Functional Neuroimaging of Belief, Disbelief, and Uncertainty
By SAM HARRIS, SAMEER A. SHETH, MARK S. COHEN
Added: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 UTC
Reposted from:
http://www.samharris.org/site/articles/
and
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/117858891/HTMLSTART
Sam Harris
Sameer A. Sheth, MD, PhD
Mark S. Cohen, PhD
Objective: The difference between believing and disbelieving a proposition is one of the most potent regulators of human behavior and emotion. When we accept a statement as true, it becomes the basis for further thought and action; rejected as false, it remains a string of words. The purpose of this study was to differentiate belief, disbelief, and uncertainty at the level of the brain.
Methods: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the brains of 14 adults while they judged written statements to be "true" (belief), "false" (disbelief), or "undecidable" (uncertainty). To characterize belief, disbelief, and uncertainty in a content-independent manner, we included statements from a wide range of categories: autobiographical, mathematical, geographical, religious, ethical, semantic, and factual.
Results: The states of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty differentially activated distinct regions of the prefrontal and parietal cortices, as well as the basal ganglia.
Interpretation: Belief and disbelief differ from uncertainty in that both provide information that can subsequently inform behavior and emotion. The mechanism underlying this difference appears to involve the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the caudate. While many areas of higher cognition are likely involved in assessing the truth-value of linguistic propositions, the final acceptance of a statement as "true," or its rejection as "false," seems to rely on more primitive, hedonic processing in the medial prefrontal cortex and the anterior insula. Truth may be beauty, and beauty truth, in more than a metaphorical sense, and false propositions might actually disgust us.
Read the PDF:
http://www.samharris.org/images/uploads/Harris_Sheth_Cohen_AON_2008.pdf
Full Text:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/117858891/HTMLSTART
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Cocaine decreases activity of a protein...
- - MedicalXpress 27 Comments
Cocaine decreases activity of a protein necessary for normal functioning of the brain's reward system
Neurons Mirror the Diametric Mind
Christopher Badcock, Ph.D -... 3 Comments
Neurons Mirror the Diametric Mind
Schizophrenics amplify neuronal mirroring, autistics reduce it
How thinking about death can lead to a...
- - MedicalXpress 11 Comments
How thinking about death can lead to a good life
Thinking about death can actually be a good thing. An awareness of mortality can improve physical health and help us re-prioritize our goals and values, according to a new analysis of recent scientific studies. Even non-conscious thinking about death – say walking by a cemetery – could prompt positive changes and promote helping others.
Brain Controls Paralyzed Muscles
Ed Yong - TheScientist 11 Comments
A new system decodes brain signals from the motor cortex of monkeys and translates them into basic arm movements, despite temporary paralysis.
Megan Scudellari - The Scientist 25 Comments
Let Them Eat DirtEarly exposure to microbes shapes the mammalian immune system by subduing inflammatory T cells.
Dr Margaret McCartney - The... 86 Comments
I'd be willing to bet that if more people understood the fine balance of risks screening offers, there would be less screening – and more anger.
RSS Feeds
Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page