Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, May 17, 2007 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments |

Document Antarctic 'treasure trove' found

by Rebecca Morelle, BBC News

Thanks to Jenny Littler for the link.

Reposted from:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6661987.stm
A rich array of marine life was found in the cold, deep waters
An extraordinarily diverse array of marine life has been discovered in the deep, dark waters around Antarctica.

Scientists have found more than 700 new species of marine creatures in seas once thought too hostile to sustain such rich biodiversity.

Groups of carnivorous sponges, free-swimming worms, crustaceans and molluscs were collected.

The findings, published in the journal Nature, could provide insights into the evolution of ocean life in this area.

Dr Katrin Linse, an author of the paper and a marine biologist from British Antarctic Survey (BAS), said: "What was once thought to be a featureless abyss is in fact a dynamic, variable and biologically rich environment.

"Finding this extraordinary treasure trove of marine life is our first step to understanding the complex relationships between the deep ocean and distribution of marine life."

New to science

The research formed part of the Andeep (Antarctic benthic deep-sea biodiversity) project, which is the first comprehensive study of Antarctic marine life.

It is designed to fill the "knowledge vacuum" that surrounds the fauna that inhabit the deeper parts of the Southern Ocean.
Map of Andeep studies. The first sampling expedition (Andeep 1) took place in 2002. Andeep 2 took also took place in 2002. Andeep 3 took place in 2005.
During three research expeditions that took place between 2002 and 2005, an international team collected tens of thousands of specimens from the Weddell Sea, from depths of between 774 and 6,348m (2,539-20,826ft).

The samples were taken from diverse settings, including the continental slope, the abyssal plain and channel levees.

The researchers found the area to be teeming with lifeforms; well over 1,000 species were recovered, and many were completely new to science.

For example, they spotted 674 species of isopod (a diverse order of crustaceans), most of which had never previously been described; more than 200 polychaete species (marine worms), 81 of which were found to be new species; and 76 sponges, 17 of which had previously been unknown.

Lead author of the paper, Angelika Brandt, who is based at the Zoological Institute and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Germany, said: "I initiated the Andeep project because such a vast area of the Southern Ocean had never been explored.

"We thought we might find some novel species, but previous research had suggested deep-sea diversity this far south would be poor, so we were very surprised to find such enormous diversity."

The findings could help to shed light on the evolution of ocean life in this area, Professor Brandt told the BBC News website.

By comparing the species that are found in the deep-sea and those found in the shallower waters surrounding Antarctica, scientists will be able to better understand how climate and the environment these animals live in drove past evolutionary changes.

Comments 1 - 25 of 25 | | View Alternate Comment Thread

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #41909 by Rtambree on May 17, 2007 at 9:39 am

 avatarWhat - no Hitchens?

Where's the Man In White's opinion on this?

Other Comments by Rtambree

2. Comment #41916 by exegesis_saves on May 17, 2007 at 9:48 am

 avatarCarnivorous sponges?

CARNIVOROUS F#*%@*G SPONGES?!?!?!

Horrors like this are the perfect ammunition against the Argument from Design, I guess.

CARNIVOROUS SPONGES???????????

Other Comments by exegesis_saves

3. Comment #41928 by Enblomst on May 17, 2007 at 10:05 am

exegesis_saves: Haha, nice rant.

Other Comments by Enblomst

4. Comment #41953 by konquererz on May 17, 2007 at 11:01 am

 avatarHEADLINE NEWS!!!

Today, a man was found in his shower, half eaten alive. Apparently his wife, tired of his crap, bought a carnivorous sponge and tossed it into the shower while he was in it. Its not clear whether she knew the sponge was still alive or whether it spontaneously came alive when hit with hot water.

Their little boy is currently under going therapy and won't stop saying "no more sponges mommy, no more sponges!" The mother had no comment.

Other Comments by konquererz

5. Comment #41966 by USA_Limey on May 17, 2007 at 11:25 am

 avatarCarnivorous sponges are nothing new; I see 'em all the time dumpster diving at the back of McDonalds right before they threaten me and ask for change.

Other Comments by USA_Limey

6. Comment #41983 by steveroot on May 17, 2007 at 12:03 pm

 avatarThe thing that amazes me is that Noah was able to get pairs of those 700+ species onto his ark in time for the flood. Which part of the ark do you suppose contained the aquarium?

And:
It is designed to fill the "knowledge vacuum" that surrounds the fauna that inhabit the deeper parts of the Southern Ocean.

Is that a kind of "gap"?

Steve

Other Comments by steveroot

7. Comment #41990 by RickM on May 17, 2007 at 12:14 pm

 avatar"no more sponges mommy, no more sponges!"

ROTF

Other Comments by RickM

8. Comment #42005 by mikelpearce on May 17, 2007 at 12:40 pm

steveroot

You must be kidding! Even if the Noah's Ark story were true (of course it isn't), Noah would not have had to collect aquatic life to save it from a FLOOD!

Other Comments by mikelpearce

9. Comment #42080 by Azven on May 17, 2007 at 3:17 pm

 avatarI knew that sponges would attack each other; is this what's meant?

Other Comments by Azven

10. Comment #42090 by ? on May 17, 2007 at 3:33 pm

 avatar"Even if the Noah's Ark story were true (of course it isn't), Noah would not have to collect aquatic life to save it from a FLOOD!"-mikelpearce

You wouldn't think so, but I think there are Creationists (Noahists? Genesisists?) who actually say things like this. They treat the flood as if it were some kind of nuclear holocaust instead of just a bunch of rain. The details are unclear as always. They have the planet reduced to a lifeless hunk of rock except for Noah and Company. THEN they seriously argue that a wooden boat would have survived it all!

Other Comments by ?

11. Comment #42101 by dawgdoc2000 on May 17, 2007 at 3:51 pm

 avatarPerhaps all that rain altered the ocean's salinity, thus requiring Noah to save all the creatures of the sea as well.

Other Comments by dawgdoc2000

12. Comment #42113 by Oppomystic on May 17, 2007 at 4:20 pm

 avatarEeew, gross! Remind me never to go swimming in the Antarctic...

Other Comments by Oppomystic

13. Comment #42153 by mandrellian on May 17, 2007 at 5:57 pm

"Perhaps all that rain altered the ocean's salinity, thus requiring Noah to save all the creatures of the sea as well." - dawgdoc2000

Spoken like a true Creationist (that is, "Creative Rationalist") - are you sure you're not one of them? :)

Saving all those marine species must've been quite a task for ol' Noah. He would have needed one of those giant transparent aluminium aquariums like they had in Star Trek IV to pull that one off.

Other Comments by mandrellian

14. Comment #42171 by Kakashi_monkey on May 17, 2007 at 6:59 pm

 avatarAnd all I thought you'd find on Antarctica were penguins, birds, and seals. Then there's all this! Go sponges!! Ha ha.

Other Comments by Kakashi_monkey

15. Comment #42179 by ? on May 17, 2007 at 8:13 pm

 avatarDoes this stuff remind anyone else of H. P. Lovecraft (classic American horror, sci-fi, fantasy writer)? Weird discoveries in Antarctica, strange life forms where no one expected them, carnivorous sponges .........

Other Comments by ?

16. Comment #42183 by steveroot on May 17, 2007 at 8:45 pm

 avatar
17. Comment #42179 by ? on May 17, 2007 at 8:13 pm
Does this stuff remind anyone else of H. P. Lovecraft (classic American horror, sci-fi, fantasy writer)? Weird discoveries in Antarctica, strange life forms where no one expected them, carnivorous sponges .........


Cthulhu in 2008!
Why vote for a lesser evil?

The "mountains of madness" referred, as it turns out, not to a mountain range, but to the sheer quantity of looniness about!
Steve

Other Comments by steveroot

17. Comment #42190 by Liveliest Crib on May 17, 2007 at 9:06 pm

Hmmm. I don't know about this. I mean, we all know that this area of the sea is too hostile to support life of any kind. It's a fact. Creatures can't live down there. Clearly this "discovery" is a hoax of the worst kind: these disgusting creatures were placed there by Satan to trick us into abandoning facts that we know because we observe something else. Only silly scientists could buy the idea that creatures that hideous thrive in such deadly waters.

Other Comments by Liveliest Crib

18. Comment #42199 by dawgdoc2000 on May 17, 2007 at 10:27 pm

 avatarSpoken like a true Creationist (that is, "Creative Rationalist") - are you sure you're not one of them? :)
-mandrellian

I'd rather have my brain removed...but then I would be on of them!

Other Comments by dawgdoc2000

19. Comment #42203 by Kergillian on May 17, 2007 at 10:46 pm

 avatarAn example of a Carnivorous Sponge:



http://www.allposters.com/IMAGES/TRND/FP2614.jpg

Other Comments by Kergillian

20. Comment #42442 by Keinen_Gott on May 18, 2007 at 7:53 am

Noah must have had an ark the size of california(Maybe bigger) to fit all the species of animals on this planet. He would need many aquariams to keep the predators away from the prey, and also much food for all of them to eat.

response to steveroot: I do think he would have to collect all the life in the ocean because if the flood was actually as great as the bible said, as in it covered mountains, I believe the saltwater organisms would die because the salt concentration in the water would be greatly reduced.Have you ever had to care for saltwater fish? It is a bitch to keep the salt concentration between certain levels.

Other Comments by Keinen_Gott

21. Comment #42443 by Keinen_Gott on May 18, 2007 at 7:55 am

edit: I am sorry I did not mean steveroot I meant to address my comment to mikelpearce.

Other Comments by Keinen_Gott

22. Comment #42567 by jonecc on May 18, 2007 at 12:23 pm

I often wonder what this kind of thing says about the likelihood of life elsewhere.

We know that many planets and large moons have a wide range of climates (hot planets have poles, cold planets may have deep oceans with volcanic heat), and that life on earth got going fairly much straight away after the earth cooled by the standards of geological time.

We can also see on earth that once started life can adapt to all kinds of challenges - not just the Antarctic, but deserts, freezing lakes, deep underground. You have to wonder how much of it there is out there.

Other Comments by jonecc

23. Comment #42597 by bluebird on May 18, 2007 at 2:22 pm

 avatarThe discovery/movie of Giant Tube Worms was awesome, now this. We hope to see these "critters" at a Big Screen complex soon, with 3-d glasses, and popcorn:)

Wonder if Jean-Michel Cousteau was part of the team??

Other Comments by bluebird

24. Comment #42607 by MiloC on May 18, 2007 at 3:31 pm

The creationsists will say, "see, see, there's a gap here between the carnivorous sponge and the other ones. Where is the transitional sponge?" The answer, the gap is between their ears.

Other Comments by MiloC

25. Comment #42707 by FXR on May 19, 2007 at 5:51 am

 avatarThese discoverys were mentioned in the bible:

Ezekeel 7:11
"And the lord sayet: I maketh this day the birds of the air and lots of other strange gear that thou you not knoweth now but thouest wilt knoweth wheneth we cometh back after the break. Stay tuneth!

Other Comments by FXR
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: