'Telepathic' Genes Recognize Similarities In Each Other2. Comment #116741 by Deepthought on January 27, 2008 at 10:15 am
3. Comment #116747 by jaytee_555 on January 27, 2008 at 10:30 am
It's obvious! The flourescent bits of DNA found each other easily because they were glowing in the dark.4. Comment #116758 by Mike O'Risal on January 27, 2008 at 10:49 am
5. Comment #116788 by tybowen on January 27, 2008 at 12:11 pm
6. Comment #116795 by Geoff on January 27, 2008 at 12:52 pm
7. Comment #116822 by Gunnar on January 27, 2008 at 2:35 pm
8. Comment #116850 by Tatarize on January 27, 2008 at 3:32 pm
It doesn't matter how quickly the gap is filled. How many instantly filled gaps are still propped up as problematic.9. Comment #116862 by notsobad on January 27, 2008 at 4:38 pm
The authors of the new study carried out a series of experiments in order to test the theory
long pieces of identical double-stranded DNA could identify each other merely as a result of complementary patterns of electrical charges which they both carry.
10. Comment #116938 by drcancerman on January 27, 2008 at 8:36 pm
This is an important part since the title and introduction make it seem like there is some kind of out-of-this-world cooperation. Of course, we understand that it's just a word play, but the author should be more careful about his choice of words because it can get misunderstood by the general public.
11. Comment #116943 by sarah95 on January 27, 2008 at 9:04 pm
12. Comment #116949 by righton on January 27, 2008 at 9:51 pm
I dont see any gap here. The similarity in bases probably creates favorable interactions.13. Comment #116950 by righton on January 27, 2008 at 9:54 pm
Agree that telepathic is a horrible word. Journalists seem to use very bad words when describing new scientific breakthroughs. I wonder who is behind that?14. Comment #116953 by Steve Zara on January 27, 2008 at 10:07 pm
I dont see any gap here. The similarity in bases probably creates favorable interactions.
15. Comment #116955 by righton on January 27, 2008 at 10:27 pm
The bases are not necesarily completely tucked away. Restriction enzymes are able to identify specific sequences of double stranded DNA.16. Comment #116956 by righton on January 27, 2008 at 10:30 pm
I don think it happens over long distances. THe effect sounds like it is subtle as in they dont pair together strongly. If they happen to come into close proximity of each other then the electronegative interactions are seen.17. Comment #116957 by Steve Zara on January 27, 2008 at 10:36 pm
The bases are not necesarily completely tucked away. Restriction enzymes are able to identify specific sequences of double stranded DNA.
I don think it happens over long distances. THe effect sounds like it is subtle as in they dont pair together strongly. If they happen to come into close proximity of each other then the electronegative interactions are seen.
18. Comment #116959 by righton on January 27, 2008 at 10:51 pm
"In aqueous solution, "long distance" for electrostatic interaction is more than a few water molecule radii apart."19. Comment #116963 by Steve Zara on January 27, 2008 at 11:05 pm
I dont understand what your saying with this.
There are plenty of very subtle interactions in molecular biology and it just doesnt seem that suprising to me. If these similar pieces of dsDNA happen to come into close proximity of each other they will stay close due to a subtle favorable interaction between electronegative charges on the surface of the molecules.
20. Comment #116965 by righton on January 27, 2008 at 11:17 pm
"According to the theory, this recognition mechanism is stronger the longer the genes are."21. Comment #117010 by bugaboo on January 28, 2008 at 3:35 am
Have'nt read the article.A double helix is a not a rigid structure but "breaths", and so perhaps the phenomenon could be explained by intermittant base pairing.22. Comment #117013 by ianmkz on January 28, 2008 at 4:35 am
Water is not very good at letting electrostatic charges have influence over long distances.
23. Comment #117167 by Duff on January 28, 2008 at 11:13 am
The writers of this paper should be dope slapped for using the word telepathic. They then go on to correctly state that the attraction is not magically telepathic but due to "...complementary patterns of electrical charges...". Well, duh!24. Comment #121480 by Geoff Baldwin on February 3, 2008 at 1:16 pm
To Duff - and anyone else who has commented on the use of the word 'telepathic'. Can I please make clear that this word was not used by the authors of the scientific paper published in J. Phys. Chem. B.25. Comment #121503 by Geoff on February 3, 2008 at 2:02 pm
26. Comment #123792 by davidstvz on February 7, 2008 at 4:11 pm
What a stupid title for this article.
1. Comment #116738 by MPhil on January 27, 2008 at 10:05 am
Other Comments by MPhil