Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Wednesday, March 19, 2008 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments |

Document Flipping particle could explain missing antimatter

by New Scientist

Thanks to SPS for the link.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19726483.600-flipping-particle-could-explain-missing-antimatter.html

Flipping particle could explain missing antimatter
Valerie Jamieson

IT IS one the biggest mysteries in physics - where did all the antimatter go? Now a team of physicists claims to have found the first ever hint of an answer in experimental data. The findings could signal a major crack in the standard model, the theoretical edifice that describes nature's fundamental particles and forces.

In its early days, the cosmos was a cauldron of radiation and equal amounts of matter and antimatter. As it cooled, all the antimatter annihilated in collisions with matter - but for some reason the proportions ended up lopsided, leaving some of the matter intact.

Physicists think the explanation for this lies with the weak nuclear force, which differs from the other fundamental forces in that it does not act equally on matter and antimatter. This asymmetry, called CP violation, could have allowed the matter to survive to form the elements, stars and galaxies we see today.

The standard model, our best effort to describe the universe's structure, fails to fully explain CP violation. Many alternative theories claim to have the answer, such as those incorporating supersymmetry, extra dimensions and hitherto unseen forces. However, they often invoke new particles, and experiments have yet to turn up evidence of these.

Particle physicists have long thought that they might find such evidence in a particle called the Bs meson, which comprises a bottom antiquark bound to a strange quark. The Bs is one of a handful of mesons that transforms into its own antiparticle and back again 3 trillion times per second before decaying into other particles (see Diagram). These oscillations between matter and antimatter make it a good place to look for evidence that CP violation goes beyond the standard model.

At the Tevatron particle accelerator at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, two groups of scientists running the rival CDF and D-Zero experiments have been studying several properties of Bs mesons and their oscillations by picking through the debris created when protons and antiprotons collide. While each experiment on its own has found faint hints of CP violation above and beyond the standard model, the experimental uncertainties have been too large to make a definitive claim, says Giovanni Punzi, a physicist at the University of Pisa in Italy and one of the leaders of the B meson physics group at CDF.

Now Luca Silvestrini at Italy's National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN) in Rome and colleagues in Italy, France and Switzerland have managed to reduce these uncertainties. By combining the published results of the CDF and D-Zero teams, they have shown there seems to be much more CP violation than the standard model permits. "We can say with greater than 99.7 per cent probability that CP violation is there," says Silvestrini (www.arxiv.org/abs/08030659). In other words, new physics is at work in the oscillations. His group cannot yet say what kind of new physics - that will require others to test whether existing theories explain the data.

"It is tantalisingly interesting at the moment," says Val Gibson, an expert on B meson physics at the University of Cambridge. "If it is true, it is earth-shattering."

Jacobo Konigsberg, who leads the CDF collaboration, says that Tevatron researchers are "cautiously excited" about the analysis. He points out that more data needs to be analysed to rule out a statistical fluke, which has happened several times before in particle physics.

The real proof could come later this year when the Large Hadron Collider switches on at CERN, near Geneva, Switzerland. The LHC-b experiment has been designed specifically to study mesons containing bottom quarks. "LHC-b will make an unambiguous measurement within two months," says Gibson.

Comments 1 - 22 of 22 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #146521 by evolver23 on March 19, 2008 at 6:58 am

I think it's enormously refreshing and reaffirming when scientists discover new, possibly "earth-shattering" data that have the potential to undermine some of their own theories. In this way, not only do we get to learn more about our very counterintuitive home, but we get to offer up an example (however ignored it may be by religious fanatics) that THIS is how the epistemology of science operates...not dogmatically, but by embracing REALITY whatever change in "beliefs" that may entail.

Other Comments by evolver23

2. Comment #146533 by movingshadow on March 19, 2008 at 7:12 am

 avatarcommoooonnnnn warp drive

Other Comments by movingshadow

3. Comment #146542 by Geoff on March 19, 2008 at 7:21 am

 avatarJust when I start to think I'm getting a vague understanding of physics...

Other Comments by Geoff

4. Comment #146557 by Quetzalcoatl on March 19, 2008 at 7:35 am

 avatarRead this earlier on New Scientist; interesting stuff. When the LHC comes online it might finally provide an answer to the matter/anti-matter disparity question.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

5. Comment #146562 by Ygern on March 19, 2008 at 7:37 am

 avatar@ Geoff

Yeah, know how you feel!

But from the little I do know, this looks to be really exciting.

Other Comments by Ygern

6. Comment #146578 by Animavore on March 19, 2008 at 7:51 am

 avatarThis information has shaken my faith in physics. Crisis of conscience.

Oh.. it's ok. It's passed.

Other Comments by Animavore

7. Comment #146649 by sarah95 on March 19, 2008 at 8:55 am

 avatar
The real proof could come later this year when the Large Hadron Collider switches on at CERN, near Geneva, Switzerland. The LHC-b experiment has been designed specifically to study mesons containing bottom quarks. "LHC-b will make an unambiguous measurement within two months," says Gibson.


I can't wait!
;)

Other Comments by sarah95

8. Comment #146652 by stereoroid on March 19, 2008 at 8:58 am

 avatarI somehow knew it would all come down to flipping particles... 8)

Isn't it exciting? The new frontiers opening up as we seek to fill the gaps in our knowledge of the universe(s)... and to think there are those who would rather attribute nature to a man-made god, and get all their answers out of ancient books? Oh, but the books give you certainty, and answer all your questions while science gives you only uncertainty, and more questions. Never mind the useful applications of science - the god can take credit for them too, as he does for everything else.

Other Comments by stereoroid

9. Comment #146696 by GBile on March 19, 2008 at 9:31 am

 avatarThis Bs meson reminds me of the BS boson, named Dinesh D'Souza, who changes his argumentation about as fast as our flipping particle, when confronted in debate by an atheist.

Now, if he could also decay into something harmless after a while ...

Other Comments by GBile

10. Comment #146755 by njwong on March 19, 2008 at 11:07 am

 avatarInterestingly, I was just browsing a blog that has compiled and captioned several very beautiful pictures of the LHC. The photos (which the blogger tastefully selected from CERN's huge public archive) impressively shows the LHC in its immense and breathtaking majesty:

http://www.darkroastedblend.com/2008/03/time-machine-worlds-biggest-particle.html


One of the comments a visitor left on the blog left me in stitches:


David Bryden said...

What a waste of money. God put all we need to know about the Cosmos into His holy book.

Here at Creationism Labs, we seek the Truth in our own way. We hurl King James Bibles together at great speed, smashing them into tiny bits of paper which we paste together to form new Divine Revelations.


Other Comments by njwong

11. Comment #146798 by TheHardProblem on March 19, 2008 at 12:18 pm

..that transforms into its own antiparticle and back again 3 trillion times per second before..


Brett: "what?"

Other Comments by TheHardProblem

12. Comment #146802 by Mr0Joshua on March 19, 2008 at 12:20 pm

Where's the diagram? I love diagrams...

Other Comments by Mr0Joshua

13. Comment #146827 by seqenenre on March 19, 2008 at 1:15 pm

"...and back again 3 trillion times per second before decaying into other particles."
If I would have Designed the universe Intelligently I would have made the damn thing do this either not at all or 2,7182818 trillion times per second. Just to give Mister Dembski an extra argument. (or, just to tease Mister Dembski 2,7282818 trillion times per second)

Other Comments by seqenenre

14. Comment #146828 by rod-the-farmer on March 19, 2008 at 1:17 pm

 avatarGbile said

This Bs meson reminds me of the BS boson, named Dinesh D'Souza, who changes his argumentation about as fast as our flipping particle, when confronted in debate by an atheist.

Funny. The bullshirt boson. Comprised of one part strange, too. LOL.

Other Comments by rod-the-farmer

15. Comment #146940 by RobDinsmore on March 19, 2008 at 3:07 pm

 avatar
This Bs meson reminds me of the BS boson, named Dinesh D'Souza, who changes his argumentation about as fast as our flipping particle, when confronted in debate by an atheist.


BS was the first thing I thought of when I read this, then I checked the calendar and told myself to read more. One can never bee to careful this time of year. :)

Other Comments by RobDinsmore

16. Comment #147091 by Blake C. Stacey on March 19, 2008 at 7:20 pm

The link to the actual paper is broken. This one should work:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0659

Other Comments by Blake C. Stacey

17. Comment #147134 by flistr8 on March 19, 2008 at 10:11 pm

 avatar"The Bs is one of a handful of mesons that transforms into its own antiparticle and back again 3 trillion times per second before decaying into other particles (see Diagram)."

It seems it would just be easier to believe in god, who only transforms between a handful of names every 1000 years or so.

Other Comments by flistr8

18. Comment #147249 by j.mills on March 20, 2008 at 4:36 am

 avatarI can't keep up with all these flipping particles. Soon there'll be one for every Hindu deity!

Other Comments by j.mills

19. Comment #147498 by dloubet on March 20, 2008 at 5:43 pm

You know, if it takes less energy for a particle to flip than is released by it's annihilation, that sounds like a path to nearly free energy to me. (But probably only because I'm not a physicist)

Flip-annihilate-repeat, sounds like a plan.

Other Comments by dloubet

20. Comment #148012 by j.mills on March 21, 2008 at 7:21 pm

 avatarBabrock said:

"Nowhere tho did I read what sounded to me to be an explaination of how we have ended up w/ way more of one type than t other. Could someone clue me in please ?"

There may only have been a tiny bit more matter than anti-matter at the start of the universe. Each annihilates the other, so the matter we see around us is just the left-overs - perhaps just a tiny proportion of what was there to start with.

The research here is suggesting that matter and anti-matter aren't acted on equally by the weak force, and that might mean that even if we started with equal quantities of each, we could still end up with a bit of one kind left over.

Other Comments by j.mills

21. Comment #148405 by jaster on March 22, 2008 at 11:50 pm

It is going to be so very exciting when questions surrounding topics such as this can be made closer to being answered (or ACTUALLY being answered) by the LHC in Switzerland. Can't wait!

Other Comments by jaster

22. Comment #149697 by Divineosaur on March 26, 2008 at 6:25 am

 avatarWhat a shame that so many have traded true magnificence for mundane anthropomorphisms. I think this a fair dichotomy. I can only hope we won't kill ourselves off completely before at least someone gets to know the half that is.

Other Comments by Divineosaur
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: