2008 at 3:33 pm
So much for Turkey joining in the EU. I guess the popular movemnt of islamists in that country really has gotten a hold of their nation. We'd better be watchful in the U.S for there are similar people here.239. Comment #250393 by fevzi_from_turkey on September 19, 2008 at 3:38 pm
it's shamefully true that a scientist honestly lining up with an excluded idea is banned in my country, turkey. actually "so-called banned" statement is more appropriate as you know, anyone who wants to reach to this website, can do it. i, myself recently bought the book the god delusion and i think it really both enlights the people open-minded and enrages the people known by their close relation to our religious government. because of that government, my country is in a period of stress both pollitically and socially. the open minded, intellectual part of the society is under a great pressure coming from the conservative part of the society. however, it is all caused by the great confusion that the government created. thus, optimistics like me hope that this chaos will be exterminated by "that" part of the society themselves as soon as they realize the thick wall built right in front of their eyes, so please do not misjudge the common will of my country, think twice after reading this explanation. we will become one of the "free" countries soon enough, i believe, i want to.240. Comment #250416 by TurkishAtheist on September 19, 2008 at 4:09 pm
241. Comment #250424 by fevzi_from_turkey on September 19, 2008 at 4:26 pm
there are dozens of stops on "that" drug path. one of them may be turkey that's true but weather turkey is receiving concealing and transporting these materials as much as other "stops" or not, it doesn't change the fact that these goods are heading for a final destination: the U.S. here turkey seems like the accomplice but the criminal is the U.S. who pulls the trigger last. same goes for the others like weaponary etc. so, let's get a little perspective here please?242. Comment #250436 by Erklig on September 19, 2008 at 5:03 pm
I am a Turkish man. I'm ashamed of my government that commits these cencorships.243. Comment #250477 by f451 on September 19, 2008 at 6:33 pm
244. Comment #250478 by Hellene on September 19, 2008 at 6:34 pm
245. Comment #250497 by goTurk on September 19, 2008 at 7:03 pm
What is equally unfortunate as banning of Dawkins website by Turkish courts is that some of the adamant readers of Mr Dawkins are so ignorantly hateful and remorseful against Turks that, some wrong legal action taken against this website causes uproar and hateful remarks against a country that has one of the most legitimate and staunch secular systems in human history.246. Comment #250502 by dogacyavuz on September 19, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Alright, I'm in just to add two things missing in this discussion. Sorry about my english if anything's wrong:247. Comment #250508 by goTurk on September 19, 2008 at 7:32 pm
now... where did the Armenians came into the picture here?248. Comment #250510 by Hellene on September 19, 2008 at 7:35 pm
249. Comment #250520 by Erklig on September 19, 2008 at 8:10 pm
257. Comment #250478 by Hellene250. Comment #250522 by Hellene on September 19, 2008 at 8:26 pm
This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE
201. Comment #250139 by zeocrash on September 19, 2008 at 2:00 am
Other Comments by zeocrash